Outflow block secondary to stenosis of the inferior vena cava following living-donor liver transplantation?

Although it is well known that outflow block is caused by stenosis or occlusion of hepatic vein anastomoses following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there have been few reports on inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis following LDLT. In this paper, we report two cases of IVC stenosis and hepatic vein outflow block following right hepatic LDLT in the absence of stenosis of any of the anastomoses. Both patients presented with liver dysfunction, an ascitic fluid volume of approximately 2000 mL, and congestion in their biopsy specimens, and venocavography demonstrated IVC stenosis with gradients of more than 10 mmHg in patients with a dominant inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) anastomosis. After a Gianturco expandable metallic stent successfully implanted in the IVC, the patient's liver function recovered and the volume of ascitic fluid decreased. The pathogenesis of hepatic vein outflow block secondary to IVC stenosis following LDLT may involve the anastomosis with the IRHV, which is the dominant draining vein of the graft and larger than the RHV, caudal to the IVC stenosis and a significant IVC pressure gradient that results in increased IRHV pressure. In conclusion, it is important to include hepatic vein outflow block in the differential diagnosis when patients who have undergone right hepatic LDLT in which anastomosis of the large IRHV has been performed develop manifestations of liver dysfunction.     

Should the inferior vena cava be reconstructed after resection for malignant tumors?

BACKGROUND: Caval replacement after circumferential resection of the inferior vena cava remains controversial. The aim of the current study is to determine whether or not inferior vena cava replacement should be performed. METHODS: We reviewed 36 cases undergoing resection of the inferior vena cava concomitant with resection of malignant neoplasms. Our criteria for circumferential resection of the inferior vena cava were half or more of the circumference of the vessel wall invaded by tumor, a primary tumor of the caval wall, or massive intraluminal tumor thrombus suspected of adhering to the caval wall. We detailed 10 patients undergoing circumferential resection of the inferior vena cava. RESULTS: Most of patients who did not undergo replacement of the inferior vena cava showed no sign of swelling of the lower limbs, but one showed persistent leg edema with oliguria. This patient had poor development of collateral circulation and mild obstruction of the inferior vena cava before surgery. Two patients who underwent replacement of inferior vena cava had no venous sequelae, although they had poor development of collateral circulation before surgery. CONCLUSION: Caval replacement after circumferential resection of the inferior vena cava may be necessary in patients who have preoperative poor development of collateral circulation or who have oliguria or unstable hemodynamics intraoperatively.     

Who decides? Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Few effective treatment options are available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Some transplant centers have begun offering living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for selected patients whose HCC exceeds Milan criteria by a small margin. However, this remains a controversial subject. In this article, we weigh the arguments for and against LDLT for advanced HCC. Because donor autonomy forms the crux of this dilemma, the real question becomes: to whom does the decision belong, the individual donors or the medical community? We argue that donor autonomy should not be paramount in settings where the recipient benefit is uncertain.     

Acute Budd–Chiari syndrome due to a simple liver cyst

Simple liver cysts are common, rarely causing significant morbidity or mortality. Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) is caused by obstruction of hepatic venous outflow and is the leading cause of postsinusoidal liver failure. We present a rare case of BCS caused by a simple hepatic cyst.A 16cm × 16cm liver cyst was found on computed tomography of a 66-year-old woman presenting with abdominal pain. The cyst had become infected, thus enlarged, exerting mass effect with almost complete compression of the inferior vena cava. Shortly after admission, the patient developed acute liver failure, with deranged clotting and hepatic encephalopathy requiring full organ support on the intensive care unit. Cardiac output studies showed a low cardiac index of 1.4l/min/m².An emergency laparotomy with fenestration of the cyst and drainage of 2l of purulent material led to a full recovery. Intraoperative cystic fluid aspirates later confirmed no evidence of Echinococcus. Histology confirmed a simple cyst. Liver biopsies showed severe, confluent, bridging necrosis, without background parenchymal liver disease.Acute BCS due to rapid compression of all major hepatic veins leading to fulminant hepatic failure is rare. Our case highlights a clinically significant complication of a simple liver cyst of which clinicians should be aware when managing these ‘innocent’ lesions.     

Is combined partial hepatectomy with segmental resection of inferior vena cava justified for malignancy?

