Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanomas

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for head and neck (H&&N) melanomas may be more technically challenging compared with other locations because of complex lymphatic drainage patterns. This analysis was performed to compare the results of SLN biopsy for H&&N, truncal, and extremity melanomas.Methods: The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial includes patients aged 18 to 70 with melanomas 1.0 mm thick. Statistical comparison was performed by ² or analysis of variance test.Results: A total of 2610 patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 18 months. The mean number of SLN per nodal basin was 2.8, 2.7, and 2.1 for H&&N, truncal, and extremity melanomas, respectively. Median Clark level, Breslow thickness, and percentage of ulceration were similar between the groups. Peri-parotid SLN was identified in 25% of cases; there were no facial nerve injuries. SLN biopsy for H&&N melanoma had higher false-negative rates at 1.5% (vs. 0.5% for trunk or extremity) but less histologically positive SLN at 15% (vs. 23.4%, and 19.5%; P &< .001) compared with truncal and extremity melanoma. Blue dye was visualized less frequently in SLN of H&&N melanoma patients compared with those with trunk or extremity melanomas.Conclusions: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and meticulous intraoperative search for blue/radioactive nodes may improve results in H&&N melanomas.Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, March 14–17, 2002.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for CutaneousMelanoma of the Head and Neck

Background Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now the standard of care for staging clinically node-negative patients. It is accurate with low morbidity, yet SLNB for head and neck melanoma is challenging because of unpredictable lymphatic drainage and risk of complications.Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck ≥.76 mm. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified by using a standardized protocol of preoperative lymphoscintigrams, intraoperative blue dye injections, and handheld gamma probes. Clinical, surgical, and pathologic data were collected and analyzed.Results A sentinel lymph node was removed in 41 (94%) of 44 patients. Seven (17%) of 41 had at least 1 positive sentinel lymph node. Three of seven had primary tumors <1 mm (two of the three were not ulcerated). The sites of lymphatic drainage of the primary lesion were discordant, with historical anatomically predicted sites in 24.4% of cases. None of the 34 patients with negative SLNB has had a nodal recurrence (false-negative rate, 0%; sensitivity and negative predictive value, 100%). The mean follow-up is 22.4 months (range, <1–69 months). Seven (17%) of 41 patients had minor complications.Conclusions: SLNB in the head and neck area is challenging; however, combined preoperative, intraoperative, and histological techniques produce a sensitive procedure with a high negative predictive value. The lack of false-negative results obviates the need for prophylactic neck dissections.Presented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the International Head and Neck Society, Washington, DC, August 10, 2004.     

The Second International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer

Background The Second International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer was hosted by the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of the University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland, from September 12 to 13, 2003. The aims of this conference were to present the results of validation studies and to achieve a consensus on methodological requirements. Methods More than 80 delegates from 20 countries attended the conference. The presented validation studies were summarized and compared with the literature. Consensus was achieved concerning requirements for lymphatic mapping and histopathologic work-up. Results Twenty centers presented results on 379 patients with cN0 disease. Sentinel nodes were identified in 366 (97%) of 379. Of these 366, 103 (29%) were positive for occult metastasis, and 263 (71%) were negative. Of those 263 patients, 11 patients (4%) showed nodal disease not revealed by the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB). The negative predictive value of a negative sentinel node for the remaining neck was 96%. The consensus conference resulted in the use of a radiotracer, lymphoscintigraphy, and a handheld gamma probe for lymphatic mapping as minimal requirements. The use of conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin is mandatory. Step-sectioning of the entire node at intervals of 150 μm is recommended. Conclusions The conference attracted delegates from all over the world, thus underscoring the high interest in the topic. With regard to the presented data and the data from the literature, SNB for early oral and oropharyngeal cancer is sufficiently validated. The consensus conference resulted in the definition of minimal methodological requirements for accurate SNB.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Trial

