Aluminum-catalyzed tunable halodefluorination of trifluoromethyl- and difluoroalkyl-substituted olefins

Herein, we report unprecedented aluminum-catalyzed halodefluorination reactions of trifluoromethyl- and difluoroalkyl-substituted olefins with bromo- or chlorotrimethylsilane. The interesting feature of these reactions is that one, two, or three fluorine atoms can be selectively replaced with bromine or chlorine atoms by modification of the reaction conditions. The generated products can undergo a variety of subsequent transformations, thus constituting a valuable stock of building blocks for installing fluorine-containing olefin motifs in other molecules.

Aluminum-catalyzed halodefluorination reactions of fluoroalkyl-substituted olefins are developed. The reactions can selectively deliver mono-, di-, or trisubstituted products.

Combined with the use of fluorine-18 for positron emission tomography, the discovery that incorporating fluorine atoms into drug molecules can improve their bioavailability, metabolic stability, and target specificity has driven the rapid development of new methods for generating C–F bonds and forming bond connections with fluorine-containing structural motifs over the past decade.¹ However, synthesis of compounds bearing fluorovinyl (F–C C) and gem-difluoroallyl (F₂C–C C) groups remains a challenge, despite the presence of these structural motifs in numerous drugs, such as tezacitabine,² seletracetam,³ and tafluprost⁴ (Scheme 1a). We envisioned that synthesis of fluorovinyls containing an allylic bromine atom (F–C C–C–Br) would facilitate the preparation of such compounds because the bromine atom would serve as a handle for a wide variety of substitution and cross-coupling reactions. The existing methods for their preparation generally rely on reactions of fluorovinyls containing an allylic hydroxyl group or gem-difluorinated vinyloxiranes with brominating reagents.⁵ Direct methods for their synthesis from readily accessible substrates are lacking.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of fluorovinyls via Lewis acid activation of trifluoromethylalkenes.Elegant work from the groups of Maruoka,⁶ Oshima,⁷ Ozerov,⁸ Müller,⁹ Stephan,¹⁰ Oestreich,¹¹ Chen,¹² and Young¹³ on C–F bond activation reactions has proven that Lewis acid-promoted abstraction of fluoride from alkyl fluorides is a powerful tool for generating carbocations that can be trapped by nucleophiles. When trifluoromethylalkenes were studied as substrates, Ichikawa et al. reported that aryldefluorination of trifluoromethylalkenes can be accomplished with a stoichiometric amount of EtAlCl₂via fluoride abstraction and subsequent Friedel–Crafts reactions between the resulting allylic carbocation and arenes (Scheme 1b).¹⁴ In addition, Braun and Kemnitz and colleagues carried out hydrodefluorination reactions of trifluoromethylalkenes with hydrosilanes catalyzed by Lewis acidic nanoscopic aluminum chlorofluoride (Scheme 1b).¹⁵ In light of these reports and our experiences in developing Lewis acid-catalyzed reactions,¹⁶ we speculated that 3,3-difluoroallyl bromides (F₂C C–C–Br) could be directly prepared from trifluoromethylalkenes and a suitable bromide source via Lewis acid activation of the C–F bonds and subsequent nucleophilic attack of the bromide anion at the distal olefinic carbon of the resulting allylic carbocation, a process that has no precedent in the literature.Herein, we report our discovery that by using an aluminum-based Lewis acid catalyst and bromotrimethylsilane (TMSBr) or chlorotrimethylsilane (TMSCl) as a halide source, we were able to achieve the proposed C–F bond activation/substitution reaction (Scheme 1c). Furthermore, simply by adjusting the stoichiometry of the reactants and the reaction temperature, we could selectively obtain mono-, di-, or trisubstituted products. Mechanistic studies indicated the multi-substitution reaction was achieved by thermally promoted 1,3-halogen migration of the initially formed product, followed by further halodefluorination. Notably, the previously reported defluorination reactions of trifluoromethylalkenes, either Lewis acid-catalyzed^14,15 or promoted via other methods,^17–19 usually provide monosubstitution products; that is, our finding that we could selectively generate multiply substituted products is also unprecedented.To test various reaction conditions, we chose α-aryl-substituted trifluoromethylalkene 1a as a model substrate (Table 1). TMSBr was selected as the bromide source because we expected the generated silyl cation to be an excellent scavenger for the displaced fluoride anion. We began by evaluating several Lewis acid catalysts and found that no reaction occurred when 1a was treated with B(C₆F₅)₃, Zn(OTf)₂, Sc(OTf)₃, Al(OTf)₃, or ZrCl₄ (5 mol%) and 3 equiv. of TMSBr in DCE at 80 °C for 24 h (entries 1–5). However, we were encouraged to find that AlCl₃ would catalyze the proposed bromodefluorination reaction, giving monobrominated product 2a and dibrominated product 3a (ref. 20) in 17% and 2% yields, respectively (entry 6). Investigation of additional aluminum-based Lewis acids showed that AlEtCl₂ and Al(C₆F₅)₃(tol)_0.5 (ref. 21) had higher activities: AlEtCl₂ gave 2a and 3a in 5% and 38% yields, respectively (entry 7), and Al(C₆F₅)₃(tol)_0.5 gave 16% and 32% yields, respectively (entry 8). Because Al(C₆F₅)₃(tol)_0.5 is a solid and therefore easier to store and handle than AlEtCl₂ (a liquid), we chose Al(C₆F₅)₃(tol)_0.5 for further investigation. Changing the solvent to toluene inhibited the formation of 3a, but failed to improve the yield of 2a (entry 9). Coordinative solvents (acetonitrile and dioxane) shut down the reaction entirely (entries 10 and 11). When the reaction temperature was increased to 120 °C, 2a and 3a were obtained in 13% and 68% yields, respectively (entry 13). Gratifyingly, when 4 equiv. of TMSBr relative to 1a was used, 3a was generated as the sole reaction product in 90% yield (Z/E = 55 : 45, entry 14). Next, we tried using TMSBr as the limiting reagent to determine whether we could obtain the monobrominated product (2a) as the major product. Indeed, when 3 equiv. of 1a was treated with 1 equiv. of TMSBr at 80 °C, 2a was obtained as the sole product, although the yield was only 30% (entry 15). Further screening of reaction conditions revealed that using 9.0 mol% of Al(C₆F₅)₃(tol)_0.5 and running the reaction at 60 °C for 48 h (entry 16) gave the highest yield of 2a (76%; the yield of 3a was 8%).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Rh(iii)-catalyzed tandem annulative redox-neutral arylation/amidation of aromatic tethered alkenes

Transition-metal-catalyzed directed C–H functionalization has emerged as a powerful and straightforward tool to construct C–C bonds and C–N bonds. Among these processes, the intramolecular annulative alkene hydroarylation reaction has received much attention because this intramolecular annulation can produce more complex and high value-added structural motifs found in numerous natural products and bioactive molecules. Despite remarkable progress, these annulative protocols developed to date remain limited to hydroarylation and functionalization of one side of alkenes, thus largely limiting the structural diversity and complexity. Herein, we developed a rhodium(iii)-catalyzed tandem annulative arylation/amidation reaction of aromatic tethered alkenes to deliver a variety of 2,3-dihydro-3-benzofuranmethanamine derivatives bearing an all-carbon quaternary stereo center by employing 3-substituted 1,4,2-dioxazol-5-ones as an amidating reagent to capture the transient C(sp³)–Rh intermediate. Notably, by simply changing the directing group, a second, unsymmetrical ortho C–H amidation/annulation can be achieved to provide tricyclic dihydrofuro[3,2-f]quinazolinones in good yields.

A rhodium(iii)-catalyzed tandem annulative arylation/amidation reaction of aromatic tethered alkenes was developed to deliver a variety of 2,3-dihydro-3-benzofuranmethanamine derivatives.

Transition-metal-catalyzed C–H functionalization for the direct conversion of C–H bonds to C–C bonds and C–N bonds has evolved into a widespread and effective strategy for fine chemical production.¹ Among these processes, the hydroarylation of C–C double bonds via a C–H addition has been well-established and become an effective strategy to access synthetically useful structural motifs.¹ Recently, this alkene hydroarylation reaction has received much attention in an intramolecular fashion² (Scheme 1a) because this intramolecular annulation can produce more complex and high value-added structural motifs found in numerous natural products and bioactive molecules (Fig. 1).³ Despite remarkable progress in this area, most of the annulative protocols developed to date remain limited to one-component intramolecular alkene hydroarylation and functionalization of one side of alkenes. More challenging C–H arylation of intramolecular alkenes followed by a tandem coupling with a different coupling partner have unfortunately proven elusive thus far, thus largely limiting the structural diversity and complexity.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Representative bioactive 2,3-dihydrobenzofurans.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Transition-metal-catalyzed C–H functionalization to construct the C–C and C–N bonds.On the other hand, nitrogen-containing molecules have gained great attention due to their widespread presence in natural products and widespread use in pharmaceutical science.⁴ During the last two decades, transition-metal-catalyzed direct C(sp²)–H amination/amidation assisted by chelating directing group is a well-established strategy.⁵ Recently, several examples of C(sp³)–H amination/amidation have also been reported for the efficient installation of C–N bonds.^6,7 Mechanistically, the reaction is initiated by a chelation-assisted C–H metalation to form a C(sp³)–M species, which is then coupled with amination reagents to construct the C–N bonds.In this context, we wondered if a catalytic annulative C–H arylation of a O-bearing olefin-tethered arenes might be possible, thus leading to a C(sp³)–M intermediate, which upon capture with a amidation reagent to construct a new C–N bond and provide bioactive 2,3-dihydro-3-benzofuranmethanamine derivatives. Inherently, the tandem annulative 1,2-arylation/amidation of alkenes has several challenges. First, the resulting C(alkyl)–M intermediate is liable to undergo protonation to provide the alkene hydroarylation products.^1,2 Moreover, a potential competing β-H elimination of the resulting C(alkyl)–M intermediate also required to be suppressed. In addition, compared with the C(sp²)–M species, the resulting C(alkyl)–M species is relatively unstable and also has a low reactivity.To address these challenges and with our continuing interest in the Rh(iii)-catalyzed C–H functionalization,⁸ we introduced a Weinreb amide as a directing group and 3-substituted 1,4,2-dioxazol-5-ones as the amide sources⁹ to trigger a new tandem annulative 1,2-arylation/amidation of alkenes via a Rh(iii)-catalyzed C–H activation,¹⁰ providing a variety of synthetically challenging 2,3-dihydro-3-benzofuranmethanamine derivatives bearing an all-carbon quaternary stereo center (Scheme 1b). More importantly, through simply changing the directing group, a second, unsymmetrical ortho C–H amidation/annulation could be realized to provide tricyclic dihydrofuro[3,2-f]quinazolinone derivatives. This protocol provides a good complement to previously reported carboamination reactions.¹¹To begin our studies, Weinreb amide 1a was reacted with methyl dioxazolone 3a in the presence of various catalyst and AgSbF₆ at 70 °C in DCE (Table 1, entries 1–4). The use of [Cp*RhCl₂]₂ as the catalyst was found to be crucial to give the desired tandem annulative product 4a, with other catalysts, such as [Ru(p-cymene)Cl₂]₂, [Cp*IrCl₂]₂, and Cp*Co(CO)I₂, resulting in no desired product. Attempt to increase or lower the reaction temperature led to a slightly low yield (entries 5 and 6). Interestingly, when employing a NH–OMe amide 2a as the substrate and using 3 equivalent of 3a, a second, unsymmetrical ortho C–H amidation/annulation was achieved to provide the tricyclic dihydrofuro[3,2-f]quinazolinone 5a in 50% yield (entry 7). A screen of additives (entries 8–10) identified LiOAc as the optimal additive, affording the desired product 5a in 93% yield (entry 10). The Rh(iii) catalyst was found to be crucial for this tandem annulative arylation/amidation reaction, with no reactivity in its absence (entries 11 and 12).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

An unusual formal migrative cycloaddition of aurone-derived azadienes: synthesis of benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocycles

Aurone-derived azadienes are well-known four-atom synthons for direct [4 + n] cycloadditions owing to their s-cis conformation as well as the thermodynamically favored aromatization nature of these processes. However, distinct from this common reactivity, herein we report an unusual formal migrative annulation with siloxy alkynes initiated by [2 + 2] cycloaddition. Unexpectedly, this process generates benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocyclic products with formal substituent migration. This observation is rationalized by less common [2 + 2] cycloaddition followed by 4π and 6π electrocyclic events. DFT calculations provided support to the proposed mechanism.

A HNTf₂-catalyzed formal migrative cycloaddition of aurone-derived azadienes with siloxy alkynes has been developed to provide access to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridines.

