Cyclin D1 gene amplification and overexpression are present in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Cyclin D1 (CCND1) amplification is found in 10–15 per cent of invasive breast carcinomas, but it is not well established whether this gene alteration also occurs in the precursor of invasive breast carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). By Southern blot analysis, cyclin D1 gene amplification was detected in 10 per cent (3/32) of DCIS cases. In addition, 15 cases of DCIS were analysed using bright field in situ hybridization (BRISH), of which 11 had already been analysed by Southern blotting. One additional case with gene amplification was found by BRISH. The use of BRISH for the detection of gene amplification is shown to be a novel and reliable in situ method on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. By immunohistochemistry, 147 cases of DCIS were analysed for the expression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 overexpression was found in 9 per cent of well-differentiated, 29 per cent of intermediately differentiated, and 19 per cent of poorly differentiated DCIS. No statistically significant association was found between cyclin D1 overexpression and the differentiation grade of DCIS, although 90 per cent of the cases that show overexpression are classified as intermediately and poorly differentiated. An association was found between cyclin D1 overexpression and oestrogen receptor positivity. Cyclin D1 overexpression was found in all four cases with cyclin D1 gene amplification, but was also found in 30 per cent (8/27) of cases without detectable gene amplification. It is concluded that cyclin D1 gene amplification is an early event in the development of breast carcinoma and occurs in poorly differentiated DCIS. Cyclin D1 protein overexpression is also present in tumours without cyclin D1 gene amplification and is seen predominantly in DCIS of intermediately and poorly differentiated histological type and oestrogen receptor positivity. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 in salivary gland tumors

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) is a 15-kd glycoprotein that is expressed by normal apocrine epithelia and in a majority of breast carcinomas. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this substance is also present in tumors of the salivary glands, sweat glands, and prostate gland. To determine whether the expression of CGDFP-15 might aid in the differential diagnosis of salivary gland lesions, the anti-GCDFP-15 monoclonal antibody D6 was applied to paraffin sections of 133 such neoplasms. Benign tumors (76% reactive) were more often labeled than malignant lesions (28% reactive) by this antibody; overall, 53 (41%) of 133 cases were positive for GCDFP-15. Notably, the tubuloglandular components in 17 (81%) of 21 pleomorphic adenomas were reactive, but no example of either adenoid cystic carcinoma or polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma were labeled. In contrast, 24% of adenocarcinomas stained with this antibody. The apparent expression of GCDFP-15 by a spectrum of salivary gland tumors supports their biologic relationship to lesions of the cutaneous apocrine glands and breast. Furthermore, the demonstration of this determinant may be of use in suggesting the salivary gland nature of poorly differentiated carcinomas of the head and neck, and it may facilitate the separation of pleomorphic adenoma from histologically similar malignant neoplasms in the salivary glands themselves.     

Androgen receptor expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptors

AIMS: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been diagnosed increasingly since the advent of mammographic screening. In contrast to the situation in invasive breast carcinoma, there are no reports on androgen receptor (AR) status in DCIS and few reports on oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors. METHODS: AR expression was examined in 57 cases of DCIS of the breast and correlated to the degree of differentiation and ER/PR status using immunohistochemical methods. RESULTS: AR positivity was noted in 19 of the cases, whereas the other 38 cases were negative. There was no significant association between AR expression and the degree of differentiation of DCIS; three of the 13 well differentiated DCIS cases, 10 of the 19 intermediately differentiated cases, and six of the 25 poorly differentiated cases were positive (p = 0.093). However, a strong association was shown between the expression of ER (p < 0.0001) and PR (p = 0.002) and the degree of differentiation of DCIS. In addition, no significant association was found between the expression of AR and the expression of ER (p = 0.26) or PR (p = 0.57) in DCIS of the breast. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of cases of DCIS of the breast express AR and this may be associated with apocrine differentiation, which may impact on accurate typing of DCIS. Moreover, the expression of AR (but not ER or PR) in DCIS does not appear to be associated with the degree of differentiation.     

