Lorenz 96模式中三种目标观测方法的有效性比较

目标观测是有效提升观测效能和观测质量的一种观测策略,其核心部分是敏感区的识别。本文在Lorenz-96模式上比较了奇异向量法(SVs)、集合变换卡尔曼滤波法(ETKF)和条件非线性最优扰动法(CNOP)识别敏感区的优劣,并尝试揭示ETKF方法性能不稳定的原因与机制。试验结果表明:在312h内的不同预报时刻,CNOP方法识别的敏感区范围较小且对预报效果的提升率最高;SVs方法识别的敏感区对72h内的预报有较好的改进,但72h后改进程度急剧下降,到120h后基本失效;ETKF方法识别的敏感区在72h内不如其他方法的效果好。此外,在ETKF方法识别的敏感区与随机选取的敏感区对比中发现,由于ETKF方法操作时采用顺序观测资料处理方案搜寻敏感区,本质上忽略了观测资料间的相关性,导致ETKF方法识别出的敏感区并不一定是全局信号方差最大的区域,对预报效果的改善有限,这也说明了如何优化敏感区搜寻方案是提高ETKF方法效能的关键。     

伴随敏感性方法、第一奇异向量方法以及条件非线性最优扰动方法在台风目标观测敏感区识别中的比较研究

本文通过深入分析伴随敏感性（ADS）方法、第一奇异向量（LSV）方法、以及条件非线性最优扰动（CNOP）方法在目标观测敏感区识别方面的原理,提出了非线性程度的概念和计算方法,考察了转向型和直线型台风的非线性程度,分析了上述三种方法在不同非线性程度下识别的敏感区的异同,同时对比了转向型和直线型台风的敏感区的差异,并通过敏感性试验探讨了在不同非线性程度下以及在转向型与直线型台风中,预报对敏感区内初值的敏感性程度,进而探讨台风目标观测在不同情况下的有效性。结果表明,转向型台风的非线性程度差别比较大,或者特别强,或者特别弱;而直线型台风非线性程度居中,不同台风个例之间的非线性程度差别较小。对于非线性较弱的台风,三种方法识别的敏感区较为相似,而对于非线性较强的台风,LSV方法与ADS方法识别的敏感区较为相似,但是与CNOP方法识别的敏感区具有较大的差别。对于转向型台风,敏感区主要位于行进路径的右前方,而对于直线型台风,敏感区主要位于初始台风位置的后方。敏感性试验表明,不论台风非线性强弱,转向还是直行,CNOP敏感区内的随机扰动发展最大,而LSV敏感区内叠加的随机扰动发展次之,ADS敏感区内叠加的扰动发展最小;此外,非线性弱的台风,扰动的发展大于非线性强的台风的扰动的发展,表明非线性弱的台风预报受初值影响更大,目标观测的效果可能会更明显。     

基于条件非线性最优扰动的目标观测中瞄准区 不同引导性变量的影响试验研究

基于GRAPES区域业务预报模式,采用一种快速算法计算出来的条件非线性最优扰动对实际台风个例麦莎(No.0509)开展了目标观测研究,应用数值模式,进行一系列的敏感性试验,讨论了与目标观测设计相关的一些问题,包括确定瞄准区时使用不同的引导性变量对目标观测效果的影响、及瞄准区范围变化对预报效果的影响。文中分别以提高麦莎在检验区(20.125°—35.3125°N,116.8125°—129.75°E)内的24 h海平面气压预报和24 h累积降水量预报为目的,基于条件非线性最优扰动使用了3种不同的引导性变量寻找敏感区(又称瞄准区),对这些敏感区的分布特点和有效性进行了比较和讨论。试验结果表明,在使用的3种引导性变量中,用不同的引导性变量识别的敏感区是有差别的,总体上说,文中使用的3种引导性变量识别的瞄准区对提高预报都是有效的,特别是第2和第3种的效果更好些,且两者识别的瞄准区常显示出类似的特点。文中进一步针对检验区内24 h累积降水量预报误差问题,将前面确定的瞄准区范围扩大相同的幅度,讨论瞄准区范围变化对改进预报的影响。试验结果表明,增加瞄准格点数,有可能使预报效果得到改善,但是试验结果同时也暗示了单纯靠扩大瞄准...     

