The Effects of Fentanyl on Sevoflurane Requirements for Loss of Consciousness and Skin Incision

Background: Fentanyl produces a minimal reduction in the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane to prevent response to a verbal command in 50% of patients (MACawake) at low but analgesic plasma concentrations. The reduction in MACawake, however, is still unknown at higher fentanyl concentrations. The reduction in the MAC of sevoflurane by fentanyl has not been described accurately. The purpose of this study was to determine the MACawake and MAC reduction of sevoflurane by fentanyl.

Methods: Ninety-two patients were randomly allocated to seven fentanyl concentration groups (target plasma concentrations of 0, 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 10, and 14 ng/ml). Responses to verbal command were observed for MACawake assessment at predetermined sevoflurane concentrations. Thereafter, in patients whose target fentanyl concentration was 0 to 10 ng/ml, responses to skin incision were observed for MAC assessment at new steady-state sevoflurane concentrations. The reduction in the MACawake and MAC of sevoflurane by the measured fentanyl concentration was calculated.

Results: There was an initial steep reduction in the MAC of sevoflurane by fentanyl, with 3 ng/ml resulting in a 59% MAC reduction. A ceiling effect was observed, with 10 ng/ml providing only a further 17% reduction in MAC. The initial reduction in MACawake was not as steep as that in MAC. Fentanyl reduced MACawake by approximately 24% at a plasma concentration of 3 ng/ml. Although the reduction curve of MACawake was parabolic, no manifest ceiling effect was observed at concentrations administered in the present study.     

Auditory Evoked Potential Index Predicts the Depth of Sedation and Movement in Response to Skin Incision during Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Background: The auditory evoked potential (AEP) index, which is a single numerical parameter derived from the AEP in real time and which describes the underlying morphology of the AEP, has been studied as a monitor of anesthetic depth. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of AEPindex for predicting depth of sedation and anesthesia during sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: In the first phase of the study, a single end-tidal sevoflurane concentration ranging from 0.5 to 0.9% was assigned randomly and administered to each of 50 patients. The AEPindex and the Bispectral Index (BIS) were obtained simultaneously. Sedation was assessed using the responsiveness portion of the observer's assessment of alertness-sedation scale. In the second phase of the study, 10 additional patients were included, and the 60 patients who were scheduled to have skin incisions were observed for movement in response to skin incision at the end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations between 1.6 and 2.6%. The relation among AEPindex, BIS, sevoflurane concentration, sedation score, and movement or absence of movement after skin incision was determined. Prediction probability values for AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration to predict depth of sedation and anesthesia were also calculated.

Results: The AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration correlated closely with the sedation score. The prediction probability values for AEPindex, BIS, and sevoflurane concentration for sedation score were 0.820, 0.805, and 0.870, respectively, indicating a high predictive performance for depth of sedation. AEPindex and sevoflurane concentration successfully predicted movement after skin (prediction probability = 0.910 and 0.857, respectively), whereas BIS could not (prediction probability = 0.537).     

Graded Hypercapnia and Cerebral Autoregulation during Sevoflurane or Propofol Anesthesia

Background: Hypercapnia abolishes cerebral autoregulation, but little is known about the interaction between hypercapnia and autoregulation during general anesthesia. With normocapnia, sevoflurane (up to 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration) and propofol do not impair cerebral autoregulation. This study aimed to document the level of hypercapnia required to impair cerebral autoregulation during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: Eight healthy subjects received a remifentanil infusion and were anesthetized with propofol (140 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) and sevoflurane (1.0-1.1% end tidal) in a randomized crossover study. Ventilation was adjusted to achieve incremental increases in arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (Paco2) until autoregulation was impaired. Cerebral autoregulation was tested by increasing the mean arterial pressure (MAP) from 80 to 100 mmHg with phenylephrine while measuring middle cerebral artery flow velocity by transcranial Doppler. The autoregulation index, which has a value ranging from 0 to 1, representing absent to perfect autoregulation, was calculated, and an autoregulation index of 0.4 or less represented significantly impaired autoregulation.

Results: The threshold Paco2 to significantly impair cerebral autoregulation ranged from 50 to 66 mmHg. The threshold averaged 56 +/- 4 mmHg (mean +/- SD) during sevoflurane anesthesia and 61 +/- 4 mmHg during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.03). Carbon dioxide reactivity measured at a MAP of 100 mmHg was 30% greater than that at a MAP of 80 mmHg.     

