Non-adherence to statin therapy: a major challenge for preventive cardiology

Background: Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. In the last twenty years, effective lipid-lowering therapies, particularly statins, have become widely available to prevent and reverse the progression of disease. However, there is a significant gap between expected and actual benefits; this may be attributed to poor adherence to statin therapy. Objective: To define the extent, causes (including psychological aspects), consequences and management of non-adherence to statins. Methods: Literature using PubMed and Medline up to and including 30 July 2009. Results: Adherence to statin therapy is suboptimal in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Causes vary, and include patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, financial constraints, psychological issues), practitioner factors (e.g., poor knowledge of adherence, time constraints, poor communication skills and patient–doctor working alliance) and system factors (e.g., medication costs, lack of clinical monitoring, drug side effects). Non-adherence is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased costs of healthcare. A framework, based on a multidisciplinary approach, for addressing non-adherence, including managing the statin-intolerant patient, is presented. Conclusions: Non-adherence to statins is a significant issue for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Increased awareness of the causes and solutions for overcoming non-adherence, including safer prescribing, improvement in physician–patient alliance and reduction in drug costs, will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the use of statins and significantly improve patient care and outcomes.     

Perspectives on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement

ABSTRACT

Background: Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). European and US guidelines now recommend lower LDL-C levels, particularly in high-risk patients. Although LDL-C treatment goals to reduce the risk of CHD are clear, many patients do not reach their LDL-C goals.

Objectives: Examine consensus guideline targets for LDL-C lowering in patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk; examine cholesterol goal achievement in clinical practice; evaluate the effectiveness of ezetimibe/statin and other adjunctive lipid-lowering treatments in achieving LDL-C goals; and consider ongoing controversies and the randomized controlled trials that may help to resolve or better illuminate them.

Methods: An English-language PubMed search was conducted to identify prospective randomized controlled trials, open-label studies, and retrospective and observational studies from 2001 (same year that the executive summary of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III was published) to present for an analysis of the effects of adjunctive therapies on LDL-C lowering and goal attainment in patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.

Results: Elevated LDL-C is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy; aggressive lowering is of great benefit to those at high risk. Statins are recommended first-line lipid-lowering agents, with a long, well-regarded history of efficacy and safety. Not all patients, however, can achieve recommended LDL-C goals simply using starting doses of statins. For such patients, more intensive therapy utilizing high-dose statins or combination therapy, including statins combined with other lipid-lowering agents, such as ezetimibe, bile acid resins (BARs), or niacin, is warranted. Potential limitations of the present review include possible publication bias and the focus on pharmacotherapy rather than lifestyle modification and the important objective of multiple risk-factor modification to reduce absolute global cardiovascular risk.

Conclusions: With a well-established link between elevated LDL-C and cardiovascular risk, aggressive LDL-C lowering becomes particularly important. Patients needing intensive LDL-C lowering to achieve goals will often require adjunctive treatments, including ezetimibe, BARs, or niacin along with statins. Given both their high mg: mg potency in lowering LDL-C and favorable tolerability and patient acceptance/adherence profile, ezetimibe/statin combination regimens arguably provide the greatest likelihood for patients to reach new, lower LDL-C targets; however, efficacy and safety data of any adjunctive treatment, along with drug costs and patient adherence to treatment (partly related to complexity of the regimen) all need to be considered when determining the optimal regimen to achieve LDL-C goals in individual patients according to their baseline absolute cardiovascular risk, LDL-C level, and consensus LDL-C targets.     

Physicians’ attitudes and adherence to use of risk scores for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional survey in three world regions

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate physicians’ attitudes and adherence to the use of risk scores in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Design and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 2056 physicians involved in the primary prevention of CVD. Participants included cardiologists (47%), general practitioners (42%), and endocrinologists (11%) from several geographical regions: Brazil (n?=?968), USA (n?=?381), Greece (n?=?275), Chile (n?=?157), Venezuela (n?=?128), Portugal (n?=?42), The Netherlands (n?=?41), and Central America (Costa Rica, Panama, El Salvador and Guatemala; n?=?64).

