Three-dimensional evaluation of heel raise test in pediatric planovalgus feet and normal feet

Planovalgus foot is a common pediatric deformity which may be associated with pain. To evaluate flexibility of the foot, the heel raise test is used. During this test the arch and hindfoot are assessed. Several studies have described planovalgus foot based on 3D gait and standing analysis. However, no studies have evaluated foot flexibility during heel raise using an objective 3D analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the flexibility of planovalgus feet during the heel raise test using an objective 3D assessment and to determine whether any hypotheses can be generated about potential differences between painful and painless flexible planovalgus feet and reference feet.Here, 3D foot analysis was conducted in 33 children (7 reference feet, 16 painless, and 10 painful flexible planovalgus feet) during the heel raise test. To identify the characteristics of planovalgus foot, the concept of 3D projection angles was used as introduced in the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method (HFMM), with a modified marker set.All feet showed dynamic movements of the medial arch and hindfoot from valgus to varus position during heel raise. Reference feet had the smallest range of motion, perhaps due to joint stability and absence of foot deformity. Painful and painless flexible planovalgus feet demonstrated similar movements. No significant differences were found between the painful and painless groups. However, the kinematics of the pain group seemed to differ more from those of the reference group than did kinematics of the painless group.This assessment is a new, practical, and objective method to measure the flexibility of small children's feet.     

Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex

BackgroundThe demonstration of the relationship between midfoot passive mechanical resistance and foot pronation during gait may guide the development of assessment and intervention methods to modify foot motion during gait and to alter midfoot passive mechanical resistance.Research questionIs foot pronation during the stance phase of gait related to the midfoot passive mechanical resistance to inversion?MethodsThe resistance torque and stiffness provided by midfoot soft tissues of 33 participants (21 females and 12 males) with average of 26.21 years were measured. In addition, the participants’ forefoot and rearfoot kinematic data during the stance phase of gait were collected with the Qualisys System (Oqus 7+). Correlation Coefficients were calculated to test the association between kinematic variables representing pronation (forefoot-rearfoot inversion, forefoot-rearfoot dorsiflexion and rearfoot-shank eversion) and maximum resistance torque and maximum stiffness of the midfoot with α = 0.05.ResultsReduced maximum midfoot resistance torque was moderately associated with increased forefoot-rearfoot inversion peak (p = 0.029; r = 0.38), with forefoot-rearfoot dorsiflexion peak (p = 0.048; r = −0.35) and with rearfoot-shank eversion peak (p = 0.008; r = −0.45). Maximum midfoot stiffness was not associated to foot pronation.SignificanceThe smaller the midfoot resistance torque, the greater the forefoot-rearfoot inversion and dorsiflexion peaks and the rearfoot-shank eversion peak during gait. The findings suggest the existence of a relationship between foot pronation and midfoot passive mechanical resistance. Thus, changes in midfoot passive mechanical resistance may affect foot pronation during gait.     

Cluster analysis to identify foot motion patterns in children with flexible flatfeet using gait analysis—A statistical approach to detect decompensated pathology?

IntroductionThe paediatric flexible flatfoot constitutes the major cause of clinic visits for orthopaedic foot problems. It shows variations of deformities in different planes and locations of the foot and its indication for treatment have been extensively discussed. Despite its high prevalence there exists no classification of flatfeet during walking as a prerequisite for treatment decision. Therefore, the aim of this study is to classify flexible flatfeet based on 3D foot kinematics during walking.MethodsPatients age 7–17 years with flexible flatfeet (N = 129, 255 feet) of non-neurogenic or syndromic origin, were retrospectively included. Patients underwent gait analysis using the Oxford Foot Model after standard clinical examination. A k-means cluster analysis was performed on 3 scores derived from the principal component analysis of the foot kinematic waveforms over the gait cycle. Gait and clinical parameters were then statistically tested between clusters.ResultsCluster analysis revealed two groups of flexible flatfeet that were discriminated best by the inversion at push-off during walking. Cluster 2, including 110 feet, showed an average eversion instead of an inversion at push-off and a lower number of heel rises in the clinical test. Both was significantly different between clusters (p < 0.001).DiscussionBased on the findings, the resultant clusters can be interpreted as describing compensated and decompensated feet, with the latter presenting a group that may require surgical interventions, even if they are not yet present with pain. The hindfoot inversion capability at push-off is the most important variable in the 3D gait analysis to classify flexible flat feet.     

