Epidermal necrolysis (Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis): Historical considerations

ObjectiveTo describe the history of toxic epidermal necrolysis, before and after the original report by the British dermatologist Alan Lyell in 1956.MethodsSubjective expert choice of key advances in the comprehension of the nosology, classification, causality, and mechanisms of epidermal necrolysis (EN) over more than a century.ResultsEpidermolysis had been reported long before Lyell's paper, but most cases had likely been staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in children. Concerning non-Staphylococcus EN, confusion with erythema multiforme dissipated and its relation to Stevens–Johnson syndrome was clarified. Tremendous advances were made in understanding the causes and mechanisms, with increased acceleration in the last 10 years.ConclusionThe next decade should be devoted to improve the prevention and management of a disease that is the most terrible form of drug hypersensitivity.     

Pediatric toxic epidermal necrolysis treated successfully with infliximab

Successful management of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) with tumor necrosis factor‐α inhibitors has been described in adults. We present a case of a 7‐year‐old boy with infection‐associated TEN, diagnosed by typical clinical and histopathological features, most likely caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Treatment with a single dose of infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenously on day 5 after the onset of symptoms was followed by cessation of all blister formation over 3 days and complete resolution within a week. Sequelae were mild, consisting of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and dry eyes.     

Stevens‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children: a review of the experience with paediatric patients in a University Hospital

Background Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life‐threatening drug reactions considered to be part of the spectrum of a single pathological process. Objective To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of SJS/TEN in children attended at our hospital. Materials and methods Retrospective study of children diagnosed with SJS/TEN between 1999 and 2009 in a University Hospital provided with regional‐level burn and paediatric intensive care units. Results We found 14 paediatric patients (eight SJS and six TEN). They presented an average of 60% of the body surface area affected and 31% of epidermal sloughing. The average of suspected drugs was 1.7 per patient, anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, phenytoin and lamotrigine) and antibiotics (penicillin and macrolides) being the most frequent ones. Silver sulfadiazine was the topical treatment most frequently used, 86% of patients received systemic steroids and 28.5% intravenous immunoglobulins. One patient died. Conclusions The SJS/TEN complex is a true dermatological critical condition that also affects children. Any drug can be the causative agent, more frequently anticonvulsants and antibiotics. Depending on the extension of the affected body surface, patients should be rapidly admitted to a critical care area with experience in the care of burn patients. Discontinuation of the suspected offending drugs is mandatory. Optimal supportive care and management of denuded skin areas are still the mainstay of treatment. The use of specific therapies remains controversial. Compared with adults, the disease in children seems to be milder with lower mortality.     

French referral center management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

Drug-induced adverse reactions represent major health problems, with the skin being one of the most common targets. Approximately 2% of all drug-induced skin reactions are considered serious. Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis corresponds to rare and acute life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions characterized by extensive necrosis and epidermal detachment. This review focuses on the management of these severe cutaneous reactions in the French Referral Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases. Early referral to a specialized unit, early diagnosis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions, prompt withdrawal of the culprit drug, improved symptomatic management, and specific dermatological care have contributed to better survival in the past 10 years and also has limited sequelae.     

Update on pathobiology in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which are mainly induced by a variety of drugs. Once considered to be unpredictable, significant progress has been achieved in understanding the pathological mechanisms underlying such reactions. Recent studies suggested that SJS/TEN is a specific immune reaction where human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles specific for certain drugs in defined populations are involved in the activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells. Upon the activation, various cytotoxic and immunological signals, including but not limited to Fas/Fas ligand, perforin/granzyme B, and granulysin are launched to mediate the disseminated keratinocyte death in SJS/TEN. This review provides an update on the pathobiology of SJS/TEN in both the genomic and immunologic perspectives. The knowledge gained from these cutting-edge studies will form the basis for better prevention and management of SJS/TEN.     

Incidence of Stevens–Johnson syndrome following combination drug use of allopurinol,carbamazepine and phenytoin in Taiwan: A case–control study