Benzofuran is an important scaffold in biologically important natural molecules and therapeutic agents.¹ Among them, benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocycles are particularly noteworthy owing to their broad spectrum of bioactivities for the treatment of various diseases (Fig. 1).² Consequently, the development of efficient methods for their assembly has been a topic receiving enthusiastic attention from synthetic chemists.³ Notably, aurone-derived azadienes (e.g., 1) have been extensively employed as precursors toward these skeletons owing to their easy availability and versatile reactivity (Scheme 1a).³ The polarized conjugation system, combined with the preexisting s-cis conformation, has enabled them to serve as ideal annulation partners for the synthesis of nitrogen heterocycles of variable ring sizes. Moreover, the aromatization nature of these processes by forming a benzofuran ring provides additional driving force for them to behave as a perfect four-atom synthon for [4 + n] cycloaddition.³ In contrast, the use of such species as a two-atom partner for [2 + n] cycloaddition has been less developed.^3c,k,4 Herein, we report a new migrative annulation leading to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridines of unexpected topology (Scheme 1b, with formal R² migration), which is initiated by the less common [2 + 2] cycloaddition.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Benzofuran-fused N-heterocyclic natural and bioactive molecules.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocycles.Siloxy alkynes are another important family of building blocks in organic synthesis.^5–8 The presence of a highly polarized C–C triple bond enables such molecules to serve as versatile two-carbon cycloaddition partners in various annulation reactions.^5–7 In the above context and in continuation of our interest in the study of such electron-rich alkynes,⁷ we envisioned that the reaction between aurone-derived azadienes 1 and siloxy alkynes 2 should lead to facile electron-inversed [4 + 2] cycloaddition to form benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine products (Scheme 1b). Interestingly, the expected product 3′ from direct [4 + 2] cycloaddition was not observed. Instead, a dihydropyridine product 3 with formal R² migration was observed. Careful analysis of the mechanism suggested that a [2 + 2] cycloaddition followed by 4π and 6π electrocyclic steps might be responsible for this unexpected product topology (vide infra).We began our investigation with the model substrates 1a and 2a, which were easily prepared in one step from aurone and 1-hexyne, respectively.⁸ Various Lewis acids were initially examined as potential catalysts for this cycloaddition (Table 1). Unfortunately, common Lewis acids (e.g., TiCl₄, BF₃·OEt₂, Sc(OTf)₃, In(OTf)₃, and AgOTf) were all ineffective (entries 1–5). Substrate decomposition into an unidentifiable mixture was typically observed. However, further screening indicated that AgNTf₂ served as an effective catalyst, leading to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine 3a in 44% yield (entry 6). Careful analysis by X-ray crystallography confirmed that it was not formed by simple [4 + 2] cycloaddition, as the positions of the phenyl and the siloxy groups were switched (vs. the expected topology). The distinct catalytic performance of AgNTf₂ (vs. AgOTf) suggested that the triflimide counter anion Tf₂N⁻ might be important. However, further screening of various metal triflimide salts did not improve the reaction efficiency (entry 7). Instead, we were delighted to find that the corresponding Brønsted acid HNTf₂ served as a better catalyst (57% yield, entry 8). However, triflic acid (TfOH) led to no desired product in spite of complete conversion (entry 9). After considerable efforts in the optimization of other reaction parameters, an improved yield of 75% was obtained with 2.5 mol% of HNTf₂ and 2.5 equivalents of 2a at 60 °C (entry 10). Solvent screening indicated that the reaction proceeded faster in DCE with comparable yield (entry 11). However, other solvents were all inferior (entries 12–15). Finally, with a reversed order of addition of the two reactants, the yield was slightly improved (entry 16). We believe that this might be related to the relative decomposition rates of the substrates.Reaction conditions^a

Regioselective B(3,4)–H arylation of o-carboranes by weak amide coordination at room temperature

Palladium-catalyzed regioselective di- or mono-arylation of o-carboranes was achieved using weakly coordinating amides at room temperature. Therefore, a series of B(3,4)-diarylated and B(3)-monoarylated o-carboranes anchored with valuable functional groups were accessed for the first time. This strategy provided an efficient approach for the selective activation of B(3,4)–H bonds for regioselective functionalizations of o-carboranes.

B–H: site-selective B(3,4)–H arylations were accomplished at room temperature by versatile palladium catalysis enabled by weakly coordinating amides.

o-Carboranes, icosahedral carboranes – three-dimensional arene analogues – represent an important class of carbon–boron molecular clusters.¹ The regioselective functionalization of o-carboranes has attracted growing interest due to its potential applications in supramolecular design,² medicine,³ optoelectronics,⁴ nanomaterials,⁵ boron neutron capture therapy agents⁶ and organometallic/coordination chemistry.⁷ In recent years, transition metal-catalyzed cage B–H activation for the regioselective boron functionalization of o-carboranes has emerged as a powerful tool for molecular syntheses. However, the 10 B–H bonds of o-carboranes are not equal, and the unique structural motif renders their selective functionalization difficult, since the charge differences are very small and the electrophilic reactivity in unfunctionalized o-carboranes reduces in the following order: B(9,12) > B(8,10) > B(4,5,7,11) > B(3,6).⁸ Therefore, efficient and selective boron substitution of o-carboranes continues to be a major challenge.Recently, transition metal-catalyzed carboxylic acid or formyl-directed B(4,5)–H functionalization of o-carboranes has drawn increasing interest, since it provides an efficient approach for direct regioselective boron–carbon and boron–heteroatom bond formations (Scheme 1a),⁹ with major contributions by the groups of Xie,¹⁰ and Yan,¹¹ among others.¹² Likewise, pyridyl-directed B(3,6)–H acyloxylations (Scheme 1b),¹³ and amide-assisted B(4,7,8)–H arylations¹⁴ (Scheme 1c) have been enabled by rhodium or palladium catalysis, respectively.^15,16 Despite indisputable progress, efficient approaches for complementary site-selective functionalizations of o-carboranes are hence in high demand.¹⁷ Hence, metal-catalyzed position-selective B(3,4)–H functionalizations of o-carboranes have thus far not been reported.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Chelation-assisted transition metal-catalyzed cage B–H activation of o-carboranes.Arylated compounds represent key structural motifs in inter alia functional materials, biologically active compounds, and natural products.¹⁸ In recent years, transition metal-catalyzed chelation-assisted arylations have received significant attention as environmentally benign and economically superior alternatives to traditional cross-coupling reactions.¹⁹ Within our program on sustainable C–H activation,²⁰ we have now devised a protocol for unprecedented cage B–H arylations of o-carboranes with weak amide assistance, on which we report herein. Notable features of our findings include (a) transition metal-catalyzed room temperature B–H functionalization, (b) high levels of positional control, delivering B(3,4)-diarylated and B(3)-monoarylated o-carboranes, and (c) mechanistic insights from DFT computation providing strong support for selective B–H arylation (Scheme 1d).We initiated our studies by probing various reaction conditions for the envisioned palladium-catalyzed B–H arylation of o-carborane amide 1a with 1-iodo-4-methylbenzene (2a) at room temperature (Tables 1 and S1^†). We were delighted to observe that the unexpected B(3,4)-di-arylated product 3aa was obtained in 59% yield in the presence of 10 mol% Pd(OAc)₂ and 2 equiv. of AgTFA, when HFIP was employed as the solvent, which proved to be the optimal choice (entries 1–5).²¹ Control experiments confirmed the essential role of the palladium catalyst and silver additive (entries 6–7). Further optimization revealed that AgOAc, Ag₂O, K₂HPO₄, and Na₂CO₃ failed to show any beneficial effect (entries 8–11). Increasing the reaction temperature fell short in improving the performance (entries 12 and 13). The replacement of the amide group in substrate 1a with a carboxylic acid, aldehyde, ketone, or ester group failed to afford the desired arylation product (see the ESI^†). We were pleased to find that the use of 1.0 equiv. of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as an additive improved the yield to 71% (entry 14). To our delight, replacing the silver additive with Ag₂CO₃ resulted in the formation of B(3)–H mono-arylation product 4aa as the major product (entries 15–16).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Access to P-stereogenic compounds via desymmetrizing enantioselective bromination

A novel and efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides under chiral squaramide catalysis was reported. Using this asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy, a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates were obtained with good to excellent yields (up to 92%) and enantioselectivities (up to 98.5 : 1.5 e.r.). The reaction could be scaled up, and the synthetic utility of the desired P-stereogenic compounds was proved by transformations and application in an asymmetric reaction.

A highly efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides was developed, providing a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with high yields and enantioselectivities.

P-Stereogenic compounds are a class of privileged structures, which have been widely present in natural products, drugs and biologically active molecules (Fig. 1a).^1–4 In addition, they are also important chiral materials for the development of chiral catalysts and ligands (Fig. 1b), because the chirality of the phosphorus atom is closer to the catalytic center which can cause remarkable stereo-induction.^5,6 Thus, the development of efficient methods for the synthesis of P-stereogenic compounds with novel structures and functional groups is very meaningful.^5a Conventional syntheses of P-stereogenic compounds mainly depended on the resolution of diastereomeric mixtures and chiral-auxiliary-based approaches, in which stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents are usually needed.⁷ By comparison, asymmetric catalytic strategies, including asymmetric desymmetric reactions of dialkynyl, dialkenyl, diaryl and bisphenol phosphine oxides,^8–14 (dynamic) kinetic resolution of tertiary phosphine oxides,¹⁵ and asymmetric reactions of secondary phosphine oxides,¹⁶ can effectively solve the above-mentioned problems and have been considered as the most direct and efficient synthesis methods for constructing P-chiral phosphine oxides (Fig. 1c). Among them, organocatalytic asymmetric desymmetrization methods have been sporadic, in which the reaction sites were mainly limited to the hydroxyl group of bisphenol phosphine oxides that hindered their further transformation.^8–11 It is worth mentioning that asymmetric desymmetrization methods, especially organocatalytic desymmetrization reactions, due to their unique advantages of mild reaction conditions and wide substrate scope, have become an important strategy for asymmetric synthesis. Accordingly, the development of efficient organocatalytic desymmetrization strategy for the synthesis of important functionalized P-stereogenic compounds which contain multiple conversion groups is very meaningful and highly desirable.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(a) Examples of natural products containing P-stereogenic centers. (b) P-Stereogenic compound type ligand and catalyst. (c) Typical P-stereogenic compounds'' synthetic strategies.On the other hand, asymmetric bromination has been demonstrated to be one of the most attractive approaches for chiral compound syntheses.¹⁷ Since the pioneering work on peptide catalyzed asymmetric bromination for the construction of biaryl atropisomers,^18a the reports on constructing axially biaryl atropisomers,¹⁸ C–N axially chiral compounds,¹⁹ atropisomeric benzamides,²⁰ axially chiral isoquinoline N-oxides,²¹ and axially chiral N-aryl quinoids²² by electrophilic aromatic bromination have been well developed (Scheme 1a). In comparison, the desymmetrization of phenol through asymmetric bromination to construct central chirality remains a daunting task. Miller discovered a series of tailor made peptide catalyzed enantioselective desymmetrizations of diarylmethylamide through ortho-bromination (Scheme 1b).²³ Recently, Yeung realized amino-urea catalyzed desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of phenol derivatives to fix a new class of potent privileged bisphenol catalyst cores with excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1b).²⁴ Despite this elegant work, there is no report on the synthesis of P-centered chiral compounds using the desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination strategy.Open in a separate windowScheme 1(a) Constructing axially chiral compounds by asymmetric bromination. (b) Known synthesis of central chiral compounds via asymmetric bromination. (c) This work: access to P-stereogenic compounds via desymmetrizing enantioselective bromination.Taking into account the above-mentioned consideration, we speculated that bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates are potential substrate candidates for desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination to construct P-stereogenic centers. The advantages of using bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates as substrates are shown in two aspects. First, the ortho-position of electron rich phenol is easy to take place electrophilic bromination reaction. Second, the corresponding bromination product structure contains abundant synthetic conversion groups, including bromine, hydroxyl group, alkoxy group and phosphoryl group. To achieve this goal, two challenges need to be overcome: (i) finding a suitable chiral catalyst for the desymmetrization process to induce enantiomeric control is troublesome, due to the remote distance between the prochiral phosphorus center and the enantiotopic site; (ii) selectively brominating one phenol to inhibit the formation of an achiral by-product is difficult. Herein, we report a chiral squaramide catalyzed asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy to construct a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with good to excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1c). It is worth mentioning that the obtained P-stereogenic compounds can be further transformed at multiple sites.Our initial investigation was carried out with bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)phosphine oxide 1a and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) 2a as the model substrates, 10 mol% chiral amino-thiourea 4a as the catalyst, and toluene as the solvent, which were stirred at −78 °C for 12 h. As a result, the reaction gave the desired desymmetrization product 3a in 65% yield with 56 : 44 e.r. (Table 1, entry 1). Then, thiourea 4b was tested, in which a little better result was obtained (Table 1, entry 2). To our delight, using the chiral squaramides 4c–4f as the catalysts, the enantiomeric ratios of the desymmetrization products had been significantly improved (Table 1, entries 3–6). Especially, when chiral squaramide catalyst 4c was applied to this reaction, the enantiomeric ratio of 3a was increased to 95 : 5 (Table 1, entry 3). To further improve the yield and enantioselectivity, we next optimized the reaction conditions by varying reaction media and additives. As shown in Table 1, the reaction was affected by the solvent dramatically. Product 3a was obtained with low yield and enantioselectivity in DCM (Table 1, entry 7). Also, when Et₂O was used as the solvent, the yield and e.r. value of product 3a were all decreased (Table 1, entry 8). As a result, the initial used toluene was the optimal solvent. We also inspected the effect of different bromine sources, and found that the initially used NBS was the optimal one (Table 1, entries 3, 11 and 12). Fortunately, by adjusting the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 1.5 equiv., the yield and the enantiomeric ratio of 3a were increased to 80% and 96.5 : 3.5, respectively (Table 1, entries 3, 13 and 14). Further increasing the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 2.0 equiv. resulted in a reduced enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 15).Optimization of the reaction conditions^a

