Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) in non-small cell carcinoma of the bronchus

Between January 1985 and December 1988, 62 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the bronchus were treated by radiotherapy using continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART). With this regime on each of 12 consecutive days 3 fractions were given with a time interval of 6 hr between each. Initially a dose fraction of 1.4 Gy was used and a total of 50.4 Gy was achieved in 23 patients. As tolerance was good, the dose increment was raised to 1.5 Gy and the total to 54 Gy in the subsequent 39 patients. Esophagitis was the only immediate complication, and although most patients were reduced to a fluid diet for a period, recovery was complete and only one patient required endo-esophageal tube feeding for a short time. The results observed so far have been assessed against those in a previous trial of a radiosensitizer in cases similarly accepted for treatment. Complete regression, as observed radiologically, was achieved by 42%; this can be compared with 15% of the previously treated series. At 1 year the survival probability was 64% compared with a previous 44% and at 2 years 34% compared with a previous 12%. A randomized controlled clinical trial is now planned.     

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART): an interim report upon late morbidity

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) has given high levels of tumour control in advanced head and neck and bronchial carcinomas. In general, late changes have appeared less than after conventional radiotherapy but despite a prediction of reduced risk of spinal cord damage, two cases of radiation myelitis have presented. The possible causes are considered and a reduction in permitted spinal cord dose has been made.     

The rationale for continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART)

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) was devised to give the maximum chance of improving clinical radiotherapy and was based upon available radiobiological evidence. A pilot study, begun in 1985, has now included 210 patients. When comparison is made with previously treated cases, improved results have been seen in the two main groups included, that is, advanced head and neck and bronchial carcinomas. Multi-center randomized controlled clinical trials are planned.     

The morbidity of salvage surgery following conventional radiotherapy and continuous, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART)

A comparison was made of the morbidity of surgery for loco-regional recurrence in patients with advanced cancer of the head and neck region following continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART), after conventional radiotherapy, and also in a group following surgery only as the primary treatment. Post-surgical morbidity occurred in 14 (77%) of the 18 patients treated with CHART, of whom 11 (78%) required a further surgical procedure. In the conventional group, morbidity occurred in 14 (58%) of the 24 patients, of whom 9 (64%) required further surgery. Finally, in the surgical group morbidity occurred in 13 (48%) of the 27 patients, of whom 7 (54%) required further surgery. Because of the many factors that may influence the chance of morbidity and of the small number of cases, considered statistical analysis is not meaningful and there must be caution in the interpretation of results. When allowance is made for the greater frequency of more advanced tumors and for sites in the oropharynx and oral cavity, where procedures associated with greater risk of complication were performed, the morbidity seen after surgery was performed upon CHART patients appeared to be no greater than when conventional radiotherapy had been given. As expected, the surgery only group showed less morbidity than either of the radiotherapy groups.     

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared CHART which employs 36 fractions of 1.5 Gy 3 times per day to give 54 Gy in 12 consecutive days with conventional radiotherapy-30 fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 6 weeks. A total of 563 patients were entered between April 1990 and April 1995. This report is based upon the data updated to 1 April 1998. RESULTS: The analysis of the mature data shows that the benefits previously reported have been maintained. Overall there was a 22% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 9% from 20 to 29% (P = 0.008) and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.033). In the large subgroup of patients with squamous cell cancer which accounted for 81% of the cases, there was a 30% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 13% from 20 to 33% (P = 0.0007) and a 27% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.012). Furthermore, in squamous carcinoma there was a 25% reduction in the relative risk of local and/or distant progression (P = 0.025) and 24% reduction in the relative risk of metastasis (P = 0.043). There was no evidence that CHART gave more or less benefit in any other subgroup. CONCLUSION: This analysis of mature data confirms that CHART is superior to conventional radiotherapy in achieving local tumour control and survival in locally advanced NSCLC. This demonstrates the importance of cellular repopulation as a cause of failure in the radiotherapy of NSCLC. The reduction in the risk of metastasis confirms that improved local tumour control, even in lung cancer, can reduce the incidence of metastasis. This trial shows that control of local tumour can lead to an improvement in long term survival.     