Comparative study of monoclonal antibody B72.3 and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 as markers of apocrine carcinoma of the breast

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) is a commonly used apocrine marker; however, its expression was recently found to decrease in infiltrating, larger, or metastasizing apocrine carcinomas of the breast. In the breast, monoclonal antibody (MAb) B72.3 has been reported to be useful as an apocrine marker although it is used for that purpose much less frequently than GCDFP-15. In the search for a more consistent apocrine marker, immunoreactivity for MAb B72.3 was examined in apocrine carcinomas at different stages and compared with GCDFP-15. 47 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (92%) and 9 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (15%) were MAb B72.3 positive, while 39 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (76%) and 13 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (21%) were GCDFP-15 positive. Thus, both sensitivity and specificity were higher for MAb B72.3. Furthermore, unlike GCDFP-15, MAb B72.3 exhibited positivity irrespective of infiltrating status, tumor size, or metastatic status. There was no correlation between MAb B72.3-immunoreactivity and GCDFP-15-expression. The combined usage of MAb B72.3 with GCDFP-15 was useful to confirm the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma, especially for advanced tumors, with only two cases being negative for both MAb B72.3 and GCDFP-15. Whether these two cases should be differentiated from ordinary apocrine carcinomas remains to be investigated.     

Loss of bcl-2 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast relates to poor histological differentiation and to expression of p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins

Aim : This study (1) investigates the incidence of bcl-2 protein expression in a series of 108 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), including 25 with early invasive carcinoma, and (2) evaluates the relationship of bcl-2 expression to the histological grade of DCIS and to the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins.  

Methods and results

The expression of bcl-2, oestrogen receptor (ER), c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins was determined immunohistochemically. Cases were regarded as positive for individual antibodies when at least 10% of the DCIS cells showed positive staining. DCIS was graded histologically as well ( n  = 9), intermediately ( n  = 24), or poorly differentiated ( n  = 75). bcl-2 expression was documented in 57 cases (53%) and was strongly associated with the histological grade of DCIS ( P  < 0.0001). All cases of well-differentiated DCIS were bcl-2 positive and loss of bcl-2 expression was almost exclusively confined to poorly differentiated DCIS lesions. bcl-2 expression was also closely associated with positive ER status ( P  < 0.0001). Forty-seven of 57 (82%) bcl-2 positive cases were ER positive while 49/51 (96%) bcl-2 negative cases were ER negative. There was a significant inverse correlation between bcl-2 expression and both p53 protein expression ( P  = 0.0004) and c-erbB-2 expression ( P  < 0.0001). Nineteen of 24 (79%) p53 positive cases and 38/45 (84%) c-erbB-2 positive cases showed loss of bcl-2.  

Conclusions

Loss of bcl-2 expression occurs in poorly differentiated DCIS and is related to negative ER status and to positive p53 and c-erbB-2 status. This pattern of bcl-2 expression and its association with other biological markers in DCIS is similar to that reported in invasive breast carcinoma.     

Expression of apocrine differentiation markers in neuroendocrine breast carcinomas of aged women.

Neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinomas are a rare entity in young women; however, their frequency increases in aged patients. The present work demonstrates that NE breast carcinomas in elderly women can also express an apocrine immunophenotype and analyzes the histological and clinical aspects of such differentiation. A selected series of 50 NE tumors (positive for NE markers in >/=50% of the cells) was tested for the immunocytochemical expression of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15). The results demonstrated that about 50% of moderately (G2) and well-differentiated (G1) NE breast carcinomas (mucinous, solid papillary, and solid cohesive histotypes) coexpressed the apocrine marker. In these cases, specific mRNA for GCDFP-15 (PIP) and for chromogranin A (ChA) was demonstrated using in situ hybridization (ISH). Carcinomas of the alveolar subtype (G2) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (G3), including one case of atypical carcinoid, were pure NE carcinomas, devoid of apocrine differentiation. The steroid receptor status of these lesions was evaluated to test a possible involvement of androgen receptors in apocrine differentiation. We demonstrated that the level of AR and the mean age of patients at diagnosis were significantly higher in apocrine than in nonapocrine differentiated tumors. The histological grade and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) significantly influenced the prognosis of these NE carcinomas, either pure or NE-apocrine differentiated. The most original result of our study is therefore the demonstration of a possible divergent apocrine differentiation of NE breast carcinomas that might be regulated by the activation of androgen receptors in elder patients. In addition, the possibility for using Chs or GCDFP-15 serum values in the follow-up of these patients, as demonstrated in two cases of the present series, can justify the immunophenotyping of the tumors.     