Nickel catalysis enables convergent paired electrolysis for direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds

Convergent paired electrosynthesis is an energy-efficient approach in organic synthesis; however, it is limited by the difficulty to match the innate redox properties of reaction partners. Here we use nickel catalysis to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two opposite electrodes of an electrochemical cell, achieving direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds. This method yields a diverse set of diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in medicinal and materials chemistry. Preliminary mechanistic study suggests oxidation of a benzylic C–H bond, Ni-catalyzed C–C coupling, and reduction of a Ni intermediate as key elements of the catalytic cycle.

A direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds is achieved by integrating Ni-catalyzed benzyl–aryl coupling into convergent paired electrolysis.

Electrochemical organic synthesis has drawn much attention in recent years.¹ Compared to processes using stoichiometric redox agents, electrosynthesis can potentially be more selective and safe, generate less waste, and operate under milder conditions.^1b In the majority of examples, the reaction of interest occurs at one electrode (anode for oxidation or cathode for reduction), while a sacrificial reaction occurs at the counter electrode to fulfil electron neutrality.^1a,2 Paired electrolysis uses both anodic and cathodic reactions for the target synthesis, thereby maximizing energy efficiency.^1a,3 However, there are comparatively few examples of paired electrolysis for organic synthesis.^1a,3,4Paired electrolysis might be classified into three types: parallel, sequential, and convergent (Fig. 1).^1a,3a In parallel paired electrolysis (Fig. 1a), the two half reactions are simultaneous but non-interfering. In sequential paired electrolysis (Fig. 1b), a substrate is oxidized and reduced (or vice versa) sequentially. In convergent paired electrolysis (Fig. 1c), intermediates generated by the anodic and cathodic processes react with one another to yield the product.^1a,3a,4b,c,5 The activation mode of all three types of paired electrolysis is based on the innate redox reactivity of substrates. As a result, the types of reactions that could be conducted by paired electrolysis remain limited. We proposed a catalytic version of convergent paired electrolysis, where a catalyst is used to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two separated electrodes (Fig. 1d). Although mediators have been used in paired electrosynthesis,^3a,4c,6 catalytic coupling of anodic and cathodic intermediates remains largely undeveloped. This mode of action will leverage the power of cross-coupling to electrosynthesis, opening up a wide substrate and product space. Here we report the development of such a process, where cooperative nickel catalysis and paired electrolysis enable direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds (Fig. 1e).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Different types of paired electrolysis: (a) parallel paired electrolysis, (b) sequential paired electrolysis, (c) convergent paired electrolysis, (d) catalytic convergent paired electrolysis and (e) this work.Our method can be used to synthesize diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in bioactive compounds,⁷ natural products⁸ and materials.⁹ Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds has been recognized as an efficient strategy to synthesize diarylmethanes, and methods using metal catalysis¹⁰ and in particular combined photoredox and transition-metal catalysis have been reported.¹¹ Electrosynthesis provides a complementary approach to these methods, with the potential advantages outlined above. The groups of Yoshida¹² and Waldvogel¹³ previously developed synthesis of diarylmethanes via a Friedel–Crafts-type reaction of a benzylic cation and a nucleophile. The benzylic cations were generated by anodic oxidation of benzylic C–H bonds.¹⁴ To avoid the overoxidation of products and to stabilize the very reactive benzylic cations, the reactions had to be conducted in two steps, where the benzylic cations generated in the anodic oxidation step had to be trapped by a reagent. We thought a Ni catalyst could be used to trap the benzyl radical to form an organonickel intermediate, which is then prone to a Ni-catalyzed C–C cross-coupling reaction. Although such a coupling scheme was unprecedented, Ni-catalyzed electrochemical reductive coupling of aryl halides was well established.¹⁵ We were also encouraged by a few recent reports of combined Ni catalysis and electrosynthesis for C–N,¹⁶ C–S,¹⁷ and C–P¹⁸ coupling reactions.We started our investigations using the reaction between 4-methylanisole 1a and 4-bromoacetophenone 2a as a test reaction (Table 1). Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds was challenging and was typically conducted using toluene derivatives in large excess, e.g., as a solvent.^{11a,b,11d–f} To improve the reaction efficiency, we decided to use only 3 equivalents of 4-methylanisole 1a relative to 2a. After some initial trials, we decided to conduct the reaction in an undivided cell using a constant current of 3 mA. These conditions are straightforward from a practical point of view. After screening various reaction parameters, we found that a combination of 4,4′-dimethoxy-2-2′-bipyridine (L1) and (DME)NiBr₂ as a catalyst, THF/CH₃CN (4 : 1) as a solvent, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass as an anode and carbon fibre as a cathode gave a 50% GC yield of 1-(4-(4-methoxybenzyl)phenyl)ethanone 3a after 18 h (Table 1, entry 1). Extending the reaction time to 36 h improved the yield to 76% (isolated yield) (entry 2). The target products were formed in a diminished yield with other bipyridine type ligands (entries 3–5). Solvents commonly used in Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, such as DMA and DMF, were less effective (entries 7–8). Replacing carbon fibre by nickel foam or platinum foil as the cathode was detrimental to the coupling, but substantial yields were still obtained (entries 9–10). On the other hand, FTO could not be replaced as the anode. Using carbon fibre as the anode shut down the reaction (entry 11). Likewise, using Pt foil as the anode gave only a 7% GC yield (entry 12). The sensitivity of the reaction outcomes to the electrodes originates from the electrode-dependent redox properties of reaction components (see below). Additional data showing the influence of other reaction parameters such as nickel sources, current, concentration, and electrolytes are provided in the ESI (Table S1, ESI^†).Summary of the influence of key reaction parameters^a

Difluorination of α-(bromomethyl)styrenes via I(I)/I(III) catalysis: facile access to electrophilic linchpins for drug discovery

Simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes can be processed to a variety of 1,1-difluorinated electrophilic building blocks via I(I)/I(III) catalysis. This inexpensive main group catalysis strategy employs p-TolI as an effective organocatalyst when combined with Selectfluor® and simple amine·HF complexes. Modulating Brønsted acidity enables simultaneous geminal and vicinal difluorination to occur, thereby providing a platform to generate multiply fluorinated scaffolds for further downstream derivatization. The method facilitates access to a tetrafluorinated API candidate for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Preliminary validation of an enantioselective process is disclosed to access α-phenyl-β-difluoro-γ-bromo/chloro esters.

Simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes can be processed to a variety of 1,1-difluorinated electrophilic building blocks via I(I)/I(III) catalysis.

Structural editing with fluorine enables geometric and electronic variation to be explored in functional small molecules whilst mitigating steric drawbacks.¹ This expansive approach to manipulate structure–function interplay continues to manifest itself in bio-organic and medicinal chemistry.² Of the plenum of fluorinated motifs commonly employed, the geminal difluoromethylene group³ has a venerable history.⁴ This is grounded in the structural as well as electronic ramifications of CH₂ → CF₂ substitution, as is evident from a comparison of propane and 2,2-difluoropropane (Fig. 1, upper). Salient features include localized charge inversion (C–H^δ+ to C–F^δ−) and a widening of the internal angle from 112° to 115.4°.⁵ Consequently, geminal difluoromethylene groups feature prominently in the drug discovery repertoire⁶ to mitigate oxidation and modulate physicochemical parameters. Catalysis-based routes to generate electrophilic linchpins that contain the geminal difluoromethylene unit have thus been intensively pursued, particularly in the realm of main group catalysis.^7–9 Motivated by the potential of this motif in contemporary medicinal chemistry, it was envisaged that an I(I)/I(III) catalysis platform could be leveraged to convert simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes to gem-difluorinated linchpins: the primary C(sp³)–Br motif would facilitate downstream synthetic manipulations (Fig. 1, lower). To that end, p-TolI would function as a catalyst to generate p-TolIF₂in situ in the presence of an external oxidant¹⁰ and an amine·HF complex. Alkene activation (I) with subsequent bromonium ion formation (II)¹¹ would provide a pre-text for the first C–F bond forming process (III) with regeneration of the catalyst. A subsequent phenonium ion rearrangement¹²/fluorination sequence (III and IV) would furnish the geminal difluoromethylene group and liberate the desired electrophilic building block.Open in a separate windowFig. 1The geminal difluoromethylene group: bioisosterism, and catalysis-based access from α-(bromomethyl)styrenes via I(I)/I(III) catalysis.To validate this conceptual framework, a short process of reaction optimization (1a → 2a) was conducted to assess the influence of solvent, amine·HF ratio (Brønsted acidity)¹³ and catalyst loading (Table 1). Initial reactions were performed with p-TolI (20 mol%), Selectfluor® (1.5 equiv.) as an oxidant, and CHCl₃ as the reaction medium. Variation of the amine : HF ratio was conducted to explore the influence of Brønsted acidity on catalysis efficiency (entries 1–4). An optimal ratio of 1 : 6 was observed enabling the product 2a to be generated in >95% NMR-yield. Although reducing the catalyst loading to 10 and 5 mol% (entries 5 and 6, respectively) led to high levels of efficiency (79% yield with 5 mol%), the remainder of the study was performed with 20 mol% p-TolI. Notably, catalytic vicinal difluorination was not observed at any point during this optimization, in contrast with previous studies from our laboratory.^9d,i A solvent screen revealed the importance of chlorinated solvents (entries 7 and 8): in contrast, performing the reaction in ethyl trifluoroacetate (ETFA) and acetonitrile resulted in a reduction in yield (9 and 10). Finally, a control reaction in the absence of p-TolI confirmed that an I(I)/I(III) manifold was operational (entry 11). An expanded optimization table is provided in the ESI.^†Reaction optimization^a

Ruthenium-catalyzed formal sp3 C–H activation of allylsilanes/esters with olefins: efficient access to functionalized 1,3-dienes

Ru-catalysed oxidative coupling of allylsilanes and allyl esters with activated olefins has been developed via isomerization followed by C(allyl)–H activation providing efficient access to stereodefined 1,3-dienes in excellent yields. Mild reaction conditions, less expensive catalysts, and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity ensure universality of the reaction. In addition, the unique power of this reaction was illustrated by performing the Diels–Alder reaction, and enantioselective synthesis of highly functionalized cyclohexenone and piperidine and finally synthetic utility was further demonstrated by the efficient synthesis of norpyrenophorin, an antifungal agent.

Ru-catalysed oxidative coupling of allylsilanes and allyl esters with activated olefins has been developed via isomerization followed by C(allyl)–H activation providing efficient access to stereodefined 1,3-dienes in excellent yields.