连续加速超切割与后程加速超分割治疗食管癌

目的 比较连续加速超分割（ＣＡＨＦ）和后程加速超分割（ＬＣＡＦ）放射治疗食管癌的疗效和毒性。方法 １０１例食管鳞癌患者前瞻性随机分成２个组。ＬＣＡＦ组（５２例）前２／３疗程为常规分割（５次／周,１．８Ｇｙ／次）,照射４１．４Ｇｙ后缩野改加速超分割（２次／ｄ,１．５Ｇｙ／次）照射２７Ｇｙ,总量６８．４Ｇｙ,４１次,４４～４６ｄ,ＣＡＨＦ组（４９例）从治疗开始,２次／ｄ,１．５Ｇｙ／次,照射至３９Ｇｙ     

Radiation pneumonitis following treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART)

PURPOSE: To determine whether partial volume lung irradiation influences the risk of developing acute radiation pneumonitis after the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted an analysis of 32 patients treated with CHART at the Gloucestershire Oncology Center. Twelve patients were treated using conventional two-dimensional treatment techniques and received elective nodal irradiation (ENI). Their treatment plans were subsequently recapitulated using a three-dimensional treatment planning system. Twenty patients were planned using this system from the outset. For these patients, elective nodal irradiation was omitted. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were constructed and several parameters analyzed for their ability to predict for the development of pneumonitis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that the percentage lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20) and the mean lung dose are of predictive value for the development of pneumonitis after CHART. There is a strong correlation between these two parameters. Importantly, partial volume lung irradiation using CHART appears to be better tolerated than conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. The omission of ENI considerably reduces V20. Using a commonly employed 3-beam technique it was also noted that the shape of the planning target volume (PTV) in the transverse plane (expressed as an elliptical index) affects the conformity of the V20 isodose to the PTV. This influences the scope for dose escalation with irregularly shaped tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In relation to acute radiation pneumonitis, CHART appears to have a superior therapeutic index than conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. V20 and mean lung dose are useful factors for predicting the risk of this complication. The use of these parameters will aid the selection of optimal treatment plans and provides a basis for future dose escalation studies.     

Short course continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiation therapy (CHART) as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer

Determine feasibility and toxicity of preoperative short course pelvic CHART (25 Gy in 15 fractions over 5 days) for treatment of clinically resectable primary rectal tumours. Between 1998 and 2004, 20 patients with clinically staged T3 resectable rectal carcinoma were treated in this prospective pilot study with preoperative short course CHART to their pelvis. The aim was for total mesorectal excision within 7 days. Radiation toxicity, surgical morbidity, locoregional control (LRC), overall (OS), cause specific (CSS) and disease free survival (DFS) outcomes were documented. Nineteen of the 20 patients completed planned radiotherapy. One discontinued radiotherapy due to toxicity. All patients underwent potentially curative radical surgery. One patient developed grade 3, and three patients grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. With a median follow-up of 31 months (range 0.9-88), there is no grade 3, 4 or 5 late toxicity. Two patients experienced grade 2, and three patients grade 1 late bowel toxicity. Two patients died from postoperative complications, and two developed grade 2 abdominal wound infections. At 3 years LRC is 95% (95% CI 83-100), OS 72% (95% CI 51-94), CSS 86% (95% CI 68-100) and DFS 80% (95% CI 60-100). Two patients died from metastatic disease, one patient from a second primary and one patient is alive after successful resection of hepatic metastases. This small study suggests preoperative short course CHART for clinically resectable rectal carcinoma is feasible with acceptable compliance and tolerable side effects.     

A feasibility study of continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) and brachytherapy in patients with early oral or oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Overall time is important in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer (Dische, S., Saunders, M.I., Barrett, A., Harvey, A., Gibson, D., Parmar, M., 1997, Radiother. Oncol., 44:123-136). Results are presented on outcome and morbidity in ten patients with head and neck cancer treated with external beam irradiation (CHART protocol) and interstitial implantation, completing treatment in 12 days. Local control and overall survival at 5 years was 67%. Acute and late morbidity was acceptable giving scope for dose escalation.     

Comparison between continuous accelerated hyperfractionated and late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment results and toxicity of continuous accelerated hyperfractionated (CAHF) and late-course accelerated hyperfractionated (LCAF) radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1996 and March 1999, 101 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were randomized into two groups: 49 to the CAHF group and 52 to the LCAF group. Patients in the CAHF group received RT at 1.5 Gy/fraction b.i.d. (6-h interval), 5 d/wk, to a total dose 66 Gy in 44 fractions during 4.4 weeks. The patients in the LCAF group received conventional fractionation RT, 1.8 Gy/fraction, to a dose of 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions during 4.6 weeks, followed by accelerated fractionation RT using reduced fields, b.i.d., at 1.5 Gy/fraction, with a minimal interval of 6 h between fractions. The total dose was 68.4 Gy in 41 fraction during 6.4 weeks. Patient age, gender, performance score, diet, lesion location, lesion length, stage, and fractionation (CAHF or LCAF) were entered into the univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: All patients finished the treatment course, except for 1 patient in the CAHF group because of severe acute esophagitis. The rate of Grade I, II, and III acute bronchitis was 18.4% (9 of 49), 30.6% (15 of 49), and 8.2% (4 of 49) in the CAHF group and 13.5% (7 of 52), 21.2% (11 of 52), and 3.8% (2 of 52) in the LCAF group, respectively. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). The rate of Grade I, II, III, and IV acute esophagitis was 6.1% (3 of 49), 32.7% (16 of 49), 46.9% (23 of 49), and 14.3% (7 of 49) in the CAHF group and 26.9% (14 of 52), 32.7% (17 of 52), 7.7% (4 of 52), and 1.9% (1 of 52) in the LCAF group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The local control rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 88.7%, 83.9%, and 55.9% in the CAHF group and 80.7%, 71.4%, and 57.1% in the LCAF group, respectively (p = 0.1251). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rate was 79.6%, 51.6%, and 37.6% in the CAHF group and 80.0%, 57.6%, and 41.2% in the LCAF group, respectively (p = 0.5757). Multivariate analysis showed that age and lesion length were independent significant prognostic factors for local control rate, and age was for the overall survival rate. The fractionation schedule had no significant prognostic effect. CONCLUSION: CAHF and LCAF result in similar 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control and survival rates. CAHF resulted in more severe acute esophagitis and may be less well tolerated than LCAF. The treatment results after the CAHF and LCAF regimens were better than those of historical conventional RT.     