Apocrine epithelium of the breast: does it result from metaplasia?

 Benign and malignant breast lesions may show an apocrine epithelium considered to be the result of metaplasia. In an attempt to clarify the histogenesis of the breast apocrine epithelium we searched for the presence of apocrine cells or cells with apocrine differentiation during human breast development. We analysed 10 autopsy specimens of female breasts from fetuses between 28 and 40 weeks of gestational age and tissue from 6 normal breasts, obtained after breast reduction in nulliparous young women between 22 and 28 years of age. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin, PAS-diastase and a monoclonal antibody (BRST-2) anti-GCDFP-15, which is a specific apocrine marker. A 40-week fetal breast was analysed by electron microscopy. No cells with histological and ultrastructural apocrine features were found in the ducts of fetal breasts. All fetal breasts showed some ducts with sparse GCDFP-15-immunoreactive cells; the number of these cells increased with gestational age. PAS-diastase was negative. No cells with apocrine morphology were found in ducts and lobules of normal adult breasts. Scattered GCDFP-15-positive luminal epithelial cells and rare PAS-diastase-positive cells were observed in some lobules of all adult breasts. Cells with biochemical characteristics (GCDFP-15 expression) of apocrine differentiation are evident during human fetal breast development and persist in adult mammary glands. Unknown stimuli may induce these cells to take on an apocrine morphology. Apocrine epithelium of the breast may be a normal process of differentiation rather than metaplasia. We suggest the term ”apocrine differentiation precursor cells” for GCDFP-15-positive breast epithelial cells with no apocrine morphology. Received: 14 February 1997 / Accepted: 12 April 1997     

Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes

Invasive breast cancer shows a wide range of morphological differentiation, associated with differences in prognosis, but as yet, the underlying genetic mechanisms cannot be accounted for. In order to establish a model of the possible progression from the different subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer, 77 selected cases of invasive breast cancer representing distinct morphological subtypes were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). There was a high degree of genetic homology between tubular and tubulo-lobular carcinoma and well-differentiated DCIS, and between ductal invasive carcinoma G3 and poorly differentiated DCIS. Highly differentiated invasive breast cancers were characterized by a loss of 16q and a low average number of aberrations per case. In high-grade tumours, losses of this chromosomal region were seen with a much lower frequency in cases with evidence of an aneuploid tumour status. These data demonstrate the close genetic similarity of well-, intermediately, and poorly differentiated DCIS and distinct morphological types of invasive breast carcinoma, providing further evidence that DCIS is a direct precursor lesion of invasive breast cancer and that various evolutionary genetic pathways exist.     

p53 mutation in breast cancer. Correlation with cell kinetics and cell of origin

AIM: Several studies have investigated the expression of the cytokeratins (CKs), vimentin, the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), the oestrogen receptor (ER), and the progesterone receptor (PgR), in breast cancer, but no study has directly compared p53 mutations with these phenotypic and differentiation markers in the same case. The present study was designed to provide some of this information. METHODS: The expression of the p53 and bcl-2 proteins was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in relation to phenotypic characteristics and cellular kinetic parameters (mitotic index and apoptotic index) in 37 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 27 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. In addition, p53 gene mutation was examined by polymerase chain reaction single strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP). RESULTS: Thirteen cases (eight DCIS and five IDC) showed expression of CK8, CK14, CK18, vimentin, and EGFR, consistent with a stem cell phenotype, whereas 44 cases (27 DCIS and 17 IDC) showed expression of CK8 and CK1, weak or negative expression of CK18, but were negative for vimentin and EGFR, consistent with a luminal cell phenotype. DCIS and IDC cases with a stem cell phenotype were ER/PgR negative and intermediately or poorly differentiated. In contrast, the cases with luminal cell phenotype were ER/PgR positive and well or intermediately differentiated. In addition, intermediately or poorly differentiated cases with a stem cell phenotype showed higher proliferative activity (per cent of MIB-l positive cells) than did intermediately or well differentiated cases with a luminal cell phenotype. Both DCIS and IDC cases with a stem cell phenotype were p53 positive and bcl-2 negative by immunohistochemistry. In IDC, p53 expression was associated with a reduction of both mitotic index and apoptotic index compared with DCIS. Most of the tumours showing a more differentiated phenotype (luminal) were p53 negative and bcl-2 positive. In these cases, cell kinetic parameters increased from DCIS to IDC. These data suggest the existence of subsets of DCIS and IDC that, because of their phenotypic characteristics, could be derived from subpopulations of normal breast cells having different control mechanisms of cell proliferation and neoplastic progression. CONCLUSIONS: These results are compatible with the hypothesis that the phenotype of the cell of origin constrains both tumour phenotype and the choice of genetic events; however, the occurrence of p53 mutants by chance during neoplastic transformation cannot be excluded.     