Background: The aim was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) as a staging tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for T1/2 clinically N0 patients by means of a standardized technique.Methods: Between June 1998 and June 2002, 227 SNB procedures have been performed in HNSCC cases at six centers. One hundred thirty-four T1/2 tumors of the oral cavity/oropharynx in clinically N0 patients were investigated with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG), intraoperative use of blue dye/gamma probe, and pathological evaluation with step serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. In 79 cases SNB alone was used to stage the neck carcinoma, and in 55 cases SNB was used in combination with an elective neck dissection (END).Results: In 125/134 cases (93%) a sentinel node was identified. Of 59 positive nodes, 57 were identified with the intraoperative gamma probe and 44 with blue dye. Upstaging of disease occurred in 42/125 cases (34%): with hematoxylin-eosin in 32/125 (26%) and with additional pathological staging in 10/93 (11%). The sensitivity of the technique with a mean follow-up of 24 months was 42/45 (93%). The identification of SNB for floor of mouth (FOM) tumors was 37/43 (86%), compared with 88/91 (97%) for other tumors. The sensitivity for FOM tumors was 12/15 (80%), compared with 30/30 (100%) for other tumor groups.Conclusion: SNB can be successfully applied to early T1/2 tumors of the oral cavity/oropharynx in a standardized fashion by centers worldwide. For the majority of these tumors the SNB technique can be used alone as a staging tool.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer

The role of axillary surgery for the treatment of primary breast cancer is in a process of constant change. During the last decade, axillary dissection with removal of at least 10 lymph nodes (ALD) was replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure. Since then, the indication for SLNB rapidly expanded. Today's surgical strategies aim to minimize the rate of patients with a negative axillary status who undergo ALD. For some subgroups of patients, the indication for SLNB (e.g. multicentric disease, large tumors) or its implication for treatment planning (micrometastatic involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is being discussed. Although the indication for ALD is almost entirely restricted to patients with positive axillary lymph nodes today, the therapeutic effect of completion ALD is more and more questioned. On the other hand, the diagnostic value of ALD in node-positive patients is discussed. This article reflects today's standards in axillary surgery and discusses open issues on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of SLNB and ALD in the treatment of early breast cancer.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检研究现状及进展

目的探讨乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)技术的研究现状和进展。方法复习近年来国内、外的有关文献,对乳腺癌SLNB的定位、检取、状态评估、适应证和并发症进行分析与综述。结果乳腺癌SLNB能够准确定位、检取前哨淋巴结(SLN)。影像学检查和病理检测技术的发展有助于SLN状态的评估,SLNB的适应证正在不断扩大。该技术并发症少,能够准确判定腋窝分期,指导选择性的腋窝淋巴结清扫。结论 SLNB技术已成为乳腺癌外科治疗的重要手段,但其操作尚需进一步规范,以降低假阴性的发生;假阳性和有争议的适应证问题仍需继续关注。     

临床腋淋巴结阴性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结研究

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（ｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｌｙｍｐｈ ｎｏｄｅ ｂｉｏｐｓｙ, ＳＬＮＢ）在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。方法：使用专利蓝和美蓝染色,对１９９９年９月～２００１年４月连续收治的１４５例临床查体腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌病人行前哨淋巴结活检术。结果：ＳＬＮＢ成功率为９６．５％（１４０／１４５）,假阴性率为２３．５％,准确率为９１．４％。病人年龄、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤部位、注射染料类型及是否活检对成功率和假阴性率无影响。结论：ＳＬＮＢ能够准确预测腋窝淋巴结的转移状况,在缩小手术范围、减少术后并发症的同时,提高了腋窝淋巴结分期的准确性;美蓝与专利蓝均可成功确定ＳＬＮ。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

目的总结乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）的研究现状和进展。方法复习近年来国内外的相关文献,对乳腺癌SLNB的概念、适应证、活检技术、提高检出准确率的方法、病理学检查方法、转移灶类型、临床应用等进行综述。结果 SLNB的适应证在不断扩大。示踪剂、影像学检查和病理学检查技术的发展有助于对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结（SLN）状态的评估。乳腺癌SLNB的操作方法还没有统一的标准,对其能否指导选择性的腋窝淋巴结清扫的争议较大,且SLNB的SLN检出率及假阴性率变化范围较大。结论 SLNB已成为乳腺癌外科治疗的重要辅助手段,但其操作尚需进一步规范,其临床应用范围还需要大量前瞻性、多中心的随机试验进一步论证。     