A comparison of subtalar joint motion during anticipated medial cutting turns and level walking using a multi-segment foot model

The weight-bearing in-vivo kinematics and kinetics of the talocrural joint, subtalar joint and joints of the foot were quantified using optical motion analysis. Twelve healthy subjects were studied during level walking and anticipated medial turns at self-selected pace. A multi-segment model of the foot using skin-mounted marker triads tracked four foot segments: the hindfoot, midfoot, lateral and medial forefoot. The lower leg and thigh were also tracked. Motion between each of the segments could occur in three degrees of rotational freedom, but only six inter-segmental motions were reported in this study: (1) talocrural dorsi-plantar-flexion, (2) subtalar inversion–eversion, (3) frontal plane hindfoot motion, (4) transverse plane hindfoot motion, (5) forefoot supination–pronation twisting and (6) the height-to-length ratio of the medial longitudinal arch.The motion at the subtalar joint during stance phase of walking (eversion then inversion) was reversed during a turning task (inversion then eversion). The external subtalar joint moment was also changed from a moderate eversion moment during walking to a larger inversion moment during the turn. The kinematics of the talocrural joint and the joints of the foot were similar between these two tasks.During a medial turn, the subtalar joint may act to maintain the motions in the foot and talocrural joint that occur during level walking. This is occurring despite the conspicuously different trajectory of the centre of mass of the body. This may allow the foot complex to maintain its function of energy absorption followed by energy return during stance phase that is best suited to level walking.     

Children’s school footwear: The impact of fit on foot function,comfort and jump performance in children aged 8 to 12 years

BackgroundThere is a common perception that poorly fitting footwear will negatively impact a child’s foot, however, there is limited evidence to support this.AimTo determine the effect of shoe size on foot motion, perceived footwear comfort and fit during walking, maximal vertical jump height and maximal standing broad jump distance in children aged 8–12 years.MethodsFourteen participants completed 3D walking gait analysis and jumping tasks in three different sizes of school shoes (one size bigger, fitted for size, one size smaller). In-shoe motion of the hindfoot, midfoot and 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) were calculated using a multi-segment kinematic foot model. Physical performance measures were calculated via maximal vertical jump and maximal standing broad jump. Perceived footwear comfort and fit (heel, toes and overall) was assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Differences were compared between shoe sizes using repeated measures ANOVA, post-hoc tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d).ResultsCompared to the fitted footwear, the smaller sizing restricted hindfoot eversion (−2.5°, p = 0.021, d = 0.82), 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion (−3.9°, p = 0.012, d = 0.54), and compared to the bigger footwear, smaller sizing restricted sagittal plane midfoot range-of-motion during walking (−2.5°, p = 0.047, d = 0.59). The fitted footwear was rated as more comfortable overall with the smaller size rated as too tight in both the heel (mean difference 11.5 mm, p = 0.042, d = 0.58) and toes (mean difference 12.1 mm, p = 0.022, d = 0.59), compared to the fitted size. Vertical and standing broad jump distance were not impacted by footwear size (p = 0.218−0.836).SignificanceFootwear that is too small restricts foot motion during walking in children aged 8–12 years. Jump performance was not affected. Children were able to recognise shoes that were not correctly matched to their foot length, reinforcing that comfort is an important part of the fitting process.     

