A Comparison of In Vitro Nucleosome Positioning Mapped with Chicken,Frog and a Variety of Yeast Core Histones

Using high-throughput sequencing, we have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning in vitro on four plasmid DNAs containing DNA fragments derived from the genomes of sheep, drosophila, human and yeast. Chromatins were prepared by reconstitution using chicken, frog and yeast core histones. We also assembled yeast chromatin in which histone H3 was replaced by the centromere-specific histone variant, Cse4. The positions occupied by recombinant frog and native chicken histones were found to be very similar. In contrast, nucleosomes containing the canonical yeast octamer or, in particular, the Cse4 octamer were assembled at distinct populations of locations, a property that was more apparent on particular genomic DNA fragments. The factors that may contribute to this variation in nucleosome positioning and the implications of the behavior are discussed.     

Reconstitution experiments show that sequence-specific histone-DNA interactions are the basis for nucleosome phasing on mouse satellite DNA

The molecular basis underlying the sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes on DNA was investigated. We previously showed that histone octamers occupy multiple specific positions on mouse satellite DNA in vivo and have now reconstituted the 234 bp mouse satellite repeat unit with pure core histones into mononucleosomes. Histones from mouse liver or chicken erythrocytes bind to the DNA in multiple precisely defined frames in perfect phase with a diverged 9 bp subrepeat of the satellite DNA. This is the first time that nucleosome positions on a DNA in vivo have been compared to those found on the same DNA by in vitro reconstitution. Most of the nucleosomes occupy identical positions in vivo and in vitro. There are, however, some characteristic differences. We conclude that sequence-dependent histone-DNA interactions play a decisive role in the positioning of nucleosomes in vivo, but that the nucleosome locations in native chromatin are subject to additional constraints.     

Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes are implicated in many areas of chromosome biology. However, the physiological role of many of these enzymes is still unclear. In budding yeast, the Isw2 complex slides nucleosomes along DNA. By analyzing the native chromatin structure of Isw2 targets, we have found that nucleosomes adopt default, DNA-directed positions when ISW2 is deleted. We provide evidence that Isw2 targets contain DNA sequences that are inhibitory to nucleosome formation and that these sequences facilitate the formation of nuclease-accessible open chromatin in the absence of Isw2. Our data show that the biological function of Isw2 is to position nucleosomes onto unfavorable DNA. These results reveal that antagonistic forces of Isw2 and the DNA sequence can control nucleosome positioning and genomic access in vivo.     

The core histone tail domains contribute to sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning

The precise positioning of nucleosomes plays a critical role in the regulation of gene expression by modulating the DNA binding activity of trans-acting factors. However, molecular determinants responsible for positioning are not well understood. We examined whether the removal of the core histone tail domains from nucleosomes reconstituted with specific DNA fragments led to alteration of translational positions. Remarkably, we find that removal of tail domains from a nucleosome assembled on a DNA fragment containing a Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S RNA gene results in repositioning of nucleosomes along the DNA, including two related major translational positions that move about 20 bp further upstream with respect to the 5S gene. In a nucleosome reconstituted with a DNA fragment containing the promoter of a Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene, several translational positions shifted by about 10 bp along the DNA upon tail removal. However, the positions of nucleosomes assembled with a DNA fragment known to have one of the highest binding affinities for core histone proteins in the mouse genome were not altered by removal of core histone tail domains. Our data support the notion that the basic tail domains bind to nucleosomal DNA and influence the selection of the translational position of nucleosomes and that once tails are removed movement between translational positions occurs in a facile manner on some sequences. However, the effect of the N-terminal tails on the positioning and movement of a nucleosome appears to be dependent on the DNA sequence such that the contribution of the tails can be masked by very high affinity DNA sequences. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning can be specifically altered by regulated changes in histone tail-DNA interactions in chromatin.     

Purification and nucleosome mapping analysis of native yeast plasmid chromatin

There is much evidence indicating the importance in gene regulation of the positions of nucleosomes with respect to DNA sequence. Low resolution chromatin structures have been described for many genes, but there is a dearth of detailed high resolution chromatin structures. In the cases where they are available, high resolution maps have revealed much more complex chromatin structures, with multiple alternative nucleosome positions. The discovery that ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling machines are recruited to genes, with their ability to mobilise nucleosomes on DNA and to alter nucleosomal conformation, emphasises the necessity for obtaining high resolution nucleosome maps, so that the details of these remodelling reactions can be defined in vivo. Here, we describe protocols for purifying plasmid chromatin from cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and for mapping nucleosome positions on the plasmid using the monomer extension mapping method. This method requires purified chromatin, but is capable of mapping relatively long stretches of chromatin in great detail. Typically, it reveals very complex chromatin structures.     

Atomic force microscopy sees nucleosome positioning and histone H1-induced compaction in reconstituted chromatin.