The goal of our study was to investigate the incidence of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), the frequency of SJS diagnosis, and the association between SJS and prior use of allopurinol, carbamazepine or phenytoin. This case–control study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. Controls visited the emergency department of the same hospital for trauma or fractures (excluding burns) and used allopurinol, carbamazepine or phenytoin during the past 3 months. We determined whether patients were prescribed a combination of drugs in addition to allopurinol, carbamazepine or phenytoin within the last 3 months. We identified 1 853 985 controls and 7327 SJS‐diagnosed patients using the Taiwan NHIRD records for 2000–2008. Higher use of allopurinol (49.8%), carbamazepine (39.1%) or phenytoin (21.3%) was observed among patients (n = 3131) than among controls (n = 2858). The overall SJS incidence rate was 3.6/1 000 000. Drug combinations were uncommon (<10%) in patients or controls taking allopurinol. However, combination drug use exceeded 10% in patients taking carbamazepine or phenytoin. Logistic regression analysis of recent combination drug use revealed that phenobarbital, valproate, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including piroxicam and tenoxicam, and antibiotics including amoxicillin and cephalexin were strongly associated with SJS. Patients with gout or epilepsy taking allopurinol, carbamazepine or phenytoin should be evaluated carefully by physicians. Concurrent use of piroxicam, tenoxicam, phenobarbital, valproate, amoxicillin or cephalexin, in addition to carbamazepine or phenytoin, may increase the incidence of SJS.     

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: an Asian series

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a severe, immune-mediated, mucocutaneous reaction resulting in extensive keratinocyte apoptosis. High-dose human intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been proposed as an effective treatment for TEN. Retrospective data from 8 patients with TEN and 4 patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) overlap treated with high-dose IVIG were analysed. The total dose of IVIG administered was 2 g/kg body weight, with the exception of 2 patients who received a total dose of 1.5 g/kg body weight. Their mean age was 49.9+/-18.8 years (range, 19 to 70 years). The mean time from the first sign of skin lesion or mucosal or epidermal detachment to commencement of IVIG was 8.7+/-5.5 days (range, 3 to 22 days). Of the 11 patients who survived, the mean time to objective response was 3.6+/-1.9 days (range, 2 to 8 days). The length of stay (LOS) in hospital was 20.4+/-8.0 days (range, 10 to 37 days). The survival rate was 91.6%. One patient developed permanent mucocutaneous sequelae following TEN. There were no adverse reactions to IVIG. We conclude that high-dose IVIG may be a safe and effective therapy for Asian patients with TEN.     

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a review of treatment options

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous reactions that are medication-induced in most instances. While the clinical manifestations of SJS and TEN are well-defined, the optimal treatment for these disorders is not. Case reports have shown benefit with the use of a variety of agents including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and cyclophosphamide, whereas thalidomide was associated with an increased mortality. Plasmapheresis and cyclosporine have also demonstrated efficacy anecdotally, albeit with an even smaller number of cases in the literature. Most of the reporting has focused on the use of systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for these severe reactions. The majority of studies analyzing the use of IVIG in the treatment of SJS/TEN show a benefit, though more recent series cast doubt upon this conclusion. The results of these studies are summarized in this present review study.     

Clinical risk management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis spectrum

Clinical risk management concedes that risk is inherent to all health-care processes. Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but potentially life-threatening reactions to medications. Risk management should be considered prior to starting, during, and after therapy. Prior to starting therapy, risks that need to be assessed include any specific patient groups that may be at greater risk for the development of SJS/TEN. Gene testing is in place for Chinese and Thai patients who are going to be exposed to carbamazepine. During therapy, it is important to recognize SJS/TEN as a possible adverse drug reaction. Diagnostic criteria have changed, and more data exist on drugs with an increased risk. Although there is no standardized treatment for all patients with SJS/TEN, options that have been used include cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Standards of care are usually defined locally, but new treatments, such as amniotic membrane support for ocular damage, may need to be considered. Good communication skills are needed to allow practitioners to show empathy and to provide disclosure. Risk management after a reaction includes skills in acknowledging bad outcomes or error; freedom to say "sorry" as defined by "apology laws," and knowing the rights provided by "Quality Assurance Conferences," where the information discussed is protected. In other words, the patient is best supported after an event like SJS/TEN if the practitioner is knowledgeable about optimal care standards and their legal rights and obligations.     

Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are acute mucocutaneous reactions associated with poor prognosis. The treatment is mainly symptomatic, based on supportive care. Until now, several curative treatments have been proposed without evidence of effectiveness. Objectives To evaluate the effect of ciclosporin on SJS and TEN after a short series had suggested a benefit. Methods We conducted an open, phase II trial to determine the safety and possible benefit of ciclosporin. Among the 45 consecutive patients admitted for SJS/TEN from March 2005 to September 2007, 29 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ciclosporin was administered orally (3 mg kg^?1 daily for 10 days) and tapered over a month. Clinical and biological evaluations were performed sequentially. Predicted death rate was estimated with a validated prognostic score (SCORTEN). Results Twenty‐nine patients were included at a mean ± SD of 2·8 ± 1·8 days after onset. The final diagnosis was SJS (n = 10), SJS/TEN overlap (n = 12) and TEN (n = 7). One month of treatment was completed in 26. Ciclosporin was stopped after more than 10 days in three cases for side‐effects including posterior leucoencephalopathy (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 1) and nosocomial pneumopathy (n = 1). Ciclosporin dosage was tapered earlier than scheduled in two cases for alteration in renal function. The prognostic score predicted 2·75 deaths; none occurred (P = 0·1). Mean epidermal detachment remained stable in 18 of 29 cases (62%). The mean ± SD hospital stay was 16·2 ± 9·1 days. Conclusions Both the death rate and the progression of detachment seemed lower than expected, suggesting a possible usefulness of ciclosporin in SJS and TEN that needs to be confirmed.     