Nuclear cytometric changes in breast carcinogenesis

Breast cancer is thought to originate through progressively aberrant precursor lesions, paralleled by increasing morphological changes. The aim of this study was to quantify nuclear features by image cytometry in invasive breast cancer and its early (hyperplasia) and late (ductal carcinoma in situ) precursor lesions, in order to objectively describe nuclear changes in the spectrum of proliferative intraductal and invasive breast lesions. Image cytometry was performed on tissue sections of 20 samples of normal breast tissue, 71 of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), nine of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and 11 of well-differentiated and 13 of poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. The invasive breast carcinomas consisted of 19 well-differentiated and 24 poorly differentiated lesions. Through the spectrum from normal breast tissue to invasive carcinoma, progressive changes in many nuclear features were measured. Significant differences were found between nuclei of florid ductal hyperplasia compared with mild and moderate ductal hyperplastic lesions, suggesting that florid ductal hyperplasia may be a more advanced lesion than assumed and may contain cancer precursor cells. No differences were found between ADH and well-differentiated DCIS, suggesting that these lesions are closely related. Feature values of well-differentiated DCIS were comparable to values found in well-differentiated invasive carcinoma and the same applied to poorly differentiated DCIS and invasive lesions. These results support the hypothesis that breast cancer develops through different routes of progression, one leading to well-differentiated invasive cancer through well-differentiated DCIS, and one leading to poorly differentiated invasive cancer through poorly differentiated DCIS. In conclusion, image cytometry reveals progressive changes in nuclear morphological and subvisual chromatin distribution features in the spectrum from intraductal proliferations to invasive breast cancer. This provides evidence for a progression from usual to atypical ductal hyperplasia and then to invasive cancer, through different routes for well-differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions.     

Genetic relation of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, and associated invasive carcinoma of the breast.

AIMS: The mutual relation of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, as accepted precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, is controversial. Because they display genetic heterogeneity, it is not clear how genetically advanced these entities are and what causes the transition to an invasive carcinoma. METHODS: Six cases of LCIS, four of them with associated lobular invasive carcinoma, four cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with an associated invasive lobular carcinoma, and nine cases of intermediately and poorly differentiated DCIS with associated ductal invasive carcinoma were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) after microdissection and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin. RESULTS: LCIS was characterised by a low average rate of copy number changes, no evidence of amplifications, and a high rate of gains and losses of chromosomal material at 1q and 16q, respectively. A high degree of genetic homology with well differentiated DCIS was obvious, as reported previously. The cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with associated lobular invasive components and lobular differentiation revealed striking homologies, and a significant difference of E-cadherin expression. The comparison of preinvasive and invasive breast lesions, irrespective of differentiation within the same patient, revealed no specific alteration that might be associated with invasion. Genetic alterations seen in invasive carcinoma were not necessarily seen in the adjacent precursor lesions. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide strong evidence that invasive breast cancer is a disease with multiple cytogenetic subclones already present in preinvasive lesions. Moreover, specific CGH alterations associated with invasion were not observed. Furthermore, the close genetic association between well differentiated and a subgroup of intermediately differentiated DCIS and LCIS led to the hypothesis that LCIS and a subgroup of DCIS are different phenotypic forms of a common genotype.     

