Randomized placebo-controlled trial assessing the effect of bifidobacteria-fermented milk on active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are efficacious for treating and maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To conduct a randomized placebo-controlled trial of bifidobacteria-fermented milk supplementation as a dietary adjunct in treating active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Twenty patients with mild to moderate, active, ulcerative colitis randomly received 100 mL/day of bifidobacteria-fermented milk or placebo for 12 weeks with conventional treatment. RESULTS: Clinical and endoscopic activity indices and histological scores were similar in the two groups before treatment. Although improvements were significant in both groups, the clinical activity index was significantly lower in the bifidobacteria-fermented milk than in the placebo group after treatment. The post-treatment endoscopic activity index and histological score were significantly reduced in the bifidobacteria-fermented milk, but not the placebo group. Increases in faecal butyrate, propionate and short-chain fatty acid concentrations were significant in the bifidobacteria-fermented milk, but not the placebo group. No adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with this bifidobacteria-fermented milk product is safe and more effective than conventional treatment alone, suggesting possible beneficial effects in managing active ulcerative colitis. This is a pilot study and further larger studies are required to confirm the result these preliminary results.     

Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,dose-escalation trial

BACKGROUND: Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal models of colitis. AIM: To evaluate repifermin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with active ulcerative colitis were enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive treatment for five consecutive days with intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1, 5, 10, 25 or 50 microg/kg, or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of repifermin. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical remission at week 4, defined as a score of zero on the endoscopic appearance and stool blood components of the Mayo score and a score of zero or unity on the stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. RESULTS: At week 4, the rates of clinical remission in the 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg repifermin groups were 19%, 9%, 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively, and 11% for the placebo group (P = 0.32 for repifermin vs. placebo). The frequencies of commonly occurring adverse events and severe adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1-50 microg/kg was very well tolerated, but there was no evidence that repifermin was effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis at these doses. An additional study to determine the efficacy of repifermin at doses of > 50 microg/kg or for a longer treatment duration may be warranted, as the maximally tolerated dose was not reached in the present study.     

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral phytonadione for excessive anticoagulation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of managing excessive anticoagulation in the absence of bleeding by either omitting warfarin therapy alone or administering oral phytonadione in addition to omitting warfarin therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service in a group model health maintenance organization. SUBJECTS: Thirty nonbleeding patients with international normalized ratios (INRs) ranging from 6.0-10.0. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either a single oral dose of phytonadione 2.5 mg or placebo. Both groups omitted warfarin doses until the INR became less than or equal to 4.0. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean calculated time to reach an INR of 4.0 was significantly greater in the placebo than the phytonadione group (2.6 vs 1.4 days, p=0.006). Overcorrection of anticoagulation was significantly more common in patients receiving phytonadione. Overt warfarin resistance was not observed in either group after reinitiating warfarin therapy. No major bleeding or thromboembolic complications occurred, and minor bleeding episodes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of oral phytonadione 2.5 mg reduced the time to achieve an INR of 4.0 by approximately 1 day compared with omitting warfarin therapy alone. Adverse events did not differ between the two groups. Both strategies were effective in managing asymptomatic patients with INRs of 6.0-10.0. Oral phytonadione may be most appropriate for patients at high risk for bleeding in whom the benefit of prompt INR reduction would outweigh the thromboembolic risk associated with INR overcorrection.     

Oral beclometasone dipropionate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of oral beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) when added to 5-ASA in the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients with extensive or left-sided mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive oral 5-ASA (3.2 g/day) plus BDP (5 mg/day) or placebo. Clinical, endoscopic and histologic features, and haematochemical parameters were recorded at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled and randomly treated with BDP plus 5-ASA (n = 58) or placebo plus 5-ASA (n = 61). Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant decrease of disease activity index (DAI) and histology score at the end of treatment (P = 0.001, each). DAI score was lower in the BDP group than in the placebo group (P = 0.014), with more patients in clinical remission in the BDP group (58.6% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.008). Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased in BDP group vs. baseline (P = 0.002), but without signs of pituitary-adrenal function depletion. A low incidence of adverse events was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral BDP in combination with oral 5-ASA is significantly more effective than 5-ASA alone in the treatment of patients with extensive or left-sided active ulcerative colitis.     