Results: The main outcome measure was the percentage of responses on a multiple-choice questionnaire describing a hypothetical asymptomatic patient at intermediate risk for CVD according to the Framingham Risk Score.

Only 48% of respondents reported regular use of CVD risk scores to tailor preventive treatment in the case scenario. Of non-users, nearly three-quarters indicated that ‘It takes up too much of my time’ (52%) or ‘I don’t believe they add value to the clinical evaluation’ (21%).

Only 56% of respondents indicated that they would prescribe lipid-lowering therapy for the hypothetical intermediate-risk patient. A significantly greater proportion of regular users than non-users of CVD risk scores identified the need for lipid-lowering therapy in the hypothetical patient (59 vs. 41%; p?<?0.0001).

Conclusions: Based on a survey conducted in a ‘real-world’ setting, risk scores are generally not used by a majority of physicians to guide primary prevention in asymptomatic persons at intermediate risk for CVD. Appropriate prescribing of lipid-lowering therapy in such patients is equally neglected. Changing physicians’ attitudes towards the use of CVD risk scores is one of several challenges that need to be addressed to reduce the world-wide burden of CVD.     

Statin discontinuation in high-risk patients: a systematic review of the evidence

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death worldwide. Since the late 1980s, statins have emerged as effective lipid-lowering therapies and are now widely used to protect against and slow the progression of CVD and cerebrovascular disease. However, there is a significant gap between disease improvement in clinical trials and daily practice possibly attributable to poor adherence with statin therapy. High discontinuation rates were reported in primary and secondary prevention. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the association between statin therapy discontinuation and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality in high-risk patients. Available English literature was reviewed using Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences and the Cochrane Library; 39 studies were identified. In primary and secondary prevention, as well as perioperatively, non-adherence or discontinuation of statin therapy was associated with detrimental effects on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes, including disease severity and mortality. Importantly, some studies reported that very low adherence and discontinuation was associated with worse outcomes than never using statins. In conclusion, non-adherence and discontinuation of statin therapy significantly increased the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events as well as all-cause mortality in high-risk patients. Patients would therefore benefit from closer adherence assessment and education programs aimed at increasing awareness of the risk associated with discontinuation of statin therapy.     

Current pharmacotherapy for the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with HIV infection

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is higher in PWH compared to uninfected persons. Dyslipidemia is a critical link in the pathogenesis of ASCVD in PWH. Chronic inflammation associated with HIV infection may drive both dyslipidemia and ASCVD.

Areas covered: The authors review the evidence for using lipid-lowering therapy in PWH and includes an overview of the utility and complexity of using statins in PWH, in particular, drug interactions, safety, and efficacy. In addition, data covering alternate therapies like omega-3 fatty acids, fibrates, niacin, ezetimibe, and PCSK-9 inhibitors are reviewed.

Expert opinion: Dyslipidemia is a common problem in PWH. The risk of ASCVD is higher in PWH. Lipid-lowering therapy reduces the risk of ASCVD, but clinical endpoint trials are lacking in PWH. Statin therapy is the mainstay of primary prevention for ASCVD. The timing of when to initiate primary prevention with statins in PWH is unclear. Beyond statins, there are limited data that other lipid-lowering agents have utility in PWH. Ongoing trials like the REPRIEVE trial will inform the community about the optimal approach to lipid-lowering therapy in PWH.     

Statin drug interactions and related adverse reactions

Introduction: Statin monotherapy is generally well tolerated, with a low frequency of adverse events. The most important adverse effects associated with statins are myopathy and an asymptomatic increase in hepatic transaminases, both of which occur infrequently. Because statins are prescribed on a long-term basis, their possible interactions with other drugs deserve particular attention, as many patients will typically receive pharmacological therapy for concomitant conditions during the course of statin treatment.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic properties of statins and emphasizes their clinically relevant drug interactions and related adverse reactions.

