比较手术夹闭和介入栓塞治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤安全性和有效性的Meta分析

目的比较手术夹闭和介入栓塞治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。方法计算机检索1990至2018年颅内未破裂动脉瘤的所有临床对照研究。两名研究员分别纳入研究、提取数据、质量评价并应用Rev Man5. 0软件进行数据处理。结果最终纳入21篇文献,病例数109114例。Meta分析结果提示:手术夹闭组动脉瘤闭塞率为88. 2%,平均住院时间7. 7天,均高于介入栓塞组的65. 3%和4. 1天,P 0. 05。介入组患者的短期死亡率和致残率分别为0. 61%和2. 1%,均低于手术组的1. 27%和4. 7%,P 0. 05。介入组患者的1年期死亡率和致残率(2. 5%、2. 5%)均与手术组(2. 2%、1. 8%)无明显差异,P 0. 05。漏斗图未发现发表偏倚。敏感性分析结果一致。结论介入栓塞相比于手术夹闭可缩短患者的住院时间,降低患者的短期不良预后发生率。但是动脉瘤的闭塞率较低,1年期预后与手术夹闭无明显差异。据此推测手术夹闭患者的长期预后可能要好于介入栓塞,手术夹闭更适合于年轻患者。     

Surgical nuances of clipping after coiling: looking beyond the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial

After the introduction of Guglielmi Detachable Coils (GDC), endovascular management of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms became a viable alternative to surgical clipping as a "minimally invasive" option. Endovascular management of aneurysms became even more common after the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial, which was one of the first prospective, randomized trials comparing clipping and coiling, showed reduced dependency and death in patients undergoing coiling after two months and one year. As the numbers of patients treated by endovascular therapy grow neurosurgeons are facing increasing challenges of clipping difficult aneurysms not suitable for coiling, including those that are wide-necked, thrombosed or involving many perforators. In addition, treatment failures (recurrent and residual aneurysms after coiling) pose difficult treatment scenarios fraught with complications due to surrounding adhesions, coil migration and involvement of adjacent neurovascular structures. Thus, we analyzed the recent literature dealing with the nuances of clipping after coiling and reviewed the current management principles involved in treating these difficult aneurysms.     

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Between 3.6 and 6% of the population harbour an unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Risk of rupture is related to aneurysm site and size and whether or not the patient has already had a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) from another aneurysm. In ISUIA 2, the rupture rate for anterior circulation aneurysms<7mm was 0% per year in patients with no prior SAH, and 0.3% per year in patients with previous SAH; 7-12mm aneurysms, 0.5% per year (both groups); 13-24mm aneurysms, 3% per year; and giant aneurysms 8% per year. Rupture rate for posterior circulation aneurysms is higher at all sizes:<7mm was 0.5% per year in subjects with no prior SAH, 0.7% in those with prior SAH; 7-12mm, 3% per year; 13-24mm, 3.7% per year; and giant aneurysms, 10% per year. Non-invasive tests like contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and multislice computed tomographic angiography (CTA) are alternatives to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) to detect aneurysms. Although these are promising techniques, the quality of data testing their accuracy remains limited and single slice CTA and time-of-flight MRA are poorer at detecting aneurysms<5mm diameter, which account for up to 1/3 of unruptured aneurysms. For ruptured aneurysms, the only large scale randomised controlled trial comparing surgical and endovascular treatment (ISAT) by coiling, resulted in an absolute 8.8% reduction (updated figure as of June 2003 for 1888 patients) in death or dependency at 1 year compared with surgical clipping. For unruptured aneurysms, the best available data so far comparing coiling and clipping is from the prospective (but non-randomised) arm of ISUIA. Elective surgical clipping had combined morbidity and mortality at 1 year of 12.2% versus 9.5% for coiling, although the groups were not matched with more high risk patients in the endovascular treatment cohort. Nevertheless these data are encouraging for future randomised trials of elective coiling versus clipping for asymptomatic aneurysms, in particular as the unproven long-term durability of coiling treatment and the fact that complete aneurysm occlusion is not always achieved remain obstacles to its wider use in unruptured aneurysms. There is an increased risk of SAH in relatives of patients with SAH (highest in those with two or more first degree relatives affected), but most SAH is sporadic and therefore the balance of available evidence indicates that mass screening for aneurysms is not cost effective. There may be a limited role for investigation of high-risk subgroups and ideally such screening should be tested in a randomised trial. The avoidance and active management of vascular risk factors should also be part of the management of at risk subjects.     