Segmental kinematic analysis of planovalgus feet during walking in children with cerebral palsy

Pes planovalgus (flatfoot) is a common deformity among children with cerebral palsy. The Milwaukee Foot Model (MFM), a multi-segmental kinematic foot model, which uses radiography to align the underlying bony anatomy with reflective surface markers, was used to evaluate 20 pediatric participants (30 feet) with planovalgus secondary to cerebral palsy prior to surgery. Three-dimensional kinematics of the tibia, hindfoot, forefoot, and hallux segments are reported and compared to an age-matched control set of typically-developing children. Most results were consistent with known characteristics of the deformity and showed decreased plantar flexion of the forefoot relative to hindfoot, increased forefoot abduction, and decreased ranges of motion during push-off in the planovalgus group. Interestingly, while forefoot characteristics were uniformly distributed in a common direction in the transverse plane, there was marked variability of forefoot and hindfoot coronal plane and hindfoot transverse plane positioning. The key finding of these data was the radiographic indexing of the MFM was able to show flat feet in cerebral palsy do not always demonstrate more hindfoot eversion than the typically-developing hindfoot. The coronal plane kinematics of the hindfoot show cases planovalgus feet with the hindfoot in inversion, eversion, and neutral. Along with other metrics, the MFM can be a valuable tool for monitoring kinematic deformity, facilitating clinical decision making, and providing a quantitative analysis of surgical effects on the planovalgus foot.     

Kinematic differences in the presentation of recurrent congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)

BackgroundThe tibialis anterior tendon transfer (TATT) is the suggested surgical intervention in the Ponseti method for treatment of dynamic recurrent congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) presenting as hindfoot varus and forefoot supination during the swing phase of gait. The indication for surgery, however, is typically based on visual assessment, which does not sufficiently examine the variability of foot motion in this cohort.Research questionThe aim of this research was to determine whether subgroups, based on foot model kinematics, existed within a clubfoot cohort being considered for TATT surgery.MethodsSixteen children with recurrent clubfoot that had been previously treated with the Ponseti method and were being considered for tendon transfer surgery were prospectively recruited for this study and were required to attend a pre-surgery data collection session at the Queensland Children’s Motion Analysis Service (QCMAS). Data collected included standard Plug-in-Gait (PiG) kinematics and kinetics, Oxford Foot Model (OFM) foot kinematics, and regional plantar loads based on anatomical masking using the integrated kinematic-pressure method.ResultsResults of this study identified two clear subgroups within the cohort. One group presented with increased hindfoot inversion across 91 % of the gait cycle. The second group presented with increased hindfoot adduction across 100 % of the gait cycle. Hindfoot adduction was statistically significantly different between the two groups.SignificanceThe identification of these two groups propose a need for further classification of deformity within this cohort and query the appropriateness of this surgical intervention for both presentations.     

Estimation of a midfoot joint center in typically developed adults using functional calibration methods

BackgroundThere are detailed findings on hip and knee joint parameters determined via functional calibration methods for use in instrumented 3D-gait analysis but these methods have not yet been addressed to the foot.Research questionAre functional calibration methods feasible for determining foot joint parameters and may they help for clinical interpretation of foot deformities?MethodsRigid segments were formed by markers on forefoot and hindfoot via a least square method. The position of the midfoot joint articulating both foot segments was then determined via a functional calibration motion. This two-stage procedure was applied on a cohort of 17 typically developed adults and one subject with severe planovalgus foot deformity for determining the location of the midfoot joint and kinematics of hindfoot and forefoot.ResultsThe position of the midfoot joint center could be estimated in the typically developed cohort and also in the demonstration case with planovalgus foot deformity. Depending on the choice of marker set for hindfoot and forefoot, the position of the joint center varied in the anatomic midfoot region with most robust results when addressing the marker on the navicular to the hindfoot.ConclusionThe presented method for joint center determination within the foot and the characteristic results of the foot joint angles appear promising for typically developed feet. However, further validation of the method is needed for application in clinical context.     

Does an overcorrected clubfoot caused by surgery or by the Ponseti method behave differently?

