分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A

建立了分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A的分析方法.通过交互正交试验和混合型优化实验设计对影响因素(萃取剂体积、分散剂类型及其体积、水样体积、pH值及离子强度)进行了优化.优化后的分散液液微萃取条件为:60 μL萃取剂,0.4 mL分散剂(甲醇),pH 4.0;优化后的柱前衍生化条件:0.1 mL 2.0 g/L衍生剂(对硝基苯甲酰氯)、衍生化时间30 min;方法的线性范围:0.002～0.2 mg/L(r=0.9997),检出限0.007 μg/L(S/N=3);不同浓度双酚A的萃取率为59.0%～63.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)2.5%～9.2%(n=5);水样中双酚A的加标率为86.5%～107.1%,RSD为4.0%～11.9%(n=5),其它雌激素(雌酮、雌二醇、雌三醇和17α-乙炔基雌二醇)对双酚A的测定无干扰.本方法可以对水环境中的痕量BPA进行检测,具有操作简便、快速等优点.     

固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生法测定水样中痕量雌激素

建立了碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-柱前荧光衍生化(SPE-DLLME-PFD)测定水体中痕量雌三醇(E3)、双酚A(BPA)、17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的高效液相色谱方法.采用中心复合设计和响应曲面法分析并优化SPE、DLLME及PLD条件,最佳条件为210 mL水样以2.0 mL/min的流速过固相萃取柱(碳纳米管量30 mg),甲醇洗脱,氮气浓缩并定容至0.6 mL(分散剂),将100 μL C6MIM[PF6]与分散剂的混合液注入到NaCl含量为25％的2.0 mL去离子水中,离心,移取20 μL下层有机相于样品瓶中,与4.0 mg衍生剂混合,在40℃水浴中衍生25 min;用0.1mL甲醇溶解过量的衍生剂颗粒,取20 μL进样分析.在优化条件下.4种雌激素的线性范围为0.05～5.00 μg/L,相关系数R2=0.9966～0.9999;,检出限介于0.13～6.33 ng/L(S/N=3)之间.不同加标浓度条件下,雌激素的加标回收率在83.1％～122.4％范围内(RSD=1.7％～9.6％).在实际水样中E3和BPA检出率较高.与其它方法相比,本方法虽然萃取时间长、水样量大、步骤多,但具有检出限低、操作简便、环境友好等优点.     

基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取测定水中多种痕量环境雌激素

建立了基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/ 上浮溶剂固化-高效液相色谱/荧光法测定水体中痕量雌激素雌三醇(E3)、 双酚A(BPA)、 17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的方法. 利用中心复合实验设计分别对固相萃取和分散液液微萃取条件进行了优化, 通过响应曲面法得到的最佳萃取条件为碳纳米管用量30 mg, 水样体积210 mL, 流速2.0 mL/min, 萃取剂(十二醇)体积50 μL, 分散剂(甲醇)体积0.2 mL以及不添加盐. 在优化的实验条件下, E3, BPA, EE2和E2测定的线性范围分别为0.05~100, 0.05~100, 0.05~50和0.05~50 μg/L, 相关系数为0.9993~0.9999, 检出限分别为48.4, 3.3, 8.1和6.0 ng/L. 对不同加标浓度(0.40和4.00 μg/L)的实验室自来水、 排水沟污水及市售矿泉水3种实际水样进行了分析: E3, BPA, EE2和E2的加标回收率依次为107.5%~120.8%, 92.5%~108.3%, 103.5%~121.0%和102.5%~132.5%, 相对偏差分别为2.47%~13.28%, 1.73%~11.94%, 1.72%~8.36%和3.54%~11.95%, 富集因子平均值分别为461, 1075, 2074和949. 实际水样分析结果表明, 本方法可用于不同基质水样中雌激素的测定. 与其它方法相比, 本方法虽然固相萃取时间长及水样量大, 但检出限低、 富集因子高、 操作简便及费用低, 仍可作为一种可普及的水中痕量雌激素检测方法.     