1,3-Dienes not only are widespread structural motifs in biologically pertinent molecules but also feature as a foundation for a broad range of chemical transformations.^1–14 Indeed, these conjugated dienes serve as substrates in many fundamental synthetic methodologies such as cycloaddition, metathesis, ene reactions, oxidoreduction, or reductive aldolization. It is well-understood that the geometry of olefins often influences the stereochemical outcome and the reactivity of reactions involving 1,3-dienes.¹⁵ Hence, a plethora of synthetic methods have been developed for the stereoselective construction of substituted 1,3-dienes.^16–24 The past decade has witnessed a huge advancement in the field of metal-catalyzed C–H activation/functionalization.^25–27 Although, a significant amount of work in the field of C(alkyl)–H and C(aryl)–H activation has been reported; C(alkenyl)–H activation has not been explored conspicuously, probably due to the complications caused by competitive reactivity of the alkene moiety, which can make chemoselectivity a significant challenge. Over the past few years, several different palladium-based protocols have been developed for C(alkenyl)–H functionalization, but the reactions are generally limited to employing conjugated alkenes, such as styrenes,^28–31 acrylates/acrylamides,^32–36 enamides,³⁷ and enol esters/ethers.^38,39 To date, only a few reports have appeared in the literature for expanding this reactivity towards non-conjugated olefins, which can be exemplified by camphene dimerization,⁴⁰ and carboxylate-directed C(alkenyl)–H alkenylation of 1,4-cyclohexadienes.⁴¹ In 2009, Trost et al. reported a ruthenium-catalyzed stereoselective alkene–alkyne coupling method for the synthesis of 1,3-dienes.⁴² The same group also reported alkene–alkyne coupling for the stereoselective synthesis of trisubstituted ene carbamates.⁴³ A palladium catalyzed chelation control method for the synthesis of dienes via alkenyl sp² C–H bond functionalization was described by Loh et al.⁴⁴ Recently, Engle and coworkers reported an elegant approach for synthesis of highly substituted 1,3-dienes from two different alkenes using an 8-aminoquinoline directed, palladium(ii)-mediated C(alkenyl)–H activation strategy.⁴⁵ Allyl and vinyl silanes are known as indispensable nucleophiles in synthetic chemistry.⁴⁶ Alder ene reactions of allyl silanes with alkynes are reported for the synthesis of 1,4-dienes.⁴⁷ Innumerable methods are known for the preparation of both allyl and vinyl silanes^48–52 but limitations are associated with many of the current protocols, which impedes the synthesis of unsaturated organosilanes in an efficient manner. Silicon-functionalized building blocks are used as coupling partners in the Hiyama reaction⁵³ and are easily converted into iodo-functionalized derivatives (precursor for the Suzuki cross-coupling reaction), but there is little attention given for the synthesis of functionalized vinyl silanes. Herein, we report a general approach for the stereoselective synthesis of trisubstituted 1,3-dienes by the Ru-catalyzed C(sp³)–H functionalization reaction of allylsilanes (Scheme 1).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Highly stereoselective construction of 1,3-dienes.In 1993, Trost and coworkers reported an elegant method for highly chemoselective ruthenium-catalyzed redox isomerization of allyl alcohols without affecting the primary and secondary alcohols and isolated double bonds.^54,55 Inspired by the potential of ruthenium for such isomerization of double bonds in allyl alcohols, we sought to identify a ruthenium-based catalytic system that can promote isomerization of olefins in allylsilanes followed by in situ oxidative coupling with an activated olefin to form substituted 1,3-dienes. We initiated our studies by choosing trimethylallylsilane 1a and acrylate 2a by using a commercially available [RuCl₂(p-cymene)]₂ catalyst in the presence of AgSbF₆ as an additive and co-oxidant Cu(OAc)₂ in 1,2-DCE at 100 °C. Interestingly, it resulted into direct formation of (2E,4Z)-1,3-diene 3aa as a single isomer in 55% yield. It is likely that this reaction occurs by C(allyl)–H activation of the π-allyl ruthenium complex followed by oxidative coupling with the acrylate and leaving the silyl group intact (Table 1). π-Allyl ruthenium complex formation may be highly favorable due to the α-silyl effect which stabilizes the carbanion forming in situ in the reaction.⁵⁶ Next, the regioselective C–H insertion of vinyl silanes could be controlled by stabilization of the carbon–metal (C–M) bond in the α-position to silicon. This stability arises due to the overlapping of the filled carbon–metal orbital with the d orbitals on silicon or the antibonding orbitals of the methyl–silicon (Me–Si) bond.⁵⁷ The stereochemistry of the diene was established by 1D and 2D spectroscopic analysis of the compound 3aa. To quantify the C–H activation mediated coupling efficiency, an extensive optimization study was conducted (allylsilanes followed by in situ oxidative coupling with an activated olefin to form substituted 1,3-dienes). The change of solvents from 1,2-DCE to t-AmOH, DMF, dioxane, THF or MeCN did not give any satisfactory result, rather a very sluggish reaction rate or decomposition of starting materials was observed in each case (entry 2–6).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

S(vi) in three-component sulfonamide synthesis: use of sulfuric chloride as a linchpin in palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling

Sulfuric chloride is used as the source of the –SO₂– group in a palladium-catalyzed three-component synthesis of sulfonamides. Suzuki–Miyaura coupling between the in situ generated sulfamoyl chlorides and boronic acids gives rise to diverse sulfonamides in moderate to high yields with excellent reaction selectivity. Although this transformation is not workable for primary amines or anilines, the results show high functional group tolerance. With the solving of the desulfonylation problem and utilization of cheap and easily accessible sulfuric chloride as the source of sulfur dioxide, redox-neutral three-component synthesis of sulfonamides is first achieved.

Sulfuric chloride is used as the source of the –SO₂– group in a palladium-catalyzed three-component synthesis of sulfonamides.

Since its development in the 1970s,¹ Suzuki–Miyaura coupling has become a widely used synthetic step in diverse areas. With two of the most widely sourced materials, organoborons and alkyl/aryl halides, a number of C–C coupling reactions are established and the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction has successfully acted as the key step in the synthesis of medicines and agrochemicals.²In addition to the well-known aryl halides and esters, various other substrates such as acid chlorides,³ anhydrides,⁴ diazonium salts⁵ and sulfonyl chlorides⁶ were also reported for the coupling in the past decades. As far as acid chlorides are concerned, carbamoyl chlorides were successfully transformed to the corresponding benzamides in the early years of the 21st century.⁷ However, the use of sulfamoyl chlorides as coupling partners is challenging due to the strong electron-withdrawing properties of the sulfonyl group, which cause the tendency of desulfonylation to form tertiary amines.Synthesis of sulfonyl-containing compounds, especially sulfones and sulfonamides, via the insertion of sulfur dioxide has been extensively studied during the last decade.⁸ A series of sulfur-containing surrogates have been developed as the source of the –SO₂– group. Willis and co-workers first reported the use of DABCO·(SO₂)₂, a bench-stable solid adduct of DABCO and gaseous SO₂ discovered by Santos and Mello,^9a as the source of sulfur dioxide in the synthesis of sulfonylhydrazines.^9b Soon after, alkali metal metabisulfites were found to provide sulfur dioxide for the formation of sulfonyl compounds.¹⁰ In the recent developments in this field, DABCO·(SO₂)₂ and metabisulfites have become the most popular SO₂ surrogates for the insertion of sulfur dioxide.⁸ However, the practical applications of sulfur dioxide insertion reactions are limited by atom-efficiency problems and the unique properties of reactants. For instance, the three-component synthesis of aryl sulfonylhydrazines using aryl halides, SO₂ surrogates and hydrazines by a SO₂-doped Buchward–Hartwig reaction was realized in the earliest developments in this field.¹⁰ However, similar transformations from aryl halides and amines to the corresponding sulfonamides still remain unresolved (Scheme 1a).^11,12Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthetic approaches to sulfonamides.In order to provide a simple and efficient method for the three-component synthesis of aryl sulfonamides without the pre-synthesis of sulfonyl chlorides, many scientists have made various attempts. Interestingly, the use of arylboronic acids instead of aryl halides provided an alternative route. An oxidative reaction between boronic acids, DABCO·(SO₂)₂ and amines for the preparation of aryl sulfonamides at high temperature was realized,¹² while reductive couplings of boronic acids, SO₂ surrogates and nitroarenes were also reported (Scheme 1b).¹³ However, due to the reversed electronic properties of boronic acids from halides, additional additives and restrictions had to be considered. Extra oxidants and harsh conditions were usually used, and some of the transformations required “oxidative” substrates, such as nitroarenes and chloroamines.¹⁴Early in 2020, a reductive hydrosulfonamination of alkenes by sulfamoyl chlorides was reported,¹⁵ which gave us the inspiration to use in situ generated sulfamoyl chlorides as the electrophile for the synthesis of aryl sulfonamides by Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. In this way, sulfamoyl chlorides could be formed by nucleophilic substitution of an amine to sulfuric chloride, and the S(vi) central atom introduced into the reaction could reverse the electronic properties of the amine, which would eliminate the addition of oxidants (Scheme 1c). With the utilization of boronic acids as the coupling partner, a palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling could provide the sulfonamide products. Compared with traditional attempts, reversing the electronic properties of an amine from nucleophilic to electrophilic could reverse the whole reaction process, and two-step synthesis starting from the amine side could bypass the existing difficulty of S–N bond forming reductive elimination.¹² Instead, a C–S bond formation could be the key for success (Scheme 2). In this proposed route, the presence of a base would be essential to remove the acid generated in situ during the reaction process. Additionally, we expected that the addition of a ligand would improve the oxidative addition of Pd(0) to sulfamoyl chloride, thus leading to the desired sulfonamide product.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Comparison between the traditional route and designed work.As designed based on our assumption, we used a commercialized sulfamoyl chloride intermediate A, which would be generated from morpholine 1a and SO₂Cl₂, to start our early investigations. The results showed that the direct Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of sulfamoyl chloride intermediate A and 2-naphthaleneboronic acid 2a mostly led to the generation of byproduct 3a′ with traditional phosphine ligands added to the reaction, and the desired product 3a was obtained in poor yields (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). It is known that an electron-rich ligand would enhance the oxidative addition of Pd(0) to the electrophile, and the bulky factor would facilitate the reductive elimination process. As expected, the yield of product 3a was increased significantly when electron-rich and bulky tris-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)phosphine was used as the ligand (Table 1, entry 3). Moreover, the reaction could proceed more efficiently by using a mixture of THF and MeCN as the co-solvent (Table 1, entry 4).Early investigations using morpholine-4-sulfonyl chloride A as the starting material

Ligand design for Rh(iii)-catalyzed C–H activation: an unsymmetrical cyclopentadienyl group enables a regioselective synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones

We report the regioselective synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones from aliphatic alkenes and O-pivaloyl benzhydroxamic acids mediated by a Rh(iii) precatalyst bearing sterically bulky substituents. While the prototypical Cp* ligand provides product with low selectivity, sterically bulky Cp^t affords product with excellent regioselectivity for a range of benzhydroxamic acids and alkenes. Crystallographic evidence offers insight as to the source of the increased regioselectivity.C–H activation mediated processes have provided a unique retrosynthetic approach to access a variety of substituted heterocycles.¹ One tactic that has received increased attention is the coupling of π-components with heteroatom containing molecules.² A variety of transition metals are capable of catalyzing this type of transformation, providing access to dozens of heterocyclic motifs.^1–3 A challenge for these methods is controlling the regioselectivity of migratory insertion across alkenes and alkynes after the metallacycle forming C–H activation (eqn 1).Steric and electronic effects are understood to control migratory insertion of unsymmetrical alkynes in Rh(iii) catalyzed isoquinolone syntheses (eqn 1). When the substituents are electronically similar, the larger group resides β- to Rh in the metallacycle to avoid unfavorable steric interactions (selectivity is generally >10 : 1).⁴ When the substituents are electronically different, the more electron-donating group prefers being α- to rhodium in the metallacycle, presumably to stabilize the electron poor metal.^5,6 The type of C–H bond being activated also plays an important role in the regioselectivity of migratory insertion; aromatic substrates typically provide synthetically useful regioselectivities when electronically different alkynes are used (>10 : 1) but alkenyl C–H activation leads to products with lower regioselectivities, presumably due to minimal steric interactions during migratory insertion.^7,8 We found that sterically bulky di-tert-butylcyclopentadienyl ligand (Cp^t) enhances the regioselectivity of the alkyne migratory insertion event in these cases, delivering regioselectivities (>10 : 1) modestly above those achievable by Cp* ligated Rh complexes (<6 : 1). However, when the alkyne migratory insertion was poorly selective with RhCp* (<3 : 1), RhCp^t complex was ineffective at providing synthetically useful levels of selectivity. Furthermore, the Cp^t ligand was only effective with aryl substituted alkynes, presumably because of strong steric interactions between the ligand and alkyne in the insertion event. Migratory insertion of alkenes to access heterocycles using C–H activation chemistry is still relatively rare, with seminal studies by Glorius and Fagnou reporting the synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones.^9–11 Similar to alkynes, alkenyl electron-donating groups favor the position adjacent to the metal in the metallacycle delivering high regioselectivity. In contrast to alkynes, aliphatic alkenes afford product with poor regioselectivity (2 : 1) (eqn 2).^5h,12 We hypothesized competing steric and electronic effects cause the low regioselectivity, with steric effects favoring the formation of a 4-substituted product and electronics favoring the formation of a 3-substituted product.¹³ As a temporary solution to this problem, our group and others have employed tethering strategies to increase the regioselectivity of the migratory insertion event (eqn 3).^14,15 Of course, regioselectivity controlled by the ligand on Rh would be the optimal solution to the selectivity problem (eqn 4).¹⁶ Consequently, we focused our attention toward developing an intermolecular variant of this reaction that would provide product with improved regioselectivity.As a model system, we explored the impact ligands have on the coupling of O-pivaloyl-benzhydroxamic acid 1a with 1-decene 2a to provide dihydroisoquinolones 3a and 3a′. When Cp* is used as a ligand, the desired products are isolated in excellent yield but poor selectivity (2.4 : 1 3a : 3a′) ( a

Chemo-selective cross reaction of two enals via carbene-catalyzed dual activation

A dual catalytic chemo-selective cross-coupling reaction of two enals is developed. One enal (without α-substitution) is activated by an NHC catalyst to form an acylazolium enolate intermediate that undergoes Michael-type addition to another enal molecule bearing an alkynyl substituent. Mechanistic studies indicate that non-covalent interactions between the alkynyl enal and the NHC·HX catalyst play important roles in substrate activation and enantioselectivity control. Many of the possible side reactions are not observed. Our reaction provides highly chemo- and diastereo-selective access to chiral lactones containing functionalizable 1,3-enyn units with excellent enantioselectivities (95 to >99% ee).