Direct costs of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms can be preventively treated by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. We determined in detail the costs of these treatments. METHODS: We included patients who were treated for an unruptured aneurysm between 1997 and 2003. Patients coiled in this period were matched with clipped patients according to the year of treatment, age and gender. Considering clipping and coiling, we compared all pre-admission costs of diagnostic procedures, all costs of treatment, and costs during follow-up including standard angiographic control examinations at 6 and 18 months after coiling. Costs were calculated as the product of the used resources and the costs of these resources. RESULTS: The mean price for clipping was EUR 8,865.42 and that for coiling EUR 10,370.29. The difference was mainly determined by the higher material costs of coiling (EUR 5,300) compared with clipping (EUR 690). Costs of clipping were mainly determined by the need for intensive care facilities (1.2 days after clipping and 0 days after coiling) and the length of hospital stay (10.5 days after clipping and 3.4 days after coiling). After bootstrapping the data, costs of coiling were on average EUR 1,553 (95% confidence interval: EUR 1,539-1,569) higher than those of clipping. CONCLUSIONS: For unruptured intracranial aneurysms, direct in-hospital costs of coiling are on average higher than those of clipping, mostly because of the more expensive coils.     

动脉瘤外科治疗的临床研究

目的 比较开颅夹闭和介入治疗颅内动脉瘤的临床治疗效果. 方法 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院神经外科自2008年11月至2010年1月收治颅内动脉瘤患者73例,其中行开颅夹闭治疗30例,行介入治疗43例.回顾性分析2组患者的临床资料并比较并发症、住院时间和预后情况. 结果 脑水肿、脑梗死、颅内出血、脑积水和颅内感染的发生率2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);开颅夹闭组患者住院时间[(17.56±7.57)d]长于介入治疗组[(13.12±7.12)d],差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);开颅夹闭组患者出院时预后良好25例,预后不良5例,介入治疗组患者出院时预后良好40例,预后不良3例,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05). 结论 血管内介入治疗动脉瘤的安全性和有效性并不优于开颅夹闭治疗.     

The impact of microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling on the outcome of cerebral aneurysms in patients over 60 years of age

A retrospective study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy in elderly patients of endovascular coiling, with clipping, for cerebral aneurysms. In total, 198 patients over 60 years of age with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated by microsurgical clipping (n = 122) or endovascular coiling (n = 76). Endovascular coiling achieved favorable outcome in 88.2% of patients, which was significantly higher than for the microsurgical clipping group. The occurrence of re-bleeding, infarction, and hydrocephalus was similar between the two groups. Intraoperative time for microsurgical clipping was significantly longer than that for endovascular coiling. Length of hospitalization was shorter for the coiling group than for the clipping group. Our results suggest that endovascular coiling should be considered as the first-choice therapy in elderly patients with ruptured aneurysms, as it may reduce duration of both the operation and hospitalization.     

Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms after the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial. United Kingdom experience

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) was designed as the first multi-central international prospective randomized trial aiming to compare the safety and efficacy of the 2 available treatments for ruptured intracranial aneurysms; endovascular coiling and surgical clipping. The initial results were published in the Lancet (2002), and it showed clearly a superiority of coiling over clipping in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms; 22.7% of coiled patients were dependent or dead compared with 30.6% in the surgical group with absolute risk reduction of 6.9%. The results of the ISAT drew huge attention from both scientific authorities and lay media. Despite criticisms, the study has made a significant impact on the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, especially in the United Kingdom and Europe. Since their initial results, the ISAT group has published further papers and updates covering more interesting results regarding the risks of rebleeding, repeat procedures, epilepsy, and the cost effectiveness of both treatments.     

