Comment on "Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy"

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as an attractive intervention to improve left ventricular mechanical function by changing the sequence of electrical activation. Unfortunately, many patients receiving CRT do not benefit but are subjected to device complications and costs. Thus, there is a need for better selection criteria. Current criteria for CRT eligibility include a QRS duration >120 ms. However, QRS morphology is not considered, although it can indicate the cause of delayed conduction. Recent studies have suggested that only patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT, and not patients with right bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. The authors review the pathophysiologic and clinical evidence supporting why only patients with complete LBBB benefit from CRT. Furthermore, they review how the threshold of 120 ms to define LBBB was derived subjectively at a time when criteria for LBBB and right bundle branch block were mistakenly reversed. Three key studies over the past 65 years have suggested that 1/3 of patients diagnosed with LBBB by conventional electrocardiographic criteria may not have true complete LBBB, but likely have a combination of left ventricular hypertrophy and left anterior fascicular block. On the basis of additional insights from computer simulations, the investigators propose stricter criteria for complete LBBB that include a QRS duration >140 ms for men and >130 ms for women, along with mid-QRS notching or slurring in >2 contiguous leads. Further studies are needed to reinvestigate the electrocardiographic criteria for complete LBBB and the implications of these criteria for selecting patients for CRT.     

Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as an attractive intervention to improve left ventricular mechanical function by changing the sequence of electrical activation. Unfortunately, many patients receiving CRT do not benefit but are subjected to device complications and costs. Thus, there is a need for better selection criteria. Current criteria for CRT eligibility include a QRS duration ≥ 120 ms. However, QRS morphology is not considered, although it can indicate the cause of delayed conduction. Recent studies have suggested that only patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT, and not patients with right bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. The authors review the pathophysiologic and clinical evidence supporting why only patients with complete LBBB benefit from CRT. Furthermore, they review how the threshold of 120 ms to define LBBB was derived subjectively at a time when criteria for LBBB and right bundle branch block were mistakenly reversed. Three key studies over the past 65 years have suggested that 1/3 of patients diagnosed with LBBB by conventional electrocardiographic criteria may not have true complete LBBB, but likely have a combination of left ventricular hypertrophy and left anterior fascicular block. On the basis of additional insights from computer simulations, the investigators propose stricter criteria for complete LBBB that include a QRS duration ≥ 140 ms for men and ≥ 130 ms for women, along with mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥ 2 contiguous leads. Further studies are needed to reinvestigate the electrocardiographic criteria for complete LBBB and the implications of these criteria for selecting patients for CRT.     

Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block.

AIMS: We sought to define the reference values of intra-left ventricular (LV) electromechanical delay (EMD), and to assess the prevalence (and pattern) of intra-LV dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure (HF) and normal QRS and in patients with right and left bundle branch block. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography and a six-LV wall model to study LV EMD in 103 patients [41 with HF and normal QRS, 22 with right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 40 with left bundle branch block (LBBB)], and in 59 controls. In controls, the median intra-LV EMD was 17 ms, (inter-quartile range 13-30); 95% of controls had a value < or =41 ms. Patients showed a longer intra-LV EMD than controls: 33 ms (20-57) in patients with normal QRS, 32 ms (23-50) in RBBB patients, and 50 ms (30-94) in LBBB patients. Intra-LV dyssynchrony (defined as intra-LV EMD >41 ms) was present in 39, 36, and 60% of the patients, respectively. On average, HF patients showed the same pattern of activation as controls, from the septum to the posterior wall, but activation times were significantly prolonged. In RBBB patients the activation sequence was directed from inferior to anterior and in LBBB from anterior to inferior wall. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular dyssynchrony was present in several patients with HF and normal QRS, and in patients with RBBB; conversely, 40% of LBBB patients showed values of LV EMD within the normal range. Left ventricular activation sequence was different between groups. Assessment of LV synchronicity by means of imaging techniques may be more important than QRS duration or morphology in selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization treatment.     

Recovery of complete left bundle branch block following heart failure improvement by left bundle branch pacing in a patient

A 57‐year‐old male presented with symptomatic systolic heart failure and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB). Left bundle branch pacing corrected LBBB at a low capture threshold (0.5V @0.4ms) with right bundle branch conduction delay and paced QRS morphology changed to near‐normal by adjusting AV delay with diminished RBBD. At 1‐year follow‐up, the patient had a significant improvement in heart failure and LBBB automatically resolved with a rate‐dependent pattern. LBBP may be an alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy with the likelihood of recovery of LBBB. More research is needed to evaluate the potential use of this pacing strategy in patients with LBBB and heart failure.     