Significance of Multiple Nodal Basin Drainage in Truncal Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background: Although previous studies have demonstrated that truncal site is associated with an adverse prognosis, explanations for such risk are lacking. In addition, the number of nodal basins as well as the number of lymph nodes containing regional metastases are important prognostic factors in these patients. Because the lymphatic drainage pattern of truncal melanoma often includes more than one basin, we designed a study to evaluate (1) whether patients with multiple nodal basin drainage (MNBD) were at an increased risk of lymph node metastases identified by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, and (2) whether the histological status of an individual basin reliably predicted the status of the other draining basins in patients with MNBD.Methods: The records of 295 consecutive truncal melanoma patients who were managed primarily with intraoperative lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy, between 1991 and 1997, were reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, which established the number and location of draining nodal basins. Univariate and multivariate analyses of relevant clinicopathological factors were performed to assess which factors may predict the presence of a pathologically positive SLN.Results: At least one SLN was identified in 281 patients. MNBD was present in 86 (31%) patients, and a pathologically positive SLN was found in 56 (20%) patients. By multivariate analysis, the presence of MNBD (relative risk = 1.9; P = .03), tumor thickness (P = .007), and tumor ulceration (relative risk = 2.4; P = .01) were significant independent risk factors for the presence of at least one pathologically positive SLN. SLN pathology in one basin did not predict the histology of other basins in 19 (22%) of 86 patients with MNBD.Conclusions: MNBD is independently associated with an increased risk of nodal metastases in truncal melanoma patients. Because the histological status of an individual basin did not reliably predict the status of the other draining basins in patients with MNBD, it is important to adequately identify and completely assess all nodal basins at risk, as defined by lymphoscintigraphy, in truncal melanoma patients.Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, March 4–7, 1999.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

目的 报道乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展。方法 采用文献回顾的方法，对国外乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的历史、概念、活检技术以及临床应用等问题进行综述。结果 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的操作方法还没有统一的标准，检出率及假阴性率变化范围广。结论 前哨淋巴结活检的临床应用还需要大量前瞻性多中心随机实验结果进一步论证。     

Eighteen Sensations After Breast Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background The aim of this study is to evaluate prevalence, severity, and level of distress of 18 sensations at baseline (3–15 days) and 5 years after breast cancer surgery, and compare sensations after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with those after SLNB plus immediate or delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods A total of 187 patients with breast cancer completed the Breast Sensation Assessment Scale at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery to assess prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations. Of these, 133 had SLNB, and 54 had SLNB and ALND. Additionally, of the 187 patients, 141 had breast-conservation therapy and 46 had total mastectomy. Results Sensations were less prevalent, severe, and distressing after SLNB compared with ALND at baseline and at 5 years. This difference was most evident in those who had breast-conservation therapy. Most sensations after SLNB and ALND, even if prevalent, were not severe or distressing. Some sensations remained notably prevalent at 5 years, including tenderness and twinges after SLNB, and tightness and numbness after ALND. Phantom sensations were frequently reported by mastectomy patients. Conclusions Prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations were lower after SLNB compared with ALND, but some morbidity existed after SLNB. Certain sensations remained highly prevalent in both groups for up to 5 years.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Provides More Accurate Staging Than Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

Background: In most major melanoma treatment centers, sentinel node biopsy (SNB), with complete regional lymph node dissection when a positive sentinel node is found, has now replaced elective lymph node dissection (ELND) for patients with primary cutaneous melanomas who are considered to be at moderate to high risk of nodal recurrence. As for ELND, however, no overall survival benefit for the SNB procedure has yet been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to compare the nodal staging accuracy and duration of survival for SNB and ELND.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II disease treated at a single center between 1983 and 2000 with either SNB (n = 672) or ELND (n = 793). Multivariate analyses were performed using the logistic regression model for nodal staging accuracy and Coxs proportional hazards regression model for survival.Results: Patient factors that influenced nodal positivity included age, Breslow thickness, ulceration, head or neck primary, and operation type (SNB or ELND). SNB was superior to ELND in the detection of micrometastases (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI, 1.06 – 1.43) but operation type did not influence survival (P = .24).Conclusions: Sentinel node biopsy identified more nodal micrometastases than ELND but did not influence survival, although complete regional node dissection was performed in all patients who were SNB positive. This increase in staging accuracy likely results from the reliable identification of the appropriate lymph node field by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, along with more detailed pathologic examination of the nodes removed by SNB.Presented to the Society of Surgical Oncology, New York, March 2004     