Expert opinion: Avoiding drug–drug interactions and consequent adverse drug reactions is essential in order to optimize compliance, and thus improve the treatment of patients at high cardiovascular risk. The different pharmacokinetic profiles among statins should be carefully considered, in order to understand the possible spectrum of drug interactions. The growing trend toward earlier statin treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular disease means that physicians must anticipate future polypharmacy when their patients require additional medications for comorbid conditions.     

心绞痛患者应用辛伐他汀治疗的依从性研究

背景:他汀类药物在冠心病一、二级预防中的作用已经得到了广泛认同,通过其降脂和非降脂作用,可显著改善不同胆固醇水平个体的预后。他汀类的收益依赖于药物的长期不间断治疗。目的:通过对平均胆固醇水平不稳定性心绞痛患者辛伐他汀治疗依从性及影响因素调查,分析治疗依从性的现状及相关因素,为提高药物的干预率提供依据。方法:选择平均胆固醇水平不稳定性心绞痛患者,口服辛伐他汀作为二级预防手段,随访药物治疗的依从情况、药物不良反应,分析不依从治疗的原因。结果:辛伐他汀治疗3、6、18个月的依从性分别是68.9%、48.0%,40.0%,依从性下降以前6个月明显。不稳定性心绞痛的临床分型和患者的年龄群对治疗依从性影响不大,高危患者治疗的依从性低。不依从治疗的主要原因有患者对高危人群血脂控制水平、他汀类药物的非降脂作用认识不足,以及经济条件限制等。结论:辛伐他汀在冠心病二级预防中的治疗依从性较低,为提高远期疗效,有必要提高患者对药物治疗的依从性。     

Adherence to statin or aspirin or both in patients with established cardiovascular disease: exploring healthy behaviour vs. drug effects and 10-year follow-up of outcome

Aims

To characterize adherence in patients with established cardiovascular disease taking statins and aspirin and to estimate the effects of adherence due to health behaviour, a lack of beneficial drug effect, or both on recurrence of cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality over 10 years.

Methods

A population-based cohort study using a record-linkage database in Tayside, Scotland. Subjects with cardiovascular disease (n = 7657; 4185 aspirin-alone cohort, 671 statin-alone cohort and 2801 combination use cohort) were studied between 1993 and 2003. The effects of adherence on recurrence of cardiovascular disease or mortality were assessed using Poisson regression model.

Results

In subjects taking both aspirin and statins, those adherent to statins but not aspirin had a lower risk of recurrence [adjusted risk ratio (RR) 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.49, 0.82], but those adherent to aspirin but not statins has no such effect (adjusted RR 0.91; 0.72, 1.15), suggesting that adherence behaviour alone was not responsible for the beneficial effect. Within the group adherent to aspirin, ≥80% adherence to statins was associated with reduced recurrence compared with those poorly adherent (adjusted RR 0.76; 0.62, 0.94), but no such effect of aspirin was seen in those adherent to statins. Similar results were found for all-cause mortality.

Conclusions

Poor health behaviour is not a sufficient explanation of adverse outcome in poorly adherent patients. Adverse outcome is more likely to be driven by foregone drug benefits.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Aspirin and statins are widely-used drugs in patients with cardiovascular disease.
• There is less information on healthy behaviour vs. drug effects.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• Long-term adherence to aspirin and statin treatments in patients with established cardiovascular disease has been investigated.
• Poor health behaviour is not a sufficient explanation of adverse outcome in poorly adherent patients.

     

Role and significance of statins in the treatment of hypertensive patients

ABSTRACT

Background: Statins are the first-line drug therapy in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The beneficial clinical impact of statins on the cardiovascular system results not only from their lipid-lowering action but also from other effects. Recently, it has been suggested that statins can reduce blood pressure, especially in hypertensive patients.

Aim: The role of the hypotensive action of statins and other mechanisms which reduce cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients are discussed in this review.