A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial of essential fatty acid supplementation in the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Essential fatty acid supplementation has been found to ameliorate certain chronic inflammatory diseases. This effect is thought to be mediated through the modulation of eicosanoid synthesis. Pro-inflammatory eicosanoids have been implicated in ulcerative colitis. AIM: To investigate the possible therapeutic benefit of essential fatty acids in quiescent ulcerative colitis to reduce the frequency of disease relapse. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed with a treatment duration of 12 months. Patients with quiescent disease received either trial medication (gamma-linolenic acid, 1.6 g, eicosapentaenoic acid, 270 mg, and docosahexaenoic acid, 45 mg, per day) or placebo (sunflower oil, 500 mg/day). The primary end-point was disease activity, assessed by a previously validated clinical index, sigmoidoscopic appearance and histology. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were randomized, 31 to receive essential fatty acid treatment and 32 to receive placebo. Disease relapse rates were similar at 12 months (placebo, 38%; essential fatty acids, 55%), as were changes in sigmoidoscopic grade from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The supplementation of the diet with this combination of essential fatty acids does not prolong the period of disease remission of ulcerative colitis.     

Clinical trial: oral prednisolone metasulfobenzoate (Predocol) vs. oral prednisolone for active ulcerative colitis

Background  Systemic corticosteroids are effective in ulcerative colitis but commonly cause side effects.
Aim  To compare the safety and efficacy of a sparingly absorbed formulation of prednisolone metasulfobenzoate (Predocol) with a conventional tapering course of oral prednisolone.
Method  In a double-blind randomized study, 59 active ulcerative colitis patients received Predocol 40 mg/day for 6 months, 61 received Predocol 60 mg/day for 6 months and 61 received prednisolone 40 mg/day for 2 weeks, tapered to week 8, followed by placebo until 6 months.
Results  Steroid-related side effects assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale were fewer at 2 months with Predocol 40 mg [VAS 8.1 cm (2.6), mean (s.d.)], or 60 mg [8.1 (2.1)] compared with prednisolone [6.7 (2.7); P  = 0.01]. Mood changes affected 43% receiving prednisolone at 4 weeks vs. 8% for Predocol 40 mg ( P  = 0.001). Remission rates (Powell-Tuck ≤2) at 2 months were Predocol 40 mg 46%, Predocol 60 mg 28% and tapering prednisolone 41% ( P  = 0.13). Visual analogue scale for efficacy also showed non-inferiority for Predocol 40 mg/day. Remission rates at 6 months were Predocol 40 mg 51%, Predocol 60 mg 38% and tapering prednisolone 32% ( P  = 0.08).
Conclusion  Predocol 40 mg/day has similar efficacy but markedly fewer side effects than a conventional tapering prednisolone regimen (ISRCTN14133410).     

A double-blind dose-escalating trial comparing novel mesalazine pellets with mesalazine tablets in active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine as the treatment standard for ulcerative colitis can be applied in different galenical preparations. AIM: A novel formulation of mesalazine pellets with delayed and prolonged release characteristics was compared with conventional Eudragit L-coated tablets. Furthermore, the effect of mesalazine dose escalation on nonresponders was evaluated in both treatment groups. METHODS: A total of 233 patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either mesalazine (1.5 g/day in three doses) as pellets (n = 115) or tablets (n = 118) for 8 weeks. At insufficient response, the dose was increased to 3.0 g. RESULTS: The clinical remission rate (clinical activity index < or = 4) for pellets was 67% vs. 68% for tablets which statistically proved to be not inferior (significance level alpha = 2.5%). In patients without dose increase, the remission rate was 47% (pellets) vs. 42% (tablets). Endoscopic improvement was observed in 80% (pellets) vs. 83% (tablets), and histological improvement in 48% (pellets) vs. 52% (tablets) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine pellets are as effective as tablets in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Dose escalation to 3.0 g/day is a valid option for nonresponders to a starting dose of 1.5 g/day.     

Randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial of prednisolone in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome is associated with increased serotonin-containing enterochromaffin cells and lymphocytes in rectal biopsies. Animal studies have suggested that steroids reduce the lymphocyte response and suppress some of the post-infectious changes in neuromuscular function. AIM: To evaluate whether steroids reduce the number of enterochromaffin cells and improve the symptoms of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome underwent a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3 weeks of oral prednisolone, 30 mg/day. Mucosal enterochromaffin cells, T lymphocytes and mast cells were assessed in rectal biopsies before and after treatment, and bowel symptoms were recorded in a daily diary. RESULTS: Initial enterochromaffin cell counts were increased and correlated with initial lamina propria T-lymphocyte counts (r = 0.460, P = 0.014). Enterochromaffin cell counts did not change significantly after either prednisolone (- 0.8% +/- 9.2%) or placebo (7.9% +/- 7.9%) (P = 0.5). Although lamina propria T-lymphocyte counts decreased significantly after prednisolone (22.0% +/- 5.6%, P = 0.003), but not after placebo (11.5% +/- 8.6%, P = 0.1), this was not associated with any significant treatment-related improvement in abdominal pain, diarrhoea, frequency or urgency. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone does not appear to reduce the number of enterochromaffin cells or cause an improvement in symptoms in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. Other approaches to this persistent condition are indicated.     

Clinical trial: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase II study of subcutaneous interferon-β-1a in moderately active ulcerative colitis

Background  Ulcerative colitis (UC) pathophysiology is characterized by an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Interferon (IFN)-β-1a has potent immunoregulatory properties, including stimulation of host defence mechanisms and thus represents a potential treatment.
Aim  To extend pilot data and identify a suitable dose of IFN-β-1a to achieve endoscopically confirmed remission (ECR) in patients with moderately active UC and to evaluate safety.
Methods  In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with moderately active UC were randomized to IFN-β-1a 44 or 66 μg, or placebo, subcutaneously three times weekly for 8 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up.
Results  Endoscopically-confirmed remission was observed in 23.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.8–35.7] of placebo patients, 29.2% (95% CI: 18.6–41.8) of the IFN-β-1a 44 μg group and 20.0% (95% CI: 11.1–31.8) of the 66 μg group ( P  = 0.45). Improvements with IFN-β-1a 44 μg were greater than with placebo for most secondary efficacy outcomes, although significance was not achieved. Placebo response rates were higher than expected from previous trials. Adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of IFN treatment.
Conclusions  Interferon-β-1a was generally well tolerated at the doses tested, but a significant therapeutic benefit in patients with UC was not observed.     

Anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hypercholesterolemic effects of Aloe vera leaf gel in hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

Diabetes mellitus type 2 with dyslipidemia is a common disease. Previous studies suggest that aloe (Aloe vera L.) leaf gel may positively affect the blood glucose and lipid levels in dyslipidemic type 2 diabetic patients. Thus, in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial with hyperlipidemic (hypercholesterolemic and/or hypertriglyceridemic) type 2 diabetic patients aged 40 to 60 years not using other anti-hyperlipidemic agents and resistant to daily intake of two 5 mg glyburide tablets and two 500 mg metformin tablets, the efficacy and safety of taking aloe gel (one 300 mg capsule every 12 hours for 2 months) combined with the aforementioned drugs in treatment of 30 patients were evaluated and compared with the placebo group (n = 30). The aloe gel lowered the fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and LDL levels significantly (p = 0.036, p = 0.036, p = 0.006, and p = 0.004, respectively) without any significant effects on the other blood lipid levels and liver/kidney function tests (p > 0.05) compared with the placebo at the endpoint. No adverse effects were reported. The results suggest that aloe gel may be a safe anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hypercholesterolemic agent for hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for cocaine dependence