HYPOTHESIS: En bloc partial hepatectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) resection may be the only curative strategy for patients with hepatic malignancies involving the IVC. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients undergoing combined partial hepatectomy with segmental IVC resection and reconstruction between 1990 and 2002. Patients with tangential excision of the IVC were excluded. Follow-up was completed by outpatient clinic visits and mail correspondence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes; overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (7 men and 12 women) underwent partial hepatectomy and segmental IVC resection and reconstruction. Median age was 59 years (range, 24-74 years). Diagnoses consisted of cholangiocarcinoma (9 patients), metastatic tumor (5 patients), sarcoma (3 patients), and hepatocellular carcinoma (2 patients). Major hepatectomies (>/=3 segments) were performed in 15 patients; the caudate lobe was resected in 13. Hepatic vascular isolation was used in 13 patients. Ringed polytef grafts were used for IVC reconstruction in all but 1 patient. Transfusion was necessary in 18 patients (median requirement, 5 U). Median operative time was 6.3 hours (range, 3.7-9.0 hours), and hospitalization was 10.5 days (range, 6-41 days). Negative margins of resection were achieved in 16 patients. Complications occurred in 8 patients (42%), including 1 perioperative death (5%). There was evidence of mural thrombosis of the graft in 2 patients (both nonocclusive); warfarin sodium was used postoperatively in 14. Late graft thrombosis was evident in 2 patients. Median overall survival was 38 months (5-year survival, 21%), and recurrence-free survival was 11.5 months (5-year survival, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large tumors involving both the liver and the IVC are candidates for partial hepatectomy and segmental IVC resection. Resection affords the possibility of negative margins, acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality, long-term graft patency, and prolonged survival.     

Orthotopic liver transplantation with vena cava preservation in cirrhotic patients: is systematic temporary portacaval anastomosis a justified procedure?

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the peri- and postoperative effects of the lack of a temporary portocaval anastomosis (TPCA) during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in 84 patients with cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1996 to December 2002, 156 liver transplant recipients included (54%; 60 men and 24 women) of mean age 52 +/- 9 years with portal hypertension. In whom peri- and postoperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: The median fall in mean arterial pressure upon vascular clamping and unclampings was 20 mm Hg (range 15 to 75), while the median duration of portal vein clamping was 77 minutes. The median amount of blood autotransfusion was 1100 mL (range 0 to 5400). The median number of red blood cell and fresh-frozen plasma units transfused were 5 and 6.5, respectively. The median intraoperative urinary output was 72 mL/h (range 11 to 221). Three patients (3.5%) presented a perioperative complication, but no perioperative death was observed. Six patients experienced an early postoperative complication (<10 days): five hemodynamic complications and one transient renal failure, which did not require hemodialysis. One patient (1%) died at 12 hours after OLT from acute pulmonary edema. CONCLUSION: This study shows that systematic TPCA during OLT with preservation of the native retrohepatic vena cava in cirrhotic patients does not appear to be justified. In contrast, peri- and postoperative hemodynamic parameters as well as blood component requirements were comparable to those of the literature reporting OLT with straightforward TPCA.     

Giant focal nodular hyperplasia determining Budd–Chiari syndrome: an operative challenge requiring 210 min of liver ischemia

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a relatively common benign liver tumor with rare indications to surgery. Early after pregnancy, a 35-year-old woman developed right upper quadrant abdominal pain with fever. A large abdominal mass was palpable. Abdominal CT scan showed a 18-cm FNH substituting all liver segments but S6 and S7, compressing middle and left hepatic vein near their origin, displacing and compressing right hepatic vein, with ascites. Surgery consisted of a left hepatectomy extended to S5-S8 and S1. Main technical challenge was the preservation of the right hepatic vein. Intermittent pedicle clamping was performed, associated with hepatic vascular exclusion with preservation of caval flow; total duration of ischemia was 210 min. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for a transient fall in prothrombin time, and the formation of a sub-diaphragmatic serous collection, which was percutaneously drained. The patient is well 25 months after the operation. To our knowledge, this is the second reported case requiring surgery for a FNH causing a Budd-Chiari syndrome. In these peculiar cases a cumbersome operation may be required, maximizing all precautions to perform a risk-free procedure.     