Methods: Electronic databases searched were [MEDLINE (1966 – February 2009), EMBASE and SCOPUS (1965 – February 2009), DARE (1966 -- February 2009)]. Additionally, abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied to identify unpublished studies. The main data search terms were: blood pressure, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and statins.

Findings: At present, it is difficult to unequivocally assess the impact of statins on blood pressure. However, according to most authors, the impact of statins on the decrease in BP is slight, but significant, especially among patients with hypertension.     

Pharmacotherapy of hypercholesterolaemia: statins in clinical practice

The objective of this article is to evaluate the roles of the lipid-lowering class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in reducing cardiovascular events and to review their mechanism of action based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The clinical outcome of 15 major clinical trials has been critically reviewed and summarised; all showed a high degree of efficacy and safety. Statins, either in active or prodrug forms, are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, have good absorption rate and their bioavailability depends on their lipophobicity and concomitant use with meals. Abdominal discomfort is the most commonly reported adverse effect. Although the incidence is low, myopathy with or without rhabdomyolysis may be considered a serious adverse effect of statins. A combination of a statin with gemfibrozil seems to increase the risk of this adverse event, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Combination therapy with several other agents, frequently administered to cardiovascular patients, has also been reviewed. Statin therapy is considered highly cost effective in secondary prevention, but it is less cost effective in primary prevention. This factor may underline the rationale for developing other safe and effective agents with an improved cost effectiveness profile. The pleiotropic non-lipid lowering effects of statins may include their anti-oxidant and antithrombotic potential as well as restoration of endothelial function. Statins may also be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. Fewer studies have investigated statins’ effects on the quality of lipoprotein particles, the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as their possible synergistic effects with n-3 fatty acids, anti-oxidants and aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.     

Cardiovascular disease in patients with renal disease: the role of statins

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Atherosclerosis is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a major cause of death. The National Kidney Foundation guidelines favour the use of statin therapy for treatment of dyslipidaemia in patients with CKD. Much evidence supports statin therapy for reducing CVD and improving outcomes in the general population, but there is less evidence in patients with CKD. Consequently, prevention of CVD in CKD is based primarily on extrapolation from non-CKD trials. Significantly, in trials specifically designed to investigate patients with CKD, evidence is emerging for improved cardiovascular outcomes with statin therapy. This review describes available data relating to cardiovascular outcomes and the role of statins in patients with CKD, including pre-dialysis, dialysis, and renal transplant patients.

Research design and methods: The PubMed database was searched (1998–present) to ensure comprehensive identification of publications (including randomised clinical trials) relevant to CKD patients, patterns of cardiovascular outcome in such patients and their relationship to lipid profile, and the role of statins for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications.

Results: There are conflicting data on the relationship between dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular outcomes, with one major study of statin therapy (4D – Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie) providing equivocal results. Further studies, including AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events; NCT00240331) in patients receiving haemodialysis, and SHARP (Study of Heart And Renal Protection; NCT00125593) in patients with CKD including those on dialysis, should help to clarify the role of statin therapy in these populations.

Conclusions: More studies are needed to elucidate the role of statins in improving cardiovascular outcomes for CKD patients. It is anticipated that ongoing clinical trials geared towards the optimal prevention and treatment of CVD in patients with CKD will help guide clinicians in the management of CKD.     

Poor adherence to oral bisphosphonate treatment and its consequences: a review of the evidence

Poor therapeutic adherence is a major issue faced by physicians today. This paper summarizes the adherence rates with oral bisphosphonate (OBP) treatment in clinical practice and their impact on clinical outcomes. Studies systematically demonstrated that overall compliance and persistence with OBPs among osteoporotic women are poor. Although extending dosing intervals improved adherence, the gains are suboptimal. Most importantly, low compliance and persistence rates consistently resulted in increased rates of fractures. The results emphasize the importance of adherence to treatment to achieve optimal antifracture efficacy. There is an urgent need to implement strategies and to encourage physicians to take measures that increase patients' awareness of the need to use osteoporosis medications as directed in order to benefit from them fully.     

