脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验

目的 对脑卒中后失能综合评估量表进行汉化及信效度检验,探索该量表在国内的临床适用性。方法 采用Brislin双人直译-回译法、专家评议、预调查对量表进行文化调适,便利抽取203名脑卒中患者进行调查,对中文版量表进行项目分析,并验证其重测信度、评定者间信度、内容效度、效标关联效度。结果 脑卒中后失能综合评估量表重测信度相关性分析结果显示相关系数为0.988;评定者间信度Kappa系数为0.846（95%置信区间为0.793~0.899）,P<0.001;各条目内容效度指数均在0.833~1.000之间,量表内容效度指数为0.935;以改良Rankin量表为标准,效标关联效度系数为0.896。结论 中文版脑卒中后失能综合评估量表具有良好的信效度,可作为我国临床脑卒中失能评估工具。     

结核病污名感受量表的汉化及其信度和效度的评价

目的译制中文版结核病污名感受量表(tuberculosis-related stigma scale,TSS),并对其信度和效度进行初步评价.方法通过系统的前译-回译形成中文版TSS量表,并采用中文版TSS量表对230名结核病患者进行调查,对测定结果进行信度和效度分析.结果中文版TSS量表总的Cronbach α系数为0.877,其2个维度的Cronbach α值均大于0.8;总量表重测信度为0.943,分半信度为0.846.内容效度评估表明全部条目的平均内容效度比CVI值为0.90;以Rosenberg自尊量表为效标,其效标关联效度为-0.766;因子分析萃取2个公因子,方差累计贡献率为64.952%.结论中文版TSS量表是一份信度和效度颇佳的评定工具,可用于评价我国结核病患者的污名感受.     

中文版痴呆心境评估量表的信效度研究

目的 翻译痴呆心境评估量表(Dementia Mood Assessment scale,DMAS),并对其信、效度进行初步评价.方法 翻译并修订DMAS,用中文版DMAS对133例老年期痴呆患者进行调查,对测定结果进行信、效度分析.结果 中文版DMAS的内容效度CVI值为0.95;以老年性痴呆生活质量量表(Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease scale,QOL-AD)为效标,其效标关联效度为-0.77;因子分析萃取了4个公因子,方差累计贡献率为54.95%.量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.81,重测信度为0.94,评定者信度为0.93.结论 中文版DMAS信、效度较好,可用于评价中国老年期痴呆患者的心境状况.     

特发性肺纤维化患者生活质量特异性量表的汉化及信度效度的初步验证

目的：形成中文版特发性肺纤维化患者生活质量特异性量表（ATAQ-IPF）,并检验其在中国特发性肺纤维化患者中的信度、效度。方法：取得原作者同意并授权后,将量表进行翻译、回译和文化调试,应用翻译和修订的中文版量表ATAQ-IPF和圣乔治呼吸问卷（SGRQ）对75名特发性肺纤维化患者进行调查,采用项目分析方法测定中文版ATAQ-IPF量表各条目的鉴别能力,进行重测信度、内部一致性信度、内容效度、效标关联效度的初步评定。结果 ：中文版ATAQ-IPF量表含74个条目,除条目49外,各条目与其所属维度的相关系数为0.305~0.962;ATAQ-IPF量表与圣乔治呼吸问卷（SGRQ）的效标关联效度为0.611（P〈0.01）;Cronbach’sα系数为0.945。结论：中文版量表ATAQ-IPF有较好的信度、效度,可用于评价特发性肺纤维化患者的生活质量。     