条件非线性最优扰动方法在黑潮目标观测研究中的应用

对近年来利用条件非线性最优扰动（Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation,CNOP）方法开展的黑潮目标观测研究进行了总结,主要包括日本南部黑潮路径变异的目标观测研究、黑潮延伸体模态转变的目标观测研究和源区黑潮流量变化的目标观测研究。通过计算这些事件的CNOP型扰动,发现这些事件的CNOP型扰动具有局地特征,可以作为实施目标观测的敏感区。理想回报试验结果表明,如果在由CNOP方法识别的敏感区内实施目标观测,则会大幅度提高上述事件的预报技巧。     

一种求解条件非线性最优扰动的快速算法及其在台风目标观测中的初步检验

条件非线性最优扰动(CNOP)是Mu等2003年提出的一个新的理论方法,它是线性奇异向量在非线性情形的推广,克服了线性奇异向量不能代表非线性系统最快发展扰动的缺陷,成为非线性系统可预报性和敏感性等研究新的有效工具.然而,由于以往CNOP的求解需要采用伴随技术,计算量相当巨大,限制了该方法的推广应用.为了克服这一困难,本文基于经验正交分解(EOF),提出了一种求解CNOP的快速算法,利用GRAPES区域业务预报模式实现了CNOP快速计算,并在台风"麦莎"的目标观测研究中得到初步检验,通过观测系统模拟实验(OSSE)检验了该方法确定敏感性区域(瞄准区)的有效性和可行性.试验结果表明,用快速算法求解的CNOP,其净能量随时间快速地发展,而且发展呈非线性.在台风"麦莎"个例的目标观测试验中,用快速算法得到的预报时间为24 h的CNOP可以有效地识别瞄准区,并通过瞄准区内初值的改善,可明显减少目标区域(检验区)内24 h累计降水预报误差.尤其,累计降水预报的这种改进效果能够延伸到更长时间(如72 h),尽管检验时间是设在第24小时.进一步分析发现,24 h累计降水预报误差的减少是通过利用瞄准区内改善的初值改进初始时刻台风暖心结构、高空相对涡度以及水汽条件等而得以实现的.     

条件非线性最优扰动方法在台风“风神”和“凤凰”相互作用过程中的应用研究

利用条件非线性最优扰动(CNOP)方法,对2002年发生在西太平洋上的台风“风神”和“凤凰”之间的相互作用进行研究。CNOP方法可揭示出“风神”对“凤凰”单向引导作用的过程,表现为若将“凤凰”所在区域作为验证区域,用CNOP方法识别的敏感区主要位于“风神”所在区域,呈现出环绕“风神”的半环状结构;若将“风神”所在区域作为验证区域,则CNOP方法所识别的敏感区主要位于“风神”与副高交界的地方,远离“凤凰”所在的区域,可见,“风神”主要受副高的影响。敏感性试验表明,CNOP所识别的敏感区内误差的发展要大于台风中心周围区域内初始误差的发展,且在全场误差的发展中占有较大的比重,说明CNOP所识别的敏感区对验证区域的预报有较大的影响。      

基于集合卡尔曼变换的目标观测敏感区识别系统优化及影响试验

在基于集合卡尔曼变换(Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter,ETKF)方法的适应性观测系统的基础上,考虑湿度因子作用并增加对流层低层的大气运动信息,发展了更加适用于我国中尺度高影响天气系统敏感区识别的优化方案。针对环北京夏季暴雨和冬季降雪的高影响天气个例,分别设计4组试验进行观测敏感区识别试验,考察了优化方案目标观测敏感区识别质量,并对分析和预报结果进行了评估。结果表明:优化方案的目标观测敏感区识别效果最佳,对环北京夏季暴雨和冬季降雪天气的目标观测敏感区质量有明显改善,湿度因子可使最强观测敏感区更加集中,对夏季降水敏感区的影响比冬季降雪天气更加明显。低层大气信息的引入对最强观测敏感区的准确识别也具有重要的积极作用。目标观测敏感区的目标资料对分析和短期预报质量具有明显的正贡献。     