An NHC-catalyzed dual activation of two different enals is disclosed with both covalent and non-covalent activation pathways involved.

The development of chemo-selective reactions of two or more substrates bearing similar functional groups remains a classic challenge in organic synthesis.¹ Enals (α,β-unsaturated aldehydes) are common building blocks that offer multiple useful modes of reactions. For instance, enals are readily used as Michael acceptors in many reactions including organic catalytic reactions mediated by amines.² In the area of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) organocatalysis,³ enals are used as precursors of several NHC-bound intermediates, including Breslow acyl anion intermediates,⁴ homoenolate intermediates,⁵ enolate intermediates,⁶ and acylazolium intermediates.⁷ Somewhat surprisingly, on the other hand, there is little success in using enals as Michael acceptors to react with any of these NHC-bound intermediates.⁸ Elegant studies in this direction are from Scheidt, in which they showed that in the presence of an NHC catalyst, a homo coupling reaction of enals (with one enal molecule as the Michael acceptor) occurred effectively (Fig. 1a, top side).^8a,c Berkessel reported an intramolecular reaction of two enal moieties (in one molecule) to form a bicyclic lactone adduct in the presence of an achiral NHC catalyst (Fig. 1a, bottom side).^8b To the best of our knowledge, the intermolecular Michael addition reaction of two different enal substrates mediated by NHC catalysts has not been reported.⁹ Possible reasons for the difficulties of enals to behave as effective Michael acceptors likely include: (a) the relatively low electrophilicity of the α,β-unsaturated bonds of enals under the typical NHC catalytic conditions and (b) the presence of competing reactions involving both the alkene and aldehyde moieties of enals.Open in a separate windowFig. 1NHC-catalyzed reactions (a) with enals as Michael acceptors, (b) via cross intermolecular reactions of two enals, and (c) bio-active molecules bearing alkyne units.Here we disclose the first cross intermolecular reaction of two enals catalyzed by NHC catalysts (Fig. 1b). We envisioned that installation of an alkynyl substituent at the α-position of an enal can likely promote its reactivity as a Michael acceptor.¹⁰ The presence of an α-substituent can interrupt π-conjugations and thus minimize its reactivity via the corresponding enal-derived enolate/homoenolate intermediate formed with NHC, as shown by Bode, Glorius and others.^6b,11 In addition, the alkynyl substituent can promote hydrogen-bonding interactions to increase the electrophilicity of the enal to react as a Michael acceptor, as observed in Jørgensen''s amine-catalyzed reactions.¹² In our present study, a non-linear effect was observed regarding enantiomeric excesses of the NHC catalyst and the catalytic reaction product. The reaction enantioselectivity was also found to be sensitive to solvents and bases. These results suggested that the NHC and its azolium salt pre-catalyst (NHC·HX) played dual roles in our reaction: one is to activate the α-unsubstituted enal via the formation of the NHC-bound enolate intermediate,⁶ the other is to activate the α-alkynyl substituted enal via the acidic proton of the chiral NHC·HX (Fig. 1b, intermediate I & transition state TS-I).¹³ With respect to applications, carbon–carbon triple bonds are found in a good number of bioactive molecules such as cleviolide, (+)-prelaureatin, and oxamflatin (Fig. 1c).¹⁴ We demonstrated that our products containing these alkynyl units could be readily transformed into a diverse set of molecules.Cinnamaldehyde 1a and α-alkynyl enal 2a were chosen as the model substrates to search for suitable cross coupling reaction conditions (Table 1). The reactions were first carried out with Et₃N as the base and THF as the solvent. When aminoindanol derived azoium salt A¹⁵ was used as the NHC pre-catalyst, the desired formal [4 + 2] product (3a) was obtained in a very encouraging yield (52%) with excellent ee and dr values (entry 1). The reactions appeared to be very sensitive to the structure of the NHC pre-catalysts, as similar azolium salts with N-phenyl or N–C₆F₅ substituents (B¹⁶ and C¹⁷) were completely ineffective, leading to no product formation (entries 2 & 3). Additional studies on the NHC pre-catalysts finally revealed that introduction of a Br substituent in the indane phenyl ring of the catalyst (D)¹⁸ led to 3a in 85% yield with 99% ee as nearly a single diastereomer (entry 4). Replacing Et₃N with DIEA led to similar results (entry 5). Very interestingly, when the bases were replaced with DABCO or K₃PO₄, a significant drop in the enantioselectivity was observed (entries 6 & 7; see the ESI^† for more details). Changing the solvent from THF to CHCl₃ or EtOAc has moderate effects on reaction yields (entries 8 & 9).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Correction: Deep in blue with green chemistry: influence of solvent and chain length on the behaviour of N- and N,N′-alkyl indigo derivatives

Correction for ‘Deep in blue with green chemistry: influence of solvent and chain length on the behaviour of N- and N,N′-alkyl indigo derivatives’ by Daniela Pinheiro et al., Chem. Sci., 2020, DOI: 10.1039/d0sc04958a.

The authors regret that incorrect compound names and values are reported in Table 5 of the original article. The corrected Table 5 is shown below.Comparison of the fluorescence decay times, τ_i, obtained from the ultrafast time-resolved TA studies and from the ps-TCSPC technique for N,N′C₁Ind and N,N′C₂Ind in n-dodecane and 2MeTHF at T = 293 K

Pd/Cu-Catalyzed amide-enabled selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of unactivated alkenes

The addition reaction between CuBpin and alkenes to give a terminal boron substituted intermediate is usually fast and facile. In this communication, a selectivity-reversed procedure has been designed and established. This selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation reaction is enabled by a cooperative action between palladium and copper catalysts and proceeds with complete regioselectivity. The key to the success of this transformation is the coordination of the amide group and slower CuBpin formation by using KHCO₃ as the base. A wide range of β-boryl ketones were produced from terminal unactivated aliphatic alkenes and aryl iodides. Further synthetic transformations of the obtained β-boryl ketones have been developed as well.

A selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation reaction has been developed with complete regioselectivity.

The catalytic borocarbonylation of alkenes represents a novel synthetic tool for the simultaneous installation of boron and carbonyl groups across alkenes, enabling rapid construction of molecules with high complexity from abundant alkenes. In particular, the obtained organoboron compounds are versatile synthetic intermediates that can be readily converted into a wide range of functional groups with complete stereospecificity.¹ Consequently, several catalytic systems have been developed to diversify the molecular frameworks through carbonylative borofunctionalization.² In general, carbonylative borofunctionalization of alkenes proceeds via an alkyl-copper intermediate, which was produced by the addition of CuBpin to the terminal position of the alkene starting material,³ followed by CO insertion and other related steps. A new C–B bond is formed at the terminal position of the alkene and a carbonyl group has been installed at the β-position simultaneously (Scheme 1a). However, in contrast to the progress in the borocarbonylation, a selectivity-reversed procedure (the boryl group is installed at the internal position) to give β-boryl ketone products is still unprecedented.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Strategies for borocarbonylation of activated alkenes.Recently, several attractive strategies have emerged for the borofunctionalization of unactivated alkenes to give β-boryl products.^4–7 In 2015, Fu, Xiao and their co-workers established a copper-catalyzed regiodivergent alkylboration of alkenes.^4a In the same year, Miura and Hirano''s group reported a copper-catalyzed aminoboration of terminal alkenes.^4b In these two attractive procedures, the regioselectivity was controlled by the ligand applied. More recently, an intermolecular 1,2-alkylborylation of alkenes was described by Ito''s research group.⁵ A radical-relay strategy was used to achieve the targeted regioselective addition. Furthermore, Engle and co-workers explored a palladium-catalyzed 1,2-carboboration and -silylation reaction of alkenes.⁶ Stereocontrol can be achieved in this new procedure with the assistance of a chiral auxiliary which is a coordinating group in this case.Inspired by these pioneering studies, we assumed that if the reaction could be initiated by the insertion of an acylpalladium complex into alkenes, followed by transmetalation with CuBpin before reductive elimination, β-boryl ketones can finally be produced (Scheme 1b). However, due to the inherent reactivity of the palladium species toward alkenes, olefin substrates were usually restricted to styrenes and a large excess of them is typically required (>6 equivalents).^8,9 Therefore, the critical part of the reaction design is to promote the reaction of the acylpalladium intermediate with alkenes faster than the insertion of CuBpin into olefins. One of the ideas is taking advantage of the coordinating group to transform the reaction from intermolecular to intramolecular. Among the developed directing groups,¹⁰ 8-aminoquinoline (AQ) is interesting and has been relatively well studied by various groups in a number of novel transformations.^11–13 Although the AQ directing group contains a NH group which can participate in intramolecular C–N bond formation,¹⁴ we believe that the selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of alkenes can potentially be achieved through cooperative Pd/Cu catalysis. Then, valuable β-boryl ketones can be produced from readily available substrates directly and effectively.To test the viability of our design on selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of alkenes, N-(quinolin-8-yl)pent-4-enamide (1a), iodobenzene (2a), and bis(pinacolato)diboron (B₂pin₂) were chosen as model substrates for systematic studies. As shown in 15 In the testing of palladium precursors, allylpalladium chloride dimer proved to be the best palladium catalyst for this reaction, affording 3a in 41% yield (†) and tend to generate the by-product β-aminoketone. Xantphos was found to be superior to the other tested bidentate ligands (

Asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-xestoquinone and (+)-adociaquinones A and B

The asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-xestoquinone and (+)-adociaquinones A and B was achieved in 6–7 steps using an easily accessible meso-cyclohexadienone derivative. The [6,6]-bicyclic decalin B–C ring and the all-carbon quaternary stereocenter at C-6 were prepared via a desymmetric intramolecular Michael reaction with up to 97% ee. The naphthalene diol D–E ring was constructed through a sequence of Ti(Oi-Pr)₄-promoted photoenolization/Diels–Alder, dehydration, and aromatization reactions. This asymmetric strategy provides a scalable route to prepare target molecules and their derivatives for further biological studies.

The asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-xestoquinone and (+)-adociaquinones A and B was achieved in 6–7 steps using an easily accessible meso-cyclohexadienone derivative.

