RNA--protein interactions in the ribosome. IV. Structure and properties of binding sites for proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 in the 16S RNA

Proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli+ associate with specific binding sites in the 16 S ribosomal RNA. A systematic investigation of the co-operative interactions that occur when two or more of these proteins simultaneously attach to the 16 S RNA indicate that their binding sites lie near to one another. The binding site for S4 has previously been located within a 550-nucleotide RNA fragment of approximately 9 S that arises from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA upon limited hydrolysis with pancreatic ribonuclease. The 9 S RNA was unable to associate with S20 and S16/S17, however, either alone or in combination. A fragment of similar size and nucleotide sequence, termed the 9 S¹ RNA, has been isolated following ribonuclease digestion of the complex of 16 S RNA with S20 and S16/S17. The 9 S¹ RNA bound not only S4, but S20 and S16/S17 as well, although the fragment complex was stable only when both of the latter protein fractions were present together. Nonetheless, measurements of binding stoichiometry demonstrated the interactions to be specific under these conditions. A comparison of the 9 S and 9 S¹ RNAs by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing urea revealed that the two fragments differ substantially in the number and distribution of hidden breaks. Contrary to expectation, the RNA in the ribonucleoprotein complex appeared to be more accessible to ribonuclease than the free 16 S RNA as judged by the smaller average length of the sub-fragments recovered from the 9 S¹ RNA. These results suggest that the binding of S4, S16/S17 and S20 brings about a conformational alteration within the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA.To delineate further the portions of the RNA chain that interact with S4, S16/S17 and S20, specific fragments encompassing subsequences from the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA were sought. Two such fragments, designated 12 S-I and 12 S-II, were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis from partial T₁ ribonuclease digests of the 16 S RNA. The two RNAs, which contain 290 and 210 nucleotides, respectively, are contiguous and together span the entire 5′-terminal 500 residues of the 16 S RNA molecule. When tested individually, neither 12 S-I nor 12 S-II bound S4, S16/S17 or S20. If heated together at 40 °C in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions, however, the two fragments together formed an 8 S complex which associated with S4 alone, with S16/S17 + S20 in combination, and with S4 + S16/S17 + S20 when incubated with an un fractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins. These results imply that each fragment contains part of the corresponding binding sites.     

Location and characteristics of ribosomal protein binding sites in the 16S RNA of Escherichia coli.

Specific binding sites for five proteins of the Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit have been located within the 16S RNA. The sites are structurally diverse and range in size from 40 to 500 nucleotides; their functional integrity appears to depend upon both the secondary structure and conformation of the RNA molecule. Evidence is presented which indicates that additional proteins interact with the RNA at later stages of subunit assembly.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. II. Binding of ribosomal proteins to isolated fragments of the 16 S RNA

Specific fragments of the 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli have been isolated and tested for their ability to interact with proteins of the 30 S ribosomal subunit. The 12 S RNA, a 900-nucleotide fragment derived from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA, was shown to form specific complexes with proteins S4, S8, S15, and S20. The stoichiometry of binding at saturation was determined in each case. Interaction between the 12 S RNA and protein fraction $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was detected in the presence of S4, S8, S15 and S20; only these proteins were able to bind to this fragment, even when all 21 proteins of the 30 S subunit were added to the reaction mixture. Protein S4 also interacted specifically with the 9 S RNA, a fragment of 500 nucleotides that corresponds to the 5′-terminal third of the 16 S RNA, and protein S15 bound independently to the 4 S RNA, a fragment containing 140 nucleotides situated toward the middle of the RNA molecule. None of the proteins interacted with the 600-nucleotide 8 S fragment that arose from the 3′-end of the 16 S RNA.When the 16 S RNA was incubated with an unfractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins at 0 °C, 10 to 12 of the proteins interacted with the ribosomal RNA to form the reconstitution intermediate (RI) particle. Limited hydrolysis of this particle with T₁ ribonuclease yielded 14 S and 8 S subparticles whose RNA components were indistinguishable from the 12 S and 8 S RNAs isolated from digests of free 16 S RNA. The 14 S subparticle contained proteins S6 and S18 in addition to the RNA-binding proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$. The 8 S subparticle contained proteins S7, S9, S13 and S19. These findings serve to localize the sites at which proteins incapable of independent interaction with 16 S RNA are fixed during the early stages of 30 S subunit assembly.     