台风“灿鸿”(1509)的适应性观测敏感区特征及其模拟观测同化研究

适应性观测可以改善资料同化和预报质量。本文利用集合卡尔曼变换适应性观测系统对2015年09号台风“灿鸿”进行了观测敏感区识别,并以第一目标时刻的观测敏感区为基础,运用观测系统模拟试验方法获取模拟的适应性观测资料。基于WRF中尺度同化和预报系统,开展了适应性观测敏感区模拟资料的同化和预报试验。研究发现,台风“灿鸿”(1509)的观测敏感区主要位于台风中心的东北侧及东南侧。同化敏感区内模拟观测资料比同化常规观测资料能更好地改善分析质量和高度、台风路径的预报质量,但对降水的预报改善较弱。     

北京地区暴雨个例的观测敏感区研究

利用基于集合预报的相关方法对2009年7月23日发生在北京及周边地区的暴雨过程的观测敏感区进行了分析。通过WRF(Weather Research Forecast)三维变分方法对初始场进行随机扰动,形成30个初始集合样本,做了预报时效为12 h的集合预报。利用该方法分析检验区(北京及周边地区)累积降水[14:00(北京时间,下同)至20:00]相对于初始时刻(08:00)各基本要素的敏感性,确定感性要素及其对应的区域。研究发现初步确定的敏感性要素为水汽和温度,对应的敏感区分别位于北京的西南侧和北京的东北侧,且通过实况分析可知初步确定的敏感性要素和对应的敏感区具有明确的物理意义。还进一步通过观测系统模拟试验(OSSE)的资料同化验证所确定的敏感区,结果表明在水汽对应的敏感区内同化水汽对降水的预报结果有明显的改进;在温度对应的敏感区内同化温度,降水的预报准确率有了明显的提高,说明了初步确定的敏感性要素和敏感区的正确性。在水汽对应的敏感区内同化水汽的同时在温度对应的敏感区内同化温度,使降水预报的技巧有大幅度的提高,说明了温度和水汽的共同作用对提高降水预报准确率贡献最大。因此,通过基于集合预报的相关方法能够快速的确定敏感区。研究结果将为确定北京暴雨的观测敏感区提供参考。     

一次典型华南暴雨预报目标观测区的确定和敏感性试验

针对一次典型华南暴雨过程,利用适应性观测技术确定对华南暴雨预报起关键作用的敏感区,并设计一组试验方案,以目前国内实际地面观测站点分布为前提,在敏感区内增加不同数量的均匀随机分布的地面观测资料,通过MM5(The Fifth PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model)三维变分(3DVAR)同化系统对已有的地面观测站点资料和敏感区内所增加的观测进行同化,考察地面观测站点的分布对关注区域内预报效果的影响。试验结果表明,各试验对降水的预报差异不大;而以扰动总能量的大小衡量预报水平,与CTRL试验相比,在敏感区内增加观测对短时临近数值预报效果的改善尤为明显,若敏感区内增加75%的地面观测,可使24 h后的关注区域内的数值预报水平提高12.6%,而随着敏感区内地面观测站点的增加,关注区域内的预报水平并没有得到相应提高,这说明布设过多的地面观测站点不但不能改善预报效果,反而造成资源浪费。因此,这一结果为充分利用有限资源、更好设计地面观测站网、最大限度提高华南暴雨的预报水平有很好的理论指导作用。      

Impact of Different Guidances on Sensitive Areas of Targeting Observations Based on the CNOP Method

The conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations(CNOPs) obtained by a fast algorithm are applied to determining the sensitive area for the targeting observation of Typhoon Matsa in 2005 using an operational regional prediction model-the Global/Regional Assimilation and PrEdiction System(GRAPES).Through a series of sensitivity experiments,several issues on targeting strategy design are discussed,including the effectivity of different guidances to determine the sensitive area(or targeting area) and the impa...     