心肌梗死多维度评估量表的信效度研究

目的翻译“心肌梗死多维度评估量表”(Myocardial Infarction Di mensional Assessment Scale,MIDAS),评价其效度、信度及文化相关性,提供一种有效评估心肌梗死患者生活质量的中文版问卷。方法应用专家小组评定法进行问卷文化相关性、语言一致性及内容效度的评价。对88例心肌梗死患者应用问卷对其内部一致性、效标关联效度及结构效度进行评价,对其中30例心梗患者在2周内重新应用问卷收集资料,进行重测信度的评价。结果问卷中所有条目均具有较好的文化相关性,其中2个条目被重新修订。中文版“心肌梗死多维度评估量表”具有较好的表面和内容效度,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.94,其内部一致性及重测信度均可接受,问卷7个亚量表的Cronbach'sα为0.73~0.91,重测信度系数为0.74~0.94,总体Cronbach'sα为0.93,重测信度系数为0.85。中文版MIDAS中的各亚量表与中文版“36条目简明量表”(Short Form36,SF-36)中的相关亚量表具有显著相关性(P<0.05)。因子分析结果提示中文版MIDAS具有与原英文量表一致的结构效度。结论中文版“心肌梗死多维度评估量表”是一种具有较高效度和信度的疾病专用量表,可为医护人员量化评估心肌梗死患者生活质量提供可靠的依据。     

临床护士育儿压力量表的汉化及信度效度检验

目的 ：汉化临床护士育儿压力量表并检验其信度和效度,为临床护士养育压力的评估提供依据。方法 ：通过邮件取得原量表作者的授权,采用Brislin翻译模型对原量表进行翻译、回译、文化调试和预调查,形成中文版临床护士养育压力量表。2022年7月采用便利抽样方法选取武汉市临床护士490名进行调查,评价量表的信度、效度。结果 ：中文版临床护士育儿压力量表包括4个维度,共19个条目,累计方差贡献率为62.692%,内容效度为0.88～0.96,效标关联效度为0.622。该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.906,重测信度为0.888。量表结构效度经过验证性因子分析结果显示模型各项指标适配良好。结论 ：中文版临床护士育儿压力量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为临床护士养育压力的评估工具。     

乳腺癌患者益处发现评定量表的信效度检验

目的 评价中文版益处发现评定量表(Benefit Finding Scales,BFS)的信效度.方法 征得源量表作者同意,按照量表引入流程对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、校正、专家内容效度及表面效度评价后最终形成中文版BFS,对293例乳腺癌患者进行问卷调查,评价中文版BFS的信效度.结果 中文版BFS含19个条目,Cronbach α系数为0.911,重测信度为0.812,各条目内容效度I-CVI为0.833～1.000,整个量表平均内容效度S-CVI为0.955,因子分析提取特征值大于1的3个公因子,累积方差贡献率达55.101％,效标关联效度显示中文版BFS与中文版创伤后成长评定量表的相关系数r=0.745.结论 中文版BFS具有良好的信效度,适合我国文化背景下对乳腺癌患者益处发现水平的测量.     

接受胰岛素治疗患者的生活质量量表的信效度研究

目的 翻译"接受胰岛素治疗患者的生活质量量表(ITR-QOL)",并评价中文版量表的效度和信度,为评估接受胰岛素治疗患者的生活质量提供一种有效的工具.方法 翻译并形成中文版"接受胰岛素治疗的患者生活质量量表(ITR-QOL-CV)",对问卷进行内部一致性、内容效度、结构效度、效标关联效度及区分效度的评价.结果 ITR-QOL-CV的Cronbach's α总系数为0.89,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.82.因子分析结果示ITR-QOL-CV具有较好的结构效度,ITR-QOL-CV与糖尿病患者特异生活质量量表(DSQL)具有相关性(r=0.56,P<0.05),ITR-QOL-CV能够区分发生过低血糖反应和未发生过低血糖反应患者的生活质量.结论 ITR-QOL-CV具有较高的信度和效度,可为医护人员评估接受胰岛素治疗患者的生活质量提供可靠的依据.     