BackgroundOvercorrection is a recognized problem following surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot. Recently this complication has also been mentioned following Ponseti treatment.Research questionDo overcorrected clubfeet (OCCF) caused by surgery behave differently from those caused by Ponseti treatment in terms of segmental motion of the feet and show differences in the severity of deformity on X-rays?MethodsChildren between 7 and 12 years with OCCF were included in this study. Depending on the aetiology causing them, the feet were divided into 2 groups (Ponseti and peritalar release surgery). 25 typically developing children served as controls. All subjects were subjected to clinical and radiological examination and 3-Dimensional gait analysis using the Oxford Foot Model.ResultsThirty-two children with OCCF, of these 18 feet in the surgical and 14 feet in the Ponseti group, were included in the study. No radiological differences were seen in the flatfoot parameters between OCCF groups except in the calcaneal inclination angle that was more pathological in the Ponseti group. The clinical ankle plantar flexion was significantly reduced in the surgical group. During walking the range motion of the hindfoot in the frontal plane was significantly reduced in surgically treated feet compared to the Ponseti group. The other parameters did not show any significant difference between groups.SignificanceThe overcorrected clubfeet following surgery and Ponseti showed similar appearance and showed no significant differences in 11/12 radiological parameters. The segmental motion of the feet showed no significant differences between groups except the in the range of motion of the subtalar eversion. A considerable subtalar joint motion was present even in the surgical group. These findings might help plan the treatment of these feet.     

Treatment of spastic varus/ equinovarus foot with split-tendon transfers in cerebral palsy: How does it affect the hindfoot motion?

IntroductionThe flexible spastic varus foot in cerebral palsy is commonly corrected by split-tendon transfer of tibialis anterior or tibialis posterior. These tendon transfers are said to preserve hindfoot motion, which is until now not been proven. Therefore, the aim of the study was to show the hindfoot motion following split-tendon transfer in comparison to a midtarsal arthrodesis.Materials and methodsA retrospective study was done on patients with flexible spastic varus foot in cerebral palsy who underwent a combined split-tendon transfer of tibialis anterior and posterior. Patients with a rigid foot deformity underwent a midfoot arthrodesis. These children and normal children served as controls. An instrumented gait analysis was done in all patients before and at follow-up. A statistical analysis was done using 2-factor ANOVA with repeated measures on time.ResultsThirteen children underwent a combined split-tendon transfers of tibialis anterior and posterior muscles and 14 children midtarsal arthrodesis. The mean follow-up was 2.4 (SD=0.8) years for flexible varus foot and 1.9 (SD=0.7) years for rigid foot deformity. The preoperative hindfoot range of motion in eversion-inversion was 54% and 49% of TD controls in flexible varus foot and rigid foot deformity respectively. At follow-up, it reduced further to 45% and 42% of TD controls in the respective groups.ConclusionBoth flexible and rigid hindfoot deformity reduced the hindfoot motion. However following surgery, the hindfoot motion reduced further and was identical in both groups independent of the type of surgery. This indicates a tenodesis-effect of split-tendon transfers on the hindfoot.     

The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back

The purpose of this study was first to investigate whether foot pronation (measured as calcaneal eversion) induced an anterior tilt of the pelvis and increased the degree of lumbar lordosis. Second the study investigated whether foot supination (measured as calcaneal inversion) induced a posterior pelvic tilt and a decreased lumbar lordosis. Participants placed their feet in 18 different foot positions while standing on a rigid platform. Seven of these positions ranged from 15 degrees of foot eversion to 15 degrees of foot inversion and 11 positions ranged from 40 degrees of external foot rotation to 40 degrees of internal foot rotation. Pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis were estimated using a 3D motion analysis system. Foot pronation and supination did not have a significant relationship with pelvic tilt (r=0.3) and lumbar lordosis (r=0.05). Internally rotating the legs caused the pelvis to tilt anteriorly and externally rotating the legs caused the pelvis to tilt posteriorly (r=0.58). There was no relationship between leg rotation and lumbar lordosis (r=0.24). Since the effects of pelvic tilt on the lumbar spine were only noticeable when pelvic tilt was exaggerated beyond values seen this study it seems unlikely that there is a link between induced foot pronation and an increase in lumbar lordosis.     

Flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity

Background: Flatfoot deformity is thought to affect gait kinematics, but the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait remains unclear. Recently, multi-segmental foot models (MFMs) have been introduced for the in vivo analysis of dynamic foot kinematics. The objective of this study was to find the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait in females by comparisons with age and gender controlled healthy adults.Methods: Thirty six symptomatic flatfeet patients (52–80 years old) and 42 symptom-free female participants without flatfoot (60–69 years old) were included in this study. According to the Meary angle (MA) on standing lateral radiograph, flatfoot patients are divided into severe (SFF, MA>20°) and moderate (MFF, 10°<MA<20°) flatfoot group. Segmental foot kinematics were evaluated using a 3D MFM of a 15-marker set (DuPont Foot Model).Results: The cadence, speed, stride length, and step width are significantly lower in flatfoot patients. ROM of sagittal and transverse plane of the hindfoot, transverse plane of the forefoot and sagittal plane of the hallux were lower in severe flatfoot group. In the SFF group, there was loss of hindfoot adduction motion during the terminal stance and pre-swing phase. In forefoot kinematics, the SFF group showed significantly supinated and abducted position throughout the gait cycle. In hindfoot kinematics, plantar flexion motion in the pre-swing phase was significantly lower in flatfoot patients in proportion to the severity of the deformity.Conclusions: We showed that flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity. We cautiously suggest that there might be a threshold of flatfoot precluding normal foot kinematics because normal kinematic pattern of the foot might not collapse in moderate flatfoot with a Meary angle of less than 20 degrees.     

Reliability of isokinetic ankle inversion- and eversion-strength measurement in neutral foot position, using the Biodex dynamometer

This study was designed to investigate the intratester and intertester reliability of isokinetic ankle inversion and eversion-strength measurement in neutral foot position in healthy adults using the Biodex dynamometer. Twenty-five men and women performed five maximal concentric contractions at 60 and 180°/s angular velocities. Two physicians tested each subject. The first physician applied the test four times, and the second physician three times. Reliability of peak torque was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). At both angular velocities, inversion strength was greater than eversion, and when the angular velocity was increased, inversion and eversion strength were decreased, as tested by both physicians. The first measurements of inversion and eversion strength of the first physician were significantly lower than the other measurements (p<0.01). The intratester ICCs for ankle inversion in healthy young adults were highly reliable (ICC 0.92–0.96), and for the eversion values ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Intertester ICCs for ankle inversion and eversion peak torque values demonstrated a value of 0.95. Isokinetic tests of ankle inversion and eversion strength at 60 and 180°/s angular velocities in neutral foot position for healthy adults are highly reliable with the Biodex dynamometer.     

Decreased foot inversion force and increased plantar surface after maximal incremental running exercise

Formulating the hypothesis that a maximal running exercise could induce fatigue of some foot muscles, we searched for electromyographic (EMG) signs of fatigue in the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscles. We also searched for post-exercise alterations of the stationary upright standing in normal-arched feet subjects.Healthy subjects performed a maximal running exercise. Surface EMGs of the TA, PL, and GM muscles were analysed during maximal dynamic efforts. Before and after the running bout, we measured the evoked compound muscle potential (M-wave) in TA, the maximal force into inversion (MIF), and the repartition of the plantar and barycentre surfaces with a computerised stationary platform.During maximal running exercise, the median frequency of the EMG spectra declined in TA while it remained stable in the PL and GM muscles. After the exercise, MIF decreased, and both the rearfoot plantar surface and the barycentre surface increased.We concluded that a maximal running bout elicits EMG signs of fatigue, though only in the TA muscle. It also elicits post-exercise changes in the foot position during stationary upright standing which indicates a foot eversion. These data solely concern a maximal running test and they can not be extrapolated to walking or running at a low speed.     