Esmolol Reduces Anesthetic Requirement for Skin Incision during Propofol/Nitrous Oxide/Morphine Anesthesia

Background: Although beta blockers have been used primarily to decrease unwanted perioperative hemodynamic responses, the sedative properties of these compounds might decrease anesthetic requirements. This study was designed to determine whether esmolol, a short-acting beta1 -receptor antagonist, could reduce the propofol concentration required to prevent movement at skin incision.

Methods: Sixty consenting patients were premedicated with morphine, and then propofol was delivered by computer-assisted continuous infusion along with 60% nitrous oxide. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, propofol alone, propofol plus low-dose esmolol (bolus of 0.5 mg/kg, then 50 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 min-1), and propofol plus high-dose esmolol (bolus of 1 mg/kg, then 250 micro gram [center dot] kg (-1) min-1). Two venous blood samples were drawn at equilibrium. The serum propofol concentration that prevented movement to incision in 50% of patients (Cp50) was calculated by logistic regression.

Results: The propofol Cp50 with nitrous oxide was 3.85 micro gram/ml. High-dose esmolol infusion was associated with a significant reduction in the Cp50 to 2.80 micro gram/ml (P < 0.04). Propofol computer-assisted continuous infusion produced stable serum concentrations with a slight positive bias. Esmolol did not alter the serum propofol concentration. No intergroup differences in heart rate or blood pressure response to intubation or incision were found.     

Recovery from Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparison to Isoflurane and Propofol Anesthesia

Backgroud: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane, which may cause a more rapid recovery from anesthesia; it also might cause faster emergence times than for propofol-based anesthesia. We evaluated a database that included recovery endpoints from controlled, randomized, prospective studies sponsored by Abbott Laboratories that compared sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol when extubation was planned immediately after completion of elective surgery in adult patients.

Methods: Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane in eight studies (N = 2,008) and to propofol in three studies (N = 436). Analysis of variance was applied using least squares method mean values to calculate the pooled mean difference in recovery endpoints between primary anesthetics. The effects of patient age and case duration also were determined.

Results: Sevoflurane resulted in statistically significant shorter times to emergence (-3.3 min), response to command (-3.1 min), orientation (-4.0 min) and first analgesic (-8.9 min) but not time to eligibility for discharge (-1.7 min) compared to isoflurane (mean difference). Times to recovery endpoints increased with increasing case duration with isoflurane but not with sevoflurane (patients receiving isoflurane took 4-5 min more to emerge and respond to commands and 8.6 min more to achieve orientation during cases longer than 3 hr in duration than those receiving sevoflurane). Patients older than 65 yr had longer times to orientation, but within any age group, orientation was always faster after sevoflurane. There were no differences in recovery times between sevoflurane and propofol.     

Remifentanil Requirements during Sevoflurane Administration to Block Somatic and Cardiovascular Responses to Skin Incision in Children and Adults

Background: The authors found no studies comparing intraoperative requirements of opioids between children and adults, so they determined the infusion rate of remifentanil to block somatic (IR50) and autonomic response (IRBAR50) to skin incision in children and adults.

Methods: Forty-one adults (aged 20-60 yr) and 24 children (aged 2-10 yr) undergoing lower abdominal surgery were studied. In adults, anesthesia induction was with sevoflurane during remifentanil infusion, whereas in children remifentanil administration was started after induction with sevoflurane. After intubation, sevoflurane was administered in 100% O2 and was adjusted to an ET% of 1 MAC-awake corrected for age at least 15 min before surgery. Patients were randomized to receive remifentanil at a rate ranging from 0.05 to 0.35 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 for at least 20 min before surgery. At the beginning of surgery, only the skin incision was performed, and the somatic and autonomic responses were observed. The somatic response was defined as positive with any gross movement of extremity, and the autonomic response was deemed positive with any increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure equal to or more than 10% of preincision values. Using logistic regression, the IR50 and IRBAR50 were determined in both groups of patients and compared with unpaired Student t test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The IR50 +/- SD was 0.10 +/- 0.02 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in adults and 0.22 +/- 0.03 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in children (P < 0.001). The IRBAR50 +/- SD was 0.11 +/- 0.02 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in adults and 0.27 +/- 0.06 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 in children (P < 0.001).     