护士采取深静脉血栓形成预防性措施意向量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的 对护士采取深静脉血栓形成预防性措施意向量表进行汉化,并对中文版量表进行信效度检验。方法 在取得原作者的授权后,严格遵循Brislin翻译回译模型对量表进行翻译、回译,邀请16名专家对量表的内容进行效度评价,得到中文版量表。同时采用该量表对674名ICU护士采取深静脉血栓形成预防性措施的意向进行评估,检验量表的信度及效度。结果 中文版量表共15个条目及4个开放式问题,经探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为82.66%;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合良好;效标关联效度显示相关系数为0.426,效标关联效度较为理想。量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.872,折半信度为0.840,重测信度为0.843(P<0.01);量表平均内容效度为0.870,量表各条目内容效度指数为0.900～1.000。结论 中文版护士采取深静脉血栓形成预防性措施意向量表具有良好的信效度,适合对我国ICU护士采取深静脉血栓形成预防性措施的意向进行评价。     

HIV感染者/AIDS患者自我管理量表的汉化及信效度评价

目的对HIV自我管理量表(the HIV Self-management Scale, HIVSMS)进行汉化并评价其信效度。方法征得原作者同意后,采用翻译、综合、回译、专家咨询、预测试等步骤对HIVSMS进行汉化。对成都和上海的296例HIV感染者及AIDS患者进行调查,并通过内部一致性、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度及效标效度等指标对中文版HIVSMS进行信效度评价。结果中文版HIVSMS量表水平的内容效度指数为0.957,各条目的内容效度指数为0.769～1.000;总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.918,各维度的Cronbach’sα系数范围为0.820～0.959,量表总的重测信度为0.965;探索性因子分析得到3个公因子累计方差贡献率为72.26%;以慢性病自我管理量表为效标的相关系数为0.196～0.296 (P0.01)。结论中文版HIVSMS具有较好的信度和效度,可以作为我国HIV感染者及AIDS患者自我管理能力的评估工具。     

Development of a reliable and valid Chinese version of the diabetes empowerment scale

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES) into Chinese and establish its psychometric properties among Hong Kong Chinese people. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A two-stage study design, incorporating qualitative and quantitative components, determined the cultural equivalency and content validity of the translated scale and established the psychometric properties of the Chinese DES (C-DES) in 207 patients. RESULTS: Psychometric analysis supported the reliability and validity of the 20-item Chinese DES (C-DES-20) and five subscales: overcoming barriers (alpha = 0.89), determining suitable methods (alpha = 0.79), achieving goals (alpha = 0.78), obtaining support (alpha = 0.78), and coping (alpha = 0.76). The test-retest reliability of the intraclass correlations was satisfactory when a subsample of 20 patients was tested after a 2-week interval. There was criterion validity between the global scale and metabolic control (HbA(1c)) of respondents with type 2 diabetes (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The C-DES-20 is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patient education and psychosocial interventions among Hong Kong Chinese people with diabetes.     

Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults

OBJECTIVE: To examine psychometric properties of the Self-Care Inventory-revised (SCI-R), a self-report measure of perceived adherence to diabetes self-care recommendations, among adults with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used three data sets of adult type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients to examine psychometric properties of the SCI-R. Principal component and factor analyses examined whether a general factor or common factors were present. Associations with measures of theoretically related concepts were examined to assess SCI-R concurrent and convergent validity. Internal reliability coefficients were calculated. Responsiveness was assessed using paired t tests, effect size, and Guyatt's statistic for type 1 patients who completed psychoeducation. RESULTS: Principal component and factor analyses identified a general factor but no consistent common factors. Internal consistency of the SCI-R was alpha = 0.87. Correlation with a measure of frequency of diabetes self-care behaviors was r = 0.63, providing evidence for SCI-R concurrent validity. The SCI-R correlated with diabetes-related distress (r = -0.36), self-esteem (r = 0.25), self-efficacy (r = 0.47), depression (r = -0.22), anxiety (r = -0.24), and HbA(1c) (r = -0.37), supporting construct validity. Responsiveness analyses showed SCI-R scores improved with diabetes psychoeducation with a medium effect size of 0.62 and a Guyatt's statistic of 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: The SCI-R is a brief, psychometrically sound measure of perceptions of adherence to recommended diabetes self-care behaviors of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.     

