Some explicit formulae in simultaneous padé approximation

Using old results on the explicit calculation of determinants, formulae are given for the coefficients of P₀(z) and P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z), where P_i(z) are polynomials of degree σ ? ρ_i (i=0,1,…,n), P₀(z)f_i(z) ? P_i(z) are power series in which the terms with z^k, 0?k?σ, vanish (i=1,2,…,n), (ρ₀,ρ₁,…,ρ_n) is an (n+1)-tuple of nonnegative integers, σ=ρ₀+ρ₁+?+ρ_n, and {f_i}ⁿ_i=1 is the set of hypergeometric functions {₁F₁(1;c_i;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{z.drule;}\text{N}\text{, c}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? c}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ or {₂F₀(a_i,1;z)}ⁿ_i=1$\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{?}\text{N}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? a}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{Z}\text{)}$ under the condition ρ₀?ρ_i ? 1 (i=1,2,…,n).     

A new inequality for symmetric functions

Let x_i ≥ 0, y_i ≥ 0 for i = 1,…, n; and let a_j(x) be the elementary symmetric function of n variables given by a_j(x) = ∑_{1 ≤ ii < … <ij ≤ n}x_ii … x_ij. Define the partical ordering x <y if a_j(x) ≤ a_j(y), j = 1,… n. We show that $\text{x}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{y ? x}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{, 0}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{α ≤ 1}$, where {x^α}_i = x^α_i. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition on a function f(t) such that x <y ? f(x) <f(y). Both results depend crucially on the following: If x <y there exists a piecewise differentiable path z(t), with z_i(t) ≥ 0, such that z(0) = x, z(1) = y, and z(s) <z(t) if 0 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ 1.     

Note on lower bounds for the rank of a matrix

The following results are proved: Let A = (a_ij) be an n × n complex matrix, n ? 2, and let k be a fixed integer, 1 ? k ? n ? 1.(1) If there exists a monotonic G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1. (2) If A is irreducible and if there exists a G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1 if k ? 2, n ? 3; it is ? n ? 1 if k = 1.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Decomposable bilinear numerical radii

Let A be an n-square normal matrix over $\text{C}$, and Q_{m, n} be the set of strictly increasing integer sequences of length m chosen from 1,…, n. For α,β∈Q_{m, n} denote by A[α|β] the submatrix obtained from A by using rows numbered α and columns numbered β. For k∈{0,1,…,m} write z.sfnc;α∩β|=k if there exists a rearrangement of 1,…,m, say i₁,…,i_k, i_k+1,…,i_m, such that α(i_j)=β(i_j), j=1,…,k, and {α(i_k+1),…,α(i_m)};∩{β(i_k+1),…,β(i_m)}=ø. Let

be the group of n-square unitary matrices. Define the nonnegative number

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)=}\text{max}\text{U∈}\textcolor{red}{}\text{|}\text{det}\text{(U}{}^1\text{AU) [α|β]|}$

, where |α∩β|=k. Theorem 1 establishes a bound for ?_k(A), 0?k<m?1, in terms of a classical variational inequality due to Fermat. Let A be positive semidefinite Hermitian, n?2m. Theorem 2 leads to an interlacing inequality which, in the case n=4, m=2, resolves in the affirmative the conjecture that

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{(A)??}{}_{\mathrm{m?1}}\text{(A)????}{}_0\text{(A)}$

.     

A generalization of the Kruskal-Katona theorem

Let k_n ? k_n?1 ? … ? k₁ be positive integers and let ($\text{i}\text{j}$) denote the coefficient of xⁱ in $\text{Π}\text{r=1}\text{j}\text{(1 + x + x}{}^2\text{+ … + x}{}^{\mathrm{kr}}\text{)}$. For given integers l, m, where 1 ? l ? k_n + k_n?1 + … + k₁ and $\text{1 ? m ? (}\text{n}\text{n}\text{)}$, it is shown that there exist unique integers m(l), m(l ? 1),…, m(t), satisfying certain conditions, for which $\text{m = (}\text{m(l)}\text{l}\text{+ (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?1}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t}\text{)}$. Moreover, any m l-subsets of a multiset with k_i elements of type i, i = 1, 2,…, n, will contain at least $\text{(}\text{m(l)}\text{l?1}\text{) + (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?2}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t?1}$ different (l ? 1)-subsets. This result has been anticipated by Greene and Kleitman, but the formulation there is not completely correct. If k₁ = 1, the numbers ($\text{j}\text{i}$) are binomial coefficients and the result is the Kruskal-Katona theorem.     

A class of facet producing graphs for vertex packing polyhedra

We examine a family of graphs called webs. For integers n ? 2 and $\text{k, 1 ? k ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{n}$, the web W(n, k) has vertices V_n = {1, …, n} and edges {(i, j): j = i+k, …, i+n ? k, for i?V_n (sums mod n)}. A characterization is given for the vertex packing polyhedron of W(n, k) to contain a facet, none of whose projections is a facet for the lower dimensional vertex packing polyhedra of proper induced subgraphs of W(n, k). Simple necessary and sufficient conditions are given for W(n, k) to contain W(n′, k′) as an induced subgraph; these conditions are used to show that webs satisfy the Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture. Complements of webs are also studied and it is shown that if both a graph and its complement are webs, then the graph is either an odd hole or its complement.     