Various halenaquinone-type natural products with promising biological activity have been isolated from marine sponges of the genus Xestospongia¹ from the Pacific Ocean. (+)-Halenaquinone (1),^2,3 (+)-xestoquinone (2), and (+)-adociaquinones A (3) and B (4)^4,5 bearing a naphtha[1,8-bc]furan core (Fig. 1) are the most typical representatives of this family. Naturally occurring (−)-xestosaprol N (5) and O (6)^6,7 have the same structure as 3 and 4 except for a furan ring, while a naphtha[1,8-bc]furan core can also be found in fungus-isolated furanosteroids (−)-viridin (7) and (+)-nodulisporiviridin E (8)^8,9 (Fig. 1). Halenaquinone (1) was first isolated from the tropical marine sponge Xestospongia exigua² and it shows antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Xestoquinone (2) and adociaquinones A (3) and B (4) were firstly isolated, respectively, from the Okinawan marine sponge Xestospongia sp.^4a and the Truk Lagoon sponge Adocia sp.,^4b and they show cardiotonic,^4a,c cytotoxic,^4b,i antifungal,⁴ⁱ antimalarial,^4j and antitumor^4l activities. These compounds inhibit the activity of pp60v-src protein tyrosine kinase,^4d topoisomerases I^4e and II,^4f myosin Ca²⁺ ATPase,^4c,g and phosphatases Cdc25B, MKP-1, and MKP-3.^4h,kOpen in a separate windowFig. 1Structure of halenaquinone-type natural products and viridin-type furanosteroids.Owing to their diverse bioactivities, the synthesis of this family of natural compounds has been extensively studied, with published pathways making use of Diels–Alder,^{3a,d,e,5a–c,e,g} furan ring transfer,^5b Heck,^{3b,c,5f,7,9b,d} palladium-catalyzed polyene cyclization,^5d Pd-catalyzed oxidative cyclization,^3f and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) radical cyclization^9c reactions. In this study, we report the asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-xestoquinone (2), (−)-xestoquinone (2′), and (+)-adociaquinones A (3) and B (4) (Fig. 1).The construction of the fused tetracyclic B–C–D–E skeleton and the all carbon quaternary stereocenter at C-6 is a major challenge towards the total synthesis of xestoquinone (2) and adociaquinones A (3) and B (4). Based on our retrosynthetic analysis (Scheme 1), the all-carbon quaternary carbon center at C-6 of cis-decalin 12 could first be prepared stereoselectively from the achiral aldehyde 13via an organocatalytic desymmetric intramolecular Michael reaction.^10,11 The tetracyclic framework 10 could then be formed via a Ti(Oi-Pr)₄-promoted photoenolization/Diels–Alder (PEDA) reaction^12–16 of 11 and enone 12. Acid-mediated cyclization of 10 followed by oxidation state adjustment could be subsequently applied to form the furan ring A of xestoquinone (2). Finally, based on the biosynthetic pathway of (+)-xestoquinone (2)^4b,5c and our previous studies,⁷ the heterocyclic ring F of adociaquinones A (3) and B (4) could be prepared from 2via a late-stage cyclization with hypotaurine (9).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Retrosynthetic analysis of (+)-xestoquinone and (+)-adociaquinones A and B.The catalytic enantioselective desymmetrization of meso compounds has been used as a powerful strategy to generate enantioenriched molecules bearing all-carbon quaternary stereocenters.^10,11 For instance, two types of asymmetric intramolecular Michael reactions were developed using a cysteine-derived chiral amine as an organocatalyst by Hayashi and co-workers,^11a,b while a desymmetrizing secondary amine-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular Michael addition was later reported by Gaunt and co-workers to produce enantioenriched decalin structures.^11c Prompted by these pioneering studies and following the suggested retrosynthetic pathway (Scheme 1), we first screened conditions for organocatalytic desymmetric intramolecular Michael addition of meso-cyclohexadienone 13 (Table 1) in order to form the desired quaternary stereocenter at C-6. Compound 13 was easily prepared on a gram scale via a four-step process (see details in the ESI^†).Attempts of organocatalytic desymmetric intramolecular Michael addition^a

Development of an active site titration reagent for α-amylases

α-Amylases are among the most widely used classes of enzymes in industry and considerable effort has gone into optimising their activities. Efforts to find better amylase mutants, such as through high-throughput screening, would be greatly aided by access to precise and robust active site titrating agents for quantitation of active mutants in crude cell lysates. While active site titration reagents designed for retaining β-glycosidases quantify these enzymes down to nanomolar levels, convenient titrants for α-glycosidases are not available. We designed such a reagent by incorporating a highly reactive fluorogenic leaving group onto unsaturated cyclitol ethers, which have been recently shown to act as slow substrates for retaining glycosidases that operate via a covalent ‘glycosyl’-enzyme intermediate. By appending this warhead onto the appropriate oligosaccharide, we developed efficient active site titration reagents for α-amylases that effect quantitation down to low nanomolar levels.

α-Amylases are among the most widely used classes of enzymes in industry and considerable effort has gone into optimising their activities.

Amylases are among the most common classes of enzymes employed in industrial settings, being used in detergents, bread, beer, biofuel, and many other sectors. Accordingly, α-amylases account for 25% of the world''s multi-billion dollar enzyme market.^1,2 α-Amylases are endo-acting enzymes that cleave starch into malto-oligosaccharides, which are further degraded by exo-acting α-glucosidases, glucoamylases, β-amylases and α-glucan phosphorylases and lyases. They are found in CAZy GH families 13, 57, 119 and 126, with the vast majority in the large GH13 family.³ GH13 enzymes adopt a (β/α)₈ fold with three highly conserved active site carboxylic acids.^4–6 They employ a classical double-displacement mechanism⁷ in which one of the glutamic acids provides acid catalytic assistance to the leaving group departure while an aspartate attacks the anomeric centre, forming a covalent glycosyl enzyme intermediate. In a second step, water attacks the anomeric centre with base assistance from the glutamate residue (Fig. 1A and B).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Koshland mechanism of retaining β- and α-glycosidases (A & B). The same mechanism has been observed for the hydrolysis of “β”-valienols (C), and for “α”-valienols (D).Given their industrial importance, a huge amount of attention has been given to the discovery and improvement of α-amylases to attain optimal performance for particular applications. These approaches typically require high-throughput analysis of large numbers of gene products or mutants thereof.^8–10 Identification of the best candidates then ideally requires high-throughput assay coupled with a method for determining the enzyme concentration in each sample. This can be a challenging task in the absence of purification, as would be the case for truly high-throughput approaches. The “gold standard” method to quantify active enzyme concentration is active site titration.¹¹ Active site titrants react stoichiometrically with their target enzymes and release one equivalent of a quantifiable agent, which is typically either a chromophore or fluorophore. For enzymes that operate via a covalent intermediate, such as retaining glycosidases, the active site titrants are usually chromogenic or fluorogenic substrates that form this intermediate with a rate constant (k_on) that is much greater than that for its hydrolysis (k_off) – ideally with k_off approaching zero.Our lab has previously developed active site titration reagents for several retaining β-glycosidases^12,13 and neuraminidases.^14,15 By replacing the substituent on the position adjacent to the anomeric centre of the sugar (the hydroxyl at C-2 for many monosaccharides) with a fluorine atom, both the formation and the hydrolysis of the glycosyl-enzyme intermediate are slowed, largely through inductive destabilisation of the transition state. Further incorporation of a reactive fluorogenic leaving group generates a reagent that, upon covalently inactivating the glycosidase, releases a stoichiometric and quantifiable amount of fluorophore. The fluorogenic response is then measured to determine the amount of active glycosidase that is present in solution.Unfortunately, this same strategy does not work for retaining α-glycosidases. In those cases, k_off remains greater than k_on, likely due to the inherently greater reactivity of the β-glycosyl-enzyme intermediate,^16,17 and the compounds are simply substrates with low turnover numbers. By use of 2,2-dihalosugars with yet more reactive leaving groups, this problem could be solved in some cases, but their synthesis is challenging, and inactivation rates were low, or non-existent in some cases.^18,19 Alternative approaches were called for.Recently, a new class of glycosidase substrates was reported in which the sugar moiety is replaced by an equivalently hydroxylated cyclohexene.^20–23 Hydrolysis of these enol ethers likely occurs via an allylic cation of almost identical reactivity to that of the equivalent oxocarbenium ion. Glycosidases cleave these substrates via the classical Koshland mechanism⁷ (Fig. 1C and D), but considerably more slowly than their natural substrates. However, incorporation of a good leaving group will accelerate, relatively, the first step such that, in some cases, they act as mechanism-based inactivators making them candidates for development of an active site titrant for α-amylases.Since α-amylases are endo-acting enzymes that do not usually cleave monosaccharide glycosides, an ‘extended” oligosaccharide version containing a total of 2 or 3 sugar/pseudosugar moieties would be needed. Substrates longer than this would be prone to internal glycoside cleavage. Since 2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl maltotrioside (CNP-G3) functions as a substrate for most amylases, we focused on addition of a maltosyl unit to a valienol moiety containing a 6,8-difluorocoumarin (F₂MU) leaving group at its “anomeric centre”. The low pK_a of this coumarin, 4.7,¹⁴ results in a greater reactivity of the reagent and also ensures the coumarin will be deprotonated and thus fluorescent, upon release at neutral pH.Synthesis of partially protected alcohol 2 from gluconolactone 1via literature methods²⁴ was followed by attachment of F₂MU via a Mitsunobu reaction and subsequent removal of the protecting groups under acidic conditions, generating known pseudo-glycoside 3.²³ To check this concept before we synthesized the longer version, we tested compound 3 as a titrant of a simple α-glucosidase and found that it did indeed titrate the enzyme (Fig. S5^†). Since elongation of this pseudosugar via classical organic synthesis would require substantial protecting group chemistry, we elected instead to employ an enzymatic coupling strategy using the GH13 cyclodextrin transglycosidase, CGTase. This enzyme can use glycosyl fluorides, such as α-maltosyl fluoride, to effect glycosyl transfer onto suitable acceptors. However, a significant competing reaction would involve self-condensation of glycosyl fluorides ultimately forming cyclodextrins. To avoid this problem, we employed a maltosyl fluoride donor (4), in which the 4′-hydroxyl had been capped with a methyl group.^25,26 Incorporation of 4′-methoxy groups does not alter the reaction with α-amylases, as this site in the normal substrate is occupied by additional sugar residues. Thus CGTase-catalysed glycosylation between known glycosyl fluoride 4 and pseudo-glycoside 3, gave the pseudo-trisaccharide 5 in 64% isolated yield (Scheme 1).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of titration reagent 5.With this reagent in hand, we proceeded to screen its ability to inactivate a small panel of α-amylases. As shown in Fig. 2, time-dependent inactivation was observed for all enzymes tested, with the most industrially relevant enzymes, Effusibacillus pohliae amylase (EPA) and Aspergillus oryzae amylase (AOA), being inactivated the fastest.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Time-dependent inactivation of a small panel of amylases, showing remaining % activity versus time. Red box with X: AOA (91 nM); blue square: EPA (66.7 nM); purple cross: PPA (500 nM); green triangle: HPA (125 nM). AOA = A. oryzae amylase; EPA = E. pohliae amylase; HPA = human pancreatic amylase; PPA = porcine pancreatic amylase.Kinetic parameters for inactivation were then determined by directly monitoring the release of F₂MU by UV-Vis (Table 1). To determine k_on and k_off (Scheme 2), we monitored chromophore (F₂MU) release by absorbance at 370 or 380 nm (dependent on the concentration of 5 in the measurements of each enzyme). After mixing 5 with each enzyme individually, a burst phase followed by a steady-state phase was observed. For each enzyme, this was then repeated with varying concentrations of 5. Initial rates of F₂MU release versus concentration of 5 were fit to a Michaelis–Menten equation to provide k_on. The rate constant of cyclitol release, k_off, was determined by measuring rates of the steady-state region at a saturating concentration (5× K_i). We found that several amylases: Effusibacillus pohliae amylase (EPA), Aspergillus oryzae amylase (AOA), Rhizomucor pusillus amylase (RPA) and porcine pancreatic amylase (PPA), inactivated quickly (highest k_on, lowest k_off, and greatest k_on/K_i), and are therefore ideal candidates for titration with compound 5. Human pancreatic amylase (HPA), on the other hand, while inactivating rapidly, binds the reagent relatively poorly.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Kinetic parameters for the hydrolysis of 5 by several amylases (at 25 °C for EPA, AOA, and RPA and 30 °C for human pancreatic amylase [HPA] and porcine pancreatic amylase [PPA])

Redox-neutral manganese-catalyzed synthesis of 1-pyrrolines

This report describes a manganese-catalyzed radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and oxime ethers, leading to valuable multi-functional 1-pyrrolines. In this redox-neutral process, the oxime ethers function as internal oxidants and H-donors. The reaction involves sequential rupture of C–C, C–H and N–O bonds and proceeds under mild conditions. This intermolecular protocol provides an efficient approach for the synthesis of structurally diverse 1-pyrrolines.

Described herein is a novel manganese-catalyzed radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and oxime ethers, leading to valuable multi-functionalized 1-pyrrolines.

