C18柱串联冠醚手性柱高效分离3种芳香族氨基酸对映体

将C18柱与手性冠醚柱串联,建立了一种反相高效液相色谱法用于3种芳香族氨基酸对映体同时拆分的方法.考察了反相色谱流动相的组成、pH值、柱温、流速对对映体拆分的影响.实验结果表明,当流动相为HClO4-乙睛溶液(86:14,V/V,pH 2.0)、柱温20℃、流速0.4 mL/min时,3种氨基酸对映体可获得基线分离.进一步对比了C18柱、冠醚手性柱和串联顺序不同的4种分离模式,结果表明,C18柱不能拆分氨基酸对映体,仅能分离不同种类氨基酸;冠醚手性柱可分离氨基酸映体,但不同种类氨基酸色谱峰出现重叠;串联模式能实现3种氨基酸对映体的基线分离,实现双柱优势互补,而串联顺序对分离影响不大,仅影响色谱峰的峰形.     

替考拉宁键合手性固定相高效液相色谱法直接拆分泮托拉唑钠对映体

以替考拉宁为手性选择剂制备了大环抗生素类手性固定相替考拉宁键合手性固定相(T-CSP),建立了T-CSP反相液相色谱直接拆分泮托拉唑钠对映体的方法。考察了流动相中有机改性剂的种类和比例、柱温以及流动相流速对拆分泮托拉唑钠对映体的影响。研究发现,用甲醇作有机改性剂比乙腈更有利于对映体的分离;在研究的温度范围内,随着柱温的升高,对映体的保留时间缩短,同时分离因子和分离度降低;在一定范围内降低流速有利于对映体的分离。采用T-CSP色谱柱(150 mm×4.6 mm i.d.,5 μm),以甲醇-水(体积比为35∶65)为流动相,在流速0.6 mL/min、检测波长290 nm、柱温20 ℃的条件下,泮托拉唑钠对映体获得了近于基线的分离,所建立的方法具有简便快速及重复性好等优点。     

手性流动相HPLC法拆分对羟基苯甘氨酸对映体的研究

将β-环糊精、羟丙基-β-环糊精作为手性流动相添加剂,系统地研究了D,L对羟基苯甘氨酸在RP-HPLC系统中的拆分。分别考察了手性流动相的种类,手性试剂β-环糊精的浓度,流动相的pH,修饰剂的种类及浓度,色谱柱温度等对拆分效果的影响,以-βCD为手性流动相添加剂,建立了-βCD手性流动相分离对羟基苯甘氨酸对映体的方法。结果表明:用ODS柱(250 mm×4.6 mmi.d.),以V(甲醇-β环糊精)∶V(pH 4.5磷酸盐缓冲液)=30∶70为流动相,流速0.2 mL/min,柱温25℃,检测波长为230 nm时对羟基苯甘氨酸对映体得到了良好的基线分离,分离度可达1.71。     

超高效合相色谱法拆分卡多曲对映体研究

利用超高效合相色谱仪(UPC2),建立了卡多曲对映体拆分方法。考察了手性固定相、有机改性剂、动态背压以及柱温对卡多曲对映体分离度的影响。结果表明,卡多曲对映体手性拆分的最佳色谱条件:采用Lux Cellulose-2(2.5μm,2.1 mm×150 mm)手性色谱柱,CO2-甲醇(60:40,V/V)为流动相,等度洗脱,流速为1.0 m L/min,柱温为40℃,动态背压为13.79 MPa,进样量1μL时,卡多曲对映体得到基线分离。     

高效液相色谱手性流动相添加法拆分奥昔布宁对映体

采用C18固定相,以羟丙基-β-环糊精为手性流动相添加剂,建立了奥昔布宁对映体的高效液相色谱拆分方法。考察了手性添加剂、有机极性调节剂、缓冲盐的种类和浓度以及流动相的pH值和流速及柱温等因素对对映体分离的影响。在最佳分离条件下,奥昔布宁对映体的分离度为1.54,检测限为1.0 ng。该方法简便,重复性好,比手性固定相法更加经济。     

异喹啉酸衍生物配体交换色谱手性固定相的制备及应用

合成了2-(2-羟基十六烷基)-(S)-1,2,3,4-四氢-3-异喹啉羧酸手性选择子,并采用动态涂渍方法,制备了一种涂渍于ODS柱上的新型手性配体交换色谱固定相。采用醋酸铜水溶液为流动相,在柱温25℃和UV254nm检测条件下,拆分了16种D,L-氨基酸对映体,其对映体选择性α和分离度Rs分别在1.09~1.67和1.0~4.8之间,并观察到D-异构体在先,L-异构体在后的色谱流出顺序。讨论了柱温、流动相的流速、pH值、Cu2 浓度和NH4 对D,L-氨基酸对映体拆分的影响。     