Pharmacotherapy of hypercholesterolaemia: statins in clinical practice

The objective of this article is to evaluate the roles of the lipid-lowering class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in reducing cardiovascular events and to review their mechanism of action based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The clinical outcome of 15 major clinical trials has been critically reviewed and summarised; all showed a high degree of efficacy and safety. Statins, either in active or prodrug forms, are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, have good absorption rate and their bioavailability depends on their lipophobicity and concomitant use with meals. Abdominal discomfort is the most commonly reported adverse effect. Although the incidence is low, myopathy with or without rhabdomyolysis may be considered a serious adverse effect of statins. A combination of a statin with gemfibrozil seems to increase the risk of this adverse event, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Combination therapy with several other agents, frequently administered to cardiovascular patients, has also been reviewed. Statin therapy is considered highly cost effective in secondary prevention, but it is less cost effective in primary prevention. This factor may underline the rationale for developing other safe and effective agents with an improved cost effectiveness profile. The pleiotropic non-lipid lowering effects of statins may include their anti-oxidant and antithrombotic potential as well as restoration of endothelial function. Statins may also be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. Fewer studies have investigated statins' effects on the quality of lipoprotein particles, the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as their possible synergistic effects with n-3 fatty acids, anti-oxidants and aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.     

Advancing therapy for hypercholesterolemia

Importance of the field: Hypercholesterolemia holds a key role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis and is a causative factor of coronary artery disease. Current guidelines for cholesterol treatment target low-density cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary goal of therapy. Despite advances in the pharmacotherapy of atherosclerosis, the most successful agents used to treat this disease – HMG CoA reductase inhibitors – remain ineffective for the primary or secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in 50 – 60% of patients. Advancing therapy for hypercholesterolemia with new-emerging drugs either as monotherapy or in combination will hopefully improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Areas covered in this review: The two major sources of cholesterol in the human body are: i) biosynthesis of cholesterol by the liver; and ii) absorption by the intestines. Both play a pivotal role in the overall balance of cholesterol. A recent and more effective therapeutic strategy is to treat both sources of cholesterol simultaneously with a complementary mechanism of action. The present article presents cholesterol metabolism and reviews new emerging lipid-lowering drugs and therapies that: i) lower LDL-C; ii) lower triglycerides; and iii) increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

What the reader will gain: This review summarizes the pivotal role of both the liver and intestine in the overall balance of cholesterol in the body and describe the clinical impact and relevance of using new emerging lipid-lowering drugs either alone or co-administered with statins in controlling cholesterol levels.

Take-home message: An elevated concentration of LDL-C plays a causal role in the development of cardiovascular disease. The new aggressive cholesterol treatment goals call for a more advanced therapeutic approach to maximize the cardiovascular benefits associated with lower LDL-C levels.     

Statins as anti-inflammatory agents in atherogenesis: molecular mechanisms and lessons from the recent clinical trials

Ample evidence exists in support of the potent anti-inflammatory properties of statins. In cell studies and animal models statins exert beneficial cardiovascular effects. By inhibiting intracellular isoprenoids formation, statins suppress vascular and myocardial inflammation, favorably modulate vascular and myocardial redox state and improve nitric oxide bioavailability. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that further to their lipid lowering effects, statins are useful in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) due to their anti-inflammatory potential. The landmark JUPITER trial suggested that in subjects without CHD, suppression of low-grade inflammation by statins improves clinical outcome. However, recent trials have failed to document any clinical benefit with statins in high risk groups, such in heart failure or chronic kidney disease patients. In this review, we aim to summarize the existing evidence on statins as an anti-inflammatory agent in atherogenesis. We describe the molecular mechanisms responsible for the antiinflammatory effects of statins, as well as clinical data on the non lipid-lowering, anti-inflammatory effects of statins on cardiovascular outcomes. Lastly, the controversy of the recent large randomized clinical trials and the issue of statin withdrawal are also discussed.     