Pyrroline and its derivatives appear frequently as the core of the structure of natural products and biologically active molecules (Fig. 1A).¹ Such compounds also serve as versatile feedstocks in various transformations, such as 1,3-dipolar cyclization, ring opening, reduction and oxidation, leading to diverse and valuable compounds.^2–4 Over the past few decades, great effort has been devoted to the preparation of pyrrolines. This has resulted in several elegant approaches that rely on photoredox catalysis (Fig. 1B).⁵ The groups of Studer,^5a,b Leonori,^5c and Loh^5d–f disclosed intramolecular addition of the intermediate iminyl radical to alkenes to construct pyrrolines. Generally, the synthetic value of a method can be further improved by using an intermolecular reaction pattern. For example, Alemán et al. recently reported a radical-polar cascade reaction involving the addition to ketimines of alkyl radicals formed in hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions.^5g That the existence of benzylic C–H bonds in the substrates is requisite for the HAT, compromises the substrate scope. Despite the appealing photochemical processes, development of new redox approaches to enrich the product diversity of pyrrolines, especially with inexpensive transition-metal catalysts, is still in demand.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(A) Importance of pyrrolines, and (B and C) synthetic approaches to pyrrolines.Prompted by extensive applications of cyclopropanols in synthesis⁶ and our achievements in manganese-catalyzed ring-opening reactions,⁷ we conceived a radical [3 + 2] cyclization using cyclopropanol as a C3 synthon and oxime ethers as a nitrogen source (Fig. 1C). Hypothetically, single-electron oxidation of cyclopropanol by Mnⁿ generates the β-keto radical (I), which undergoes a radical [3 + 2] cascade reaction with an oxime ether to give the alkoxy radical species (II). Conversion of II to the intermediate (III), the pyrroline precursor, requires an extra H-donor to support a HAT process and an oxidant for recovery of Mnⁿ to perpetuate the catalytic cycle. In this scenario, the strategic inclusion of oxime ether is crucial to the overall transformation. The oxime ether is not only an internal oxidant and H-donor, but should also be subject to in situ deprotection by cleaving the N–O bond during the reaction. The choice of a proper Mnⁿ/Mnⁿ⁻¹ pair with suitable redox potentials is also vital to the catalytic cycle.Herein, we provide proof-of-principle studies for this hypothesis. The desired radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and O-benzyl oxime ethers is accomplished with manganese catalysis. This redox-neutral process involves sequential rupture of C–C, C–H, and N–O bonds under mild conditions. The intermolecular protocol provides an ingenious approach to the synthesis of multi-functionalized 1-pyrrolines.With these considerations in mind, phenylcyclopropanol (1a) and oxime ether (2a) were initially chosen as model substrates to evaluate reaction parameters in the presence of manganese salt ( N bond of 2a (entry 2). The optimization of organic solvents was then conducted (entries 3–8), and it was found that the use of fluorinated alcohols, such as trifluoroethanol (TFE) and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) as solvents provided excellent yields (entries 7 and 8). Decreasing the amount of Mn(acac)₃ to 1.2 equiv. gave a comparable yield (entry 9), but further reducing the amount compromised the yield (entry 10). Replacing Mn(acac)₃ with Mn(OAc)₃ or MnCl₂ significantly decreased the reaction yield (entries 11 and 12). However, the use of Mn(acac)₂ gave a similar yield to Mn(acac)₃ (entries 13 vs. 9). The above results prompted us to think over the counteranion effect that the acetylacetone (acac) anion may be requisite to the reaction. Indeed, the synergistic use of stoichiometric MnCl₂ and acetylacetone led to a good yield of the desired product (entry 14). More importantly, a comparable yield was obtained with only 0.2 equiv. of MnCl₂ and added acetylacetone, realizing this reaction under a catalytic amount of Mn salts (entry 15). Given that the low solubility of the Mn salt may lead to poor efficiency, a reaction with 0.067 M concentration was carried out and gave a 89% yield (entry 16). Further reducing the amount of acetylacetone to 1.0 equiv. had no influence on the outcome of the reaction (entry 17), but the reaction efficiency slightly decreased when 0.6 equiv. of acetylacetone was used as the additive (entry 18). Use of a decreased amount (1.0 equiv.) of acetic acid led to the best yield (91%, entry 19), whereas the reaction in the presence of 0.5 equiv. acetic acid (entry 20) or without acetic acid (entry 21) also gave high yields. It is noted that acetic acid is not crucial to the reaction using MnCl₂ as catalyst, as the reaction could generate cat. HCl in situ. The reaction with substoichiometric amount (0.6 equiv.) of acac gave a decreased but also good yield (entry 22). Reducing the catalytic loading of MnCl₂ to 10 mol% slightly compromised the yield (entry 23).Optimization of the synthesis of 1-pyrrolines

Entrya	Mn salt (equiv.)	Additive (equiv.)	Solvent	Yield (%)
1	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	CH3CN	33
2b	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	CH3CN	Trace
3	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DCM	31
4	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	Acetone	25
5	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DMSO	Trace
6	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DMF	Trace
7	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	TFE	80
8	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	HFIP	82
9	Mn(acac)3 (1.2)	None	HFIP	83
10	Mn(acac)3 (0.9)	None	HFIP	55
11	Mn(OAc)3·2H2O (1.2)	None	HFIP	36
12	MnCl2 (1.2)	None	HFIP	Trace
13	Mn(acac)2 (1.2)	None	HFIP	88
14	MnCl2 (1.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	80
15	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	81
16c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	89
17c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	89
18c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (0.6)	HFIP	83
19c,d	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	91
20c,e	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	83
21c,b	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	80
22c,d	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (0.6)	HFIP	82
23c,d	MnCl2 (0.1)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	81

Open in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.45 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), AcOH (2.0 equiv.), and Mn salt (as shown) in solvent (2.0 mL), at room temperature (rt) under N₂, for 16 h.^bWithout AcOH.^c0.067 M reaction.^d1.0 equiv. AcOH.^e0.5 equiv. AcOH. acac = acetylacetone.With the optimized conditions in hand for the synthesis of 1-pyrrolines, the compatibility of various cyclopropanols was inspected (Scheme 1). Common functional groups on the phenyl ring, including halides (3b–3d), ester (3f), ether (3j), were compatible under the reaction conditions. Regardless of the presence of electron-withdrawing or -donating substituents at the para-position of this phenyl ring, the reactions readily proceeded with generally high yields (3b–3j). The cyclopropanol (1k) with an ortho-methyl substituent underwent a cyclization reaction with excellent yield, demonstrating that steric effects had little effect on product of the reaction (3k). By replacing the phenyl group with a naphthyl or thienyl group, the corresponding products (3l and 3m) were produced with slightly lower yields. When 2-substituted cyclopropanols were utilized, these reactions gave rise to a portfolio of trisubstituted 1-pyrrolines (3n–3u).The relative configuration of 3u was determined by comparison with a reported structure.⁸ Remarkably, this protocol provided a convenient method for the construction of an N-containing spiro skeleton (3t). The reaction with alkyl cyclopropanols could also furnish the desired products (3v–3x) smoothly and with good yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Scope of cyclopropanols. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), AcOH (0.2 mmol), MnCl₂ (0.04 mmol), and acac (0.2 mmol) in HFIP (3.0 mL), at rt under N₂. The d.r. values were determined by ¹H NMR analysis with crude reaction mixture, and major isomers are shown with relative configurations. ^aThe reaction is scaled up for 10 times.Next, we studied the scope of oxime ethers (Scheme 2). Steric hindrance from the ester moiety in the oxime ethers appeared not to influence the reaction outcome. Oxime ethers bearing various esters, such as phenyl (3y), biphenyl (3z and 3ab), 2-naphthyl (3aa), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl (3ac and 3ad), and 2,6-dimethylphenyl (3ae) esters all reacted smoothly. In addition, the substrate with tert-butyl ester also readily underwent cyclization to afford the desired product 3af with excellent yield. Remarkably, the trifluoromethyl-substituted pyrroline (3ag) was afforded almost quantitatively from the corresponding ketoxime ether. However, if the trifluoromethyl group was replaced by a methyl or phenyl group, the reaction failed to give rise to the desired product (3ah or 3ai), and this might be attributed to poorer electrophilic nature of the methyl or phenyl substituted substrate.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Scope of oxime ethers. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), AcOH (0.2 mmol), MnCl₂ (0.04 mmol), and acac (0.2 mmol) in HFIP (3.0 mL), at rt under N₂. The d.r. values were determined by ¹H NMR analysis with crude reaction mixture, and major isomers are shown with relative configurations.To illustrate the utility of this protocol, we carried out a set of synthetic applications using 1-pyrroline (3a) (Scheme 3). Upon treatment with acetyl chloride and pyridine at 42 °C, 1-pyrroline (3a) could be readily converted into the acyclic amino acid derivative (4). The reaction between 3a and LiAlH₄ gave rise smoothly to the corresponding alcohol (5). In the presence of 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquin-4-one (DDQ) and triethylamine, the 2,5-disubstituted pyrrole (6) was obtained. Moreover, treatment of 3a with MeOTf and NaBH₄ delivered the N-methyl proline derivative (7).⁹Open in a separate windowScheme 3Synthetic applications. Reaction conditions: (a) AcCl, pyridine, dry DCE, 42 °C, 63% yield; (b) LiAlH₄, THF, reflux, 90% yield; (c) DDQ, Et₃N, DCM, rt, 53% yield; (d) MeOTf, DCM, and then NaBH₄, THF, 40% yield, cis : trans = 6.6 : 1.To probe the mechanistic pathways, we performed a radical trapping experiment in the presence of 2.0 equiv. of radical scavenger TEMPO. The radical trapping product (8) was detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (Scheme 4A, top). In addition, the reaction was obviously suppressed when 1,1-diphenylethylene was added under standard condition (Scheme 4A, bottom). These results suggested that this process engaged in a radical pathway. Kinetic studies illustrated that the reaction immediately started with 20 mol% Mn(acac)₂ but an approximate 15 min of induction period was appeared by using Mn(acac)₃, which probably indicated that the reaction was initiated with Mn(ii) rather than Mn(iii), and the Mn(ii)/Mn(i) cycle might be involved in the transformation (Scheme 4B, for details see ESI^†).Open in a separate windowScheme 4(A and B) Mechanistic studies, and (C) proposed mechanism.On the basis of these results, a plausible mechanism for this radical process was proposed in Scheme 4C. Initially, the interaction between cyclopropanol (1a) and Mn(ii) salt gives rise to the alkoxy manganese species (I), which undergoes a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) process, leading to the alkoxy radical (II).^5f Subsequent ring-opening of the alkoxyl radical (II) provides the alkyl radical (III). The addition of intermediate (III) to the oxime ether, possibly activated by HFIP or HOAc, furnishes the N-centered radical (IV), which intramolecularly attacks the ketone to afford a new alkoxy radical (V).¹⁰ The subsequent 1,5-hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) process delivers the alkyl radical (VI) at the α-position adjacent to the O atom, thus driving N–O bond cleavage to generate the N-centered radical (VII),^5b,11 and benzaldehyde which was detected by TLC. This radical intermediate (VII) undergoes a single electron transfer (SET) mediated by the reduced-state Mn(i) species, and protonation to yield the cyclic pyrrolidine (VIII). Finally, dehydration of this intermediate produces 1-pyrroline (3a).     

Allylic alcohol synthesis by Ni-catalyzed direct and selective coupling of alkynes and methanol

Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir. We herein report nickel-catalyzed direct coupling of alkynes and methanol, providing direct access to valuable allylic alcohols in good yields and excellent chemo- and regioselectivity. The approach features a broad substrate scope and high atom-, step- and redox-economy. Moreover, this method was successfully extended to the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals through a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol.

Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir.

