极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

目的 研究极低出生体质量儿闪光刺激视觉诱发电位(FVEP)检测的临床意义.方法 应用英国Oxford公司Medelecsynergy诱发电位仪对43例极低出生体质量儿进行FVEP检测,并选择56例正常足月儿做对照.结果 极低出生体质量儿N1、P1、N2波潜伏期值分别为(181.43±26.73)ms、(217.27±26.54)ms、(249.21±26.49)ms,足月儿分别为(159.51±18.27)ms、(200.26±13.94)ms、(231.56±5.72)ms,两组比较差异有显著性(P＜0.05,P＜0.001).极低出生体质量儿P1波的异常率为75.6%,足月儿为0.极低出生体质量儿P1波异常相关影响因素的主效应模型为3.898-2.861颅内病变,颅内病变是独立影响因素(OR=0.057,95%CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).结论 极低出生体质量儿FVEP检测P1波异常率高,FVEP异常改变与颅内病变关系密切.极低出生体质量儿在生后1个月内和矫正胎龄42周后至少进行两次FVEP检查,动态观察FVEP改变.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.     

极低出生体质量儿闪光视觉诱发电位检测的临床意义

Objective To study the clinical significance of flash visual evoked potential(FVEP)detection in very low birth weight infants.Methods FVEP was performed in group of 43 very low birth weight infants with Medelecsynergy evoked potential instrument(Oxford Company,UK) comparing with the group of 56 term infants.Results The mean latency periods of N1,P1 and N2 waves in very low birth weight infant group were(181.43±26.73) ms,(217.27±26.54) ms,(249.21±26.49) ms respectively,while in term infant group were(159.51±18.27) ms,(200.26±13.94) ms,(231.56±15.72) ms.There were significant differences between two groups(P＜0.05,P＜0,001).The abnormal rates of main wave P1 were 75.6% and 0 respectively in very low birth weight infant group and term infant group.Furthermore,the major effect model for related influencing factors in very low birth weight infants with abnormal main wave was 3.898-2.861 intracranial lesion.Intracranial lesion was the independent risk factor for abnormal FVEP (0R=0.057,95% CI 0.006～0.579,P=0.015).Conclusion The abnormal rate of FVEP is higher in the very low birth weight infants,which is closely related to the intraeranial lesion.It is recomraended that FVEP is detected at least twice in the first month after birth or achieving the corrected gestational age of 42 weeks for dynamic observation.