分散液-液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定环境水样中的多环芳烃

建立了简便、快速、有效的分散液-液微萃取-高效液相色谱-荧光检测(DLLME-HPLC-FLD)测定环境水样中15种多环芳烃(PAHs)的方法。重点探讨了萃取剂的种类和用量、分散剂的种类和用量以及萃取时间等对PAHs萃取效率的影响。在优化的条件下,评价了方法的可靠性。15种PAHs在0.01～10 μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数r均不小于0.9913,峰面积的相对标准偏差(RSD)在2.3%～4.7%之间(n=6)。在优化条件下,富集因子和萃取回收率良好,分别为674～1032和67.4%～103.2%,15种PAHs的检出限(S/N=3)在0.0003～0.002 μg/L之间。建立的方法应用于敖江水样中PAHs的检测,平均加标回收率在79.5%～92.3%之间,RSD在4.3%～6.7%范围内(n=5)。该方法适用于环境水样中痕量PAHs的分析。     

液液萃取–气相色谱法测定地表水中硝基苯

采用液液萃取–气相色谱法测定地表水中硝基苯的含量。采用盐酸调节水样至pH值为4左右,在200mL水样中加入8 g氯化钠,以甲苯为萃取剂,以CD–5MS色谱柱进行分离,氢火焰离子化检测器检测地表水中硝基苯的含量。硝基苯的质量浓度在10~150μg/L范围内与色谱峰面积呈良好的线性关系,线性相关系数r=0.999 4,方法检出限为0.24μg/L。加标回收率在91.6%~96.7%之间,测定结果的相对标准偏差小于3(n=7)。该方法操作简便,灵敏度高,适用于地表水中硝基苯的分析。     

涡旋辅助分散液液微萃取-悬浮固化/高效液相色谱法测定水样中7种萘二酚

建立了水样中7种萘二酚的涡旋辅助分散液液微萃取-悬浮固化/高效液相色谱(VA-DLLMESFO/HPLC)测定方法。以乙醚-十二醇为二元微萃取剂,通过涡旋分散方式协同萃取水样中的目标化合物,采用C18色谱柱分离,HPLC测定。优化了萃取剂及用量、萃取时间、氯化钠用量等条件。最佳萃取条件为:萃取剂为100μL乙醚和50μL十二醇,氯化钠用量为0.2 g/m L,涡旋萃取3 min。在优化条件下,7种萘二酚在一定质量浓度范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.997,方法检出限(S/N=3)为1.7~6.0μg/L;3个加标水平下的平均回收率为82.1%~106.0%,日内相对标准偏差(RSD,n=5)为1.2%~4.1%;中间添加水平的日间RSD(n=5)为2.5%~5.7%。该方法前处理简单,涡旋分散大大提高了物质传质速率,增大了萃取效率,缩短了萃取时间,是一种适用于水样中萘二酚类物质富集检测的绿色方法。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水中多环芳烃

用分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水样中的16种多环芳烃(PAHs)。通过实验确定最佳萃取条件为:20μL四氯化碳作萃取剂,1.0 mL乙腈作分散剂,超声萃取1 min。在优化条件下,多环芳烃的富集倍数达到216～511,方法在0.05～50μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(R2)在0.9873～0.9983之间,检出限为0.0020～0.14μg/L。相对标准偏差(RSD)在3.82%～12.45%(n=6)之间。该方法成功用于实际水样中痕量多环芳烃的测定。     

凝固-漂浮分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水样中氯酚

采用凝固-漂浮分散液液微萃取(SFO-DLLME)-高效液相色谱法测定水样中3种氯酚.以密度小于水,且凝固点为24 ℃的1-十二醇为萃取剂,甲醇为分散剂,对水样进行分散液液微萃取.将混合液离心,再通过冷冻凝固操作使漂浮的萃取剂和水相分离,萃取剂复溶后进样测定.本实验确定的最佳实验条件为:萃取剂200 μL、分散剂300 μL、1.2 g NaCl、1 mol/L H3PO4 200 μL、样品体积8.0 mL、萃取时间3 min.3种氯酚测定的线性范围为0.05～6.0 mg/L;检出限为20～38 μg/L.应用本方法分析实际水样,加标回收率在90.11%～107.7%之间;日间相对标准偏差在3.5%～4.6%之间.本方法扩展了分散液液微萃取萃取剂的选择范围,具有简便、快速、准确、环境友好等特点.     

分散液液微萃取-数码比色法测定环境及生物样品中亚硝酸根

研究了分散液液微萃取(DLLME)-数码比色(DC)法测定水样中的亚硝酸根.在酸性介质中,亚硝酸根和对硝基苯胺及二苯胺作用,生成红色偶氮化合物.用乙醇作分散剂,以四氯化碳为萃取剂进行分散液液微萃取,萃取液点样在薄层硅胶板上用数码相机进行数码成像.成像斑点的灰度值和亚硝酸根的浓度成正比,据此建立了测定水样中痕量亚硝酸根的新方法.对影响萃取富集效率和数码成像效果的因素进行了优化.亚硝酸根浓度在2.0～80 μg/L范围内有良好的线性关系(r=0.9997);检出限为0.22 μg/L.方法已应用于实际水样及人体体液分析,加标回收率在97.6%～103.4%之间,相对标准偏差在1.7%～3.4%之间;方法具有仪器成本低、方便快速、灵敏度高、环境友好等特点,可满足野外现场的检测要求.     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定水中环氧七氯