Hepatic resection for primary or secondary malignancies with involvement of the inferior vena cava: is this operation safe or hazardous?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated surgical techniques and results of patients with tumors who had undergone liver resection with partial resection and reconstruction of the IVC. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent combined liver and IVC resection and reconstruction at a single institution. We identified 19 patients and two categories of tumors, primary (n = 8) and metastatic (n = 11). In 12 patients, a direct suture of the IVC was performed; in 3 patients a pericardium bovine patch was applied; in another 4 patients the IVC was replaced by PTFEt prosthesis. In nine patients, total hepatic vascular occlusion was required. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 5.9%, related to technical complications and hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative morbidity was 57.9%. Median survival time was 32 months (range 3 to 125 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 78.9%, 68%, and 49.1%, respectively. Tumor recurrence appeared in 13 patients and was the main cause of death (55.5%). Among the seven patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, three are still alive at 31, 60, and 125 months after resection. In this group, 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 71.4%, 57.1%, and 38.1%. Among the 11 patients resected for colorectal liver metastases, the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 81.8%, 62.3%, and 51.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection combined with IVC resection and reconstruction is a feasible procedure that can be performed with an acceptable operative risk leading to longterm outcome in selected patients.     

Direct reopening of the occluded hepatic veins of Budd–Chiari syndrome: verification of our operative method by the perioperative course of esophageal varices

Objective

A total of 69 patients with Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) were operated by direct approach under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). To assess the operative procedure, the perioperative course of esophageal varices (EVs) was evaluated.

Patients and methods

Of the 69 patients, 59 (22 females) were enrolled in this study because they had complete follow-up data for endoscopic evaluation of EVs. Their mean age was 46.3 ± 13.0 years (range 21–73.3 years). EVs were found in 52 patients. Under partial cardiopulmonary bypass, the inferior vena cava (IVC) was incised. The obstruction of the IVC was excised, and the occluded hepatic veins were reopened. The incised IVC was reconstructed with an auto-pericardial patch.

Results

Postoperatively, the repaired IVC was patent in all patients. The average number of patent hepatic veins (HVs) increased from 1.23 ± 0.81 to 2.21 ± 0.97/patient. The pressure gradient between the IVC and right atrium (RA) decreased from 12.4 ± 5.52 to 4.46 ± 3.21 mmHg. The indocyanine green clearance test (ICG) at 15 min decreased from 31.57 ± 17.44 to 22.27 ± 15.23%. EVs had disappeared in 13 patients at discharge and in 6 patients at late postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion

Our operative procedure for BCS is useful for decreasing portal pressure, which is reflected by disappearance of EVs. Therefore, the high risk of EV rupture could be avoided by reopening the occluded HVs.

     

De novo hepatitis B after liver transplantation from hepatitis B core antibody—Positive donors in an area with high prevalence of anti-HBc positivity in the donor population

Transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from donors who are negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg−) but positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc+) has been reported. However, previous studies were generally performed in geographic regions with a low prevalence of anti-HBc positivity in the liver donor population. The aims of this study are (1) to assess the risk for de novo hepatitis B in recipients of livers from anti-HBc+ donors in an area of high prevalence of anti-HBc positivity in the donor population, and (2) to analyze the risk factors for acquisition of HBV infection from anti-HBc+ donors. The transplantation experience of a single center between 1995 and 1998 was reviewed. Thirty-three of 268 liver donors (12%) were HBsAg− and anti-HBc+ during the study period. The proportion of anti-HBc+ donors increased with age; it was lowest (3.6%) in donors aged 1 to 20 years and highest (27.1%) in donors aged older than 60 years. Of the 211 HBsAg− recipients with 3 months or more of HBV serological follow-up, 30 received a liver from an anti-HBc+ donor and 181 received a liver from an anti-HBc− donor. Hepatitis B developed in 15 of 30 recipients (50%) of livers from anti-HBc+ donors but in only 3 of 181 recipients (1.7%) of livers from anti-HBc− donors (P < .0001). None of the 4 recipients who were antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs)+ at the time of transplantation developed HBV infection after receiving a liver from an anti-HBc+ donor compared with 15 of 26 recipients (58%) who were anti-HBs− (P = .10). None of the 5 anti-HBc+ recipients developed hepatitis B compared with 15 of 25 anti-HBc− recipients (60%; P = 0.04). Child-Pugh score was significantly higher in recipients of livers from anti-HBc+ donors who developed HBV infection than in those who did not (9 ± 2 v 7 ± 1; P = .03). In our area, testing liver donors for anti-HBc is mandatory, particularly in older donors. With such information available, anti-HBc+ donors can be safely directed to appropriate recipients, mainly those with anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc at the time of transplantation. In the current era of donor shortage, this policy would allow adequate use of such donors. (Liver Transpl 2001;7:51-58.)