A Fast Algorithm for Solving CNOP and Associated Target Observation Tests

Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation （CNOP） is a new method proposed by Mu et al. in 2003, which generalizes the linear singular vector （LSV） to include nonlinearity. It has become a powerful tool for studying predictability and sensitivity among other issues in nonlinear systems. This is because the CNOP is able to represent, while the LSV is unable to deal with, the fastest developing perturbation in a nonlinear system. The wide application of this new method, however, has been limited due to its large computational cost related to the use of an adjoint technique. In order to greatly reduce the computational cost, we hereby propose a fast algorithm for solving the CNOP based on the empirical orthogonal function （EOF）. The algorithm is tested in target observation experiments of Typhoon Matsa using the Global/Regional Assimilation and PrEdiction System （GRAPES）, an operational regional forecast model of China. The effectivity and feasibility of the algorithm to determine the sensitivity （target） area is evaluated through two observing system simulation experiments （OSSEs）. The results, as expected, show that the energy of the CNOP solved by the new algorithm develops quickly and nonlinearly. The sensitivity area is effectively identified with the CNOP from the new algorithm, using 24 h as the prediction time window. The 24-h accumulated rainfall prediction errors （ARPEs） in the verification region are reduced significantly compared with the ＂true state,＂ when the initial conditions （ICs） in the sensitivity area are replaced with the ＂observations.＂ The decrease of the ARPEs can be achieved for even longer prediction times （e.g., 72 h）. Further analyses reveal that the decrease of the 24-h ARPEs in the verification region is attributable to improved simulations of the typhoon＇s initial warm-core, upper level relative vorticity, water vapor conditions, etc., as a result of the updated ICs in the sensitivity area.     

The Time and Regime Dependencies of Sensitive Areas for Tropical Cyclone Prediction Using the CNOP Method

This study examines the time and regime dependencies of sensitive areas identified by the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation(CNOP) method for forecasts of two typhoons.Typhoon Meari(2004) was weakly nonlinear and is herein referred to as the linear case,while Typhoon Matsa(2005) was strongly nonlinear and is herein referred to as the nonlinear case.In the linear case,the sensitive areas identified for special forecast times when the initial time was fixed resembled those identified for other forecast times.Targeted observations deployed to improve a special time forecast would thus also benefit forecasts at other times.In the nonlinear case,the similarities among the sensitive areas identified for different forecast times were more limited.The deployment of targeted observations in the nonlinear case would therefore need to be adapted to achieve large improvements for different targeted forecasts.For both cases,the closer the forecast time,the higher the similarities of the sensitive areas.When the forecast time was fixed,the sensitive areas in the linear case diverged continuously from the verification area as the forecast period lengthened,while those in the nonlinear case were always located around the initial cyclones.The deployment of targeted observations to improve a special forecast depends strongly on the time of deployment.An examination of the efficiency gained by reducing initial errors within the identified sensitive areas confirmed these results.In general,the greatest improvement in a special time forecast was obtained by identifying the sensitive areas for the corresponding forecast time period.     

The Impact of Verification Area Design on Tropical Cyclone Targeted Observations Based on the CNOP Method

This study investigated the impact of different verification-area designs on the sensitive areas identified using the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method for tropical cyclone targeted observations.The sensitive areas identified using the first singular vector (FSV) method,which is the linear approximation of CNOP,were also investigated for comparison.By analyzing the validity of the sensitive areas,the proper design of a verification area was developed.Tropical cyclone Rananim,which occurred in August 2004 in the northwest Pacific Ocean,was studied.Two sets of verification areas were designed;one changed position,and the other changed both size and position.The CNOP and its identified sensitive areas were found to be less sensitive to small variations of the verification areas than those of the FSV and its sensitive areas.With larger variations of the verification area,the CNOP and the FSV as well as their identified sensitive areas changed substantially.In terms of reducing forecast errors in the verification area,the CNOP-identified sensitive areas were more beneficial than those identified using FSV.The design of the verification area is important for cyclone prediction.The verification area should be designed with a proper size according to the possible locations of the cyclone obtained from the ensemble forecast results.In addition,the development trend of the cyclone analyzed from its dynamic mechanisms was another reference.When the general position of the verification area was determined,a small variation in size or position had little influence on the results of CNOP.     

Observation System Experiments for Typhoon Nida (2004) Using the CNOP Method and DOTSTAR Data

This study investigated the influence of dropwindsonde observations on typhoon forecasts. The study also evaluated the feasibility of the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method as a basis for sensitivity analysis of such forecasts. This sensitivity analysis could furnish guidance in the selection of targeted observations. The study was performed by conducting observation system experiments (OSEs). This research used the fifth-generation Mesoscale Model (MM5), the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, and dropsonde observations of Typhoon Nida at 1200 UTC 17 May 2004. The dropsondes were collected under the operational Dropsonde Observations for Typhoon Surveillance near the Taiwan Region (DOTSTAR) program. In this research, five kinds of experiments were designed and conducted:(1) no observations were assimilated; (2) all observations were assimilated;(3) observations in the sensitive area revealed by the CNOP method were assimilated;(4) the same as in (3), but for the region revealed by the first singular vector (FSV) method;and (5) observations within a randomly selected area were assimilated. The OSEs showed that (1) the DOTSTAR data had a positive impact on the forecast of Nida’s track;(2) dropsondes in the sensitive areas identified by the MM5 CNOP and FSV remained effective for improving the track forecast for Nida on the WRF platform;and (3) the greatest improvement in the track forecast resulted from the CNOP-based (third) simulation, which indicated that the CNOP method would be useful in decision making about dropsonde deployments.     