Diminished left ventricular dyssynchrony and impact of resynchronization in failing hearts with right versus left bundle branch block.

OBJECTIVES: We compared mechanical dyssynchrony and the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in failing hearts with a pure right (RBBB) versus left bundle branch block (LBBB). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is effective for treating failing hearts with conduction delay and discoordinate contraction. Most data pertain to LBBB delays. With RBBB, the lateral wall contracts early so that biventricular (BiV) pre-excitation may not be needed. Furthermore, the magnitude of dyssynchrony and impact of CRT in pure RBBB versus LBBB remains largely unknown. METHODS: Dogs with tachypacing-induced heart failure combined with right or left bundle branch radiofrequency ablation were studied. Basal dyssynchrony and effects of single and BiV CRT on left ventricular (LV) function were assessed by pressure-volume catheter and tagged magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. RESULTS: Left bundle branch block and RBBB induced similar QRS widening, and LV function (ejection fraction, maximum time derivative of LV pressure [dP/dt(max)]) was similarly depressed in failing hearts with both conduction delays. Despite this, mechanical dyssynchrony was less in RBBB (circumferential uniformity ratio estimate [CURE] index: 0.80 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.58 +/- 0.09 for LBBB, p < 0.04; CURE 0-->1 is dyssynchronous-->synchronous). Cardiac resynchronization therapy had correspondingly less effect on hearts with RBBB than those with LBBB (i.e., 5.5 +/- 1.1% vs. 29.5 +/- 5.0% increase in dP/dt(max), p < 0.005), despite similar baselines. Furthermore, right ventricular-only pacing enhanced function and synchrony in RBBB as well or better than did BiV, whereas LV-only pacing worsened function. CONCLUSIONS: Less mechanical dyssynchrony is induced by RBBB than LBBB in failing hearts, and the corresponding impact of CRT on the former is reduced. Right ventricular-only pacing may be equally efficacious as BiV CRT in hearts with pure right bundle branch conduction delay.     

The role of left ventricular conduction in the electrogenesis of left ventricular hypertrophy. An electrophysiologic study in man.

Various electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic (ECG-VCG) patterns of ventricular conduction disturbances are inducible by premature right atrial stimulation (PRAS). These patterns are a consequence of different degrees of refractoriness in the specialized ventricular conduction system. We observed that the intermediate phase of left bundle branch block (LBBB) induced by PRAS in 20 subjects with normal basal QRS (complexes) were similar to those of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). In 18 patients with basal ECG-VCG signs of LVH, right bundle branch block (RBBB) induced by PRAS produced a progressive disappearance of these signs and the "normalization" of the tracings. The initial maximum QRS vector decreased, disappeared or remained absent in the patients with LBBB induced by PRAS, and appeared (when absent in the basal VCG) and remained unchanged (when present) in patients with RBBB induced by PRAS. In this paper we discuss the electrogenetic implications of these data. The ECG-VCG sings of LVH are probably dependent on a slowed conduction in the left bundle branch system, while anatomical hypertrophy per se probably plays a less important role.     

Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block

When left bundle branch block (LBBB) is present on the electrocardiogram, the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) may be difficult. The left ventricular mass in 70 patients with LBBB was estimated by echocardiography, and was compared to the QRS configuration on the electrocardiogram. We found that there was agreement between a monophasic R pattern in lead 1 or V6 (sensitivity 79.3%, 70.7%) and left ventricular hypertrophy. We suggest that a monophasic R pattern in L1 and V6 may provide a useful simple index of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block.     

Evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular pacing in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has recently emerged as an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe systolic heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Right ventricular pacing (RVP) leads to an LBBB-like pattern in the electrocardiogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients induced by RVP. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 33 patients with a conventional single or dual chamber pacemaker, 18 with ejection fraction (EF) > 35% and 15 with EF < or = 35%. In all patients, an intrinsic rhythm without intraventricular conduction delay (QRS < or = 120 ms) was present without RVP. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic criteria for mechanical dyssynchrony [aortic pre-ejection delay (APE), interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), delayed activation of the posterior left ventricular wall (PD), septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD)] were evaluated in all patients with and without RVP. QRS duration showed no difference between the two EF-groups without RVP (93 +/- 10 vs. 96 +/- 9 ms), but was significantly longer in patients with low EF with RVP (152 +/- 18 vs. 181 +/- 18 ms; P < 0.001). In patients with EF > 35%, only APE was slightly prolonged by RVP (111 +/- 20 vs. 129 +/- 17 ms; P = 0.03), whereas in patients with EF < or = 35% marked pathological differences in APE (118 +/- 29 vs. 169 +/- 24 ms; P < 0.001), IVMD (22 +/- 17 vs. 58 +/- 14 ms; P < 0.001), SPWMD (103 +/- 28 vs. 125 +/- 29 ms; P = 0.004), and PD (-21 +/- 25 vs. - 39 +/- 25 ms; P = 0.005) were found. A significant correlation between QRS duration and mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony was only found for two echocardiographic parameters (IVMD, APE) with RVP. CONCLUSION: In patients with a conventional pacemaker, mechanical dyssynchrony with RVP was shown exceptionally in patients with preserved or moderately depressed systolic left ventricular (LV) function, but in nearly all patients with severely depressed systolic LV function. These patients might benefit from CRT when frequent RVP is required.     

Right and left ventricular activation sequence in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a detailed analysis using three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system

Three-dimensional mapping in RBBB and heart failure. INTRODUCTION: Recently, right bundle branch block (RBBB) was proved to be an important predictor of mortality in heart failure (HF) patients as much as left bundle branch block (LBBB). We characterized endocardial right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) activation sequence in HF patients with RBBB using a three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic electroanatomic contact mapping system (3D-Map) in order to provide the electrophysiological background to understand whether these patients can benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using 3D-Map, RV and LV activation sequences were studied in 100 consecutive HF patients. Six of these patients presented with RBBB QRS morphology. The maps of these patients were analyzed and compared post hoc with those of the other 94 HF patients presenting with LBBB. Clinical and hemodynamic profile was significantly worse in RBBB group compared to LBBB. Patients with RBBB showed significantly longer time to RV breakthrough (P<0.001), longer activation times of RV anterior and lateral regions (P<0.001), and longer total RV endocardial activation time (P<0.02) compared to patients with LBBB. Time to LV breakthrough was significantly shorter in patients with RBBB (P<0.001), while total and regional LV endocardial activation times were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of LV activation delay is similar between HF patients with LBBB and RBBB. Moreover, patients with RBBB have larger right-sided conduction delay compared to patients with LBBB. The assessment of these electrical abnormalities is important to understand the rationale for delivering CRT in HF patients with RBBB.     

Clinical-electrocardiographic correlates of newly acquired left bundle branch block: the Framingham Study

To determine whether any associated electrocardiographic findings in persons with newly acquired complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) correlate with the prevalence of associated clinically apparent cardiovascular abnormalities, electrocardiograms (ECGs) from all 55 members of the Framingham Study cohort in whom LBBB developed during 18 years of routine prospective biennial examinations were reviewed. A QRS axis left of or equal to 0 degrees, left atrial conduction delay and an inverted T wave in lead V6 on the first ECG with LBBB, and an abnormal ECG in the Framingham examination preceding the appearance of LBBB each correlated with the prevalence of systemic hypertension, cardiomegaly, coronary heart disease and congestive heart failure. However, neither the PR interval nor the duration of the QRS complex on the first ECG with LBBB correlated with the prevalence of any of the associated cardiovascular abnormalities. The 8 patients with neither left atrial conduction delay nor a QRS axis left of or equal to 0 degrees on the first Framingham ECG with LBBB nor an abnormal ECG on the examination preceding the appearance of LBBB were 6 times more likely to remain free of all of the clinical cardiovascular abnormalities than the 47 patients with 1 or more of these 3 electrocardiographic findings (p less than 0.001).     

Baseline Doppler parameters are useful predictors of chronic left ventricular reduction in size by cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: The identification of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB) remains difficult. We aimed to define the predictive value of conventional Doppler parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 73 patients (65 +/- 9 years, 51 male, 36 ischaemic, 37 non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, QRS 167 +/- 31 ms, LVEF 23 +/- 6%) with LBBB, a CRT device was implanted. LV pre-ejection interval (PEI), interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), LV filling time (FT), and myocardial performance index (MPI) were assessed at baseline and on optimized CRT. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (EDD) was obtained at baseline and after 10.6 +/- 6.7 months. end-diastolic diameter diminished from 66.3 +/- 8.1 to 59.9 +/- 9.6 mm (P < 0.001). Initial LVPEI (r = 0.41, P < 0.001), baseline IVMD (r = 0.34, P = 0.003), acute LVPEI shortening (r = 0.33, P = 0.006), and baseline LVEDD (r = 0.32, P = 0.007) correlated with LVEDD reduction. An LVPEI > or =140 ms had a 82% accuracy to predict long-term LVEDD reduction (sensitivity 86%, specificity 67%, positive and negative predictive values 91 and 56%, respectively). Multivariate analysis solely revealed baseline LVPEI as predictor of LVEDD reduction. FT and MPI correlated only with their respective improvements. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular pre-ejection interval and IVMD predict favourable LV remodelling on CRT. The additional application of tissue Doppler parameters may further increase specificity and negative predictive value.     