We addressed the question of how nuclear histones and DNA interact and form a nucleosome structure by applying atomic force microscopy to an in vitro reconstituted chromatin system. The molecular images obtained by atomic force microscopy demonstrated that oligonucleosomes reconstituted with purified core histones and DNA yielded a 'beads on a string' structure with each nucleosome trapping 158 +/- 27 bp DNA. When dinucleosomes were assembled on a DNA fragment containing two tandem repeats of the positioning sequence of the Xenopus 5S RNA gene, two nucleosomes were located around each positioning sequence. The spacing of the nucleosomes fluctuated in the absence of salt and the nucleosomes were stabilized around the range of the positioning signals in the presence of 50 mM NaCl. An addition of histone H1 to the system resulted in a tight compaction of the dinucleosomal structure.     

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines in the GAL1-10 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines were analyzed at nucleotide resolution in the divergent GAL1-10 genes of intact yeast cells, encompassing their common upstream-activating sequence. In glucose cultures where genes are repressed, nucleosomes with fixed positions exist in regions adjacent to the upstream-activating sequence, and the variability of nucleosome positioning sharply increases with increasing distance from this sequence. Galactose induction causes nucleosome disruption throughout the region analyzed, with those nucleosomes close to the upstream-activating sequence being most striking. In glucose cultures, a strong correlation between N-methylpurine repair and nucleosome positioning was seen in nucleosomes with fixed positions, where slow and fast repair occurred in nucleosome core and linker DNA, respectively. Galactose induction enhanced N-methylpurine repair in both strands of nucleosome core DNA, being most dramatic in the clearly disrupted, fixed nucleosomes. Furthermore, N-methylpurines are repaired primarily by the Mag1-initiated base excision repair pathway, and nucleotide excision repair contributes little to repair of these lesions. Finally, N-methylpurine repair is significantly affected by nearest-neighbor nucleotides, where fast and slow repair occurred in sites between pyrimidines and purines, respectively. These results indicate that nucleosome positioning and DNA sequence significantly modulate Mag1-initiated base excision repair in intact yeast cells.     

Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences tested in yeast minichromosomes: a strong rotational setting is not sufficient to position nucleosomes in vivo.

DNA sequences that support bending around the histone octamer ('rotational setting') are considered to be a major determinant of nucleosome positions. TG5 is an artificial positioning sequence containing 100 bp of an (A/T)3NN(G/C)3NN motif repeated with a 10 bp period. It provides a strong rotational setting and is superior to natural sequences in nucleosome formation in vitro [Shrader, T.E. and Crothers, D.M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 7418-7422]. To investigate the contribution of the rotational setting to nucleosome positioning in vivo, TG sequences were inserted in a nucleosome, at the edge of a nucleosome and in a nuclease sensitive region of yeast minichromosomes and the chromatin structures were analysed. In none of the constructs were TG sequences folded in a positioned nucleosome, demonstrating that the rotational setting played a subordinate role in the rough positioning in vivo. The rotational setting might fine tune the positions. Positioned nucleosomes were found overlapping the ends of TG, indicating that a discontinuity of the 10 bp periodicity of (A/T)3 and (G/C)3 near the centre of a nucleosome might be favourable for positioning and serve as a translational signal.     

Nucleosome positioning on yeast plasmids is determined only by the internal signal of DNA sequence occupied by the nucleosome

The possible role of border factors in determining the nucleosome positioning on a DNA sequence was investigated. To this end a family of recombinant plasmids based on Gal10Cyc1 promoter and neomycin phosphotransferase gene NPTII were created. A DNA sequence adjoining the GalCyc promoter was varied in these plasmids. Three nearly equally represented nucleosome positions on the GalCyc promoter were found. In the basal plasmid an FRT sequence adjoins the GalCyc promoter at the right. It contains an internal signal of multiple positioning. Its replacement with different DNA sequences does not affect nucleosome positioning on the GalCyc promoter. The nucleosome positioning on the GalCyc promoter does not depend on nucleosome positioning (or its absence) on adjoining sequences. The same is true for nucleosome positioning on FRT sequence. It was found also that nucleosomes' positioning on the NPTII gene and their mutual disposition, namely the spacing between neighboring nucleosomes (linker length) are determined by the location of positioning signals only. Generally the nucleosome positioning in our experimental model is determined solely by internal DNA sequence occupied by nucleosome. On the other hand, the action of this internal positioning signal does not extend to neighboring DNA sequences.     

DNA structure, nucleosome placement and chromatin remodelling: a perspective

A major question in chromatin biology is to what extent the sequence of DNA directly determines the genetic and chromatin organization of a eukaryotic genome? We consider two aspects to this question: the DNA sequence-specified positioning of nucleosomes and the determination of NDRs (nucleosome-depleted regions) or barriers. We argue that, in budding yeast, while DNA sequence-specified nucleosome positioning may contribute to positions flanking the regions lacking nucleosomes, DNA thermodynamic stability is a major component determinant of the genetic organization of this organism.     