条件非线性最优扰动方法在适应性观测研究中的初步应用

针对适应性观测中敏感性区域的确定问题,考虑初始误差对预报结果的影响, 比较了条件非线性最优扰动(CNOP)与第一线性奇异向量(FSV)在两个降水个例中的空间结构的差异,考察了它们总能量范数随时间发展演变的异同。结合敏感性试验的分析,揭示了预报结果对CNOP类型的初始误差的敏感性要大于对FSV类型的初始误差的敏感性,因而减少初值中CNOP类型误差的振幅比减少FSV类型的收益要大。这一结果表明可以把CNOP方法应用于适应性观测来识别大气的敏感区。关于将CNOP方法有效地应用于适应性观测所面临的挑战及需要采取的对策等也进行了讨论。     

An Adjoint-Free CNOP–4DVar Hybrid Method for Identifying Sensitive Areas in Targeted Observations: Method Formulation and Preliminary Evaluation

This paper proposes a hybrid method, called CNOP–4 DVar, for the identification of sensitive areas in targeted observations, which takes the advantages of both the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation(CNOP) and four-dimensional variational assimilation(4 DVar) methods. The proposed CNOP–4 DVar method is capable of capturing the most sensitive initial perturbation(IP), which causes the greatest perturbation growth at the time of verification; it can also identify sensitive areas by evaluating their assimilation effects for eliminating the most sensitive IP. To alleviate the dependence of the CNOP–4 DVar method on the adjoint model, which is inherited from the adjoint-based approach, we utilized two adjointfree methods, NLS-CNOP and NLS-4 DVar, to solve the CNOP and 4 DVar sub-problems, respectively. A comprehensive performance evaluation for the proposed CNOP–4 DVar method and its comparison with the CNOP and CNOP–ensemble transform Kalman filter(ETKF) methods based on 10 000 observing system simulation experiments on the shallow-water equation model are also provided. The experimental results show that the proposed CNOP–4 DVar method performs better than the CNOP–ETKF method and substantially better than the CNOP method.     

MJO随机强迫对CNOP型初始误差演变的影响

用Zebiak-Cane模式和季节内振荡(Madden-Julian Oscillation,MJO)的参数化表述以及条件非线性最优扰动(Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbation,CNOP)方法,分析了以ENSO事件为基态的CNOP型初始误差的空间结构增长规律。结果表明,参数化的MJO对CNOP型初始误差的发展影响较小,其影响主要是使中东太平洋的海表面温度异常增大。CNOP型初始误差比由MJO不确定性产生的模式误差的影响大,前者可能是造成ENSO事件预报不确定性的主要误差来源。由于CNOP型初始误差的局地性,本结论可用来指导ENSO的目标观测和适应性资料同化。     

The Impact of Horizontal Resolution on the CNOP and on Its Identified Sensitive Areas for Tropical Cyclone Predictions

In this study,the impacts of horizontal resolution on the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) and on its identified sensitive areas were investigated for tropical cyclone predictions.Three resolutions,30 km,60 km,and 120 km,were studied for three tropical cyclones,TC Mindulle (2004),TC Meari (2004),and TC Matsa (2005).Results show that CNOP may present different structures with different resolutions,and the major parts of CNOP become increasingly localized with increased horizontal resolution.CNOP produces spiral and baroclinic structures,which partially account for its rapid amplification.The differences in CNOP structures result in different sensitive areas,but there are common areas for the CNOP-identified sensitive areas at various resolutions,and the size of the common areas is different from case to case.Generally,the forecasts benefit more from the reduction of the initial errors in the sensitive areas identified using higher resolutions than those using lower resolutions.However,the largest improvement of the forecast can be obtained at the resolution that is not the highest for some cases.In addition,the sensitive areas identified at lower resolutions are also helpful for improving the forecast with a finer resolution,but the sensitive areas identified at the same resolution as the forecast would be the most beneficial.