The safety and effectiveness of statins as treatment for HIV-dyslipidemia: the evidence so far and the future challenges

Introduction: Statin therapy is widely used across the globe for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is well established that statin therapy is associated with significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and plasma cholesterol levels. HIV-dyslipidemia is a common problem with extensive use of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART), and is associated with an increase in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), resulting in hospital admission and surgery throughout the western healthcare systems.

Areas covered: This review describes the effectiveness and safety of statins in the treatment of HIV-dyslipidemia. Medline was searched for different statins as treatment for HIV-dyslipidemia.

Expert opinion: Dyslipidemia in patients with HIV is different from the normal population, due to the fact that HIV treatment may not only cause dyslipidemia, but may also interact with lipid lowering medication. Statin-unresponsive HIV-dyslipidemia can be treated with the addition of ezetimibe, fenofibrate, fish oil and niacin. Current guidelines recommend the use of pravastatin and atorvastatin as first-line therapy, whereas European guidelines include rosuvastatin. There is an urgent need to confirm whether the use of statins in HIV-dyslipidemia is associated with an increase in the incidence of diabetes; this is significant because HIV patients are known to be insulin-resistant. HIV is also associated with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), a condition known to be associated with insulin resistance. Further clinical trials are urgently needed to assess the impact of statins on CVD in HIV patients, and future challenges for researchers in this area are enormous.     

Impact of gender on statin efficacy

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the impact of statin therapy on the combined endpoint of cardiovascular events in women and men separately.

Research design and methods: A systematic literature search through May 2006 was conducted to identify randomized, controlled statin trials evaluating the gender specific incidence of cardiovascular events. Weighted averages were reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated via random-effects model.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measured was a composite endpoint of all cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes measured included death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.

Results: Fifteen trials were included in this meta-analysis. Cardiovascular events were reduced in men (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.70, 0.81]) and women (RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69, 0.90]). Reductions in mortality, MI, and stroke predominantly contributed to the reduction in cardiovascular events in men taking statins. Women did not have a reduction in mortality or stroke, suggesting that the reductions in cardiac events may have been predominantly due to reductions in need for revascularization and/or unstable angina.

Conclusions: Statins reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in men and women, but women on statins may not have reductions in mortality and stroke like their male counterparts.     

LDL-C reductions and goal attainment among naive statin users in the Netherlands: real life results*

ABSTRACT

Objective: The effectiveness of statin therapy in a real life setting may differ from that in clinical trials, as physicians make non-randomised treatment decisions for patients with less uniform and possibly different characteristics. We therefore performed a study to compare the effectiveness of different statins and doses in routine clinical practice with respect to total serum cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and goal attainment according to European guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Research design and methods: Naive statin users starting treatment in 2003 and 2004 with LDL-C measurements at baseline and between 30 and 365 days after start of treatment were extracted from the PHARMO database. During treatment with their initial statin dose LDL-C reduction and attainment of cholesterol goals were compared between different statins and doses.

Results: Of 2303 identified naive patients, approximately 30% were allocated to the high CVD-risk group. Average LDL-C reductions were 48%, 42%, 39%, and 32% at mean doses of 11 mg rosuvastatin, 17 mg atorvastatin, 22 mg simvastatin and 35 mg pravastatin, respectively. The proportion of patients attaining cholesterol goals was 75% for rosuvastatin, 68% for atorvastatin, 56% for simvastatin, and 42% for pravastatin. Dose comparisons showed greater LDL-C reduction and increased goal attainment for rosuvastatin 10 mg compared to other statins at most doses (adjusted p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In a real life setting, both LDL-C reduction and the proportion of patients attaining cholesterol goals appear to be significantly increased among users of rosuvastatin compared to other statins. These results confirm and extend reported clinical trial results to a real world setting.