PIP/GCDFP-15 gene expression and apocrine differentiation in carcinomas of the breast

The frequency and the significance of apocrine differentiation in carcinomas of the breast are uncertain, because of the lack of reliable and reproducible criteria for morphological diagnosis. The 15 kDa glycoprotein of cystic breast disease (GCDFP-15) is regarded as a specific functional marker of apocrine cells. Expression of the prolactin-inducible protein (PIP)/GCDFP-15 gene was investigated by Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization in breast cancer cell lines and in an unselected series (33 cases) of primary carcinomas of the breast. On the same cases, histological assessment of apocrine differentiation and immunocytochemical detection of GCDFP-15 were also performed and correlated with follow-up data. The presence of PIP/GCDFP-15 mRNA was a feature of a relatively high number of cases, but was incompletely correlated with histological and immunocytochemical evidences of apocrine differentiation. Expression of the PIP/GCDFP-15 gene was significantly associated with relapse-free survival, and may represent a novel variable of functional and prognostic relevance.Work supported by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca ca sul Cancro (AIRC) (Milan, Italy), Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche (CNR, grant N. 93.02125.PF39), Ministero dell' Universita' e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST), Rome, Italy.     

Poorly differentiated cutaneous apocrine carcinomas: histopathological clues and immunohistochemical analysis for the diagnosis of this unusual neoplasm

Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma (PCAC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that is derived from apocrine glands. Histologically, these tumours can appear well-differentiated where diagnosis should be relatively straightforward. However, occasionally these tumours can exhibit high-grade features, and in such instances the diagnosis can be challenging. A retrospective analysis of 12 cases of poorly differentiated PCAC, obtained from large academic institutions, was performed, and summarised below. Immunohistochemical studies were performed in all cases with antibodies against CK7, p63, CAM 5.2, GCDFP-15, GATA3, CEA, PR, ER, HER2, calponin, SMA, androgen receptor and EMA. All 12 cases were poorly differentiated; however, there were some histopathological clues to the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma; namely, the presence of focal glandular formation, acrosyringial involvement and the presence of single ‘pagetoid’ cells within epidermis. All tumours were consistently positive for CK7, GATA3 and GCDFP-15 and negative for p63. The tumours had variable expression of CAM5.2, CEA, ER, PR, HER2, androgen receptor and EMA. In three cases, there was a preservation of the myoepithelial cell layer (with calponin and SMA), which also confirmed the primary cutaneous origin. PCAC is a difficult neoplasm to diagnose, as it can appear identical to metastatic carcinomas. We describe 12 cases of poorly differentiated PCAC, highlighting their salient clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical features, and discuss the potential diagnostic pitfalls in distinguishing this entity from other malignant neoplasms. Our results indicate that a combination of thorough histological inspection coupled with an adequate battery of immunohistochemical stains is necessary to support the diagnosis of PCAC.     

Value of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 in distinguishing metastatic breast carcinomas among poorly differentiated neoplasms involving the ovary

Women with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing primary ovarian tumors. Because a differential diagnosis between primary and metastatic tumors may be difficult in poorly differentiated ovarian neoplasms, breast carcinoma markers may be helpful in establishing the primary site of origin. Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), a well-known marker of apocrine differentiation, has been reported as a highly specific and sensitive breast carcinoma marker. To evaluate the usefulness of GCDFP-15 as a marker for metastatic breast cancer, we have studied, by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique, 14 cases of breast cancer metastatic to the ovary and compared them with 32 primary ovarian tumors and seven cases of ovarian metastases other than breast in origin. Two cases of primary ovarian cancer metastatic to the breast were also included. A strong cytoplasmic immunostaining was found in 10 of 14 cases (71%) of ovarian metastasis from breast carcinoma, and in most cases a characteristic paranuclear staining was noted. All primary ovarian tumors were negative. Ovarian metastases from tumors other than breast and both cases of ovarian carcinoma metastatic to the breast were negative. These results are highly significant (P less than .00001) and demonstrate the value of GCDFP-15 in establishing a primary breast origin among neoplasms of unknown origin involving the ovaries.     

