三分螺旋折流板换热器水-水传热壳侧综合性能

对倾斜角为10°、15°和20°的扇形折流板,倾斜角为15°的椭圆折流板和倾斜角为20°的轴向搭接扇形折流板三分螺旋折流板换热器以及弓形折流板换热器的传热特性和压降性能进行了测试试验研究,其中螺旋折流板全部采用分区布管结构,有48根管子,而弓形折流板换热器有49根管子。试验数据分析采用轴向Reynolds数Re_z,o作为自变量,壳侧Nusselt数Nu_o、轴向Euler数Eu_z,o等参数作为因变量,并采用Nu_o/Eu_z,o量纲1组合数作为综合性能指标。在试验范围内,20°s方案的综合性能指标最高,比弓形折流板换热器方案平均提高69.8%;倾斜角最小的10°s方案的综合性能低于弓形折流板换热器方案;轴向搭接折流板换热器方案的综合性能低于相同倾斜角外圈连接折流板换热器方案,而椭圆折流板方案的综合性能低于相同倾斜角的扇形折流板方案。     

当量螺旋角对三分螺旋折流板换热器性能的影响

提出了非连续螺旋折流板换热器的当量螺旋角定义,并建议以组合数ho/Δp1o/3来反映换热器的综合性能。对可拆卸芯体管束折流板的倾斜角为10°扇形、15°扇形、15°椭圆、20°扇形、20°扇形搭接的三分螺旋折流板换热器和弓形折流板换热器进行了传热和压降性能测试实验。实验结果表明:其中当量螺旋角最大的20°倾斜角扇形折流板方案的壳侧换热系数最高且压降较低,其综合性能指标ho/Δp1o/3比弓形折流板换热器的数值高26%左右;20°倾斜角扇形搭接方案与当量螺旋角相仿的15°倾斜角扇形方案的性能大致相当;15°扇形方案比当量螺旋角较小的15°椭圆方案的性能更高。可见对换热器的性能起决定作用的是当量螺旋角而不是倾斜角;实验预示在当量螺旋角更大的范围存在最佳值。     

新型六分扇形螺旋折流板换热器壳程传热及流动特性

针对现有四分螺旋折流板换热器中心区域漏流明显的特征,提出了一种新型的六分扇形螺旋折流板换热器。建立了六分扇形螺旋折流板换热器的三维物理模型,应用Ansys CFX软件对其壳程流动与传热特性进行数值模拟,分析了不同螺旋角(10°、20°、30°、40°)和不同工况下六分扇形螺旋折流板换热器的壳侧性能,并与传统的弓形折流板换热器作对比。结果表明,六分扇形螺旋折流板可以显著减少三角区漏流现象的发生,壳程流体旋流特性较好。随着螺旋角的增大,壳侧速度场与温度场分布更加均匀,综合换热性能逐步提高。     

螺旋折流板管壳式换热器壳程传热性能及压降的研究

对螺旋折流板换热器和传统的弓形折流板换热器进行了壳程传热性能和壳程的阻力的对比,同时通过实验方法对30°、40°螺旋角的螺旋折流板换热器进行了壳程传热性能和壳程阻力的研究,得出螺旋折流板换热器的螺旋流动强化了传热,螺旋折流板换热器的壳程阻力比弓形折流板换热器的小。     

折流板结构对换热器壳程性能影响的定量研究

针对弓形折流板、连续螺旋折流板换热器,采用CFD软件FLUENT,RNG k-ε模型,借助数值模拟的方法,定量地比较2种折流板结构下换热器的压降、传热系数、综合性能,并进一步分析了不同折流板结构下换热器壳程局部流场和温度场的分布特点。结果表明:同连续螺旋折流板换热器相比,弓形折流板换热器壳程速度场和温度场分布存在着明显的不连续性。弓形折流板相邻折流板间距同连续螺旋折流板螺距相同条件下,折流板螺距较小时,采用连续螺旋折流板能够明显提高换热器传热系数,但折流板结构改变对换热器综合性能的影响不大;增大折流板螺距,采用连续螺旋折流板能够明显提高换热器综合性能,但不同折流板结构下换热器传热系数变化不大。计算结果为折流板结构的选用提供了理论依据。     

螺旋折流板与弓形折流板换热器的性能比较

针对螺旋折流板换热器的折流板的角度提出了一些改进措施。在自行设计的换热原理试验台上,5#柴油走壳程,水走管程,分别对12°,18°的单螺旋和18°的双螺旋折流板和弓形折流板换热器的阻力和传热性能进行了试验研究。试验结果表明,螺旋折流板阻力只有弓形的30%,此外,在同样的压降下,螺旋折流板传热效率也提高10%。     