Inverse Hölder inequalities in one and several dimensions

We study certain functionals and obtain an inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁^a1,…,f_n^an (f_k concave, 1 dimension).We also prove a multidimensional inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁,…,f_n, where $\text{?}{}^2\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{? 0, i = 1,…, d, k = 1,…, n}$.Finally we give an inverse Minkowski inequality for concave functions.     

On a problem of Katona on minimal completely separating systems with restrictions

Let S be a set of n elements, and k a fixed positive integer $\text{<}\text{1}\text{2}\text{n}$. Katona's problem is to determine the smallest integer m for which there exists a family $\text{A}$ = {A₁, …, A_m} of subsets of S with the following property: |_i| ? k (i = 1, …, m), and for any ordered pair x_i, x_i ∈ S (i ≠ j) there is A₁ ∈ $\text{A}$ such that x_i ∈ A₁, x_j ? A₁. It is given in this note that $\text{m = ?}\text{2n}\text{k}\text{?}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{k}{}^2\text{? 2}$.     

On differences and sums of integers,I

A set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} ? {1,2,…,N} is said to be a difference intersector set if {a₁,a₂,…,a_s} ? {1,2,…,N}, j > ?N imply the solvability of the equation a_x ? a_y = b′; the notion of sum intersector set is defined similarly. The authors prove two general theorems saying that if a set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} is well distributed simultaneously among and within all residue classes of small moduli then it must be both difference and sum intersector set. They apply these theorems to investigate the solvability of the equations ($\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{p}\text{= + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{u}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{p}\text{) = + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{z}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$ (where ($\text{a}\text{p}$) denotes the Legendre symbol) and to show that “almost all” sets form both difference and sum intersector sets.     

An asymptotic evaluation of the cycle index of a symmetric group

Let $\text{Z(S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{;?(x))}$ denote the polynomial obtained from the cycle index of the symmetric group Z(S_n) by replacing each variable s_i by f(x¹). Let f(x) have a Taylor series with radius of convergence ? of the form f(x)=x^k + a_k+1x^k+1 + a_k+2x^k+2+? with every a₁?0. Finally, let 0<x<1 and let x??. We prove that

This limit is used to estimate the probability (for n and p both large) that a point chosen at random from a random p-point tree has degree n + 1. These limiting probabilities are independent of p and decrease geometrically in n, contrasting with the labeled limiting probabilities of $\text{1}\text{n!e}$.In order to prove the main theorem, an appealing generalization of the principle of inclusion and exclusion is presented.     

Selection principle for pointwise bounded sequences of functions

For a number ? > 0 and a real function f on an interval [a, b], denote by N(?, f, [a, b]) the least upper bound of the set of indices n for which there is a family of disjoint intervals [a _i , b _i ], i = 1, …, n, on [a, b] such that |f(a _i ) ? f(b _i )| > ? for any i = 1, …, n (sup Ø = 0). The following theorem is proved: if {f _j } is a pointwise bounded sequence of real functions on the interval [a, b] such that n(?) ≡ lim sup _j→∞ N(?, f _j , [a, b]) < ∞ for any ? > 0, then the sequence {f _j } contains a subsequence which converges, everywhere on [a, b], to some function f such that N(?, f, [a, b]) ≤ n(?) for any ? > 0. It is proved that the main condition in this theorem related to the upper limit is necessary for any uniformly convergent sequence {f _j } and is “almost” necessary for any everywhere convergent sequence of measurable functions, and many pointwise selection principles generalizing Helly’s classical theorem are consequences of our theorem. Examples are presented which illustrate the sharpness of the theorem.     

Convergence of weighted sums of tight random elements

Convergence of weighted sums of tight random elements {V_n} (in a separable Banach space) which have zero expected values and uniformly bounded rth moments (r > 1) is obtained. In particular, if {a_nk} is a Toeplitz sequence of real numbers, then | Σ_k=1^∞a_nkf(V_k)| → 0 in probability for each continuous linear functional f if and only if 6Σ_k=1^∞a_nkV_k 6→ 0 in probability. When the random elements are independent and max_{1≤k≤n | ank | = $\text{O}$(n^?8)} for some $\text{0 <}\text{1}\text{s}\text{< r ? 1}$, then |Σ_k=1^∞a_nkV_k 6→ 0 with probability 1. These results yield laws of large numbers without assuming geometric conditions on the Banach space. Finally, these results can be extended to random elements in certain Fréchet spaces.     