向已加入100mg氯化钠的5.0mL水样中加入由20.0μL四氯乙烯、1.0mL丙酮混合而成的分散微萃取溶液,采用气相色谱-质谱法测定萃取相中环氧七氯的含量。在气相色谱分离中采用DB-5ms石英毛细管色谱柱,在质谱分析中采用选择离子监测模式。环氧七氯的质量浓度在0.5～200μg·L~(-1)内与其对应的峰面积呈线性关系,检出限(3S/N)为0.1μg·L~(-1)。以空白样品为基体进行加标回收试验,所得回收率为81.6%～97.4%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=5)为4.6%～7.2%。     

Preconcentration and determination of methyl methacrylate by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

This article describes the preconcentration of methyl methacrylate in produced water by the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using extraction solvents lighter than water followed by gas chromatography. In the present experiments, 0.4 mL dispersive solvent (ethanol) containing 15.0 μL extraction solvent (toluene) was rapidly injected into the samples and followed by centrifuging and direct injection into the gas chromatograph equipped with flame ionization detector. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were evaluated and optimized including toluene (as extraction solvent), ethanol (as dispersive solvent), 15 μL and 0.4 mL (as the volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, respectively), pH 7, 20% ionic strength, and extraction's temperature and time of 20°C and 10 min, respectively. Under the optimum conditions, the figures of merits were determined to be LOD = 10 μg/L, dynamic range = 20–180 μg/L, RSD = 11% (n = 6). The maximum recovery under the optimized condition was determined to be 79.4%.     

Microwave-assisted extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a new approach to determination of chlorophenols in soil and sediments

A new method was applied for extraction of five chlorophenols from soil and marine sediment samples. Microwave-assisted extraction coupled with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by semi-automated in-syringe back-extraction technique was used as an extraction technique. Microwave-assisted extraction was performed by using 2.0 mL of alkaline water at pH 10.0. After extraction, the pH of extraction solution was adjusted at 6.0 and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure was done using 1.0 mL of acetone as a disperser solvent and 37.0 μL of chlorobenzene as extraction solvent. About 20.0 ± 0.5 μL sedimented phase was collected after centrifugation step. Then, chlorophenols were back extracted into 20 μL of alkaline water at pH 12.0 within the microsyringe. Finally, 20.0 μL of aqueous solution was injected into high performance liquid chromatography with ultra violet detection for analysis. The obtained recovery and preconcentration factors for the analytes were in the range of 68.0-82.0% and 25-30, respectively, with relative standard deviations ≤7.6%. The limits of the detection were found in the range of 0.0005-0.002 mg/kg. The method provides a simple and fast procedure for the extraction and determination of chlorophenols in soil and marine sediment samples.     

Ultrapreconcentration and determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water by solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high‐performance liquid chromatography

Solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed as an ultra‐preconcentration method for the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides (isocarbophos, parathion‐methyl, triazophos and fenitrothion) in water samples. The analytes considered in this study were rapidly extracted and concentrated from large volumes of aqueous solutions (100 mL) by solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and then analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. Experimental variables including type and volume of elution solvent, volume and flow rate of sample solution, salt concentration, type and volume of extraction solvent and sample solution pH were investigated for the solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with these analytes, and the best results were obtained using methanol as eluent and ethylene chloride as extraction solvent. Under the optimal conditions, an exhaustive extraction for four analytes (recoveries >86.9%) and high enrichment factors were attained. The limits of detection were between 0.021 and 0.15 μg/L. The relative standard deviations for 0.5 μg/L of the pesticides in water were in the range of 1.9–6.8% (n = 5). The proposed strategy offered the advantages of simple operation, high enrichment factor and sensitivity and was successfully applied to the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides in water samples.     