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil treatment for cocaine dependence. Patients (N = 210) who were actively using cocaine at baseline were randomized to 8 weeks of modafinil (0 mg/day, 200 mg/day, or 400 mg/day) combined with once-weekly cognitive-behavioral therapy. Our primary efficacy measure was cocaine abstinence, based on urine benzoylecgonine (BE) levels, with secondary measures of craving, cocaine withdrawal, retention, and tolerability. We found no significant differences between modafinil and placebo patients on any of these measures. However, there was a significant gender difference in that male patients treated with 400 mg/day tended to be more abstinent than their placebo-treated counterparts (p = .06). Our negative findings might be explained by gender differences and/or inadequate psychosocial treatment intensity in patients with severe cocaine dependence.     

Enteric-release glyceryl trinitrate in active Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Mucosal ischaemia may contribute to the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. Microvascular abnormalities have been found in colonic resection specimens, and mucosal levels of constitutive nitric oxide synthase are reduced. AIM: To assess the efficacy of a novel, enteric-release formulation of the nitric oxide donor, glyceryl trinitrate, aimed at increasing the mucosal circulation and relaxing smooth muscle in the affected bowel. METHODS: The trial was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. Baseline disease activity was assessed by a structured symptom diary, with blood tests and a quality of life assessment. Patients with a Crohn's disease activity index of > or = 150 and < 450 were randomized to receive 12 weeks of either glyceryl trinitrate (initially 6 mg twice daily, increasing to 9 mg twice daily after 6 weeks) or an identical placebo. Assessments were repeated at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients (22 male) entered the study; 34 were given glyceryl trinitrate and 36 placebo. At 12 weeks, there were no differences between the treatment groups in terms of Crohn's disease activity index, pain, stool frequency, inflammatory markers or quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: Enteric-release glyceryl trinitrate did not benefit patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease. Whilst ischaemia may contribute to the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease, our results fail to provide supportive evidence for this hypothesis.     

Randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa 300 micrograms for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia

ABSTRACT

Objective: Darbepoetin alfa is effective in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Administration of subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks (Q3W) could simplify treatment through synchronization with common Q3W chemotherapy regimens. We report results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa in patients with a wide variety of tumor types who experienced CIA.

Research design and methods: Patients aged?≥?18 years with anemia (hemoglobin <11?g/dL) being treated for nonmyeloid malignancy were randomized 1:1 to receive darbepoetin alfa 300?μg (n?=?193) or placebo (n?=?193) subcutaneously Q3W from weeks 1 to 13 in this 16-week study. Doses could be adjusted per prespecified rules.

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received ≥1 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion between week 5 and the end of the treatment period (EOTP). The study also analyzed the proportions of patients achieving a hemoglobin concentration ≥11?g/dL and subsequently maintaining hemoglobin levels above 11?g/dL, and the change in hemoglobin concentration over time.

Results: The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions between week 5 and EOTP was significantly lower in the darbepoetin alfa-treated group than in the placebo-treated group (24 vs. 41% of patients, a 16.3% difference, p?<?0.001). There were no differences between the two treatment arms in quality-of-life measures. Cardiovascular/thromboembolic adverse events were uncommon and were not associated with increases in hemoglobin levels. Study limitations suggest caution in the interpretation of these results: transfusions, the primary endpoint, were recommended but not required if hemoglobin concentrations were ≤8.0?g/dL, and protocol deviations (primarily dosing errors) occurred in approximately one-half of the patients in both treatment groups.

Conclusions: In this study, fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa appeared to be well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of CIA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00110955.     