Apocrine carcinomas of the breast in Turkish women: hormone receptors, c-erbB-2 and p53 immunoexpression

The aims of this study were twofold: (i) to determine the occurrence frequency of apocrine carcinoma of the breast (ApBCa) in Turkish breast cancer (BCa) patients; and (ii) to evaluate the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), gross cystic disease protein-15 (GCDFP-15), c-erbB-2, and p53 in these cases. Six hundred and twenty-six cases of BCa were studied immunohistochemically (streptoavidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase method). The results of ApBCa were compared with those of invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified type (IDC-NOS) cases of similar grade. Thirteen cases of ApBCa were encountered, accounting for 2.1% of all BCa cases. Immunohistochemically, ApBCa positivity was as follows: GCDFP-15 (100%), ER (39%), PR (8%), AR (54%), p53 (39%), and c-erbB-2 (85%). In the IDC-NOS group, GCDFP-15* was expressed in less than 50% of the tumors. The occurrence frequencies of the other markers were as follows: ER (69%), PR (69%)*, AR (46%), c-erbB-2 (0%)*, and p53 (31%), (*) indicating significant differences between the two groups.

For Turkish BCa patients, (i) the occurrence rate of ApBCa (2.1%) was high; and (ii) the following combination would allow for an immunohistochemical identification of ApBCa: GCDFP-15⁺, c-erbB-2⁺, and PR⁻.     

Immunohistochemical comparison between GCDFP-15 and estrogen and progesterone receptors in the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of the breast

Background: in the workup of tumors of unknown primary origin in women, a frequent consideration is breast carcinoma, because it is common and may initially present as metastasis. Objective: describe and compare the immunohistochemical profile of hormonal receptors (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and GCDFP-15 in lymph node metastatic breast carcinoma according the histological grade. Methods: retrospective study analyzing 30 patients with identified primary breast cancer and lymph node metastasis. The cases were divided in three groups: grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated) and grade III (poorly differentiated). We used three antibodies (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and GCDFP-15) in the lymph node and compare the expression according the histological grade. Results: in metastatic lymph node from grade I breast carcinomas the hormone receptors were 100% positive and GCDFP-15 was 80% positive. In grade II, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor were positive in 90 and 40% respectively, and GCDFP-15 was positive in 80%. In grade III, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor were positive in 30 and 50% respectively, and GCDFP-15 in 60%. Conclusions: the immunohistochemical expression of hormonal receptors and GCDFP-15 in metastatic breast carcinoma is related to histological grade in the breast.     

An immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1, p53, and p21waf1/cip1 proteins in tumors originating from the follicular epithelium of the thyroid gland

This study aimed at clarifying the factors closely related to the tumor progression of thyroid neoplasms. We examined the immunoreactivity of cyclin D1, p53, and p21waf1/cip1 proteins in 179 thyroid tumors originating from the follicular epithelium using an immunohistochemical technique. Cyclin D1 positivity was frequent in well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (39/122 cases), but it was rarely seen in follicular adenomas (1/33 cases), (p < 0.05). Positivity for p53 was more frequent in poorly differentiated carcinomas (7/19 cases) and undifferentiated carcinomas (4/5 cases) than in well-differentiated carcinomas (14/122 cases) (p < 0,05, respectively). P21waf1/cip1 positivity was more frequent in well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (43/122 cases) than in follicular adenomas (4/33 cases) (p < 0.05). Regarding the relationships of these proteins, co-positivity for cyclin D1 and p53 was observed more often in poorly differentiated carcinomas (5/7 cases) than in well-differentiated carcinomas (7/39 cases) (p < 0.05). Most cases with cyclin D1 positivity did not show p21waf1/cip1 expression in poorly differentiated carcinomas (6/7 cases). Three cases examined showed co-positivity of p53 and p21waf1/cip1. Our results suggest that cyclin D1 is invoved in thyroid oncogenesis. Moreover, p53 might be closely related to the development of poorly differentiated carcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas originating from well-differentiated carcinomas.     

