Diagnosing appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain

Differentiating acute appendicitis from other causes of acute abdominal pain in children frequently remains unsatisfactory. To determine whether initial historical and physical examination findings might predict final diagnoses, 246 patients with complaints of nontraumatic and nonrecurrent acute abdominal pain were studied. All were between three and 18 years of age and had presented to a hospital-based pediatric emergency department. Each family was telephoned an average of 5.1 days after the visit to determine the patient's subsequent clinical course; operative notes and pathology reports were reviewed for patients receiving surgery. Of these patients with acute abdominal pain, both fever and vomiting were present in 18 of the 24 who eventually had diagnoses of appendicitis, compared with 49 of 222 patients with other final diagnoses (P less than 0.01, with negative predictive value 0.97, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.78, but positive predictive value only 0.27). The duration of the pain at presentation and the frequency of other symptoms (eg, diarrhea, dysuria, anorexia, and lethargy) were unrelated, however, to final diagnosis, as was the duration of the pain and whether abdominal tenderness initially was localized or generalized. Nonruptured appendicitis was generally indistinguishable from ruptured appendicitis preoperatively, by both duration and symptoms. Boys were found more likely to have appendicitis (with or without rupture) than girls (18/118 or 15%, vs. 6/128 or 5%, P less than 0.05). In conclusion, fever and vomiting were noted at presentation more frequently in children with appendicitis than in children with other causes of acute abdominal pain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

С������֢�ĸ�ʹ�ص�

??Sudden and violent abdominal pain with comparatively fixed location should be clinical features in children with acute abdominal diseases. The constant development of system and organs in childhood makes it difficult for pediatricians to make correct diagnosis of pediatric acute abdomen. Complete inspection and particularly abdominal palpation and digital examination should be emphasized. Correct understanding of abdominal pain in children with acute abdominal diseases is of critical importance.     

Prospective evaluation of admission for acute abdominal pain in children

Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is one of the most frequent causes of admission to an emergency department of a childrens' hospital. The diagnosis viewed with the most apprehension is acute appendicitis. We present the results of a prospective study on the evaluation of the clinical and paraclinical symptoms generally observed in an AAP, and discuss the benefit of a diagnostic score for acute appendicitis. Twenty-five different diagnoses were observed, the 5 most frequent being: "non specific" (34.2%), constipation (16%), otorhinolaryngological infection (11.6%), gastroenteritis (10.7%) and acute appendicitis (10.5%). The study of 12 symptoms showed an elevated sensitivity for each one (92-50%), but a low positive predictive value (72-12%). Rigid adhesion to a diagnostic score would have led to unnecessary medical examination.     

The management of acute abdominal pain in children

Objective : Acute abdominal pain is a common problem in childhood, and appendicitis is frequently diagnosed by general practitioners and doctors working in emergency departments. The objective of the present report was to determine the frequency of appendicitis in a group of children with acute abdominal pain presenting to the emergency department of a general hospital, as well as attempting to analyse the manner in which these patients were managed.
Methodology : The initial assessment in hospital (by resident hospital staff) of the study group of patients was analysed and their subsequent clinical progress documented.
Results : The present report shows that the vast majority of children with acute abdominal pain do not have appendicitis and that appendicitis is significantly over-diagnosed by junior hospital doctors.
Conclusions : Appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis, best made by an experienced member of the paediatric surgical team. Frequent review, with a minimum of investigations, provides the best means of making a rational decision regarding surgery.     

Hospital observation for right lower quadrant abdominal pain with questionable acute appendicitis in children

920 children below the age of 12 years were admitted with complaints of pain in the right lower abdomen and a suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In 720 patients, clinical diagnosis was made and immediate operation was performed. In 644 of them (89.5%) an intraabdominal lesion was found but in 76 (10.5%) no disease was encountered. Rest 200 patients were observed in the ward and progression was noted at regular intervals. Eight of these patients did not improve while on observation and they were operated. Five others did not have acute appendicitis but in them definite medical diagnosis was made. However in remaining 187 observed patients abdominal signs gradually resolved and needed no surgery but no definite diagnosis also could be made. They appeared to have non-specific abdominal pain. The conclusion of the study was that inhospital observation of patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and questionable appendicitis upto three days was a safe way to reduce the rate of negative appendicectomies and unnecessary surgical exploration.     

Biliary scintigraphy in children with sickle cell anemia and acute abdominal pain

The patterns of radionuclide hepatobiliary scans in nine children with sickle cell disease and acute right upper quadrant abdominal pain were reviewed. The most common pattern observed was delayed gall bladder visualization, consistent with chronic cholecystitis. The value of hepatobiliary imaging in distinguishing acute cholecystitis from crisis is presented.     

Pressure pain threshold in children with recurrent abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies on humans have shown that recurrent pain is associated with altered pain perception. We measured the pressure pain threshold in regions of the body surface in a group of children who had recurrent abdominal pain and in a group of children with chronic or recurrent disease but with no pain. METHODS: Each group consisted of 45 boys and 55 girls ranging in age from 5 to 15.8 years. The regions of the body were the trapezius, deltoid, and supraspinous muscles, nine areas on the abdominal wall, and the median part of the tibias. Using an algometer, pressure was applied through a rubber disc with a surface area of 1 cm2 at a rate of 0.5 kg/cm2/s. The pressure values recorded with the algometer when the children communicated that they started to feel pain were considered as pressure pain thresholds. RESULTS: The pain thresholds were reduced in all regions investigated in children with recurrent pain. The median thresholds for all regions of the patients with and without pain were 1.60 and 2.2 kg/cm2, respectively. The diseases of children with pain did not influence the pain thresholds. CONCLUSION: There was an association between recurrent abdominal pain and a lower pressure pain threshold, with no influence of the type of disease, and there was a central nervous system alteration in the perception of pain in these patients.     

Screening for celiac disease in children with recurrent abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of celiac disease--a life-long gluten intolerance--may be characterized by chronic abdominal pain. The objective of this study was to determine if children with recurrent abdominal pain had a higher prevalence of antiendomysial antibodies (a serologic marker of celiac disease) compared with healthy children. METHODS: Children with recurrent abdominal pain and healthy control participants were recruited from the offices of community pediatricians. Serum samples were drawn and antiendomysial antibodies were measured in both groups. Demographic data included age, gender, height, and weight. RESULTS: A total of 200 children were recruited, of whom 173 (87%) had serum samples drawn. Of these, 92 were children with recurrent abdominal pain and 81 were control participants. Only 2 of the 173 samples (1.2%) were positive for antiendomysial antibody. The frequency of antiendomysial antibody positivity in children with recurrent abdominal pain was 1 in 92 (1%; 95% confidence interval, 0-6%) compared with 1 in 81 (1%; 95% confidence interval, 0-7%) in control participants. CONCLUSIONS: This community-based case-control study found no association between recurrent abdominal pain and the prevalence of antiendomysial antibody. Therefore, these data do not support screening for celiac disease in the child with classic recurrent abdominal pain in the primary care setting.