Biomechanical effects of three types of foot orthoses in individuals with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction

BackgroundPosterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) is characterized by degeneration of this tendon leading to a flattening of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Foot orthoses (FOs) can be used as a treatment option, but their biomechanical effects on individuals with PTTD are not yet fully understood.Research questionThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three types of FOs on gait biomechanics in individuals with PTTD.MethodsFourteen individuals were recruited with painful stage 1 or 2 PTTD based on Johnson and Strom’s classification. Quantitative gait analysis of the affected limb was performed in four conditions: shoes only (Shoe), prefabricated FO (PFO), neutral custom FO (CFO) and custom varus FO (CVFO) with a 5° medial wedge and a 4 mm medial heel skive. A curve analysis, using 1D statistical parametric mapping, was undertaken to assess differences in lower limb joint motion, joint moments and muscle activity over the stance phase of gait across conditions.ResultsDecreased hindfoot eversion angles, decreased ankle inversion moments and increased ankle eversion moments were observed with custom FOs compared to the Shoe and PFO conditions (p < 0.001). CFOs and CVFOs induced an increased knee abduction moment compared to Shoe (p < 0.001). No changes in hip kinematics and kinetics or in EMG activity of tested muscles were observed between conditions.SignificanceCustom orthoses may be more suitable than PFOs to decrease the pathological biomechanical outcomes observed in PTTD. Decreased ankle inversion moments during the stance phase could explain why custom orthoses are effective at reducing pain in PTTD patients. However, clinicians should be careful when prescribing custom orthoses for PTTD since unwanted collateral biomechanical effects can be observed at the knee.     

Influence of foot posture on immediate biomechanical responses during walking to variable-stiffness supported lateral wedge insole designs

BackgroundNovel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support can alter walking biomechanics as a conservative treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. However, variations in foot posture may influence individual responses to insole intervention and these effects are not yet known.Research questionHow does foot posture influence biomechanical responses to novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support?MethodsThis exploratory biomechanical investigation categorized forty healthy volunteers (age 23–34) into pronated (n = 16), neutral (n = 15), and supinated (n = 9) foot posture groups based on the Foot Posture Index. Three-dimensional gait analysis was conducted during walking with six orthotic insole conditions: flat control, lateral wedge, uniform-stiffness arch support, variable-stiffness arch support, and lateral wedge + each arch support. Frontal plane knee and ankle/subtalar joint kinetic and kinematic outcomes were compared among insole conditions and foot posture groups using a repeated measures analysis of variance.ResultsThe lateral wedge alone and lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support were the only insole conditions effective at reducing the knee adduction moment. However, the lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support had a smaller increase in peak ankle/subtalar eversion moment than the lateral wedge alone. Supinated feet had smaller ankle/subtalar eversion excursion and moment impulse than neutral and pronated feet, across all insole conditions.SignificanceSupinated feet have less mobile ankle/subtalar joints than neutral and pronated feet and, as a result, may be less likely to respond to biomechanical intervention from orthotic insoles. Supported lateral wedge insoles incorporating an arch support design that is variable-stiffness may be better than uniform-stiffness since reductions in the knee adduction moment can be achieved while minimizing increases in the ankle/subtalar eversion moment.     

Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults

BackgroundThe Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and Rizzoli Foot Model (RFM) are the two most frequently used multi-segment models to measure foot kinematics. However, a comprehensive comparison of the kinematic output of these models is lacking.Research questionWhat are the differences in kinematic output between OFM and RFM during normal gait and typical pathological gait patterns in healthy adults?.MethodsA combined OFM and RFM marker set was placed on the right foot of ten healthy subjects. A static standing trial and six level walking trials were collected for normal gait and for four voluntarily adopted gait types: equinus, crouch, toe-in and toe-out. Joint angles were calculated for every trial for the hindfoot relative to shank (HF-SH), forefoot relative to hindfoot (FF-HF) and hallux relative to forefoot (HX-FF). Average static joint angles of both models were compared between models. After subtracting these offsets, the remaining dynamic angles were compared using statistical parametric mapping repeated measures ANOVAs and t-tests. Furthermore, range of motion was compared between models for every angle.ResultsFor the static posture, RFM compared to OFM measured more plantar flexion (Δ = 6°) and internal rotation (Δ = 7°) for HF-SH, more plantar flexion (Δ = 34°) and inversion (Δ = 13°) for FF-HF and more dorsal flexion (Δ = 37°) and abduction (Δ = 12°) for HX-FF. During normal walking, kinematic differences were found in various parts of the gait cycle. Moreover, range of motion was larger in the HF-SH for OFM and in FF-HF and HX-FF for RFM. The differences between models were not the same for all gait types. Equinus and toe-out gait demonstrated most pronounced differences.SignificanceDifferences are present in kinematic output between OFM and RFM, which also depend on gait type. Therefore, kinematic output of foot and ankle studies should be interpreted with careful consideration of the multi-segment foot model used.     

Validity and reproducibility of foot motion analysis using a stretch strain sensor

BackgroundMulti-segment foot analysis is traditionally challenging to perform while subjects are wearing footwear or a foot orthosis and is difficult to apply in the clinical setting. A recently developed stretch strain sensor (STR), that is thin and highly flexible, may solve this limitation because it does not require observation using a camera and is highly portable.Research questionThis study aimed to examine the reproducibility and validity of foot motion analysis using the STR during walking and running by comparing it with a conventional motion capture system.MethodsTwenty-one healthy participants were examined in this study. The STR was placed on the participant's foot in one of two locations in separate experiments (spring ligament; SL and navicular drop; ND methods). Foot kinematic data during walking and running were simultaneously recorded using the STR and a three-dimensional motion capture system. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reproducibility of the STR method. Cross-correlation coefficient evaluated the similarity of the pattern of the signals between the two systems. Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between the STR measurement and angular excursion of the forefoot or hindfoot.ResultsThe ICCs of the SL method were 0.95 and 0.96, and those of the ND method were 0.93 and 0.71 during walking and running, respectively. In the SL method, the pattern of the signals between the STR and forefoot frontal motion was strongly correlated. The STR measurement was significantly correlated with forefoot eversion excursion (walking: r=-0.67, running: r=-0.64, p < 0.01 each). In the ND method, the STR signal was not associated with forefoot and hindfoot kinematics.SignificanceOur results showed that the STR has acceptable reproducibility and validity of foot motion analysis. This system may enable measurement of foot motion while subjects are wearing shoes and outside the laboratory.     

Kinematic foot types in youth with pes planovalgus secondary to cerebral palsy

BackgroundKinematic variability of the foot and ankle segments exists during ambulation among individuals with pes planovalgus (PPV) secondary to cerebral palsy (CP). Clinicians have previously recognized such variability through classification schemes to identify subgroups of individuals, but have been unable to identify kinematic foot types.Research questionThe purpose of this work was to identify kinematic foot types among children with PPV secondary to CP using 3-dimensional multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics during gait as inputs for principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means cluster analysis.MethodsIn a single assessment session, multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics using the Milwaukee Foot Model (MFM) were collected in 31 children/adolescents with pes planovalgus (49 feet) and 16 typically developing (TD) children/adolescents (31 feet). PCA was used as a data reduction technique on 34 kinematic variables. K-means cluster analysis was performed on the identified principal components (PCs) and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was done to determine the effect of subgroup membership on PC scores.ResultsThe PCA reduced the kinematic variables to seven PCs which accounted for 91% of the total variance. Six distinct kinematic foot types were identified by the cluster analysis. The foot types showed unique kinematic characteristics in both the hindfoot and forefoot.SignificanceThis study provides further evidence of kinematic variability in the foot and ankle during ambulation associated with pes planovalgus secondary to CP. The specific contributions of the hindfoot and forefoot would not have been detected using a single segment foot model. The identification of kinematic foot types with unique foot and ankle characteristics has the potential to improve treatment since patients within a foot type are likely to benefit from similar intervention(s).