Simple, rapid, and sensitive determination of beta-blockers in environmental water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

A novel method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection is proposed for the determination of three beta-blockers (metoprolol, bisoprolol, and betaxolol) in ground water, river water, and bottled mineral water. Some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, extraction time, pH, and salt effect were investigated and optimized. In the method, a suitable mixture of extraction solvent (60 μL carbon tetrachloride) and dispersive solvent (1 mL acetonitrile) were injected into the aqueous samples (5.00 mL) and the cloudy solution was observed. After centrifugation, the enriched analytes in the bottom CCl(4) phase were determined by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors (EFs) for metoprolol, bisoprolol, and betaxolol were 180, 190, and 182, and the limits of detection (LODs) were 1.8, 1.4, and 1.0 ng L(-1) , respectively. A good linear relationship between the peak area and the concentration of analytes was obtained in the range of 3-150 ng L(-1) . The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the extraction of 10 ng L(-1) of beta-blockers were in the range of 4.6-5.7% (n = 5). Compared with other methods, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction is a very simple, rapid, sensitive (low limit of detection), and economical (only 1.06 mL volume of organic solvent) method, which is in compliance with the requirements of green analytical methodologies.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in water samples

A novel, simple and efficient dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet (DLLME-SFO) technique coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of triclosan and its degradation product 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples. The extraction solvent used in this work is of low density, low volatility, low toxicity and proper melting point around room temperature. The extractant droplets can be collected easily by solidifying it at a lower temperature. Parameters that affect the extraction efficiency, including type and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, salt effect, pH and extraction time, were investigated and optimized in a 5 mL sample system by HPLC-UV. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: 12 μL of 1-dodecanol; dispersive solvent: 300 of μL acetonitrile; sample pH: 6.0; extraction time: 1 min), the limits of detection (LODs) of the pretreatment method combined with LC-MS/MS were in the range of 0.002-0.02 μg L(-1) which are lower than or comparable with other reported approaches applied to the determination of the same compounds. Wide linearities, good precisions and satisfactory relative recoveries were also obtained. The proposed technique was successfully applied to determine triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples.     

Optimization of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and improvement of detection limit of methyl tert-butyl ether in water with the aid of chemometrics

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-selective ion monitoring (GC-MS-SIM) was applied to the determination of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in water samples. The effect of main parameters affecting the extraction efficiency was studied simultaneously. From selected parameters, volume of extraction solvent, volume of dispersive solvent, and salt concentration were optimized by means of experimental design. The statistical parameters of the derived model were R(2)=0.9987 and F=17.83. The optimal conditions were 42.0 μL for extraction solvent, 0.30 mL for disperser solvent and 5% (w/v) for sodium chloride. The calibration linear range was 0.001-370 μg L(-1). The improved detection limit with the aid of chemometrics was 0.3 ng L(-1). The relative standard deviation (RSD) with n=9 for 0.1 mg L(-1) MTBE in water with and without internal standard was 2.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Under the optimal conditions, the relative recoveries of spiked MTBE in different water samples were in the range of 100-105%.     

Use of volatile organic solvents in headspace liquid‐phase microextraction by direct cooling of the organic drop using a simple cooling capsule

A low‐cost and simple cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device for the extraction and determination of 2,6,6‐trimethyl‐1,3 cyclohexadiene‐1‐carboxaldehyde (safranal) in Saffron samples, using volatile organic solvents, was fabricated and evaluated. The main part of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction system was a cooling capsule, with a Teflon microcup to hold the extracting organic solvent, which is able to directly cool down the extraction phase while the sample matrix is simultaneously heated. Different experimental factors such as type of organic extraction solvent, sample temperature, extraction solvent temperature, and extraction time were optimized. The optimal conditions were obtained as: extraction solvent, methanol (10 μL); extraction temperature, 60°C; extraction solvent temperature, 0°C; and extraction time, 20 min. Good linearity of the calibration curve (R² = 0.995) was obtained in the concentration range of 0.01–50.0 μg/mL. The limit of detection was 0.001 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation for 1.0 μg/mL of safranal was 10.7% (n = 6). The proposed cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device was coupled (off‐line) to high‐performance liquid chromatography and used for the determination of safranal in Saffron samples. Reasonable agreement was observed between the results of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction high‐performance liquid chromatography method and those obtained by a validated ultrasound‐assisted solvent extraction procedure.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method for the determination of diethofencarb and pyrimethanil in aqueous samples

A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method was developed for the determination of fungicides (diethofencarb and pyrimethanil) in aqueous samples. It is based on the use of solidified floating organic drops combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. Extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, extraction time and salt effect were optimized. Under optimized conditions, the enrichment factors for a 5?mL water sample are between 145 and 161. The limits of detection for diethofencarb and pyrimethanil are 0.24 and 0.09???g ? L^?1, respectively. The method offers good repeatability and high recovery. Compared with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, it has a higher enrichment factor, high precision due to the ease with which the solidified floating phase is transferred, thus avoiding the loss of analyte. Toxic solvents were replaced by 1-dodecanol with its much lower toxicity. The method has been successfully applied to the determination of the two fungicides in tap water, lake water, and river water.