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized trial

Endovascular detachable coil treatment is being increasingly used as an alternative to craniotomy and clipping for some ruptured intracranial aneurysms, although the relative benefits of these two approaches have yet to be established. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to compare the safety and efficacy of endovascular coiling with standard neurosurgical clipping for such aneurysms judged to be suitable for both treatments. We enrolled 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms and randomly assigned them to neurosurgical clipping (n = 1070) or endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils (n = 1073). Clinical outcomes were assessed at both 2 months and at 1 year with interim ascertainment of rebleeds and death. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRs) score between 3 and 6 (dependency or death) at 1 year. Trial recruitment was stopped by the steering committee after a planned interim analysis. Analysis was per protocol. One hundred and ninety of 801 (23.7%) patients allocated endovascular treatment were dependent or dead at 1 year compared with 243 of 793 (30.6%) of those allocated neurosurgical treatment (P = .0019). The relative and absolute risk reductions in dependency or death after allocation to an endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment were 22.6% (95% CI 8.9-34.2) and 6.9% (2.5-11.3), respectively. The risk of rebleeding from the ruptured aneurysm after 1 year was two per 1276 and zero per 1081 patient-years for patients allocated endovascular and neurosurgical treatment, respectively. In patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, for which endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping are therapeutic options, the outcome in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year is significantly better with endovascular coiling. The data available to date suggest that the long-term risks of further bleeding from the treated aneurysm are low with either therapy, although somewhat more frequent with endovascular coiling.     

Quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by neurosurgical clipping or by embolisation with coils. A prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND: Relatively high rates of complications occur after operation for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Published data on endovascular treatment suggest lower rates of complications. We measured the impact of treatment of unruptured aneurysms by clipping or coiling on functional health, quality of life, and the level of anxiety and depression. METHODS: In three centres, we prospectively collected data on patients with an unruptured aneurysm who were treated by clipping or coiling. Treatment assignment was left to the discretion of the treating physicians. Before, 3 and 12 months after treatment, we used standardised questionnaires to assess functional health (Rankin Scale score), quality of life (SF-36, EuroQol), and the level of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated by coiling and 32 by clipping. In the surgical group, 4 patients (12%) had a permanent complication; 36 of all 37 aneurysms (97%) were successfully clipped. Three months after operation, quality of life was worse than before operation; 12 months after operation, it had improved but had not completely returned to baseline levels. Scores for depression were higher than in the general population. In the endovascular group, no complications with permanent deficits occurred; 16 of 19 aneurysms (84%) were occluded by more than 90%. One patient died from rupture of the previously coiled aneurysm. In the others, quality of life after 3 months and after 1 year was similar to that before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, operation of patients with an unruptured aneurysm has a considerable impact on functional health and quality of life. After 1 year, recovery occurs but it is incomplete. Coil embolisation does not affect functional health and quality of life.     

German Society of Neurosurgery Section on Vascular Neurosurgery: Position Statement on the International Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trial (ISAT)

The outcome after a specific treatment (clipping or coiling) of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is determined by both the periprocedural complication rate and the success of preventing re-bleeding from the treated aneurysm. The latter is associated with a cumulative risk over many years, particularly in incompletely treated aneurysms. Incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm is not infrequently seen after endovascular coiling, even in cases with a perfect anatomical configuration. Therefore, we believe that the 1-year outcome as reported in the ISAT is not an appropriate endpoint for the comparison of both methods. There has also been a tendency to apply the 1-year ISAT data to all patients harbouring intracranial aneurysms. It is inappropriate and dangerous to be less critical when selecting the endovascular approach as the method of choice for treating an aneurysm. This will ultimately result in a higher complication rate of coiling. Another striking finding is the poor surgical outcome in the ISAT. This good-grade patient population (94 % were WFNS grade 1-3 and 89 % were WFNS grade 1-2) had an almost 10 % higher rate of poor outcome compared to other good-grade patients in large prospective surgical studies or the same outcome as trials that included up to 20 % poor-grade patients.[nl]Neurosurgeons should acknowledge that endovascular coiling is a safe method associated with less complications than clipping in experienced hands (Fig. ). Endovascular radiologists should acknowledge that the success of complete obliteration is higher after surgery, that incompletely occluded aneurysms have a higher rate of re-rupture and that the definitive long-term re-rupture rate still remains unknown. Therefore, we await with interest the angiographic and clinical follow-up data that will provide evidence about the final patient outcome.     

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm

OBJECTIVES: To compare endovascular coiling with neurosurgical clipping of ruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysms. METHODS: Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical and anatomical results were compared retrospectively in 44 coiled patients and 44 patients treated by clipping. The odds ratios for poor outcome (Glasgow outcome scale 1, 2, 3) adjusted for age, clinical condition, and aneurysm size were assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In the endovascular group, five patients (11%) had a poor outcome v 13 (30%) in the surgical group; the adjusted odds ratio for poor outcome after coiling v clipping was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.99). Procedural complications were more common in the surgical group. Optimal or suboptimal occlusion of the aneurysm immediately after coiling was achieved in 41 patients (93%). Clipping was successful in 40 patients (91%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that embolisation with coils is the preferred treatment for patients with ruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysms.     