三维肋翅片管在螺旋折流板换热器中的应用研究

本文研究了三维肋翅片管在螺旋折流板换热器中应用的传热与压降性能,以水和VG32液压油为换热对象进行实验,并与弓形折流板光滑管换热器进行对比.在相同的Re下, 螺旋折流板三维肋翅片管换热器的Nu足弓形折流板光滑管换热器的5.03~5.96倍.在相同流量下,螺旋折流板三维肋翅片管换热器壳程压降稍大,但它的传热流阻性能比足弓形折流板光滑管换热器的2.78~3.66倍.实验结果表明:三维肋翅片管枉螺旋折流板换热器中应用具有最佳的传热流阻综合性能.     

两壳程螺旋和弓形折流板管壳式换热器的性能比较

对相同的换热器体积、相同折流板数、相同管程数的两壳程螺旋折流板换热器和两壳程弓形折流板换热器进行了对比性的数值模拟研究,结果表明:(1)在相同壳程Re下,两壳程螺旋折流板换热器的换热系数h比两壳程弓形折流板换热器略低,压降DP比两壳程弓形折流板换热器低40%.(2)在相同壳程流量G下,两壳程螺旋折流板换热器的换热能力比两壳程弓形折热器高60%,压降DP比两壳程弓形折热器高80%.(3)在相同壳程压降DP下,两壳程螺旋折流板换热器的换热系数h比两壳程弓形折流板换热器高30%.(4)在允许的压降范围内,当换热要求较高时,多壳程的螺旋折流板管壳式换热器可强化换热,带走更多的热量,保证生产的安全.     

折流板间距对换热器性能影响的数值研究

采用CFD数值模拟方法,研究了简化模型下弓形折流板和螺旋折流板换热器,对应于不同间距/螺距时,流动参量的变化对换热器整体流动与传热性能的影响。结果表明,两种结构对应的壳程压力损失和换热系数均随壳程流量的增加而增大,而螺旋折流板结构单位压降下换热系数大于弓形折流板,并且其性能受折流板螺距变化的影响较小,体现了螺旋折流板结构的优越性。计算结果与现有实验结论吻合较好。     

螺旋折流板换热器在石油化工行业中的应用

通过实验对比分析弓形折流板和螺旋折流板换热器的壳程传热与流动特性,得出单位压降条件下螺旋折流板换热器壳程对流传热系数均高于弓形折流板换热器;当壳程流量相同时螺旋折流板换热器壳程压降远低于弓形折流板换热器,随着流量的增加二者相差越大.结果表明螺旋折流板具有单位压降条件传热系教高,流动阻力小,能有效防止管束振动和适用范围广的优点,在石油化工领域是冷换设备较为理想的选择.     

不同折流板结构螺旋折流板换热器传热性能的比较(英文)

Numerical simulations were performed on flow and heat transfer performances of heat exchangers having six helical baffles of different baffle shapes and assembly configurations, i.e., two trisection baffle schemes, two quadrant baffle schemes, and two continuous helical baffle schemes. The temperature contour or the pressure contour and velocity contour plots with superimposed velocity vectors on meridian, transverse and unfolded concentric hexagonal slices are presented to obtain a full angular view. For the six helix baffled heat exchangers, the different patterns of the single vortex secondary flow and the shortcut leakage flow were depicted as wel as the heat transfer properties were compared. The results show that the optimum scheme among the six configurations is a circumferential overlap trisection helix baffled heat exchanger with a baffle incline angle of 20° (20°TCO) scheme with an anti-shortcut baffle structure, which exhibits the second highest pressure dropΔpo, the highest overal heat transfer coefficient K, shel-side heat transfer coefficient ho and shel-side average comprehensive index ho/Δpo.     

Comparison of heat transfer performances of helix baffled heat exchangers with different baffle configurations

Numerical simulations were performed on flow and heat transfer performances of heat exchangers having six helical baffles of different baffle shapes and assembly configurations, i.e., two trisection ba...     