A method of preparing Escherichia coli 16 S RNA possessing previously unobserved 30 S ribosomal protein binding sites

A method of preparing 16 S RNA has been developed which yields RNA capable of binding specifically at least 12, and possibly 13, 30 S ribosomal proteins. This RNA, prepared by precipitation from 30 S subunits using a mixture of acetic acid and urea, is able to form stable complexes with proteins S3, S5, S9, S12, S13, S18 and possibly S11. In addition, this RNA has not been impaired in its capacity to interact with proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S17 and S20, which are proteins that most other workers have shown to bind RNA prepared by the traditional phenol extraction procedure (Held et al., 1974; Garrett et al., 1971; Schaup et al., 1970,1971).We have applied several criteria of specificity to the binding of proteins to 16 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea method. First, the new set of proteins interacts only with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA and not with 16 S RNA prepared by the phenol method or with 23 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea procedure. Second, 50 S ribosomal proteins do not interact with acetic acidurea 16 S RNA but do bind to 23 S RNA. Third, in the case of protein S9, we have shown that the bound protein co-sediments with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA in a sucrose gradient. Additionally, a saturation binding experiment showed that approximately one mole of protein S9 binds acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA at saturation. Thus, we conclude that the method employed for the preparation of 16 S RNA greatly influences the ability of the RNA to form specific protein complexes. The significance of these results is discussed with regard to the in vitro assembly sequence.     

Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic--RNA interactions.

Two of six mutations at a base-paired site in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA confer resistance to nine different aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo. Chemical probing of mutant and wild-type ribosomes in the presence of paromomycin indicates that interactions between the antibiotic and 16S rRNA in mutant ribosomes are disrupted. The altered interactions measured in vitro correlate precisely with resistance seen in vivo and may be attributable to specific structural changes observed in the mutant rRNA.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 within 16S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli.

Twelve specific alterations have been introduced into the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Appropriate rDNA segments were first cloned into bacteriophage M13 vectors and subjected to bisulfite and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis in vitro. Subsequently, the mutagenized sequences were placed within the rrnB operon of plasmid pNO1301 and the mutant plasmids were used to transform E. coli recipients. The growth rates of cells containing the mutant plasmids were determined and compared with that of cells containing the wild-type plasmid. Only those mutations which occurred at highly conserved positions, or were expected to disrupt the secondary structure of the binding site, increased the doubling time appreciably. The most striking changes in growth rate resulted from mutations that altered a small internal loop within the S8 binding site. This structure is phylogenetically conserved in prokaryotic 16S rRNAs and may play a direct role in S8-16S rRNA recognition and interaction.     

Mutations in the 915 region of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA reduce the binding of streptomycin to the ribosome.

The nine possible single-base substitutions were produced at positions 913 to 915 of the 16S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli, a region known to be protected by streptomycin [Moazed, D. and Noller, H.F. (1987) Nature, 327, 389-394]. When the mutations were introduced into the expression vector pKK3535, only two of them (913A----G and 915A----G) permitted recovery of viable transformants. Ribosomes were isolated from the transformed bacteria and were assayed for their response to streptomycin in poly(U)- and MS2 RNA-directed assays. They were resistant to the stimulation of misreading and to the inhibition of protein synthesis by streptomycin, and this correlated with a decreased binding of the drug. These results therefore demonstrate that, in line with the footprinting studies of Moazed and Noller, mutations in the 915 region alter the interaction between the ribosome and streptomycin.     

The binding of ribosomal protein S4 does not change the gross conformation of the 16 S RNA.

The binding of ribosomal protein S4 to the 16 S RNA does not result in a large shape or conformational change in the 16 S RNA under the conditions of reconstitution. The sedimentation coefficient, frictional coefficient ratio, and effective hydrodynamic radius of the 16 S RNA.protein S4 complex are very similar to those obtained for the 16 S RNA free in solution. Only subtle conformational differences were obtained in the comparison of the complex and free 16 S RNA by circular dichroism. Thus, extensive organization of the 16 S RNA by ribosomal protein S4 is not a step in the process of self-assembly of the 30 S subunit.     

Conformation of B. stearothermophilus 5S ribosomal RNA

The thermal melting of B. stearothermophilus 5S ribosomal RNA was studied, by means of derivative optical absorption and CD spectra, and high performance liquid chromatography, in Tris buffers with K+ and Mg2+ at pH 7.6. Biphasic changes in optical absorption and CD ellipticity were observed, which mean the melting of two helices. Change in molecular size was also examined in the melting process. The melting temperatures depended on ionic strength and concentration of Mg2+. Enhanced stability of the helix was indicated, as compared with the corresponding one in B. subtilis 5S ribosomal RNA. In the presence of a large amount of Mg2+, the third melting process was observed at low temperatures, which was suggested due to change in the tertiary structure.     

Binding sites for ribosomal proteins S8 and S15 in the 16 S RNA of Escherichia coli.

