Some recent ethical dilemmas in randomized controlled clinical trials

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are the golden standard of contemporary medical research. Just because they are ever more widespread, they stand at the focus of intense ethical debate. The debates have focused on the questions, how much the research participants can benefit from the research, and even if they can benefit from it, can a research ever be called therapeutic? Is not the notion of therapeutic research a misconception? Furthermore it has been debated when it is ethically acceptable to start an RCT, and is it acceptable to randomly assign research participants? When is it acceptable to use a placebo controlled trial? It has been debated, how to interpret the conception of "best... method" in the Declaration of Helsinki 2000. The article makes an attempt to survey some of the lessons of these debates.     

A template for analyzing ethical dilemmas in discharge planning

Involvement in discharge planning in acute-care hospitals can produce troubling ethical conflicts for social workers. Using case material, the authors present a model for analyzing these dilemmas. Exploration of available data, value systems, and decision-making dimensions of the situation at hand is suggested as a way of understanding a dilemma and moving toward necessary action.     

Experiences of ethical dilemmas in rehabilitation: Swedish occupational therapists' perspectives

The aim of this study was to describe Swedish occupational therapists' experiences of encountering ethical dilemmas in rehabilitation and strategies they used to handle the situations. Twelve occupational therapists who work with adults with developmental disabilities were interviewed using a semi-structured interview design. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The results showed that ethical dilemmas were common in the occupational therapists' daily work within rehabilitation. Many situations that created ethical dilemmas were related to occupational therapists who worked with clients and their relatives, and other healthcare providers. The results showed further that occupational therapists found it difficult to make decisions and to optimize clients' participation in decision-making, to set limits and act professionally, and to best handle the situation for the client and avoid ethical dilemmas. This study indicates the importance of illustrating experiences of ethical dilemmas within occupational therapy praxis and the meaning of discussing ethical dilemmas with different healthcare providers to reach a divided view of the client in order to develop successful and healthy strategies that will optimize the rehabilitation of clients with developmental disabilities.     

A quick guide to ethical theory in healthcare: solving ethical dilemmas in nutrition support situations.

Ethical dilemmas can be challenging for the nutrition support clinician who is accustomed to evidence-based practice. The emotional and personal nature of ethical decision making can present difficulties, and conflict can arise when people have different ethical perspectives. An understanding of ethical terms and ethical theories can be helpful in clarifying the source of this conflict. These may include prominent ethical theories such as moral relativism, utilitarianism, Kantian absolutism, Aristotle's virtue ethics and ethics of care, as well as the key ethical principles in healthcare (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice). Adopting a step-by-step approach can simplify the process of resolving ethical problems.     

Fetal conditions and fatal decisions: ethical dilemmas in ultrasound screening in Vietnam

This paper situates discussion of the ethics of ethnographic research against the background of a theoretical and methodological debate about the relationship between ethics and method, and about the relationships between research methods and their objects. In particular, the paper investigates the implications of folding together the ethical and the empirical in research and argues that this requires the development of new ethico-ethnographic methods for the investigation of ethico-moral objects. The paper falls into three main parts. The first considers calls for what has come to be known as empirical ethics, that is, for a more empirically informed bioethics, by way of an exploration of the integration of ethnographic methods in bioethics, and concludes that approaches which see the ethical and the empirical as 'complementary' do not do justice to the methodological implications of enfolding the ethical and the ethnographic. The second part juxtaposes this with calls for the integration of ethics in ethnography and, similarly, argues that the enfolding of the ethical and the empirical in ethnography calls for the development of new methods. The paper goes on to problematise the 'negotiational' approaches to informed consent preferred by many ethnographers, arguing that the concept of negotiation, rather than offering a solution to the problem of consent, is itself ethically complex and in need of analysis. The paper argues that, in the context of ethnographic research, the possibility of negotiational forms of consent depends upon engagement between researchers and researched, with unavoidably 'ethical' concepts such as 'respect', 'recognition', 'dignity', 'justice' and so on, and that this poses methodological challenges to ethnography. The paper's third section explores the implications of these arguments for research practice, using The Genethics Club as an example.     

Anthropological contributions for thinking and acting in the health area and its ethical dilemmas

This paper attempts to analyze the way in which the issue of ethics in social research is dealt by institutional commissions based in biomedicine criteria. This discussion is particularly important for Social Sciences in Health, as our projects must necessarily be presented to Committees for assessment. In actual fact, Resolution N masculine 196/1996 issued by the National Health Council establishes this mandatory requirement for all social areas. However, there is a question among researchers working with social issues, arguing that the health sector is moving outside its field when attempting to regulate actions in other fields of investigation. Grounded on philosophical anthropology, this paper is divided into three parts: (1) elements of anthropological foundations of ethics; (2) contributions of Anthropology to thinking about ethics and human rights in health; (3) internal and external questioning about anthropological practice. I conclude that if the ethical issue that involves human beings cannot be reduced to the procedures established by Ethics Committees, discussions in greater depth are required among social scientists on the construction of a practice based on and guided by respect for the intersubjectivity of all the players engaged in a research project.