CFD simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with small-angle helical baffles

Shell-and-tube heat exchanger with helical baffles is superior to that with segmental baffles in reducing pressure drop, eliminating dead zone and lowering the risks of vibration of tube bundle. This paper focused on the small-angle helical baffles that have been merely reported in open literature. These baffles are noncontinuous helical baffles with a helix angle of 10° to 30°, and their shapes are 1/4 ellipse, 1/4 sector and 1/3 sector. To assess the integrative performance, α/?p is employed, and the calculated results show that among the three baffle shapes the heat exchangers with a 1/4 sector helical baffle have the lowest pressure drop. At β = 10° and 20°, 1/4 sector helical baffle heat exchangers show the best integrative performance; at β = 30°, 1/4 ellipse and 1/4 sector helical baffle heat exchangers perform almost the same. For the study of helix angles, we found that 30° has the best integrative performance at low mass flow rate, almost the same as 20° at high mass flow rate.     

Performance comparison of heat exchangers using sextant/trisection helical baffles and segmental ones

The shell side flow fields of both sextant and trisection helical baffle heat exchangers are presented on meridian and multilayer hexagon slices. It verifies that the performance of sextant schemes is better than those of the other kinds of helical baffle heat exchangers. The main mechanisms are due to the restricted leakage flow in the minimized gaps with increased baffle number and by one row of tubes dampen the leakage flow in the circumferential overlapped area of the adjacent helical baffles. The performance features were simulated on two different angled sextant helical heat exchangers and each compared with two trisection ones of either identical helical pitch or identical incline angle. The results verified that the performances of helical heat exchangers are mainly determined by the helical pitch rather than the baffle incline angle. The average values of comprehensive index h_oΔp_o^-1/3 of the trisection helical schemes T-24.1° and T-29.7° are correspondingly 3.47% and 3.34% lower than those of the sextant ones X-20° and X-25° with identical helical pitches. The comparison results show that the average values of shell side h.t.c. h_o and comprehensive index h_oΔp_o^-1/3 of the optimal dual helix sextant scheme DX30° are respectively 7.22% and 23.56% higher than those of the segment scheme S100.     

交错螺旋折流板管壳式换热器壳侧传热与阻力性能

对交错搭接螺旋折流板换热器壳侧的流动与传热性能进行了实验研究,着重研究了内插假管及不同螺旋角度对壳程传热和阻力的影响,并与传统弓形折流板换热器进行了对比.结果表明,假管的存在反而使传热综合性能下降,同时,在相同的壳侧流量下,螺旋折流板换热器的壳程阻力和壳侧传热系数均随螺旋角的增大而减少,且小于同样条件下弓形折流板换热器的相应值.与弓形折流板换热器相比,螺旋折流板换热器的特点是单位压降下的壳侧传热系数高.     

三螺旋折流板换热器多流路通道流动与传热数值模拟

为了增加大螺旋角下单位长度换热管上螺旋折流板数量提高换热,提出三螺旋折流板导流结构,对设置三螺旋折流板后壳程流体的流动与传热进行了数值模拟,重点考察了Reynolds数Re=1391～4174时的壳程压降及对流传热系数,与设置单螺旋折流板的对比结果表明：三螺旋折流板换热器壳程对流传热系数高27.9%,JF因子高13.67%,综合传热性能更好。在此基础上运用耗散理论分析了三螺旋折流板采取不同螺旋角时对换热效率的影响,发现由传热引起的耗散率随Reynolds数变化规律与壳程对流传热系数随Reynolds数的变化规律类似,相同流量条件下螺旋角为64.8°的换热器耗散率最小。另外,中心换热管与壳壁附近换热管的传热系数比较结果显示,中心管热交换量均低于壳壁附近换热管热交换量。     

连续螺旋折流板换热器壳程流动与传热数值模拟

建立了连续螺旋折流板换热器三维模型并划分网格,采用分离式求解器、SIMPLE压力速度耦合方式与Realizable k-ε湍流模型,利用FLUENT软件对连续螺旋折流板换热器壳程流体流动与传热进行了模拟计算,得到壳程流体速度、压力与温度分布图,并与传统弓形折流板换热器作比较。螺旋折流板节距与弓形折流板间距相等时,螺旋折流板换热器壳程传热系数增加了25%左右,而压力降减小了18%左右。通过对不同螺旋角度的螺旋折流板换热器进行模拟分析,发现随螺旋角增大壳程传热系数和压力降都呈减小趋势,且壳程流体进口平均速度越大,作用越明显,故在实际工程中,盲目追求高的传热系数或低的压降都是不可取的。本数值模拟可为螺旋折流板换热器进一步的工程研究提供可靠的理论参考依据。