A fragment of the 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli that contains the binding sites for proteins S8 and S15 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit has been isolated and characterized. The RNA fragment, which sediments as 5 S, was partially protected from pancreatic RNAase digestion when S15 alone, or S8 and S15 together, were bound to the 16 S RNA. Purified 5 S RNA was shown to reassociate specifically with protein S15 by analysis of binding stoichiometry. Although interaction between the fragment and protein S8 alone could not be detected, the 5 S RNA selectively bound both S8 and S15 when incubated with an unfractionated mixture of 30-S subunit proteins. Nucleotide sequence analysis demonstrated that the 5 S RNA arises from the middle of the 16 S RNA molecule and encompasses approximately 150 residues from Sections C, C'1 and C'2. Section C consists of a long hairpin loop with an extensively hydrogen-bonded stem and is contiguous with Section C'1. Sections C'1 and C'2, although not contiguous, are highly complementary and it is likely that together they comprise the base-paired stem of an adjacent loop.     

Complementary binding of oligonucleotides with 16S RNA and ribosomal ribonucleoproteins

The accessibility of single-stranded sequences of 16S RNA in free state and in ribonucleoprotein particles (RNP) to complementary binding with isoplith fractions of oligonucleotides was studied. RNP had different protein composition and corresponded to intermediate stages of E. coli 30S subunit assembly in vitro. Gel-filtration was used to detect the most strong binding. It was found that S4 essentially inhibited the hexamer binding to RNA. Core proteins bound to 16S RNA strongly increased the shielding of single-stranded regions while split proteins insignificantly changed the hexamer binding. Nevertheless evidence is presented that split proteins might also interact directly with 16S RNA in the 30S subunit.     

The PRC-barrel domain of the ribosome maturation protein RimM mediates binding to ribosomal protein S19 in the 30S ribosomal subunits

The RimM protein in Escherichia coli is associated with free 30S ribosomal subunits but not with 70S ribosomes. A DeltarimM mutant is defective in 30S maturation and accumulates 17S rRNA. To study the interaction of RimM with the 30S and its involvement in 30S maturation, RimM amino acid substitution mutants were constructed. A mutant RimM (RimM-YY-->AA), containing alanine substitutions for two adjacent tyrosines within the PRC beta-barrel domain, showed a reduced binding to 30S and an accumulation of 17S rRNA compared to wild-type RimM. The (RimM-YY-->AA) and DeltarimM mutants had significantly lower amounts of polysomes and also reduced levels of 30S relative to 50S compared to a wild-type strain. A mutation in rpsS, which encodes r-protein S19, suppressed the polysome- and 16S rRNA processing deficiencies of the RimM-YY-->AA but not that of the DeltarimM mutant. A mutation in rpsM, which encodes r-protein S13, suppressed the polysome deficiency of both rimM mutants. Suppressor mutations, found in either helices 31 or 33b of 16S rRNA, improved growth of both the RimM-YY-->AA and DeltarimM mutants. However, they suppressed the 16S rRNA processing deficiency of the RimM-YY-->AA mutant more efficiently than that of the DeltarimM mutant. Helices 31 and 33b are known to interact with S13 and S19, respectively, and S13 is known to interact with S19. A GST-RimM but not a GST-RimM(YY-->AA) protein bound strongly to S19 in 30S. Thus, RimM likely facilitates maturation of the region of the head of 30S that contains S13 and S19 as well as helices 31 and 33b.     

Identification of Escherichia coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein binding sites on Escherichia coli 5S RNA.

Summary E. coli [³²P]-labelled 5S RNA was complexed with E. coli and B. stearothermophilus 50S ribosomal proteins. Limited T₁ RNase digestion of each complex yielded three major fragments which were analysed for their sequences and rebinding of proteins. The primary binding sites for the E. coli binding proteins were determined to be sequences 18 to 57 for E-L5, 58 to 100 for E-L18 and 101 to 116 for E-L25. Rebinding experiments of purified E. coli proteins to the 5S RNA fragments led to the conclusion that E-L5 and E-L25 have secondary binding sites in the section 58 to 100, the primary binding site for E-L18. Since B. stearothermophilus proteins B-L5 and BL22 were found to interact with sequences 18 to 57 and 58 to 100 it was established that the thermophile proteins recognize and interact with RNA sequences similar to those of E. coli. Comparison of the E. coli 5S RNA sequence with those of other prokaryotic 5S RNAs reveals that the ribosomal proteins interact with the most conserved sections of the RNA.Paper number 12 on structure and function of 5S RNA.Preceding paper: Wrede, P. and Erdmann, V.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 2706–2709 (1977)