Effect of changes in left ventricular anatomy and conduction velocity on the QRS voltage and morphology in left ventricular hypertrophy: a model study

The increased QRS voltage is considered to be a specific electrocardiogram (ECG) sign of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and it is expected that the QRS voltage reflects the increase in left ventricular mass (LVM). However, the increased QRS voltage is only one of QRS patterns observed in patients with LVH. According to the solid angle theory, the resultant QRS voltage is influenced not only by spatial (anatomic) but also by nonspatial (electrophysiologic) determinants. In this study, we used a computer model to evaluate the effect of changes in anatomy and conduction velocity of the left ventricle on QRS complex characteristics.

Material and Methods

The model defines the geometry of cardiac ventricles analytically as parts of ellipsoids and allows to change dimensions of the ventricles, as well as the conduction velocity in the individual layers of myocardium. Three types of anatomic changes were simulated: concentric hypertrophy, eccentric hypertrophy, and dilatation. The conduction velocity was slowed in the inner layer of the left ventricle representing the Purkinje fiber mesh and in the layers representing the working myocardium. The outcomes of the model are presented as the time course of the spatial QRS vector magnitude, the vectorcardiographic QRS loops (VCGs) in horizontal, left sagittal, and frontal planes, as well as derived 12-lead ECGs. The following indicators of the 12-lead ECG were evaluated: the left axis deviation, the intrinsicoid deflection in V6, Cornell voltage, Cornell voltage-duration product, and Sokolow-Lyon index.

Results

The increase in LVM did not affect the QRS voltage proportionally, and the LVM and type of hypertrophy were not the only determinants of the QRS patterns. The conduction velocity slowing resulted in a spectrum of QRS patterns including increased QRS voltage and duration, left axis deviation, prolonged intrinsicoid deflection, VCG patterns of left bundle branch block, as well as pseudo-normal VCG/ECG patterns. The anatomic changes and conduction velocity slowing affected differently Sokolow-Lyon index and Cornell criteria.

Conclusion

We showed that the LVM is not the only determinant of the QRS complex changes in LVH, but it is rather a combination of anatomic and electric remodeling that creates the whole spectrum of the QRS complex changes seen in LVH patients. The slowed conduction velocity in the model heart produced QRS patterns consistent with changes described in LVH, even if the LVM was not changed.     

Electrocardiographic patterns of left bundle-branch block caused by intraventricular conduction impairment in working myocardium: a model study

By definition, the electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns of left bundle-branch block (LBBB) represent distinctive changes in duration and shape of the QRS complex caused by intraventricular conduction delay in the left ventricle (LV) due to structural abnormalities in the His-Purkinje conduction system and/or ventricular myocardium. However, impaired conduction in the working myocardium is not taken into consideration in the practical ECG diagnosis.Because the degree of LV myocardium impairment could be of importance for clinical evaluation of patients, we studied the effects of blocked and of delayed onsets of activation in the LV to simulate complete and incomplete LBBBs and slowed conduction in the LV myocardium by applying an analytical computer model.We demonstrated that typical LBBB patterns were caused both by block or delay in the onset of the LV activation, as well as by impaired conduction in the myocardium itself while maintaining the location and onset of the LV activation. The most important difference was the absence of initial anteriorly oriented electrical forces in cases of the simulated complete LBBB and of incomplete LBBB if the onset of LV activation was delayed (≥6 milliseconds). Under the conditions defined in this model that did not consider myocardial infarction, the presence of initial anteriorly oriented electrical forces was indicative of preserved conduction in the left bundle and of impaired conduction in LV working myocardium.

Conclusion

The elucidation of the participation of working myocardium impairment in the intraventricular conduction delay in the LV could be of vital significance for the clinical management of patients with LBBB patterns, for example, indicated for resynchronization therapy.     