A conjecture of recski in combinatorial set theory

A p-cover of $\text{n = {1, 2,…,}\text{n}\text{}}$ is a family of subsets $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{≠ ?}$ such that ∪ S_i = n and |S_i ∩ S_i| ? p for i ≠ j. We prove that for fixed p, the number of p-cover of n is O(n^p+1logn).     

Existence of stable equilibrium point for dynamical systems of Volterra type

This paper presents sufficient conditions for the existence of a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point of a dynamical system of Volterra type, (1) $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{) x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) = ?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)[f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{(t),…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)) ? q}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{], i = 1,…, n}$, for every q = (q₁,…, q_n)^T?Rⁿ. Results of a nonlinear complementarity problem are applied to obtain the conditions. System (1) has a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point if (i) f(x) = (f₁(x),…,f_n(x))^T is a continuous and differentiable M-function and it satisfies a certain surjectivity property, or (ii), f(x) is continuous and strongly monotone on R₊₀ⁿ.     

A combinatorial problem involving graphs and matrices

In this paper we discuss a combinatorial problem involving graphs and matrices. Our problem is a matrix analogue of the classical problem of finding a system of distinct representatives (transversal) of a family of sets and relates closely to an extremal problem involving 1-factors and a long standing conjecture in the dimension theory of partially ordered sets. For an integer n ?1, let n denote the n element set {1,2,3,…, n}. Then let A be a k×t matrix. We say that A satisfies property P(n, k) when the following condition is satisfied: For every k-taple (x₁,x₂,…,x_k?n^k there exist k distinct integers j₁,j₂,…,j_k so that x_i= a_ii for i= 1,2,…,k. The minimum value of t for which there exists a k × t matrix A satisfying property P(n,k) is denoted by f(n,k). For each k?1 and n sufficiently large, we give an explicit formula for f(n, k): for each n?1 and k sufficiently large, we use probabilistic methods to provide inequalities for f(n,k).     

On fair coin-tossing games

Let Ω be a finite set with k elements and for each integer $\text{n ≧ 1}$ let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= Ω × Ω × … × Ω}$ (n-tuple) and $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{,…, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) | (a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{,…, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ∈ Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ and a_j ≠ a_j+1 for some 1 ≦ j ≦ n ? 1}. Let {Y_m} be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables such that P(Y₁ = a) = k^?1 for all a in Ω. In this paper, we obtain some very surprising and interesting results about the first occurrence of elements in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ and in Ω?_n with respect to the stochastic process {Y_m}. The results here provide us with a better and deeper understanding of the fair coin-tossing (k-sided) process.     

Periodic-type functionals and their extensions

Let Ω denote a simply connected domain in the complex plane and let $\text{K[Ω]}$ be the collection of all entire functions of exponential type whose Laplace transforms are analytic on Ω′, the complement of Ω with respect to the sphere. Define a sequence of functionals $\text{{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}\text{on}\text{K[Ω]}$ by $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f) =}\text{1}\text{2πi}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{\Gamma }}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(ζ) F(ζ) dζ}$, where F denotes the Laplace transform of f, Γ ? Ω is a simple closed contour chosen so that F is analytic outside and on Ω, and g_n is analytic on Ω. The specific functionals considered by this paper are patterned after the Lidstone functions, L_2n(f) = f⁽²ⁿ⁾(0) and L_{2n + 1}(f) = f⁽²ⁿ⁾(1), in that their sequence of generating functions {g_n} are “periodic.” Set g_{pn + k}(ζ) = h_k(ζ) ζ^pn, where p is a positive integer and each h_k (k = 0, 1,…, p ? 1) is analytic on Ω. We find necessary and sufficient conditions for $\text{f ∈ k[Ω]}\text{with}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f) = 0 (n = 0, 1,…)}$. DeMar previously was able to find necessary conditions [7]. Next, we generalize {L_n} in several ways and find corresponding necessary and sufficient conditions.     

Diophantine inequalities with mixed powers

Let {λ_i}_{i = 1}^s (s ≥ 2) be a finite sequence of non-zero real numbers, not all of the same sign and in which not all the ratios $\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$ are rational. A given sequence of positive integers {n_i}_{i = 1}^s is said to have property (P) (($\text{P}{}^1$) respectively) if for any {λ_i}_{i = 1}^s and any real number η, there exists a positive constant σ, depending on {λ_i}_{i = 1}^s and {n_i}_{i = 1}^s only, so that the inequality |η + Σ_{i = 1}^sλ_ix_iⁿⁱ| < (max x_i)^?σ has infinitely many solutions in positive integers (primes respectively) x₁, x₂,…, x_s. In this paper, we prove the following result: Given a sequence of positive integers {n_i}_{i = 1}^∞, a necessary and sufficient condition that, for any positive integer j, there exists an integer s, depending on {n_i}_{i = j}^∞ only, such that {n_i}_{i = j}^{j + s ? 1} has property (P) (or ($\text{P}{}^1$)), is that Σ_{i = 1}^∞n_i^?1 = ∞. These are parallel to some striking results of G. A. Fre?man, E. J. Scourfield and K. Thanigasalam.