颅内动脉瘤治疗措施的临床证据评价

目的 评价不同治疗方案对颅内动脉瘤的疗效及不良后果.以为颅内动脉瘤的循证治疗制定最佳治疗方案.方法 以颅内动脉瘤、治疗、血管内栓塞治疗、手术夹闭治疗等英文词组作为检索词.分别检索MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆等数据库,并辅助手工检索获得临床指南、随机对照临床试验、系统评价、回顾性病例分析、临床对照试验及病例观察研究等方面的相关文献,采用Jadad量表对文献质量进行评价.结果 经筛选共纳入与颅内动脉瘤治疗有关的临床指南4篇、随机对照临床试验4篇、系统评价7篇、回顾性病例分析9篇、临床对照试验1篇、病例观察研究1篇;其中20篇被评为高质量文献(2篇7分、2篇6分、4篇5分、12篇4分),6篇为低质量文献.经对各项临床试验治疗原则和不同治疗方法 的疗效及安全性评价显示:(1)血管内栓塞和手术夹闭治疗是目前治疗颅内动脉瘤的主要外科手术方法,但哪种方法 更具优势仍存在争议.(2)对于未破裂颅内动脉瘤的治疗,有症状者建议积极治疗;但对于无症状的小动脉瘤,是否需要治疗尚有争议,应根据各种影响因素如年龄、既往病史、家族史.以及动脉瘤大小、部位、形态和预期寿命等综合考虑.(3)对于已破裂的颅内动脉瘤.建议尽快施行手术治疗,除非急性期不能耐受手术者外,不宜采取延期治疗方案.手术方法 的选择也应结合患者具体情况具体分析.(4)动脉瘤破裂后的药物治疗,除尼莫地平已获得大犁随机对照临床试验证据外,其他药物治疗效果仍有待研究.结论 借助循证医学评价方法 可为颅内动脉瘤患者的治疗提供最佳的临床证据.     

椎动脉颅内段夹层动脉瘤的个体化治疗

目的 探讨椎动脉颅内段夹层动脉瘤的个体化治疗策略.方法 分别采用微弹簧圈闭塞动脉瘤和载瘤动脉、支架辅助微弹簧圈栓塞动脉瘤、单纯支架植入、手术直接夹闭动脉瘤,以及枕动脉-小脑后下动脉血管吻合术辅助微弹簧圈闭塞动脉瘤和载瘤动脉等方法 治疗18例椎动脉颅内段夹层动脉瘤患者.结果 18例患者中5例采用微弹簧圈闭塞动脉瘤和载瘤动脉,5例行支架辅助微弹簧圈栓塞动脉瘤(3例基本致密栓塞、2例非致密栓塞),4例行单纯支架植入术(术后3例动脉瘤血流动力学改善),3例经远外侧入路手术直接夹闭动脉瘤,1例行枕动脉.小脑后下动脉血管吻合术辅助微弹簧圈闭塞动脉瘤和载瘤动脉.其中2例术中动脉瘤破裂出血,1例死亡、1例中残;I例闭塞动脉瘤和载瘤动脉患者,术后出现短暂性吞咽困难和偏侧肢体麻木,其余患者术后平稳.17例获得1个月至3年随访,无一例动脉瘤复发或进展.结论 用于治疗椎动脉颅内段夹层动脉瘤的方法 有多种,选择治疗方案时需考虑动脉瘤是否破裂出血或引起脑梗死,以及动脉瘤形态(如局限性偏侧型)、是否位于优势侧、是否累及小脑后下动脉等因素,根据患者具体情况制定个体化治疗方案.     

CT血管造影指导颅内破裂动脉瘤超早期手术

目的研究单一依靠CT血管造影(CTA)资料,在超早期手术夹闭破裂颅内动脉瘤的可行性。方法从2004年6月至2007年2月,共有125例自发性蛛网膜下腔出血病人行CTA检查。其中有78例在出血后72h内完成CTA检查,并对57例患者单一依靠CTA资料急诊行超早期动脉瘤夹闭术。结果125例自发性蛛网膜下腔出血患者中,有78例在出血后72h内完成CTA检查,71例发现颅内动脉瘤,其中有57例行超早期开颅动脉瘤夹闭术。57例超早期开颅手术动脉瘤患者,多发动脉瘤4例,共61个动脉瘤,术中夹闭动脉瘤60个,动脉瘤包裹1个。CTA能很好地显示动脉瘤的大小、形态、同载瘤动脉及周边骨性结构的关系,为手术提供了足够的有用信息。结论容积重建成像CTA是一种可靠、无创的快速诊断颅内动脉瘤的方法,能为破裂动脉瘤的超早期夹闭手术提供详实的影像学资料,满足在急诊状况下开颅夹闭手术所需。     