Molecular characterization of intraductal breast carcinomas

 In situ duct carcinoma (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of lesions which has recently been subdivided into three types: well-differentiated (type I), intermediately differentiated (type II) and poorly differentiated (type III) DCIS. Fourteen cases of DCIS and 11 of DCIS with minimal invasion were analysed for mRNA levels of β-actin, EGFR, c-cerbB2, MTS1, k-ras, RB, BRCA1, cyclin E, and c-myc genes. A microdissection technique was used on paraffin-embedded tissue. A statistically significantly higher expression of cyclin E oncogene and MTS1 tumor suppressor gene was seen in type III DCIS than in the other types, while no significant differences in the mRNA expression patterns of the other genes were observed. These data are consistent with the fact that poorly differentiated DCIS is a readily recognizable class of tumours that have a particularly aggressive behaviour and probably unique histogenesis. Received: 21 July 1997 / Accepted: 11 October 1997     

An Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cyclin D1, p53, and p21 Proteins in Tumors Originating fromthe Follicular Epithelium of the Thyroid Gland*

This study aimed at clarifying the factors closely related to the tumor progression of thyroid neoplasms. We examined the immunoreactivity of cyclin D1, p53, and p21^waf1/cip1 proteins in 179 thyroid tumors originating from the follicular epithelium using an immunohistochemical technique. Cyclin D1 positivity was frequent in well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (39/122 cases), but it was rarely seen in follicular adenomas (1/33 cases), (p < 0.05). Positivity for p53 was more frequent in poorly differentiated carcinomas (7/19 cases) and undifferentiated carcinomas (4/5 cases) than in well-differentiated carcinomas (14/122 cases) (p < 0,05, respectively). P21^wafl/cip1 positivity was more frequent in well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (43/122 cases) than in follicular adenomas (4/33 cases) (p < 0.05). Regarding the relationships of these proteins, co-positivity for cyclin D1 and p53 was observed more often in poorly differentiated carcinomas (5/7 cases) than in well-differentiated carcinomas (7/39 cases) (p < 0.05). Most cases with cyclin D1 positivity did not show p21^waf1/cip1 expression in poorly differentiated carcinomas (6/7 cases). Three cases examined showed co-positivity of p53 and p21^waf1/cip1.Our results suggest that cyclin D1 is invoved in thyroid oncogenesis. Moreover, p53 might be closely related to the development of poorly differentiated carcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas originating from well-differentiated carcinomas.     

Cell-type- and tumour-type-related patterns of bcl-2 reactivity in mesenchymal cells and soft tissue tumours

 GCDFP-15, a glycoprotein identified in the cyst fluid of cystic breast disease, is considered to be a marker of apocrine differentiation. Studies on GCDFP-15 localization in adult normal tissues are lacking, and no information on GCDFP-15 expression during fetal development has been reported. We investigated GCDFP-15 expression in a large series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal human adult and fetal tissues using the monoclonal antibody BRST-2. In normal adult tissues GCDFP-15 expression was found in all apocrine, lacrimal, ceruminous and Moll’s glands and in numerous serous cells of the submandibular, sublingual and minor salivary glands. The serous cells of nasal and bronchial glands were also positive; parotid and laryngeal glands showed rare immunoreactive cells. GCDFP-15-positive cells were observed in all cutaneous eccrine glands from different body sites. In fetal tissues immunoreactivity was observed in numerous acinous cells of all tracheal, bronchial and submandibular salivary glands. GCDFP-15 positivity was identified in numerous cells of all axillary sweat glands and in rare cells of some sweat glands of the thorax, abdomen, back, leg and arm. In both apocrine and nonapocrine glands GCDFP-15 was always localized in the secretory component. These data suggest that GCDFP-15 is a glandular differentiation marker associated with apocrine secretion; that it is expressed in glands that have phylogenetic origins in common with apocrine glands (submandibular salivary and submucosal bronchial glands); and that eccrine cutaneous glands express GCDFP-15 and thus might be referred to as mixed apocrine-eccrine glands. GCDFP-15 is expressed during fetal development and may represent a common marker of embryologically linked glandular structures. Received: 22 May 1997 / Accepted: 15 September 1997