腹腔镜手术全身麻醉中联合应用瑞芬太尼与七氟烷药效学相互作用的研究

目的探讨腹腔镜手术全身麻醉中瑞芬太尼与七氟烷的药效学相互作用。方法ASAⅠ级妇科或外科拟行择期腹腔镜手术的患者65例,每名患者预先选定七氟烷的目标浓度,并在试验过程中维持七氟烷呼出浓度恒定。采用七氟烷吸入诱导。当呼气末七氟烷浓度达到设定浓度,观察七氟烷与瑞芬太尼不同剂量组合(0、1、2、4、6和8ng/ml)时,患者对100Hz、60mA、5s的强直电刺激(electrical tetanus stimuli,ETS)的体动和循环反应。应用NONMEM软件对原始数据进行分析和浓度-效应曲线(即S形曲线)的拟合。Logistic回归模型求算七氟烷强直电刺激时的肺泡最低有效浓度(minimal alveolar concentration,MAC)。结果单独应用七氟烷,抑制ETS引起体动反应的MACETS为1.52%,抑制ETS引起循环反应的MACETS为2.24%。小剂量的瑞芬太尼即可明显降低七氟烷的MACETS。当瑞芬太尼的靶控浓度为8ng/ml时,抑制强直电刺激体动反应和循环反应的MACETS值分别下降70.0%和76.3%。结论瑞芬太尼与七氟烷在抑制强直电刺激的体动和循环反应方面存在协同作用。瑞芬太尼可以...     

七氟醚与丙泊酚在小儿斜视手术麻醉的应用效果观察

目的 探究在小儿斜视手术麻醉中采用七氟醚与丙泊酚的效果。方法 选取我院2021年10月-2023年 10月收治的72例斜视患儿为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各36例,对照组输注丙泊 酚,观察组吸入七氟醚,比较两组生命体征、麻醉恢复情况、躁动发生率。结果 两组DBP、SBP比较,差 异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）;观察组T2、T3、T4、T5时刻HR高于对照组（P ＜0.05）;观察组PACU停留 时间、Steward达到4分时间长于对照组,自主呼吸恢复时间短于对照组（P ＜0.05）,拔除气管导管时间短 于对照组,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;观察组麻醉诱导期、麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率高于对照组,但差 异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 在小儿斜视手术麻醉中使用七氟醚吸入的效果更好,能改善患儿生命 体征,加快自主呼吸恢复时间,值得临床应用。     

Leukocyte-Endothelium Interaction in the Rat Mesenteric Microcirculation during Halothane or Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Background: The effects of inhalational anesthetics on the microcirculation, including leukocyte dynamics, remain to be clarified. The authors investigated halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia to determine if these agents evoked leukocyte adhesion through endothelial cell-dependent mechanisms involving such adhesion molecules.

Methods: Rats were anesthetized with halothane or sevoflurane in 100% oxygen and the lungs were mechanically ventilated. Leukocyte behavior in mesenteric venules was recorded through intravital video microscopy under monitoring microvascular hemodynamics. To examine the mechanisms for leukocyte rolling and adhesion, these studies were repeated after animals were pretreated with a monoclonal antibody against P-selectin (MAb PB1.3) or against intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; MAb 1A29): P-selectin required for rolling of circulating leukocytes and ICAM-1 for firm adhesive interactions with leukocyte integrins.

Results: Under baseline anesthetic conditions (1 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]), venular wall shear rates, an index of the disperse force on marginating leukocytes, in the sevoflurane-treated rats were about two times higher than those with halothane. At 2 MAC, halothane caused a marked arteriolar constriction and decreasing shear rates concurrent with an increasing density of venular leukocyte adhesion. Sevoflurane at 2 MAC induced leukocyte rolling and adhesion, which were attenuated by PB1.3 and 1A29, without alterations in the wall shear rates. Halothane-induced leukocyte adhesion was not prevented by PB1.3 but it was by 1A29.     

The Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Propofol and Fentanyl with Respect to the Suppression of Somatic or Hemodynamic Responses to Skin Incision, Peritoneum Incision, and Abdominal Wall Retraction

Background: Sufficient propofol or fentanyl doses necessary to prevent the response to skin incision do not necessarily attenuate hemodynamic responses during surgery. The goal of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses after three stimuli: skin incision, peritoneum incision, and abdominal wall retraction.

Methods: Propofol and fentanyl were administered via computer-assisted continuous infusion to provide equilibration between plasma-blood and biophase concentrations. Patients were randomized to nine groups that received predetermined concentrations of fentanyl (from 0 to 9 ng/ml). Each patient was administered different target concentrations of propofol. Somatic and hemodynamic responses were measured before and after each of three different stimulations: skin incision (si), peritoneum incision (pi), and abdominal wall retraction (ret). The propofol plasma concentrations at which 50% of the patients did not respond to each type of stimulation (Cp50si, Cp50pi, and Cp50ret) were calculated by fitting the Loewe synergistic model.