S-Classification of Sentinel Lymph Node Predicts Axillary Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background One-half of breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node (SN) have no further metastases in the axillary lymph node basin. The aim of the present study was to identify patients with positive SN who are unlikely to have further metastases in the axillary lymph node basin, using a new classification of SN, namely the S-classification. Methods Specimens of positive SN were subjected to a pathological review according to the previously published S-classification. S-stages of positive SN were correlated with the status of further metastases in the axillary lymph node basin after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results Of 117 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 36 (30.8%) had a positive SN and were subjected to level I and II ALND. The occurrence of positive nonsentinel nodes was significantly related to the S-stage of SN. No patient with stage SI had additional metastases in the nonsentinel lymph nodes, while 14.3% of patients with SII stage disease and 60.9 % of patients with SIII disease had other non-SN that were metastatic. Conclusion S-stages of positive SN are highly predictive for axillary nonsentinel node status. Especially patients with SI sentinel node metastases appear to be at low risk for further nonsentinel node metastases.     

Significance of Multiple Lymphatic Basin Drainage in Truncal Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Truncal melanoma involving metastases to multiple lymph node basins has a much worse prognosis than tumor involvement of a single lymph node basin. Recent results also suggest that, independently of the status of lymph node involvement, patients with multiple lymphatic basin drainage (MLBD) on lymphoscintigraphy have an increased risk of lymph node metastasis and a worse prognosis than those with a single lymphatic drainage basin. Because published reports have conflicting results, the authors compared their experience at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center with recently published findings.Methods The authors searched a prospectively maintained melanoma database at the University of Michigan for patients with primary truncal melanoma who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy between 1997 and 2004. The association of MLBD with the clinical and pathologic characteristics collected and the presence of regional metastases was tested by using contingency tables and the χ² test statistic and by using the Fisher’s exact test statistic when cell frequencies were small. The product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier was used to estimate disease-free and overall survival probabilities.Results Of 423 patients with primary truncal melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 123 (29%) had a positive result, and 98 patients (23.2%) had MLBD. Patients with tumors located in the middle of the trunk and tumor ulceration were more likely to have MLBD (P < .0001 and P = .045, respectively). Patients with a single lymphatic drainage basin and MLBD had a similar risk of lymph node metastasis and similar disease-free and overall survival.Conclusions Patients with truncal melanomas tend to have MLBD when the tumor is located in the middle of the trunk or when ulceration is present. In our experience, drainage to multiple lymphatic basins was not an independent risk factor for sentinel lymph node metastasis and has no independent prognostic significance.     

Validation of a Breast Cancer Nomogram for Predicting Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastases After a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy

Background Although completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is the standard of care for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases, the SLN is the only node with tumor in 40% to 60% of cases. To assist with decision-making regarding CLND, investigators at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center devised and validated a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of non-SLN metastases. To assess the generalizable use of this nomogram, validation analysis was performed by using an external database. Methods Eight clinicopathologic variables for 200 consecutive breast cancer patients at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with SLN metastases and CLND were entered into the nomogram. The accuracy of the nomogram to predict non-SLN metastases was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and linear regression analysis. The accuracy of the nomogram with touch-imprint cytology (TIC) as a substitute variable for frozen section was also evaluated. Results The linear correlation coefficient of the nomogram-predicted probabilities correlated with the observed incidence of non-SLN metastases for all patients (.97). The accuracy of the nomogram as measured by the area under the ROC curve was .71. When applied solely to patients who had TIC assessment of the SLN, the area under the ROC curve was .74. Conclusions This study validated the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center breast cancer nomogram by using an external database. TIC seems to be an acceptable substitute for frozen section as a nomogram variable. The nomogram may help predict an individual’s risk of non-SLN metastases and assist in patient decision making regarding the benefit of CLND. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 3–6, 2005.     