高效液相色谱手性固定相法拆分阿折地平对映体

建立了阿折地平对映体的高效液相色谱拆分方法。采用Chiralpak AD-H (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5.0 μm, Daicel公司)手性色谱柱在正相条件下直接拆分阿折地平对映体,考察了固定相种类、流动相组成及柱温等对阿折地平对映体分离的影响。确定了最佳的拆分条件: 流动相为正己烷-异丙醇(90:10, v/v),流速为0.8 mL/min,检测波长为254 nm;柱温为20 ℃;在此条件下阿折地平对映体的分离度为3.3。该法简单快速,重现性好。     

大环抗生素手性固定相拆分盐酸马布特罗对映体

基于三种大环抗生素类手性固定相Chirobiotic V,T和R,利用高效液相色谱法对盐酸马布特罗对映体进行了拆分;考察了洗脱模式、流动相组成、柱温等因素对分离的影响,对分离结果进行了比较,对分离机制进行了探讨.结果表明,盐酸马布特罗对映体在Chirobiotic R手性固定相上不能实现分离,在Chirobiotic V和T手性固定相上均可实现较好的基线分离.最佳色谱条件为:新极性有机相模式,流动相甲醇-冰醋酸-三乙胺(100∶0.01∶0.01,V/V/V),流速1.0mL/min,柱温20℃;相应的分离度分别可达3.08和3.73.与此同时,盐酸马布特罗对映体与大环抗生素类固定相之间的离子相互作用是实现对映体分离的最主要分离机制.     

大环糖肽抗生素键合相高效液相色谱法拆分7种氨基带保护基的氨基酸对映体

采用高效液相色谱法在装有大环糖肽抗生素键合相的手性柱上拆分了7种氨基带有芴甲氧羰基(fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl,Fmoc)保护的氨基酸对映体。比较了Fmoc-缬氨酸和相应的不带保护基的缬氨酸对映体在不同流动相体系中的色谱保留行为;考察了甲醇-醋酸-三乙胺流动相体系中醋酸和三乙胺的浓度以及它们二者的浓度之比对N-Fmoc氨基酸对映体拆分效果的影响。实验结果表明分离温度及流动相流速的变化也会对分离结果产生影响。该法简便快速,已成功地用于这类氨基酸的光学纯度测定。     

直链淀粉手性固定相高效液相色谱法拆分比索洛尔对映体

采用直链淀粉手性固定相高效液相色谱法在正相条件下直接拆分了比索洛尔对映异构体。分别以异丙醇、乙醇为有机改性剂,考察了流动相的组成与配比、流速及柱温等因素对比索洛尔对映体分离的影响。确定了比索洛尔对映体的最佳拆分条件:流动相正己烷-乙醇-二乙胺(体积比为88∶12∶0.1),流速0.6 mL/min,检测波长270 nm,柱温20 ℃。该方法可快捷、简便地拆分比索洛尔对映体。     

酸催化的二芳基甲醇脱水环化氧化芳构化直接构筑4-芳基喹啉

我们发展了酸催化的二芳基甲醇的脱水环化氧化芳构化的方法,直接高产率（高达81%）的合成轴手性的4-芳基喹啉.而且,Lewis酸Zn（OTf）₂和手性膦酸都能催化这个反应,初步的不对称研究可以用er 71：29得到产物.     

双手性选择单元手性固定相的研究进展

手性固定相（chiral stationary phase,CSP）作为手性色谱分离的核心技术,在手性化合物的识别和分离中得到广泛应用。以双手性选择单元结合作为CSP是近些年的研究热点,研究表明,两种手性选择单元相结合的CSP可增加手性识别位点,显著提高分离效果。本文介绍了近几年双手性选择单元手性固定相在手性分离中的研究进展,并对其发展前景进行了展望。     

Simultaneous chiral analyses of multiple analytes: case studies, implications and method development considerations