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to translate the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES) into Chinese and test the validity and reliability of the instrument within a Taiwanese population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A two-stage design was used for this study. Stage I consisted of a multi-stepped process of forward and backward translation, using focus groups and consensus meetings to translate the 20-item Australia/English version DMSES to Chinese and test content validity. Stage II established the psychometric properties of the Chinese version DMSES (C-DMSES) by examining the criterion, convergent and construct validity, internal consistency and stability testing. The sample for Stage II comprised 230 patients with type 2 diabetes aged 30 years or more from a diabetes outpatient clinic in Taiwan. RESULTS: Three items were modified to better reflect Chinese practice. The C-DMSES obtained a total average CVI score of .86.The convergent validity of the C-DMSES correlated well with the validated measure of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in measuring self-efficacy (r=.55; p<.01). Criterion-related validity showed that the C-DMSES was a significant predictor of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scores (Beta=.58; t=10.75, p<.01). Factor analysis supported the C-DMSES being composed of four subscales. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.77 to .93) and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient r=.86, p<.01) were found. CONCLUSIONS: The C-DMSES is a brief and psychometrically sound measure for evaluation of self-efficacy towards management of diabetes by persons with type 2 diabetes in Chinese populations.     

Translation and evaluation of Chinese version of the symptom experience index

Symptom assessment is crucial for patient care through the entire disease trajectory. Patients often experience multiple symptoms concurrently. The symptom experience index is reliable and valid as an instrument developed in the USA for assessing multiple symptoms and distress. The aim of the study was to translate and evaluate the Chinese version of the instrument in healthy adults and oncology patients. This is a psychometric study with a cross‐sectional design. To ensure the semantic equivalence and content validity, an integrative translation method was employed to translate the English version into Chinese language. The participants were recruited during 2014 from a large university, two university‐affiliated hospitals and a community in Changchun, China. The Chinese version demonstrated high internal consistency, test–retest reliability and content validity. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis and significant differences of symptom experience scores between healthy and oncology groups. Participants' acceptance of the Chinese version and its ability to collect adequate data among Chinese population provided evidence for using this version among Chinese population. This study provided initial evidence to support the psychometric properties of the Chinese version. The Chinese version demonstrated adequate reliability and validity to assess multiple symptom experience by Chinese populations.     

2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为量表的信、效度研究

目的 了解糖尿病自我管理行为量表修订版(SDSCA)在国内2型糖尿病患者中应用的信、效度.方法 按方便取样的方法,对符合条件的2型糖尿病患者80例进行问卷调查,并于2周后选择其中10例患者进行再次调查. 结果量表整体的Cronbach's α为0.62,重测信度为0.83(P<0.01);采用主成分分析法、方差最大正交旋转后,共提取因子8个,累计贡献率为0.92,各因子负荷系数均大于0.80.结论 SDSCA中文版具有较好的信、效度,适宜作为国内2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为的评估工具.     

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nurses’ self-concept questionnaire

cao x.y., Liu X.H., tian l. & guo y.q. (2013) Journal of Nursing Management  21 , 657–667 The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nurses’ self-concept questionnaire Aim To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nurses’ self-concept questionnaire. Background Nurses’ self-concept is important to alleviate the current shortage of nurses. Nurses’ self-concept questionnaire is an effective instrument to measure nurses’ self-perception of professional competencies. However, the psychometric properties of the Chinese version have not been tested. Methods A two-stage research design was used in this study. At Stage 1347 registered nurses were recruited to establish the psychometric properties of the Chinese version. At Stage 2, a confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the extracted factor structure from Stage 1 with 1017 respondents as a sample. Results The internal consistency of the Chinese version was 0.95 and the test–retest reliability was 0.83. The exploratory factor analysis extracted six dimensions. The findings at Stage 2 showed an acceptable model fit and discriminant validity. The Chinese version was a significant predictor of Maslach Burnout Inventory (β = −0.58; P = 0.00). Conclusions This study verified the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of nurses’ self-concept questionnaire. Implication for nursing management The Chinese version of nurses’ self-concept questionnaire will facilitate the evaluation of professional self-concept among nurses and help to develop the individualized self-concept strategies.     

Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the MacNew Heart Disease Health‐related Quality of Life questionnaire for patients with myocardial infarction in mainland China

Tools to measure the quality of life of Chinese myocardial infarction (MI) patients in mainland China are small in numbers. For this study, 210 Chinese patients with MI were recruited to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese Mandarin version of the MacNew Heart Disease questionnaire. Thirty‐five participants managed to complete the retest after 2 weeks. The MacNew Heart Disease questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency, test–retest reliability and concurrent validity. The principal components analysis identified three factors which accounted for 56.6% of the variance. The MacNew Heart Disease questionnaire demonstrated good reliability and validity to be used as a health status measurement tool, and is ready for clinical use in the assessment of the quality of life of Chinese MI patients in mainland China.     

The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This article summarizes the development and validation of a scale to measure the level of self-efficacy of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Self-efficacy is described as people's belief in their capability to organize and execute the course of action required to deal with prospective situations. This self-efficacy scale was developed based on the self-care activities these patients have to carry out in order to manage their diabetes. The following psychometric properties of this scale were established: content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and stability. The original scale contained 42 items. A panel of five experts in diabetes and four self-efficacy experts evaluated the original scale two times for relevance and clarity. This content validity procedure resulted in a final scale which consisted of 20 items. Subsequently, patients with type 2 diabetes were asked to complete this 20-item scale and further tests were done with the 94 usable responses. Factor analysis identified four factors, all of which were related to clusters of self-care activities used to manage diabetes which comprised this scale. The internal consistency of the total scale was alpha=0.81 and the test-retest reliability with a 5-week time interval was r=0.79 (P < 0.001).     

Psychometric testing of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale for patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BackgroundThe Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) is a self-report instrument that assesses symptoms and the severity of depression, but its psychometric properties in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese-Speaking populations are unknown.ObjectivesTo examine the psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CUDOS (CUDOS-Chinese).DesignA methodological research design. Setting: Endocrinology and metabolism outpatient clinics at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in northern Taiwan.ParticipantsTwo-hundred and fourteen type 2 diabetic patients with the mean age of 62.6 years were enrolled, and two-hundred and twelve of them completed the study.MethodsInternal consistency, test–retest reliability, concurrent, and contrasted-groups validity were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess sensitivity and specificity. Construct validity by means of confirmatory factor analysis was conducted.ResultsInternal consistency (Cronbach α of total scale and four subscales = 0.93, 0.80, 0.66, 0.80, and 0.83, respectively), test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients of total scale and four subscales = 0.92, 0.89, 0.94, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively), and strong correlations with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (r = 0.87) suggested good reliability and validity. The confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor model. A cut-off score of 19/20 yielded 77.8% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity.ConclusionsThe CUDOS-Chinese demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability for detecting depression in type 2 diabetic patients in Taiwan.     

中文版糖尿病自护行为量表的信度和效度研究

目的 考察中文版糖尿病自护行为量表(SDSCA)的信度和效度,为我国2型糖尿病患者,自护行为评估提供有效、简便的工具.方法 翻译国外的糖尿病自护行为量表(SDSCA),形成中文版SDSCA,采用随机抽样方法,从内分泌门诊中选取20例2型糖尿病患者,进行中文版糖尿病自护行为量表的重测信度、量表内部一致性和结构效度研究.结果 中文版SDSCA各维度重测信度在0.763～1.000;量表各维度条目间相关系数,具体饮食最低(0.104),其余各维度条目间呈中度至高度相关0.555～0.933;主成分分析共抽取4个因子,解释变异量的67.483%.结论 中文版SDSCA的信效度理想,适合于2型糖尿病患者自护行为评价.

Abstract：

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version Diabetea Self-Care Behavior(SDSCA)Questionnaire,and thus to provide an effective and convenient way of self-care behavior assessment for patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods The questionnaire based on the translation of SDSCA wag used in 20 cases of type 2 diabetes patients,in order to analyze the retest rehability,internal consistency and scale construct validity. Results The retest reliability of each dimension wag between 0.763 to 1.000;the scale correlation coeflicients between items in specific diet dimension Wag lowest(0.104),and the others were moderate to high degree of correlation between 0.555～0.933;exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 components,and the percentage of variance explained was 67.483% .Conclusions Chinese version SDSCA has a good reliability and validity,and is good for evaluating the self-care activities in type 2 diabetes patients.