Underestimation of duration of ventricular activation by 12-lead ECG compared with direct measurement of activation duration derived from implanted pacemaker leads

Aim

To determine extent to which 12-lead ECG QRS duration (QRSd) reflects ventricular activation duration compared with time relations from unpaced ventricular myograms in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients.

Methods

Left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) myograms were recorded during spontaneous rhythm from in-situ pacemaker leads in 77 patients receiving CRT; 14 ‘normal activation’ (unpaced QRSd < 120 ms), 10 ‘simple left bundle branch block’ (LBBB, QRSd 120-149 ms), 40 ‘advanced LBBB’ (QRS ≥ 150 ms) and 13 right bundle branch block. Delay in onset (Q-LV, Q-RV) and duration (dur-LV, dur-RV) of activation were measured. Interventricular delay (ΔT: Q-LV minus Q-RV) and ‘LV-overrun’ (time between end 12-lead QRS and Q-end LV myogram) were calculated.

Results

‘Normal activation’: Neither Q-LV, Q-RV (38 ± 6 ms, 39 ± 11 ms), nor dur-LV, dur-RV (66 ± 9 ms, 81 ± 25 ms) differed. ΔT (− 1 ± 11 ms) was not different from zero, nor was Q-end LV (104 ± 10 ms) different from QRSd (p = 0.09).‘Simple LBBB’: Q-LV (102 ± 28 ms) was longer than ‘normal activation’ (p < 0.001), but Q-RV, dur-LV, and dur-RV were no different. ΔT (54 ± 23 ms) was increased (p < 0.001) and Q-end LV (187 ± 48 ms) was longer than QRSd (p = 0.005).‘Advanced LBBB’: Q-LV (115 ± 52 ms) was longer than ‘normal activation’ (p < 0.001) but Q-RV was no different, so ΔT (72 ± 47 ms) was increased (p < 0.001 compared to normal, p = 0.04 compared to simple LBBB). Dur-LV (102 ± 27 ms) was also prolonged, so Q-end LV (218 ± 48 ms) was longer than QRSd (p < 0.001). Longer LV-overrun was associated with longer ΔT (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prolonged LV myopotential duration, associated with interventricular delay, is electrically silent on 12-lead QRSd. Unpaced surface QRSd underestimates true duration of native LV activation in CRT patients.     

QRS dispersion: an electrocardiographic index of systolic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with left bundle branch block

The presence of complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with congestive heart failure has been proposed to be a factor that negatively affects left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative predictive value of QRS dispersion (QRSD) and QRS duration (QRSd) in relation to systolic performance of the left ventricle. The ejection fraction of 130 consecutive patients with LBBB was evaluated by standard echocardiographic methods, whereas QRSd and QRSD were measured. It was demonstrated that QRSD in patients with complete LBBB is strongly related to LV contractility. We, therefore, suggest that this simple electrocardiographic index may serve as a useful screening test for detection of patients with LV systolic dysfunction.     

Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a non-left bundle branch block morphology

Patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphologies are thought to derive less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than those with LBBB. However, some patients do exhibit improvement. The characteristics associated with a response to CRT in patients with non-LBBB morphologies are unknown. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected from 850 consecutive patients presenting for a new CRT device. For inclusion, all patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%, a QRS duration of ≥120 ms, and baseline and follow-up echocardiograms available. Patients with a paced rhythm or LBBB were excluded. The response was defined as an absolute decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥10% from baseline. Multivariate models were constructed to identify variables significantly associated with the response and long-term outcomes. A total of 99 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these 99 patients, 22 had right bundle branch block and 77 had nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay; 52.5% met the criteria for response. On multivariate analysis, the QRS duration was the only variable significantly associated with the response (odds ratio per 10-ms increase 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.52, p = 0.048). During a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 0.9 years, 65 patients died or underwent heart transplant or left ventricular assist device placement. On multivariate analysis, the QRS duration was inversely associated with poor long-term outcomes (hazard ratio per 10-ms increase 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.94, p = 0.005). In patients with advanced heart failure and non-LBBB morphologies, a wider baseline QRS duration is an important determinant of enhanced reverse ventricular remodeling and improved long-term outcomes after CRT.     

Effects of resynchronization therapy on cardiac function in pacemaker patients "upgraded" to biventricular devices

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves echocardiographic measures of cardiac function and has a variable effect on QRS duration in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). How CRT affects these indices in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced LBBB who are "upgraded" with left ventricular (LV) leads for CRT is unknown. We studied the echocardiographic effects of RV pacing and CRT in patients with prior continuous RV pacing after LV lead placement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients (age 73 +/- 11 years, LV ejection fraction 24 +/- 6%, QRS duration 190 +/- 27 msec) with New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV symptoms and continuous RV pacing underwent LV lead placement for CRT. Echocardiography and ECG were performed sequentially during RV pacing and CRT. CRT was associated with significantly reduced QRS duration (190 +/- 27 msec vs 165 +/- 18 msec, P = 0.005) and reduced LV electromechanical delay (180 +/- 33 msec vs 161+/- 43 msec). Baseline QRS duration correlated with CRT response. After CRT, patients had significant improvements in indices of systolic function, including LV ejection fraction, myocardial performance index (MPI), and LV ejection time. Abnormal baseline MPI was associated with greater improvement after CRT. LV end-diastolic and systolic volumes were similarly decreased with CRT. Mitral valve deceleration time, an index of diastolic function, was not affected by CRT. CONCLUSION: "Upgrading" RV paced patients with advanced heart failure to CRT improves measures of electrical and LV mechanical synchrony and improves systolic function.     

Left Bundle Branch Block,an Old–New Entity

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is generally associated with a poorer prognosis in comparison to normal intraventricular conduction, but also in comparison to right bundle branch block which is generally considered to be benign in the absence of an underlying cardiac disorder like congenital heart disease. LBBB may be the first manifestation of a more diffuse myocardial disease. The typical surface ECG feature of LBBB is a prolongation of QRS above 0.11 s in combination with a delay of the intrinsic deflection in leads V5 and V6 of more than 60 ms and no septal q waves in leads I, V5, and V6 due to the abnormal septal activation from right to left. LBBB may induce abnormalities in left ventricular performance due to abnormal asynchronous contraction patterns which can be compensated by biventricular pacing (resynchronization therapy). Asynchronous electrical activation of the ventricles causes regional differences in workload which may lead to asymmetric hypertrophy and left ventricular dilatation, especially due to increased wall mass in late-activated regions, which may aggravate preexisting left ventricular pumping performance or even induce it. Of special interest are patients with LBBB and normal left ventricular dimensions and normal ejection fraction at rest but who may present with an abnormal increase in pulmonary artery pressure during exercise, production of lactate during high-rate pacing, signs of ischemia on myocardial scintigrams (but no coronary artery narrowing), and abnormal ultrastructural findings on myocardial biopsy. For this entity, the term latent cardiomyopathy had been suggested previously.     

Left bundle branch block and mechanical events of the cardiac cycle

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with a prolongation of the interval from the QRS onset to the onset of left ventricular (LV) ejection. The locus and prevalence of specific sites of delay were examined in 56 patients with complete LBBB using echocardiography, phonocardiography and external pulse recordings. The results were compared with those in 52 control subjects without LBBB. The onset of the QRS complex was used as the initial reference point of measurement of time intervals. The following abnormalities were found in patients with LBBB: (1) delayed mitral valve closure (Q-MC greater than 0.08 second) was the major site of delay in 23% of patients; (2) prolongation of the LV isovolumetric contraction time (greater than 0.06 second) was the major site of delay in 41%; (3) both Q-MC and LV isovolumetric contraction time were prolonged in 18%; and (4) in 26% of patients the onset of ventricular contraction determined by the onset of the increase of the apex impulse was delayed (Q-VC greater than 0.07 second). The most common cause of delayed ejection was a prolonged LV isovolumetric contraction time, which occurred in 59% of patients. A control group of 20 patients with abnormal LV function but without LBBB had a low incidence of the 3 types of delay in LV ejection (0 to 15%). Thus, the major abnormalities in the cardiac cycle in LBBB are due to the conduction defect and not to LV dysfunction. The results of this study suggest the presence of variable abnormalities of conduction in complete LBBB.     

Improvement of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony associated with restoration of left ventricular function in a patient with fulminant myocarditis and complete left bundle branch block

A 52-year-old woman with fulminant myocarditis had completed left bundle branch block (LBBB) and severely impaired left ventricular (LV) function. Marked mechanical dyssynchrony with septal-to-posterior delay of 389 ms was observed by echocardiographic speckle tracking radial strain imaging on admission, which was dramatically improved to 106 ms after total recovery from acute myocarditis with restoration of LV ejection fraction whereas her electrocardiogram still showed complete LBBB.