Which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated? A cost-utility analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated considering the risks. benefits, and costs. BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms are commonly treated by surgical clipping or endovascular coil embolization to prevent subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis comparing surgical clipping and endovascular coil embolization with no treatment for unruptured aneurysms. Eight clinical scenarios were defined based on aneurysm size, symptoms, and history of SAH from a different aneurysm. Health outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old women were modeled over the projected lifetime of the cohort. Costs were assessed from the societal perspective. We compared net quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost per QALY of each therapy to no treatment. RESULTS: For an asymptomatic unruptured aneurysm less than 10 mm in diameter in patients with no history of SAH from a different aneurysm, both procedures resulted in a net loss in QALYs, and confidence intervals (CI) were not compatible with a benefit from treatment (clipping, loss of 1.6 QALY [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; coiling, loss of 0.6 QALY [95% CI 0.2 to 0.8]). For larger aneurysms (> or = 10 mm), those producing symptoms by compressing neighboring nerves and brain structures, or in patients with a history of SAH from a different aneurysm, treatment was cost-effective. Coiling appeared more effective and cost-effective than clipping but these differences depended on relatively uncertain model parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of small, asymptomatic, unruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients without a history of SAH worsens clinical outcomes, and thus is neither effective nor cost-effective. For aneurysms that are > or = 10 mm or symptomatic, or in patients with a history of SAH, treatment appears to be cost-effective.     

Anxiety,depression and quality of life in patients with a treated or untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Living with an untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm(UIA) is stressful, this study was aimed to assess the influence of UIA treatment (surgery clipping and endovascular coiling) on behavior such as anxiety and depression, as well as QoL. A series of 296 UIA patients (including 162 treated and 134 untreated) were analyzed. Postal questionnaires were sent to these patients, included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS) and Short Form-36(SF-36). In total, 198 (66.9%) patients responded to our questionnaires. Patients with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling had a significant improvement in the physical function, body pain and mental health domains. No significant difference in the SAS, SDS and SF-36 was observed between the clipping and coiling group, while SF-36 in body pain domain was significant higher in the coiling group. Moreover, patients diagnosed 5 years ago with or without treatment got lower score of SAS and SDS, higher SF-36 score than those diagnosed one year ago. Neurological complications may be an important factor causing lower quality of life. The QoL of patients with endovascular coiling appear to be better than those of surgical clipping, with no difference in anxiety or depression.     

Microsurgical clipping of previously coiled intracranial aneurysms

Objective

Endovascular coiling techniques for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms have rapidly developed as an alternative option to surgical clipping. A distinct problem after endovascular coiling is the management of a residual aneurysm neck due to incomplete filling, compaction of coils or regrowth of the aneurysm. Treatment options in this situation include surgical clipping, re-coiling, stent implantation or observation.

Methods

From June 2006 to August 2011, 15 patients underwent surgical clipping of residual or recurrent aneurysms after previous endovascular treatment. The mean age of the patients was 50.6 years (range, 27–85 years). The mean interval between coiling and clipping was 76.5 weeks (range, 0–288 weeks).

Results

Thirteen patients revealed a regrowth of coiled aneurysms, and in 5 patients compaction of coils was present. Coil extrusion was observed in 9 patients intraoperatively. In case of coil obstruction at the aneurysmal neck during surgery, coils were partially or completely removed. In all cases complete occlusion of the aneurysms was surgically achieved.

Conclusion

Coiled aneuryms with incomplete occlusion, coil compaction or regrowth of the aneurysmal neck can be successfully treated with microsurgical clipping. Coil extrusion was more often observed intraoperatively than expected. Complete occlusion of the aneurysm can be performed safely, even if loops of coils protrude into the aneurysmal neck. In these cases intraoperative removal of the coils enables secure closure of the aneurysm with a surgical clip.     