To address the sustainability issues in the production of new chemicals, the development of new catalytic processes that are free of by-products and using abundant renewable feedstocks is one of the most important challenges facing chemists today. The simplest alcohol, methanol, is very abundant, with a total annual production capacity of approximately 110 million metric tons per year,¹ and is an important C1-feedstock in the chemical industry. Beller² and Milstein³ made fundamental developments in catalytic dehydrogenation reactions of methanol.⁴ Krische and coworkers pioneered the study of Ir-catalyzed direct C–C coupling of methanol with reactive π-unsaturated reactants (1,3-dienes, 1,3-enynes and allenes).⁵ The groups of Glorius,⁶ Donohoe,⁷ Obora,⁸ Andersson⁹ and others¹⁰ demonstrated the direct methylation of ketones or amines using methanol. Despite these achievements, the catalytic C–C bond coupling reactions with methanol are still extremely rare and are limited to the use of precious and noble metal-catalysts such as Ru, Rh or Ir.¹¹ The development and use of cheap and abundant metal catalysts for methanol activation is uphill and remains an important field that urgently needs to be developed.On the other hand, allylic alcohols are highly versatile building blocks in organic synthesis and the pharmaceutical industry, and much effort has been devoted to their synthesis. Among them, nickel-catalyzed reductive coupling of alkynes and aldehydes represents an effective and powerful method. However, this method generally requires the use of stoichiometric reducing reagents that are air-sensitive, metallic or pyrophoric (e.g. ZnR₂, BEt₃, and R₃SiH, Scheme 1a).¹² The direct cross-coupling of alcohols and alkynes to synthesize allylic alcohols without the use of any reductant or oxidant represents a significant advancement (Scheme 1b).¹³ However, this approach still poses many limitations that will require considerable effort to overcome. (1) Alkynes are limited to dialkyl alkynes, and poor regioselectivities were observed for unsymmetrical alkynes, which greatly limits the scope of application of the reaction. (2) Alcohols are restricted to active benzyl alcohols and higher alcohols. The direct cross-coupling of alkynes with methanol has not yet been reported.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of allylic alcohols by Ni-catalyzed coupling reaction with alkynes.Although the alkyne–paraformaldehyde reductive coupling has been developed,¹⁴ the paraformaldehyde was itself prepared from synthesis gas (through methanol). Therefore, the development of a new strategy for the direct coupling of alkynes and methanol without the use of any reductant or oxidant is still of great value, but also extremely challenging: (1) alkynes are reactive and could rapidly dimerize to 1,3-dienes¹⁵ or cyclotrimerize to aromatic ring derivatives in the interaction with nickel.¹⁶ (2) Unsymmetric alkynes could result in a mixture of regioisomers that are difficult to separate. (3) The activation energy of methanol in the dehydrogenation process (ΔH = +84 kJ mol⁻¹) is significantly higher than that of higher alcohols or even ethanol (ΔH = +68 kJ mol⁻¹).¹⁷Herein we report the nickel-catalyzed direct and regioselective hydrohydroxymethylation of alkynes for the first time using methanol as a C1-feedstock, providing a broad and efficient approach for the synthesis of high added-value allylic alcohols in a high atom-, step- and redox-economic manner. In addition, a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol has also been developed for the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals in good yields and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity (Scheme 1c).In our initial experiments, we chose unsymmetrical internal alkyne 1a as a model substrate to optimize the reaction conditions (13a Even if the reaction temperature was increased to 100 °C, only a trace amount of allylic alcohol product 2a was observed (entry 2), which indicates that the use of methanol in the catalytic C–C coupling reactions is indeed a big challenge. Various N-heterocyclic carbene ligands (L2–L6) were investigated (entries 3–9). We found that the selectivity of allylic alcohol 2a is challenged by a number of side reactions, such as the hydrogenation (3a), dimerization (4a) and trimerization (5a) of alkyne 1a. L4 is the most effective, providing 2a with the highest yield (40%) and excellent regioselectivity (14/1), but an appreciable quantity of dimerization and trimerization by-products 4a and 5a was still obtained (entry 5). Krische¹⁴ reported that PCy₃ could promote the reductive coupling of alkynes and paraformaldehyde, but we found that it is not effective for alkyne–methanol coupling (entry 8).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

3-Aminooxetanes: versatile 1,3-amphoteric molecules for intermolecular annulation reactions

Despite the versatility of amphoteric molecules, stable and easily accessible ones are still limitedly known. As a result, the discovery of new amphoteric reactivity remains highly desirable. Herein we introduce 3-aminooxetanes as a new family of stable and readily available 1,3-amphoteric molecules and systematically demonstrated their amphoteric reactivity toward polarized π-systems in a diverse range of intermolecular [3 + 2] annulations. These reactions not only enrich the reactivity of oxetanes, but also provide convergent access to valuable heterocycles.

Despite the versatility of amphoteric molecules, stable and easily accessible ones are still limitedly known.

Amphoteric molecules, which bear both nucleophilic and electrophilic sites with orthogonal reactivity, represent an attractive platform for the development of chemoselective transformations.¹ For example, isocyanides are well-established 1,1-amphoteric molecules, with the terminal carbon being both nucleophilic and electrophilic, and this feature has enabled their exceptional reactivity in numerous multi-component reactions.² In the past few decades, substantial effort has been devoted to the search for new amphoteric molecules.^1–5 Among them, 1,3-amphoteric molecules proved to be versatile. The Yudin and Beauchemin laboratories have independently developed two types of such molecules, α-aziridine aldehydes and amino isocyanates, respectively.^4,5 With an electrophilic carbon and a nucleophilic nitrogen in relative 1,3-positions, these molecules are particularly useful for the chemoselective synthesis of heterocycles with high bond-forming efficiency without protective groups (Fig. 1). However, such elegant amphoteric systems still remain scarce. Therefore, the development of new stable amphoteric molecules with easy access remains highly desirable.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Representative [1,3]-amphoteric molecules versus 3-aminooxetanes.In this context, herein we introduce 3-aminooxetanes as a new type of 1,3-amphoteric molecules and systematically demonstrate their reactivity in a range of [3 + 2] annulations, providing rapid access to diverse heterocycles. Notably, 3-aminooxetanes are bench-stable and either commercially available or easily accessible. However, their amphoteric reactivity has not been appreciated previously.Oxetane is a useful functional group in both drug discovery and organic synthesis.^6–9 Owing to the ring strain, it is prone to nucleophilic ring-opening, in which it serves as an electrophile (Scheme 1A).^6–8 We envisioned that, if a nucleophilic group is installed in the 3-position (e.g., amino group), such molecules should exhibit 1,3-amphoteric reactivity due to the presence of both nucleophilic and electrophilic sites (Scheme 1B). Importantly, the 1,3-relative position is crucial for inhibiting self-destructive intra- or intermolecular ring-opening (i.e. the 3-nucleophilic site attack on oxetane itself) due to high barriers. Thus, such orthogonality is beneficial to their stability. In contrast, the nucleophilic site is expected to react with an external polarized π bond (e.g., X = Y, Scheme 1B), which enables a better-positioned nucleophile (Y) to attack the oxetane and cyclize. Thus, a formal [3 + 2] annulation should be expected. Unlike the well-known S_N2 reactivity of oxetanes with simple bond formation, this amphoteric reactivity would greatly enrich the chemistry of oxetanes with multiple bond formations and provide expedient access to various heterocycles. In contrast to the conventional approaches that require presynthesis of advanced intermediates (e.g., intramolecular ring-opening),⁸ the exploitation of such amphoteric reactivity in an intermolecular convergent manner from simple substrates would be more practically useful. Moreover, more activation modes could be envisioned in addition to oxetane activation. In 2015, Kleij and coworkers reported an example of cyclization between 3-aminooxetane and CO₂ in 55% yield, which provided a pioneering precedent.¹⁰ However, a systematic study to fully reveal such amphoteric reactivity in a broad context remains unknown in the literature.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Typical oxetane reactivity and the new amphoteric reactivity.To test our hypothesis, we began with the commercially available 3-aminooxetanes 1a and 1b as the model substrates. Phenyl thioisocyanate 2a and CS₂ were initially employed as reaction partners, as they both have a polarized C S bond as well as a relatively strong sulfur nucleophilic motif. Moreover, the resulting desired products, iminothiazolidines and mercaptothiazolidines, are both heterocycles with important biological applications (Fig. 2).¹¹ To our delight, simple mixing these two types of reactants in DCM resulted in spontaneous reactions at room temperature without any catalyst. The corresponding [3 + 2] annulation products iminothiazolidine 3a and mercaptothiazolidine 4a were both formed with excellent efficiency (Scheme 2). It is worth mentioning that catalyst-free ring-opening of an oxetane ring is rarely known, particularly for intermolecular reactions.^6–9 In this case, the high efficiency is likely attributed to the suitable choice and perfect position of the in situ generated sulfur nucleophile.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Selected bioactive molecules containing iminothiazolidine and mercaptothiazolidine motifs.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Initial results between 3-aminooxetanes and thiocarbonyl compounds.The catalyst-free annulation protocol is general with respect to various 3-aminooxetanes and isothiocyanates. A range of iminothiazolidines and mercaptothiazolidines were synthesized with high efficiency under mild conditions (Scheme 3). Many of them were obtained in quantitative yield. Quaternary carbon centers could also be generated from 3-substituted 3-aminooxetanes (e.g., 3j). The structure of product 3b was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystallography.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Formal [3 + 2] annulation with isothiocyanates and CS₂. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3–0.4 mmol), 2 (1.1 equiv.) or CS₂ (1.5 equiv.), DCM (2 mL), RT, 3 h for 3 and 36 h for 4. Yields are for the isolated products.With the initial success of thiocarbonyl partners, we next turned our attention to isocyanates, in which the carbonyl group serves as the [3 + 2] annulation motif. Compared with sulfur as the nucleophilic site in the above cases, the oxygen atom is less nucleophilic. As expected, initial tests of the reactivity by mixing 1b and 5a resulted in no desired annulation product 6a in the absence of a catalyst (Table 1, entry 1). Next, Brønsted acids, including TsOH and the super acid HNTf₂, were examined as catalysts, but with no success (entries 2 and 3). We then resorted to various Lewis acids, particularly those oxophilic ones, in hope of activating the oxetane unit. Unfortunately, many of them still remained ineffective (e.g., ZnCl₂, AuCl, and FeCl₃). However, to our delight, further screening of stronger Lewis acids helped identify Sc(OTf)₃, Zn(OTf)₂, and In(OTf)₃ to be effective at room temperature, leading to the desired iminooxazolidine product 6a in good yield (entries 7–9). Its structure was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Nevertheless, aiming to search for a cheaper catalyst, we continued to optimize this reaction at a higher temperature using previous ineffective catalysts. Indeed, FeCl₃ was found to be effective at 80 °C (61% yield, entry 10), while Brønsted acid TsOH remained ineffective at this temperature (entry 11). Notably, decreasing the loading of FeCl₃ to 1 mol% led to a higher yield (89% yield, entry 12). However, further decreasing to 0.5 mol% resulted in slightly diminished efficiency (entry 13).Reaction conditions for annulation with isocyanates^a

A copper-catalyzed asymmetric oxime propargylation enables the synthesis of the gliovirin tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine core

The bicyclic tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine subunit of gliovirin is synthesized through a diastereoselective copper-catalyzed cyclization of an N-hydroxyamino ester. Oxidative elaboration to the fully functionalized bicycle was achieved through a series of mild transformations. Central to this approach was the development of the first catalytic, enantioselective propargylation of an oxime to furnish a key N-hydroyxamino ester intermediate.

The bicyclic tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine subunit of gliovirin is synthesized through a diastereoselective copper-catalyzed cyclization of an N-hydroxyamino ester.

The fungal secondary metabolites gliovirin (2)¹ and pretrichodermamides A (3)² and E (4)³ are disulfide antibiotics that possess an unusual tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine (THO) core (Scheme 1). In addition to 2–4, several related oxazine natural products have been isolated, including the monothiolated peniciadametizine B (5);⁴ however, these oxazine-containing natural products are rare relative to the biosynthetically related diketopiperazine natural products, hundreds of which have been isolated to date.⁵ In addition to their oxazine cores, 2–4 are unusual in that their disulfide linkages are joined to the carbon framework at C4 and C12, in contrast to the more common epipolythiodiketopiperazines (ETPs) such as gliotoxin (1).⁶ These fungal metabolites are proposed to be formed through thiolation of simple cyclic dipeptides followed by oxidative elaboration of the peripheral functionality.⁷ Perhaps because of the synthetic challenge posed by the combined oxazine and disulfide motifs, there have been no syntheses of gliovirin (2) or the related compounds 3 and 4 to date.Open in a separate windowScheme 1PTP isomerism: gliovirin and related natural products.Whereas there are no syntheses of 2, syntheses of related dihydro-1,2-oxazine (DHO) natural products, including trichodermamide A (6), have been reported by the groups of Joullié,⁸ Zakarian,⁹ and Larionov.¹⁰ These efforts relied upon cycloaddition chemistry or pericyclic rearrangement to install the DHO cores. As part of our larger program targeting the synthesis of polysulfide natural products,^11,12 we envisioned a distinct approach to 2 that would involve late-stage diketopiperazine and disulfide formation, thereby reducing the synthetic challenge to that of preparing key THO 7 (Scheme 2). Oxazine 7 was expected to be accessible from 8avia epoxidation, desaturation, and functional group interconversion.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Retrosynthetic analysis of tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine 7.In a key synthetic step, the bicyclic THO 7 would be constructed by an intramolecular oxidative cyclization of N-hydroxydihydrophenylalanine derivative 10. For the preparation of 10, we considered two approaches: (1) N-oxidation of the corresponding dihydrophenylalanine 9, or (2) initial installation of the N–O bond followed by construction of the cyclohexan-1,3-diene from the alkyne of 11a. Given concerns about potential challenges of N-oxidation in the presence of the sensitive 1,3-cyclohexadiene motif, we elected to pursue a route where 10 would be accessed from α-propargyl N-hydroxyamino acid 11a by an enyne metathesis reaction.Having identified 11a as an intermediate on route to 7, a method to prepare this compound in enantioenriched form was desired. The most direct route to 11a was envisioned to be an enantioselective propargylation of N-siloxyglyoxalate 12 (see Table 1). However, no examples of catalytic asymmetric addition of allyl nor propargyl nucleophiles to similar oxime substrates were found in the literature. The most promising lead was from Hanessian and coworkers, in which an excess of a chiral allylzinc reagent was added to an oxime.¹³ However, this method had not been extended to the corresponding propargylation.Optimization of Cu-catalyzed oxime propargylation^a