The field of chiral separations had a modest beginning some two decades ago. However, due to rapid technological advancement coupled with simultaneous availability of innovative chiral stationary phases and novel chiral derivatization agents, the field of chiral separations has now totally outpaced many other separation fields. Keeping pace with rapid changes in the field of chiral separations, investigators continue to add stereoselective pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, pharmacologic and toxicological data of new and/or marketed racemic compounds to the literature. Examination of the evolution of chiral separations suggests that in the beginning many investigators attempted to separate and quantify a single pair of enantiomers, adopting either direct (separation made on a chiral stationary phase) or indirect (separation made following precolumn conversion of enantiomers to corresponding diastereomers) approaches. However, more recent trends in chiral separations suggest that investigators are attempting to separate and quantify multiple pairs of enantiomers with available technologies. Added to this, some interesting trends have been observed in many of the recently reported chiral applications, including preferences regarding internal standard selection, mobile phase contents and composition, sorting out issues with mass spectrometric detection, determination of elution order, analytical manipulations of metabolite(s) without reference standards and addressing some specificity-related issues. This review mainly focuses on chiral separations involving multiple chiral analytes and attempts to justify the need for such chiral separations involving multiple analytes. In this context, several cases studies are described on the utility and applicability of such chiral separations under discrete headings to provide an account to the readership on the implications of such tasks. The topics of case studies covered in this review include: (a) therapy markers--differentiation from drug abuse and/or applicability in forensics; (b) role in pharmacogenetic/polymorphic evaluation; (c) monitoring and understanding the role of parent and active metabolite(s) in clinical and preclinical investigations; (d) exploration on the pharmacokinetic utility of an active chiral metabolite vis-a-vis the racemic parent moiety; (e) understanding the chirality play in delineating peculiar toxic effects; (f) exploration of chiral inversion phenomenon, and understanding the role of stereoselective metabolism. For the further benefit of readership, some select examples (n = 19) of the separation of multiple chiral analytes with appropriate information on chromatography, detection system, validation parameters and applicable conclusion are also provided. Finally, the review covers some useful considerations for method development involving multiple chiral analytes.     

16种手性化合物在不同自制手性固定相上的拆分比较

采用高效液相色谱法,在自制的纤维素-三(3,5-二甲基苯基氨基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OD)、纤维素-三(4-甲基苯基氨基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OG)和纤维素-三(4-甲基苯基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OJ)3种手性柱上对16种不同结构的手性化合物进行了拆分和比较.试验结果表明:16个手性样品在这3种手性固定相上分别获得了不同程度的拆分,A TEO-OD对所分析样品具有更好的手性识别能力,ATEO-OG和ATEO-OJ的手性识别能力相当.     

Last ten years (2008–2018) of chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography in HPLC: An updated review

Chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography is one of the elective strategies for the direct enantioresolution of small chelating compounds: amino acids, diamines, amino alcohols, diols, small peptides, etc. Unlike other methods, the interaction between chiral selector and analyte enantiomers is mediated by a cation, thus producing diastereomeric ternary complexes. Two main approaches are conventionally applied in chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography. The first relies upon chiral stationary phases where the chiral selector is either covalently immobilized or physically adsorbed onto suitable packing materials (coated phases). In the second approach, chiral molecules are added to the eluent, thus generating chiral eluent systems. Among the advantages of chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography, the generation of UV/vis‐active metal complexes, and the use of commercially available or easy‐to‐synthesize chiral selectors, in combination to rather inexpensive achiral columns for coated phases and chiral eluents, are noteworthy. Besides amino acids and amino alcohols, other species have proven suitable for chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography applications. Recently, the use of either chiral ionic liquids or micellar liquid chromatography systems as well as the successful off‐column formation of diastereomeric complexes have expanded the selectivity profiles and application fields. All of these issues are touched in the review, shedding light to the contributions appeared in the last decade.     

环境中手性污染物对映体分析方法的研究进展

手性污染物对映体尽管具有相似的物理化学性质,但在环境中的吸附、转移、降解等过程往往存在一定差异。生态安全问题与人类健康密切相关,因此,对手性环境污染物进行对映体水平上的分离分析是十分重要的研究课题。目前,国内外对环境中的手性污染物已开展了相关研究,然而全面评述相关分析测定方法的新进展鲜有报道。本文主要对环境中手性污染物的种类以及近5年环境中手性污染物的分析检测技术如液相色谱-质谱联用法、气相色谱-质谱联用法、毛细管电泳法、超临界流体色谱-质谱联用法等进行了归纳、综述和展望,为后续手性污染物的分析检测提供依据和参考。     

手性2-(口恶)唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法

在无溶剂条件下,手性的β-氨基醇和脲在160-180℃反应0．5-1 h,在200℃反应0．5 h,高产率地获得手性噁唑烷酮。     

手性2-噁唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法

手性2-噁唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法;手性氨基醇;脲;手性噁唑烷酮     

Methods of studies on quantitative structure–activity relationships for chiral compounds

Chiral compounds are very important in drug development, organic synthesis, materials science, toxicology, or environmental chemistry. Therefore, for creating new drugs, several methods have been suggested in recent years. In several laboratories in the world, some new methods for the derivations of the parameters were constructed and used for studies on quantitative structure–activity/property relationships of chiral molecules. The algorithms reviewed in this paper involve Zargeb group chiral indices, chiral molecular connectivity index, chiral topological charge index, chiral A_m index, chiral indices based on the matrixes, chiral indices based on chiral product, conformation‐independent chirality code, conformation‐dependent chirality code, quantitative two‐dimensional chirality degrees of benzenoids, and so on. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.