Clinical and Radiogical Outcomes of Endovascular Detachable Coil Embolization in Paraclinoid Aneurysms : A 10-Year Experience

Objective

Direct surgical clipping of paraclinoid aneurysms poses technical challenges to even very experienced neurosurgeons, making endovascular treatment an alternative treatment modality in many centers. We have therefore retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of endovascular detachable coil embolization of paraclinoid aneurysms.

Methods

From June 1997 to June 2007, 65 patients underwent endovascular detachable coiling for 67 paraclinoid aneurysms (of which 9 were ruptured and 58 were unruptured) in our institute. Their medical records, radiological images and readings, and operation records were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

After the initial embolization procedure, complete occlusion was achieved in 29 (43.3%) of the aneurysms treated by endovascular detachable coiling. Six aneurysms required retreatment, with two each requiring one, two, or three additional endovascular procedures. Fifty-five (82.1%) aneurysms were measured by three-dimensional time of flight (TOF) magnetic resonance images (MRI) or transfemoral cerebral angiography (TFCA) at a mean follow-up of 29.7 months (range from 4 to 94 months), with 39 aneurysms (70.9%) showing complete occlusion. Thromboembolic events (3.8%) were the most frequent complication. Rupture did not occur during or after any of the procedures. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), 98.4% of the patients treated by coil embolization had a score of 4 or 5.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that endovascular detachable coiling is a safe and effective treatment modality in paraclinoid aneurysms.     

Changing paradigm in the management of elderly patients with intracranial aneurysms: An institutional review

Optimal treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) in elderly patients has not yet been well established. We have investigated the clinical and radiological outcomes and predictors of unfavorable outcome of IAs in elderly patients. Radiological and clinical data of 85 elderly patients from 2010 through 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Significant differences between the groups were determined by a chi-square test. Regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of unfavorable outcome. Among the 85 patients with IAs, the number of patients with >7 mm size aneurysm (p = 0.01), diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.02), smoking (0.009) and Hunt and Hess grade 4–5 (p = 0.003) was significantly higher in the ruptured group compared to the unruptured group. Similarly, the number of patients who underwent clipping was higher in the ruptured aneurysm group (p = 0.01). The overall clinical outcome was comparatively better in the unruptured group (p = 0.03); however, microsurgical clipping of aneurysms provides a significantly higher rate of complete aneurysmal occlusion (p = 0.008). Overall, there was no significant difference in outcome in respect to treatment approach. In regression analysis, hypertension (HTN), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), prior stroke, ruptured aneurysms and partial occlusion of aneurysms were identified as predictors of unfavorable outcome of IAs. Intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients reveals that endovascular treatment provides better clinical outcome; however, microsurgical clipping yields higher complete occlusion. Retreatment of residual aneurysms was comparatively more in the coiling group. Practice pattern has shifted from clipping to coiling for aneurysms in posterior circulation but not for aneurysms in anterior circulation.     

Endovascular treatment of ruptured tiny (⩽3 mm) intracranial aneurysms in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage: A case series of 20 patients and literature review

Successful endovascular coiling of ruptured tiny saccular intracranial aneurysms (⩽3 mm) is technically challenging and traditionally has been associated with technical failures, as well as morbidity related to thromboembolic events and high intraoperative rupture rates. This study analyzes the feasibility, technical efficacy, and clinical outcomes of coil embolization of ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms using current coil and microcatheter technology and techniques. We performed a retrospective review of 20 patients with 20 ruptured tiny aneurysms treated with endovascular coil embolization from 2013 to 2016 at a single high-volume academic tertiary care practice. The mean aneurysm size was 2.4 mm (median 2.5 mm, 1–3). Complete occlusion was achieved in 12 of 20 patients (60%), the remaining 7 of 20 patients (35%) had a small neck remnant, and there was 1 failure (5%) converted to microsurgical clipping. Two patients had a failed attempted surgical clip reconstruction and were subsequently coiled. There was 1 intraprocedural rupture (5%) and 1 severe parent artery vasospasm (5%) during coiling. At discharge, 60% of patients were living independently. At follow-up three patients were deceased. Mean angiographic follow-up was 139 days (SD 120). There were no aneurysm recurrences among occluded patients and there were no retreatments among those with neck remnants. Coiling of ruptured aneurysms ⩽3 mm is feasible with high occlusion rates and low complication rates. The availability of softer coils with flexible detachment zones has led to safe and effective endovascular treatment of tiny ruptured aneurysms.