Results: For propofol alone, Cp50si, Cp50pi, and Cp50ret were 12.9, 17.1 and 19.4 [micro sign]g/ml, respectively. Increasing the fentanyl concentration markedly reduced propofol Cp50si, Cp50pi, and Cp50ret for somatic response, indicating the potential synergistic interaction of both drugs. During the prestimulation period, fentanyl did not decrease systolic blood pressure; however, propofol specifically decreased systolic blood pressure. Both drugs had a synergistic drug interaction on the systolic blood pressure increase after various surgical stimulations. Fentanyl and propofol concentrations that suppressed both the 50% probability of somatic response and the 50% probability of moderate hemodynamic change defined by the 15% systolic blood pressure increase over the prestimulation value were 3.6 ng/ml and 2.5 [micro sign]g/ml for skin incision, 8.4 ng/ml and 1.6 [micro sign]g/ml for peritoneum incision, and 5.9 ng/ml and 5.1 [micro sign]g/ml for wall retraction, respectively.     

定量脑电图监测全麻状态下意识的变化

目的：判断定量脑电图在全麻下监测意识的价值。方法：无神经济损务的健康志愿者,按０、０．２、０．３、０．４ＭＡＣ递增呼末异氟醚浓度,观察ｑＥＥＧ及指令反应变化,通过事后调查麻醉中的外显及内隐记忆。结果：按全麻下意识水平的１～４个阶段,第２与第１阶段相比,ｑＥＥＧＦ７、Ｆ８、Ａ１异联θ波相对功率明显降低（Ｐ〈０．０５）,第３与第２阶段相比,Ｏ１、及Ｏ２导联的α波相对功率明显降低（Ｐ〈０．０５）,Ｏ２与     

Antiemetic Activity of Propofol after Sevoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia for Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was designed to evaluate the antiemetic effectiveness of 0.5 mg/kg propofol when administered intravenously after sevoflurane- compared with desflurane-based anesthesia.

Methods: Two hundred fifty female outpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups. All patients were induced with intravenous doses of 2 mg midazolam, 2 [micro sign]g/kg fentanyl, and 2 mg/kg propofol and maintained with either 1-4% sevoflurane (groups 1 and 2) or 2-8% desflurane (groups 3 and 4) in combination with 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen. At skin closure, patients in groups 1 and 3 were administered 5 ml intravenous saline, and patients in groups 2 and 4 were administered 0.5 mg/kg propofol intravenously. Recovery times were recorded from discontinuation of anesthesia to awakening, orientation, and readiness to be released home. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and requests for antiemetic rescue medication were evaluated during the first 24 h after surgery.

Results: Propofol, in an intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg, administered at the end of a sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or desflurane-nitrous oxide anesthetic prolonged the times to awakening and orientation by 40-80% and 25-30%, respectively. In group 2 (compared with groups 1, 3, and 4), the incidences of emesis (22% compared with 47%, 53%, and 47%) and requests for antiemetic rescue medication (19% compared with 42%, 50%, and 47%) within the first 6 h after surgery were significantly lower, and the time to home-readiness was significantly shorter in duration (216 +/- 50 min vs. 249 +/- 49 min, 260 +/- 88 min, and 254 +/- 72 min, respectively).     

硬膜外与全麻用于全髋置换术围手术期出血量的比较

本文以同一原发病的男性40例且由同一术者施术的全髋置换术(THR)为对象,应用硬膜外麻醉(E组)和气管内插管全身麻醉(G组)对其围术期的血液出入进行对照比较.两组平均手术时间均为120min,出血量和手术时间呈正相相关(P<0.01).术中出血量两组间无明显差别,围术期总出血量E组为1630±80ml,G组为1380±62ml,以E组明显居多,故此主张THR以选用全麻施术为宜.     

Anesthesia Depth-dependent Features of Electroencephalographic Bicoherence Spectrum during Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Background: Growth pattern in the electroencephalographic bicoherence spectrum has recently been found to relate to anesthetic depth, and bicoherence analysis can reflect behavior of the thalamocortical reverberating network. Because the thalamocortical network is known to represent a key factor in sleep by anesthesia, systematic and qualitative bicoherence studies of different anesthetic depths is necessary throughout all pairs of frequencies.

Methods: Sixteen patients were anesthetized using sevoflurane (1, 2, or 3%) combined with remifentanil (0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1). Raw electroencephalographic signals were collected, and bicoherence was estimated in all pairs of frequencies, between 0.5 and 40 Hz at 0.5-Hz intervals.