Rapid remission of Stevens–Johnson syndrome by combination therapy using etanercept and intravenous immunoglobulin and a review of the literature

Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are spectrum of rare, acute, and life‐threatening delayed‐type drug hypersensitivity reactions that are associated with high mortality rates. However, no therapeutic standard has been proposed for SJS/TEN. Here, we report a case of a patient diagnosed with Stevens–Johnson syndrome whose disease progression was halted by a single dose of etanercept and was treated successfully. In addition, we reviewed the literature reporting patients with SJS/TEN treated with similar regimens.     

Treatment of severe drug eruptions

Severe drug eruptions are rare, life-threatening events. The management begins with the withdrawal of the suspect drug(s). We recently confirmed that an earlier withdrawal of drugs with short elimination half-life was associated with a better survival of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In cases of "acute skin failure" (exfoliative dermatitis, extensive SJS or TEN), management of patients must be undertaken in specialized intensive care units or in burn units. The main principles of symptomatic therapy are the same as for major burns: warming of the environment, correction of electrolyte disturbances, high caloric intake, and prevention of sepsis. The suspected immunologic orgin of drug eruptions prompted the use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, and anti-cytokines. Systemic corticosteroids are useful in "hypersensitivity syndrome" when visceral lesions depend on infiltration by activated cosinophils. Systemic corticosteroids were shown to be deleterious in cases of advanced TEN. Their potential usefulness at earlier stages of SJS or TEN remains controversial. High intravenous doses of cyclophosphamide or oral cyclosporin have been administered to a few patients with TEN, most often following ineffective treatment with corticosteroids for 1 to 5 days. It remains doubtful that the progression of the lesions was shortened. A few patients appeared to benefit from treatment with pentoxifyllin, a drug suppressing the production of TNF. Thalidomide, another suppressor of TNF production, significantly increased the death rate when tested in a double-blind placebo controlled trial in patients with early TEN. High dose intravenous immunoglobulins were used in 10 patients with TEN on the basis of their ability to inhibit fas-fas ligand mediated apoptosis. The potential benefit of this treatment needs confirmation by further studies. Patients and their first degree relatives should be advised to avoid the responsible drug and chemically related compounds. Regulatory agencies should be notified of such cases.     

Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions

The clinical manifestations of drug eruptions can range from mild maculopapular exanthema to severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCAR), including drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) which are rare but occasionally fatal. Some pathogens may induce skin reactions mimicking SCAR. There are several models to explain the interaction of human leukocyte antigen (HLA), drug and T‐cell receptor (TCR): (i) the “hapten/prohapten” theory; (ii) the “p‐i concept”; (iii) the “altered peptide repertoire”; and (iv) the “altered TCR repertoire”. The checkpoints of molecular mechanisms of SCAR include specific drug antigens interacting with the specific HLA loci (e.g. HLA‐B*15:02 for carbamazepine‐induced SJS/TEN and HLA‐B*58:01 for allopurinol‐induced SCAR), involvement of specific TCR, induction of T‐cell‐mediated responses (e.g. granulysin, Fas ligand, perforin/granzyme B and T‐helper 1/2‐associated cytokines) and cell death mechanism (e.g. miR‐18a‐5p‐induced apoptosis; annexin A1 and formyl peptide receptor 1‐induced necroptosis in keratinocytes). In addition to immune mechanism, metabolism has been found to play a role in the pathogenesis of SCAR, such as recent findings of strong association of CYP2C9*3 with phenytoin‐induced SCAR and impaired renal function with allopurinol SCAR. With a better understanding of the mechanisms, effective therapeutics and prevention for SCAR can be improved.     

Role of nanocrystalline silver dressings in the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and TEN/Stevens–Johnson syndrome overlap

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) are severe mucocutaneous eruptions. There is currently no defined optimal approach to wound care. The objective of this study was to evaluate silver dressings in the wound‐care management of TEN and SJS/TEN syndrome overlap with a retrospective case review of nine patients with TEN and SJS/TEN overlap presenting to our institution. Nanocrystalline silver dressings appear to be useful in the rapid commencement of healing in these patients. TEN and SJS/TEN overlap are rare conditions. This contributed to a relatively small number of cases included in the study. The ease of application, antimicrobial properties and low frequency of change make nanocrystalline silver dressings ideal in TEN/SJS.     