Failure-specific prognostic factors after continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) or conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a competing risks analysis.

The aim of this study was to identify possible failure-specific prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical outcome was analysed in 549 patients participating in the randomized controlled trial of CHART vs conventional radiotherapy. Local failure and distant failure with or without concurrent local relapse were subjected to a competing risk analysis using an accelerated failure-time model with a log-logistic hazard function. Randomization to CHART (2 P = 0.005), increasing age (2 P = 0.036) and female sex (2 P = 0.09) was all associated with a prolonged interval to failure. Advanced clinical stage was associated with a decreased interval to failure (2 P = 0.004) and a significantly increased risk (2 P = 0.009) of failing in distant rather than in local position. From this model, prognostic indices for local and distant failure were estimated for each individual patient. Competing risk analysis allows identification of patients with different failure patterns, and may provide a means of stratifying patients for intensified local or systemic therapy.     

Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with/without mitomycin C in head and neck cancer

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of mitomycin C to an accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy. The aim was to test a very short schedule with/without mitomycin C (MMC) with conventional fractionation in histologically verified squamous cell carinoma of the head and neck region.Methods and Materials: From October 1990 to December 1996, 188 patients entered the trial. Tumors originated in the oral cavity in 54, oropharynx in 82, larynx in 20, and hypopharynx in 32 cases, respectively. Patients’ stages were predominantly T3 and T4 (158/188, 84%) and most patients had lymph node metastases (144/188, 77%) at diagnosis. Only 22 patients were female, 166 were male, the median age of patients was 57 years (range 34 to 76 years). Patients were randomized to one of the following three treatment options: conventional fractionation (CF) consisting of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (65 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (V-CHART; 62 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy with 20 mg/sqm MMC on day 5 (V-CHART + MMC; 61 patients). By the accelerated regimens, the total dose of 55.3 Gy was delivered within 17 consecutive days, by 33 fractions. On day 1, a single dose of 2.5 Gy was given, from day 2 to 17 a dose of 1.65 Gy was delivered twice: the interfraction interval was 6 hours or more.Results: Mucositis was very intense after accelerated therapy, most patients experiencing a grade III/IV reaction. The mucosal reaction did not differ whether MMC was administered or not. Patients treated by accelerated fractionation experienced a confluent mucosal reaction 12–14 days following start of therapy and recovered (no reaction) within 6 weeks. The skin reaction was not considered different in the three treatment groups. Those patients treated with additional chemotherapy experienced a grade III/IV hematologic toxicity in 12/61 patients. Initial complete response (CR) was recorded in 43% following CF, 58% after V-CHART, and 67% after V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05). Actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier) was significantly improved in the combined treated patients. Local tumor control was 28%, 32%, and 56% following CF, V-CHART, and V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05).Conclusion: We conclude that our continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy regimen is equal to conventional fractionation, suggesting that by shortening the overall treatment time from 7 weeks to 17 days a reduction in dose from 70 Gy to 55.3 Gy is possible, with maintenance of local tumor control rates. The administration of MMC to the accelerated regimen is tolerable and improves the outcome for patients significantly.     

Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck region

Shortening of the overall duration of radiotherapy would reduce the possibility repopulation of tumor during treatment. Most clinical trials of such accelerated radiotherapy have incorporated a split course to improve normal tissue tolerance. Any interruption, however, even for the week-end, may allow repopulation to occur. A scheme of radiotherapy has been used during which treatment was given 3 times per day on each of 12 consecutive days without interruption for the week-end. In a pilot study a significant improvement in survival and local tumor control has been achieved in 48 patients with head and neck tumors when comparison was made with a previously treated group. A randomized controlled clinical trial is planned.