Results: Sevoflurane (1%) caused two main peaks, spindle frequencies (11.0 +/- 1.2 Hz, 44.7 +/- 12.3% [bicoherence growth]) and [delta]-[theta] frequencies (5.4 +/- 0.5 Hz, 33.0 +/- 8.4%), in the diagonal line of biphasic bicoherence plots. High concentrations of sevoflurane (2% and 3%) shifted these peaks to 9.8 +/- 1.1 Hz, 46.2 +/- 12.7%; 8.7 +/- 1.3 Hz, 37.2 +/- 13.7% and 4.9 +/- 0.5 Hz, 44.6 +/- 7.0%; 4.3 +/- 0.8 Hz, 45.2 +/- 10.6%, respectively. Sevoflurane caused a third bicoherence peak to appear in another heterogeneous pair frequency (pair of [alpha] basal frequency and its double frequency), outside the diagonal line, which also inherited the behavior of [alpha] bicoherence peaks at different anesthetic depths.     

Cortical Processing of Complex Auditory Stimuli during Alterations of Consciousness with the General Anesthetic Propofol

Background: The extent to which complex auditory stimuli are processed and differentiated during general anesthesia is unknown. The authors used blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the processing words (10 per period; compared with scrambled words) and nonspeech human vocal sounds (10 per period; compared with environmental sounds) during propofol anesthesia.

Methods: Seven healthy subjects were tested. Propofol was given by a computer-controlled pump to obtain stable plasma concentrations. Data were acquired during awake baseline, sedation (propofol concentration in arterial plasma: 0.64 +/- 0.13 [mu]g/ml; mean +/- SD), general anesthesia (4.62 +/- 0.57 [mu]g/ml), and recovery. Subjects were asked to memorize the words.

Results: During all periods including anesthesia, the sounds conditions combined elicited significantly greater activations than silence bilaterally in primary auditory cortices (Heschl gyrus) and adjacent regions within the planum temporale. During sedation and anesthesia, however, the magnitude of the activations was reduced by 40-50% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, anesthesia abolished voice-specific activations seen bilaterally in the superior temporal sulcus during the other periods as well as word-specific activations bilaterally in the Heschl gyrus, planum temporale, and superior temporal gyrus. However, scrambled words paradoxically elicited significantly more activation than normal words bilaterally in planum temporale during anesthesia. Recognition the next day occurred only for words presented during baseline plus recovery and was correlated (P < 0.01) with activity in right and left planum temporale.     

Effects of Low-flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Renal Function: Comparison with High-flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia and Low-flow Isoflurane Anesthesia

Background: The safety of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, during which CF2 = C(CF3)-O-CH2 F (compound A) is formed by sevoflurane degradation, in humans has been questioned because compound A is nephrotoxic in rats. Several reports have evaluated renal function after closed-circuit or low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, using blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine as markers. However, these are not the more sensitive tests for detecting renal damage. This study assessed the effects of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal function using not only BUN and serum creatinine but also creatinine clearance and urinary excretion of kidney-specific enzymes, and it compared these values with those obtained in high-flow sevoflurane anesthesia and low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: Forty-eight patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy were studied. Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane anesthesia with fresh gas flow of 1 l/min (low-flow sevoflurane group; n = 16) or 6-10 l/min (high-flow sevoflurane group; n = 16) or isoflurane anesthesia with a fresh gas flow of 1 l/min (low-flow isoflurane group; n = 16). In all groups, the carrier gas was oxygen/nitrous oxide in the ratio adjusted to ensure a fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired gas (FiO2) of more than 0.3. Fresh Baralyme was used in the low-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane groups. Glass balls were used instead in the high-flow sevoflurane group, with the fresh gas flow rate adjusted to eliminate rebreathing. The compound A concentration was measured by gas chromatography. Gas samples taken from the inspiratory limb of the circle system at 1-h intervals were analyzed. Blood samples were obtained before and on days 1, 2, and 3 after anesthesia to measure BUN and serum creatinine. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected before anesthesia and for each 24-h period from 0 to 72 h after anesthesia to measure creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and alanine aminopeptidase.

Results: The average inspired concentration of compound A was 20 +/- 7.8 ppm (mean +/- SD), and the average duration of exposure to this concentration was 6.11 +/- 1.77 h in the low-flow sevoflurane group. Postanesthesia BUN and serum creatinine concentrations decreased, creatinine clearance increased, and urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and alanine aminopeptidase excretion increased in all groups compared with preanesthesia values, but there were no significant differences between the low-flow sevoflurane, high-flow sevoflurane, and low-flow isoflurane groups for any renal function parameter at any time after anesthesia.