Procalcitonin as a diagnostic indicator for systemic bacterial infections in patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

Elevated serum procalcitonin (PCT) level has been reported to be a diagnostic index in systemic bacterial infections, but it can also increase in some non‐infectious inflammatory diseases. Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare immune‐mediated cutaneous mucosal reaction which is susceptible to bacterial infections and may have elevated PCT levels. The value of serum PCT has not been assessed in series of SJS/TEN patients. We aimed to investigate the PCT levels in SJS/TEN patients with systemic bacterial infections (systemic infected group), with skin surface bacterial infections (skin surface infected group) and without infections (non‐infected group), to assess whether PCT was a valuable indicator for systemic bacterial infections in SJS/TEN patients. The PCT and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels of 42 inpatients with SJS/TEN were retrospectively analysis. The receiver–operator curve (ROC) was used to determine the diagnostic efficacy of PCT for systemic bacterial infections in SJS/TEN patients. The results demonstrated that PCT levels in the systemic infected group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in CRP between the three groups. The cut‐off PCT level of 0.65 ng/mL calculated by ROC had optimal diagnostic efficacy, with sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 89.7%, respectively. PCT and severity‐of‐illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis were positively correlated (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PCT is a valuable index and superior to CRP in detecting systemic bacterial infections in SJS/TEN patients. The level of PCT can partially reflect the severity of the disease.     

Erythema multiforme,Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Frozen‐section diagnosis

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) may be fatal. Although classified by body surface area skin detachment, initial stages of both may present with erythema multiforme (EM)‐like lesions. To diagnose and predict disease activity adequately as early as possible for patients revealing EM‐like lesions, we performed frozen‐section diagnosis. Thirty‐five patients clinically diagnosed as EM, SJS or TEN were biopsied to diagnose and predict disease progression within the initial‐visit day. Half of a histological section taken from a lesion was snap‐frozen and immediately cryostat‐sectioned, acetone‐fixed and stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Specimens were examined with light microscopy for presence of epidermal necrosis. A section from unaffected sites was also examined for 11 patients. Specimens were examined with light microscopy for presence of graft‐versus‐host reaction (GVHR)‐like findings: apoptotic keratinocytes and satellite cell necrosis. Epidermal necrosis was seen in nine patients. Initial diagnosis of the nine was one of overlap SJS‐TEN, four of SJS and four of EM, and final diagnosis of those was one of TEN, one of overlap SJS–TEN, four of SJS and three of EM. Dissociation between initial and final diagnosis was seen in three cases. GVHR‐like findings in the epidermis were observed in two patients finally diagnosed as overlap SJS–TEN and TEN. Frozen sections are useful not only to make a diagnosis of erythema multiforme but to assess a potential to exhibit more aggressive clinical behaviors (SJS or TEN).     

Expression of cytokines and chemokine receptors in the cutaneous lesions of erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

BACKGROUND: Erythema multiforme (EM) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are caused by a dysregulation of cellular immunity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate further the potential role of certain cytokines and chemokine receptors in cutaneous lesions of patients affected by EM and SJS/TEN and to establish whether such diseases are polarized preferentially towards a T-helper (Th) 1 or Th2 pattern. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from eight patients with EM, six with SJS/TEN and three healthy controls were stained for immunohistochemical examination using the alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase method. The monoclonal antibodies used included those to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-gamma, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-5, IL-13, receptor 3 for C-C chemokines (CCR3), receptor 3 for C-x-C chemokines (CXCR3) and CXCR4. RESULTS: The SJS/TEN specimens showed significantly higher expression of all the cytokines and chemokine receptors (except CXCR3) tested than the EM specimens. Both lesional series showed significantly higher expression of all the receptors tested than the healthy control specimens, with the sole exception of a lower expression of CCR3 in EM specimens. Comparison between molecules associated with a Th1 or Th2 response revealed a predominance of Th1 response in EM and no significant imbalance between Th1 and Th2 in SJS/TEN. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided further evidence that TNF-alpha is strongly expressed in SJS/TEN lesions and therefore it may be involved in the epidermal necrosis featured in such diseases. IFN-gamma may play an important role both in EM and SJS/TEN. IL-2, IL-5 and IL-13 may contribute to the cutaneous immunoinflammation in these diseases. Chemokine receptors may be involved strongly in the recruitment of inflammatory cells in lesional skin. In our cases we found a sharp polarization towards a Th1 pattern in EM, while the SJS/TEN lesions showed a mixed Th1/Th2 pattern.