Positioning of a Nucleosome on Mouse Satellite DNA Inserted into a Yeast Plasmid Is Determined by Its DNA Sequence and an Adjacent Nucleosome

It has earlier been shown that multiple positioning of nucleosomes on mouse satellite DNA is determined by its nucleotide sequence. To clarify whether other factors, such as boundary ones, can affect the positionings, we modified the environment of satellite DNA monomer by inserting it into a yeast plasmid between inducible GalCyc promoter and a structural region of the yeast FLP gene. We have revealed that the positions of nucleosomes on satellite DNA are identical to those detected upon reconstruction in vitro. The positioning signal (GAAAAA sequence) of satellite DNA governs nucleosome location at the adjacent nucleotide sequence as well. Upon promoter induction the nucleosome, translationally positioned on the GalCyc promoter, transfers to the satellite DNA and its location follows the positioning signal of the latter. Thus, the alternatives of positioning of a nucleosome on satellite DNA are controlled by its nucleotide sequence, though the choice of one of them is determined by the adjacent nucleosome.     

Protein-DNA interactions and nuclease-sensitive regions determine nucleosome positions on yeast plasmid chromatin

To study mechanisms of nucleosome positioning, small circular plasmids were constructed, assembled into chromatin in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and their chromatin structures were analysed with respect to positions of nucleosomes and nuclease-sensitive regions. Plasmids used include insertions of the URA3 gene into the TRP1 gene of the TRP1ARS1 circular plasmid in the same (TRURAP) or opposite (TRARUP) orientation. The URA3 gene has six precisely positioned, stable nucleosomes flanked by nuclease-sensitive regions at the 5' and 3' ends of the gene. Three of these nucleosome positions do not depend on the flanking nuclease-sensitive regions, since they are formed at similar positions in a derivative plasmid (TUmidL) that contains the middle of the URA3 sequence but not the 5' and 3' ends. These positions are probably due to protein-DNA interactions. In both TRURAP and TRARUP, the positions of the nucleosomes on the TRP1 gene were, however, shifted compared with the positions on the parental TRP1ARS1 circle and TUmidL. These changes are interpreted to be due to changes in the positions of flanking nuclease-sensitive regions that might act as boundaries to position nucleosomes. Thus, two independent mechanisms for nucleosome positioning have been demonstrated in vivo. The ARS1 region contains the 3' end of the TRP1 gene and the putative origin of replication. Since in TRURAP and TRARUP the TRP1 gene is interrupted, but the ARS1 region remains nuclease sensitive, this non-nucleosomal conformation of the ARS1 region probably reflects a chromatin structure important for replication.     

Multiple Aspects of ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Translocation by RSC and Mi-2 Are Directed by the Underlying DNA Sequence

Background

Chromosome structure, DNA metabolic processes and cell type identity can all be affected by changing the positions of nucleosomes along chromosomal DNA, a reaction that is catalysed by SNF2-type ATP-driven chromatin remodelers. Recently it was suggested that in vivo, more than 50% of the nucleosome positions can be predicted simply by DNA sequence, especially within promoter regions. This seemingly contrasts with remodeler induced nucleosome mobility. The ability of remodeling enzymes to mobilise nucleosomes over short DNA distances is well documented. However, the nucleosome translocation processivity along DNA remains elusive. Furthermore, it is unknown what determines the initial direction of movement and how new nucleosome positions are adopted.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have used AFM imaging and high resolution PAGE of mononucleosomes on 600 and 2500 bp DNA molecules to analyze ATP-dependent nucleosome repositioning by native and recombinant SNF2-type enzymes. We report that the underlying DNA sequence can control the initial direction of translocation, translocation distance, as well as the new positions adopted by nucleosomes upon enzymatic mobilization. Within a strong nucleosomal positioning sequence both recombinant Drosophila Mi-2 (CHD-type) and native RSC from yeast (SWI/SNF-type) repositioned the nucleosome at 10 bp intervals, which are intrinsic to the positioning sequence. Furthermore, RSC-catalyzed nucleosome translocation was noticeably more efficient when beyond the influence of this sequence. Interestingly, under limiting ATP conditions RSC preferred to position the nucleosome with 20 bp intervals within the positioning sequence, suggesting that native RSC preferentially translocates nucleosomes with 15 to 25 bp DNA steps.

Conclusions/Significance

Nucleosome repositioning thus appears to be influenced by both remodeler intrinsic and DNA sequence specific properties that interplay to define ATPase-catalyzed repositioning. Here we propose a successive three-step framework consisting of initiation, translocation and release steps to describe SNF2-type enzyme mediated nucleosome translocation along DNA. This conceptual framework helps resolve the apparent paradox between the high abundance of ATP-dependent remodelers per nucleus and the relative success of sequence-based predictions of nucleosome positioning in vivo.