盐酸替利定口服液用于镇痛的随机双盲对照临床试验

目的评价盐酸替利定口服液的有效性和安全性。方法用多中心随机双盲平行对照方法,以盐酸吗啡片为对照药。144例手术后中、重度疼痛的患者分为2组,试验组(73例)口服替利定1支和安慰剂1片;对照组(71例):安慰剂1支和吗啡1片。58例癌性疼痛患者分为2组,试验组(26例)口服替利定每天2支×4次,同时口服安慰剂;对照组(32例)口服吗啡每天2片×4次,同时口服安慰剂,疗程均5天。以疼痛强度差(PID)作为镇痛效果主要疗效判定指标。结果术后与癌性的疼痛患者,试验组与对照组PID值的差异均无统计学意义。药物不良反应主要有头晕、恶心、呕吐等。结论替利定可治疗各种手术后引起的急性中重度疼痛和慢性癌性疼痛,与吗啡相似,是一种强效、安全的镇痛药。     

Clinical trial: once-daily mesalamine granules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis - a 6-month placebo-controlled trial

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 990–999

Summary

Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder. Aim To evaluate once‐daily mesalamine (mesalazine) granules (MG) for maintenance of remission of UC. Methods Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of patients (n = 209 MG, n = 96 placebo) with UC in remission [revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding = 0, mucosal appearance <2] who took MG 1.5 g or placebo once‐daily for up to 6 months. Primary efficacy endpoint: the percentage of patients who remained relapse‐free at month 6/end of treatment. Relapse was defined as SDAI rectal bleeding score ≥1 and a mucosal appearance score ≥2, a UC flare, or initiation of medication to treat a UC flare. Results The percentage of relapse‐free patients at month 6/end of treatment was higher with MG than placebo (78.9% vs. 58.3%, P < 0.001) in the intent‐to‐treat analysis. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.025) favouring MG were observed for most secondary endpoints including improvement in rectal bleeding, physician’s disease activity rating, stool frequency, the SDAI at month 6/end of treatment, patients classified as a treatment success and relapse‐free duration. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusions Once‐daily mesalamine (mesalazine) was effective in maintaining remission of UC for 6 months.     

Evaluation of oral budesonide in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis

Budesonide, a topical corticosteroid, has proven useful for the management of Crohn's disease. Its efficacy is similar to prednisone but it has fewer side effects. A new pH-modified release capsule (Budenofalk) is probably efficacious in distal ulcerative colitis. The aim of the present study was to establish the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of two dosage regimens of budesonide capsules and to obtain efficacy information. Budenofalk 9 mg daily was administered as a single dose 9 mg in 8 patients and as three 3 mg doses in 7 patients with active distal ulcerative colitis for 8 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at three timepoints during the study: baseline, 4 and 8 weeks after start of treatment. Endoscopic evaluation and budesonide concentration in mucosal biopsy specimens was performed at 0 and 8 weeks. A pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic profile (cortisol, lymphocytes and neutrophils) was performed at day 5. In the 9 mg o.d. group, higher peak concentrations and systemic availability was found compared to the 3 mg t.i.d. group. Cortisol suppression was more pronounced after 9 mg o.d. than after 3 mg t.i.d. Lag-time, AUC and pharmacodynamic effects were comparable (14% mean decrease lymphocyte count and 26% mean increase neutrophil count). Mucosal biopsy specimens in the distal colon revealed significant budesonide levels with both regimens. After 8 weeks, 71% in the 9 mg o.d. group and 38% in the 3 t.i.d. group responded. The endoscopic index improved from 10 +/- 2 to 2 +/- 3 (p <0.001) with 9 mg o.d. and from 9 +/- 2 to 4 +/- 4.7 (p = 0.02) with 3 mg t.i.d. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles found in this study indicate that Budenofalk reaches the distal part of colon and rectum, but further studies to validate the budesonide assay in the mucosa and comparison with a control group are necessary. This limited study suggests that Budenofalk is effective in distal colitis and side effects are rare. Based on these observations a large clinical trial using 9 mg o.d. is indicated to confirm efficacy and assess further possible side effects.