Predicting Nonsentinel Node Status After Positive Sentinel Lymph Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Clinicians Versus Nomogram

Background With increasing frequency, breast cancer patients and clinicians are questioning the need for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the setting of a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). We previously developed a nomogram to estimate the likelihood of residual disease in the axilla after a positive SLN biopsy result. In this study, we compared the predictions of clinical experts with those generated by the nomogram and evaluated the ability of the nomogram to change clinicians’ behavior.Methods Pathologic features of the primary tumor and SLN metastases of 33 patients who underwent completion ALND were presented to 17 breast cancer specialists. Their predictions for each patient were recorded and compared with results from our nomogram. Subsequently, clinicians were presented with clinical information for eight patients and asked whether they would perform a completion ALND before and after being presented with the nomogram prediction.Results The predictive model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .72 when applied to the test data set of 33 patients. In comparison, the clinicians as a group were associated with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .54 (P < .01 vs. nomogram). With regard to performing a completion ALND, providing nomogram results did not alter surgical planning.Conclusions Our predictive model seemed to substantially outperform clinical experts. Despite this, clinicians were unlikely to change their surgical plan based on nomogram results. It seems that most clinicians can improve their predictive ability by using the nomogram to predict the likelihood of additional non-SLN metastases in a woman with a positive SLN biopsy result.Published by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. © 2005 The Society of SurgicalOncology, Inc.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Colon Cancer: Current Status

Background The primary role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colon cancer is to increase the accuracy of nodal staging by identifying those lymph nodes with the greatest potential for harbouring metastatic disease. Ultrastaging techniques aim to identify the otherwise undetected metastases. Until now, no consensus exists as to the most optimal procedure in patients with colon cancer. Methods A systematic literature search on the value of different SLN mapping techniques in patients with colon cancer was performed using the electronic search engine PubMed. Prospective studies published before 1 December 2005 were included and further articles were selected by cross-referencing. The results of different techniques using either blue dye or radiocolloid, were investigated. Results The literature search yielded 17 relevant articles. SLN mapping using blue dye was described in 15 studies. Two studies reported the results of SLN mapping using a combination of blue dye and radiocolloid. The reported results on identification rate varied between 71 and 100%. Accuracy rates were between 78 and 100%, sensitivity rates between 25 and 100% and true upstaging rates between 0 and 26%. The results were not affected by the addition of radiocolloid to blue dye. Conclusions Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with colon cancer remains an experimental procedure with varying results. Further evaluation may lead to a standardized technique that offers the potential for significant upstaging of stage II patients. This may have important implications as to tailor adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens in these patients. Robbert J. de Haas and Dennis A. Wicherts have contributed equally and are mentioned alphabetically.     

Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy Predicts the Successful Identification but Is Not Necessary in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Background Although preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer patients is undergone commonly, its clinical significance remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively analyzed our database that contained 636 consecutive breast cancer patients who received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy before SLNB. Results The sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of 86.5% of patients were well imaged by lymphoscintigraphy, and SLN were located extra-axilla in 5.3% patients. The visualization of SLN in lymphoscintigraphy was not associated with histopathologic type, location, and stage of primary tumor, as well as the time interval from injection of radiocolloid to surgery. The negative lymphoscintigraphy results were associated with excision `biopsy before injection of radiocolloid and positive axillary node statues. The SLN was successfully detected in 625 (98.3%) enrolled patients. Failure of surgical identification of axillary SLN was associated with whether hot spot was imaged by lymphoscintigraphy. However, we identified axillary SLN in 90 (90.9%) out of 99 patients with negative axillary findings in lymphoscintigram. The false negative rate of SLNB in our study was 16.0% (15 of 94) among patients of training group, and there was no significant difference in the false negative rate between patients who had axillary hot spot in lymphoscintigram and those who had not (P = .273). Conclusions Visualization of SLN in preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predicted the successful SLN identification. However, it was less informative for the location of SLN during operation. Considering the complexity, time consumed, and cost, lymphoscintigraphy should at present be undergone for investigation purposes only.     

The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity.