Diagnostic epididymal and testicular sperm recovery and genetic aspects in azoospermic men.

Various procedures for sperm recovery in azoospermic men have been described, from open testicular biopsy to simple needle aspiration from the epididymis and the testis. Fifty-one obstructive and 86 non-obstructive azoospermic men were treated to compare the recovery of spermatozoa obtained by percutaneous aspiration from the epididymis (PESA) and aspiration/extraction from the testis (TESA, TESE) with histopathology. If TESA failed, the work up proceeded with TESE. All patients were karyotyped. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA in all obstructive men (51/51 patients). In 22 out of 86 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, testicular spermatozoa could be successfully recovered by TESA. In five additional patients TESE was successful in recovering spermatozoa where TESA had failed. In 43 patients, neither TESA nor TESE was successful. Sixteen patients chose not to proceed with TESE. Seven out of 86 patients had an abnormal karyotype in the non-obstructive group (8%), none in the obstructive group. In the non-obstructive patient group testicular histopathology showed hypospermatogenesis, incomplete maturation arrest and germ cell aplasia with focal spermatogenesis in cases where spermatozoa were recovered and complete germ cell aplasia, complete maturation arrest and fibrosis in cases where no spermatozoa were found. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA from all patients with obstructive azoospermia and from approximately 40% of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia by TESA or TESE. Retrieval of viable spermatozoa in the infertility work-up was highly predictable for sperm recovery in subsequent ICSI cycles. TESA performed under local anaesthesia seems almost as effective as more invasive procedures in recovering testicular spermatozoa, both in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men.     

The first births and ongoing pregnancies associated with sperm cryopreservation within evacuated egg zonae

This new procedure principally aims to avoid a second or possibly multiple surgical procedures for sperm extraction from the male partner in cases of limited amounts of sperm cells, where normal freeze-thaw protocols would fail. Patients (n = 34) diagnosed as azoospermic, extreme oligozoospermic, or oligoasthenozoospermic underwent the process of sperm cryopreservation within evacuated egg zonae. Other samples were allocated to conventional sperm freezing. Sperm samples were acquired using testicular sperm extraction (TESE), microepididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), or fresh ejaculate. Subsequently, five of these 34 couples have undergone in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and achieved normal fertilization using post-thawed spermatozoa frozen under zonae pellucidae in conjunction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The average fertilization rate for the post-thaw injected spermatozoa was 65%. This is comparable with the regular fertilization rate of 65% for combined MESA and TESE using fresh spermatozoa. All patients underwent embryo transfer. The average implantation rate per embryo was 31%; nearly the same for regular MESA/TESE ICSI cycles (32%). The first pregnancy associated with this procedure concluded with the full term delivery of healthy twin girls on July 18, 1997. The remaining four thaw procedures resulted in another twin delivery, an ongoing singleton gestation, a negative pregnancy test and a biochemical pregnancy respectively.     

Andrology: Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for patients requiring microsurgical sperm aspiration

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been successfulin cases of extreme oligoasthenozoospermia in achieving pregnanciesvia in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with the lowest imaginablesperm counts. In azoospermia caused by congenital bilateralabsence of the vas deferens (CBAVD), it has been shown thatepididymal spermatozoa can be retrieved in large numbers, butfertilization rates using conventional IVF are low. Furthermore,no fertilization has ever been possible using testicular spermatozoawith conventional IVF. In the most extreme case of absence ofthe epididymis, spermatozoa can only be retrieved from maceratedtesticular biopsy specimens. In such cases, all that can beseen are free-floating Sertoli cells with many spermatids attached,and only occasional spermatozoa per high power field which haveonly the barest, occasional, slightly twitching motion. Theobjective of the present study was to determine whether ICSIcould achieve better results than conventional IVF with microsurgicalaspiration of spermatozoa (MESA). ICSI (using epididymal ortesticular spermatozoa) from men with CBAVD or irreparable obstructiveazoospermia, achieved good fertilization and normal embryosin 82% of cases, compared to 19% with conventional IVF. Therewas an overall fertilization rate of 45%, with 85% progressingto normally cleaving embryos using ICSI, compared to 6.9% usingconventional IVF. The pregnancy rate with ICSI/MESA was 47%per stimulated cycle (normal delivery rate was 30%), comparedto 4.5% with conventional IVF. These results were achieved inpatients who had consistently failed to fertilize in previouscycles with MESA and conventional IVF. We conclude that althoughcomplex mechanisms (facilitated by epididymal passage) may berequired by spermatozoa for conventional fertilization of humanoocytes (whether in vivo or in vitro), no such mechanisms arerequired for fertilization after direct microinjection. Becauseof the consistently good results using epididymal spermatozoawith ICSI in comparison to conventional IVF, and also the goodresults in extreme cases requiring testicular tissue spermatozoa,ICSI may be man dated for all future MESA patients with CBAVD,or with irreparable obstructive azoospermia.     

Genetics: The use of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the genetic implications for male infertility

The results and rationale of using testicular and epididymalspermatozoa with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) forsevere cases of male infertility are reviewed. A total of 72consecutive microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)cases were performed for congenital absence of the vas (CAV)and for irreparable obstructive azoospermia. ICSI was used toobtain normal embryos for transfer and fertilization in 90%of the cases. The overall fertilization rate was 46% with anormal cleavage rate of 68%. The pregnancy and delivery ratesper transfer were 58 and 37% respectively. The delivery rateper cycle was 33%. In many cases, no epididymal spermatozoawere available and so testicular sperm extraction (TESE) wasused for sperm retrieval. The transfer rate was lower with TESE(84 versus 96%) and the spermatozoa could not be frozen andsaved for use in future cycles. However, there was little differencein pregnancy rates using epidiymal or testicular spermatozoa.The results were not affected by whether the obstruction wascaused by CAV or failed vasoepididymostomy. Both fresh and frozenspermatozoa gave similar results; the only significant factorappeared to be the age of the female. Because of the consistentlygood results obtained using epididymal sperm with ICSI whencompared with conventional IVF, and the similarly good resultswith testicular tissue spermatozoa, ICSI is mandatory for allfuture MESA patients. All CAV patients and their partners shouldbe offered genetic screening for cystic fibrosis; hence pre-implantationembryo diagnosis should be available in any full service MESAprogramme. It is now clear that even with non-obstructive azoospermia,e.g. Sertoli-cell only, or maturation arrest, there are usuallysome small foci of spermatogenesis which allow TESE with ICSIto be carried out. This means that even in men with azoospermiadue to absence of spermatogenesis or to a block in meiosis,there are usually a few spermatozoa available in the testesthat are adequate for successful ICSI. Finally, it is likelythat some forms of severe male factor infertility are geneticallytransmitted and although ICSI offspring have been shown to becompletely normal, it is possible that the sons of these infertilecouples will also require ICSI when they grow up and wish tohave a family.     

The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from patients with obstructive azoospermia--a comparative study

The aim of our study was to compare the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa retrieved by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or microepididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) from patients with obstructive azoospermia. A retrospective analysis of consecutive ICSI cycles was performed, comparing the outcome in 24 patients with obstructive azoospermia undergoing surgical sperm aspiration by MESA (7 cycles) or PESA (17 cycles). In 23 of 24 patients, excess spermatozoa were cryopreserved. Following thawing, 21 ICSI cycles were performed (11 cycles after MESA, 10 after PESA). No statistically significant differences were noted in all parameters examined in ICSI cycles with fresh or cryopreserved spermatozoa from the same patients. Comparing all ICSI cycles with fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa, the rates of two-pronuclear fertilization (56% versus 53%), embryo cleavage (90% versus 86%), implantation (10% versus 14%), clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (32% versus 37%) and delivery/ongoing pregnancy rate (27% versus 26%) were not statistically different. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per sperm retrieval procedure was 46%, respectively. We conclude that the clinical outcome of ICSI with fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa after retrieval by PESA was similar to that by MESA. Epididymal sperm cryopreservation in patients with obstructive azoospermia is feasible and efficient using a simple freezing protocol and should be offered to optimize the yield of pregnancies achieved following such procedures.      

Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia

The efficiency of testicular sperm retrieval by testicular fine needle aspiration (TEFNA) was compared with open biopsy and testicular sperm extraction (TESE), in 37 rigorously selected patients with non- obstructive azoospermia. All patients underwent TEFNA and TESE consecutively. Thus, each patient served as his own control. The case was regarded as successful if at least one testicular spermatozoon was found allowing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of at least one oocyte. The mean age of the male patients was 32.7 years (range 24-47). Whereas by TEFNA spermatozoa enabling performance of ICSI were found in only four patients out of 37 (11%), open biopsy and TESE yielded spermatozoa in 16 cases (43%). The negative predictive value of high serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations (> or =10 IU/l) (predicting failure to find spermatozoa for ICSI) was low (38.4%). The positive predictive value (predicting the chance to find spermatozoa for ICSI) of normal-sized testicle was not different from that of small- sized (<15 ml) testicle (50%). Complications included one case of testicular bleeding following fine needle aspiration, treated locally, and two cases of extratunical haematomata following TESE requiring no intervention. In patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, TEFNA has a significantly lower yield compared to TESE. Performance of ICSI with testicular sperm in these cases resulted in satisfactory fertilization and high embryo transfer rates. The implantation and pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 13 and 29% respectively. Neither serum FSH values nor testicular size were predictive of the chances to find spermatozoa for ICSI. Some complications may occur even following TEFNA.      

High implantation and pregnancy rates with testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

Thirty-two infertile couples with obstructive and non-obstructiveazoospermia were included in this study. Testicular sperm extraction(TESE) was performed in 16 obstructive azoospermic cases wheremicrosurgical sperm aspiration (MESA) or percutaneous spermaspiration (PESA) were impossible because of totally destroyedepididymis and 16 non-obstructive azoospermia cases with severespermatogenetic defect where the testicles were the only sourceof sperm cells. A total of 288 oocytes was obtained from 32females and 84% were injected. The fertilization rates (FR)with 2 pronuclei (PN) and cleavage rate were 50.8 and 68.2%respectively. A total of 15 pregnancies was achieved (53% perembryo transfer), nine from the obstructive and six from thenon-obstructive group. Four pregnancies resulted in clinicalabortion (26.6%). The ongoing pregnancy rate was 39.2% per embryotransfer (ET) and 343% per started cycle. A high implantationrate was also achieved (26.6% in non-obstructive and 30% inobstructive azoospermia group). Using testicular spermatozoain combination with ICSI in both obstructive and non-obstructiveazoospermic groups, high implantation and pregnancy rates canbe achieved.     

The effect of female age and ovarian reserve on pregnancy rate in male infertility: treatment of azoospermia with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Factors other than spermatozoa could be the major determinant of the success of assisted reproduction treatment in cases of male infertility. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the wife's age and ovarian reserve on assisted reproduction success rates in the most severe type of male infertility, i.e. azoospermia. A total of 249 consecutive couples suffering from male infertility caused by azoospermia underwent microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Of these men, 186 had irreparable obstructive azoospermia, and 63 had non-obstructive azoospermia due to testicular failure. Neither the pathology, the source, the quantity, nor the quality of spermatozoa had any effect on fertilization or pregnancy rates. Maternal age and ovarian reserve (number of eggs) had no effect on fertilization or embryo cleavage, but did dramatically affect the embryo implantation, pregnancy and delivery rates. Wives of azoospermic men who were in their 20s had a 46% live delivery rate per cycle, wives aged 30-36 years had a 34% live delivery rate per cycle, wives aged 37- 39 years had a 13% live delivery rate per cycle, and wives > or = 40 years had only a 4% live delivery rate per cycle. The number of eggs retrieved also affected pregnancy and delivery rate, but to a lesser extent than age. In virtually all cases of obstructive azoospermia, and in 62% of cases with non-obstructive azoospermia caused by germinal failure, sufficient spermatozoa could be retrieved to perform ICSI, with normal fertilization and embryo cleavage. However, the pregnancy rate and the live delivery rate were dependent strictly on the age of the wife, and on her ovarian reserve. Unfortunately, exaggerated claims of high pregnancy rates can thus easily be made by manipulating, in a very simple way, selection for female factors.      

Fertility with testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermic men

In non-obstructive azoospermia spermatozoa can usually onlybe isolated from the testicles, and thus the most promisingtreatment model is testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Hormoneconcentrations, testicular volume determinations and testicularbiopsy results are not uniform enough to select potential candidatesfor successful TESE and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)approaches in advance. The aim of this study was to assess theefficacy of using ICSI with testicular spermatozoa in casesof non-obstructive azoospermia and to compare the inclusioncriteria and sperm existence in the testicles in sperm obtainableand non-obtainable groups. All men showed either complete orincomplete (n = 14) maturation arrest in spermatogenesis, severehypospermatogenesis (n = 10) or Sertoli cell-only syndrome (n= 5) in their testicular biopsies. Only 14 out of a total of29 men provided enough spermatozoa for the ICSI procedure, whileno spermatozoa were found in the testicular samples of the remaining15 men. Out of 123 oocytes obtained from 14 females, 101 wereinjected with the husbands' testicular sperm cells. Total fertilizationfailure was observed in three cases. Of 39 oocytes fertilized,38 cleaved. The fertilization and cleavage rates were 38.6 and97.4% respectively. The pregnancy rate was 20.7% per initiatedcycle. In the group from whom spermatozoa were obtainable, thepregnancy rate was 42.9% per initiated cycle and 54.5% per embryotransfer. A total of six pregnancies were achieved, of whichtwo Were twins and four were singletons. One singleton pregnancyresulted in abortion in the first trimester. There was no statisticaldifference concerning the serum follicle stimulating hormoneconcentration, testicular volume and biopsy results in groupsin which spermatozoa were obtainable or not. In conclusion,although the association of TESE with ICSI obtained pregnanciesfor some patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, furtherstudies are needed to determine the inclusion criteria for successfulTESE.     

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Patients persistently azoospermic after chemotherapy have been considered traditionally as sterile unless sperm was frozen before therapy. Recent advances during the last decade combining testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia allow these males to father their own genetic offspring. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 12 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia after chemotherapy undergoing TESE between 1995 and 2002. Cancer type and anti-neoplastic treatments were recorded, together with maximum testicular volume, serum FSH levels and testicular histopathology. When TESE was successful, spermatozoa were cryopreserved for performing ICSI later. RESULTS: In five patients (41.6%) motile spermatozoa for cryopreservation and ICSI were retrieved. Four of them had received chemotherapy for testicular cancer, and one had been treated by chemotherapy/radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. Clinical and histological parameters were unable to predict with certainty TESE outcome in an individual patient. Eight ICSI cycles were performed on five couples and one pregnancy was obtained which resulted in the delivery of a healthy girl. CONCLUSION: Some patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy can be successfully treated by TESE-ICSI. This procedure, however, may have potential genetic risks. Therefore, freezing semen before starting gonadotoxic therapy is the strategy of choice, and patients should be counselled accordingly.     

Fertilization and pregnancy using intentionally cryopreserved testicular tissue as the sperm source for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in 10 men with non-obstructive azoospermia

Testicular tissue extraction (TESE) to obtain spermatozoa for use with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has recently been employed in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Standard protocol is to retrieve a new sample of testis tissue on the day of oocyte recovery. Unfortunately, approximately 30% of men will possess no spermatozoa in their tissue, making ICSI an impossibility. We investigated whether testicular tissue that was intentionally obtained well before any planned ICSI cycle and cryopreserved could then serve as an efficacious sperm source in a subsequent ICSI cycle. This study reports on 10 men with non-obstructive azoospermia who did have spermatozoa found within their testis tissue at the time of TESE and who chose to use their frozen samples as the source of spermatozoa for a later cycle of ICSI. In 19 cycles the overall fertilization rate was 48%. Embryo transfer occurred in 89% of cycles. Two couples have achieved pregnancy (one ongoing, one delivered). All patients except one had multiple vials of frozen tissue remaining following their first cycle. This approach is offered as an alternative to repeated testicular tissue sampling, as the availability of spermatozoa is assured prior to the initiation of ovulation induction. This tissue can be harvested at the same time as diagnostic biopsy, thereby minimizing the number of surgical procedures.      

Testicular needle biopsy, open biopsy, epididymal aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive azoospermia

Testicular or epididymal spermatozoa were obtained for in-vitrofertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection ICSI) in27 cycles out of 33 (in six men the azoospermia proved to havetesticular causes). Testicular needle biopsy carried out inaddition to surgical open biopsy proved to be an effective methodto obtain spermatozoa for ICSI from patients with obstructiveazoospermia. Thus it might be possible to replace scrotal operationsby simple needle biopsies. Embryos resulting from ICSI withtesticular spermatozoa were used in 19 transfers that resultedin six pregnancies. One pregnancy resulted from six embryo transfersfrom ICSI after microsurgical-epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA).The normal fertilization rates with testicular (37.3%) and MESAspermatozoa (53.7%) did not differ significantly from each other,but with testicular spermatozoa the rate was significantly lowerthan that obtained with ejaculated spermatozoa and ICSI (59.7%)in the matched couples. The abnormal fertilization of oocyteswith one pronucleus was significantly higher with testicularspermatozoa than with ejaculated spermatozoa in the controlcouples.     

High fertilization and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicle biopsy

In cases requiring microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration(MESA) for congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD) orirreparable obstructive azoospermia, often no spermatozoa canbe retrieved from the epididymis, or there may even be no epididymispresent. We wished to see whether testicular biopsy with testicularsperm extraction (TESE) in such cases could yield spermatozoathat would result in successful fertilization and pregnancy(despite the absence of epididymal spermatozoa) using intracytoplasmicsperm injection (ICSI). In the same setting during the same2-week period, 28 patients with CAVD or irreparable obstructionwere treated; 16 consecutive fresh MESA—ICSI cycles and12 cycles which required testicular biopsy with testicular spermextraction (TESE—ICSI) were performed. Normal two-pronuclearfertilization rates were similar in both groups: 45% for epididymalspermatozoa and 46% for testicular biopsy-extracted spermatozoa.Cleavage rates were also similar (68% for epididymal and 65%for testicular spermatozoa). The ongoing pregnancy rates inthis series were 50 and 43% respectively. We conclude that epididymalspermatozoa and testicular spermatozoa yield similar fertilization,cleavage and ongoing pregnancy rates using ICSI. When epididymalspermatozoa cannot be retrieved, a testicular biopsy can beperformed and the few barely motile spermatozoa thus obtainedcan be used for ICSI. It appears that all cases of obstructiveazoospermia can now be successfully treated.     

Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

The potency for fertilization and successful implantation was compared between fresh and cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa obtained from the same patient with non-obstructive azoospermia. Spermatozoa cryopreserved at the outset were also evaluated. Non-obstructive azoospermic men (n = 55) underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE); mature spermatozoa were found in 33 (60%) of them. Of 57 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in 25 patients, 15 used fresh spermatozoa (14 patients, group 1), 24 used the excess spermatozoa cryopreserved after 'fresh' ICSI (11 couples who did not conceive in the 'fresh' cycle, group 2) and 18 cycles used cryopreserved spermatozoa at the outset (11 other patients, group 3). Fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation and take home baby rates were not significantly different in groups 1 and 2, and 6/14 couples ultimately had healthy babies (42.8% cumulative take home baby rate per TESE). In group 3, neither the fertilization rate, embryo development, pregnancy nor implantation rates per embryo transfer were significantly different from groups 1 and 2. The cumulative delivery and ongoing pregnancy rate in this group was 36. 4%. Cryopreservation did not impair the availability of motile spermatozoa for ICSI. When immotile spermatozoa were injected, however, fertilization rate decreased dramatically. Since criteria for predicting the presence of spermatozoa in the testicular tissue of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia are inadequate, it is suggested that TESE be performed prior to initiating ovarian stimulation.     

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

We compared the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in: (i) obstructive versus non-obstructive azoospermia, (ii) obstructive azoospermia using epididymal versus testicular spermatozoa and (iii) acquired versus congenital obstructive azoospermia due to congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD). A retrospective analysis was done of 241 consecutive ICSI cycles done in 103 patients with non- obstructive azoospermia and 119 patients with obstructive azoospermia. In the obstructive group, 135 ICSI cycles were performed. Epididymal spermatozoa were used in 44 cycles and testicular spermatozoa in 91 cycles. In the non-obstructive group, 106 cycles were performed. The fertilization and pregnancy per cycle rates were 59.5 and 27.3% respectively using epididymal spermatozoa, 54.4 and 31.9% respectively using testicular spermatozoa in obstructive cases, and 39 and 11.3% respectively in non-obstructive cases. The fertilization and pregnancy per cycle rates were 56.6 and 37% respectively in acquired obstructive cases, and 55.2 and 20.4% respectively in CAVD. In conclusion, ICSI using spermatozoa from patients with acquired obstructive azoospermia resulted in significantly higher fertilization and pregnancy rates as compared to CAVD and non-obstructive cases.      

Extended sperm preparation: an alternative to testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia

Testicular sperm retrieval for the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia requires the execution of an invasive procedure, with all its possible attending complications and subsequent long-term effects. This study suggests a new non-invasive approach for collection of spermatozoa in these patients: the extended sperm preparation (ESP). ESP consists of conducting a thorough microscopic search through many droplets of ejaculate sediment. ESP was performed for 49 patients; in 17 patients (35%), spermatozoa were found and subsequently used in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Of these preparations, five yielded fewer motile spermatozoa than the number of corresponding oocytes available, and in one patient only non-motile spermatozoa were recovered. The remaining 32 ESP-negative patients underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE) from testicular biopsy. Spermatozoa were found in 16 of 32 biopsies (50%) and subsequently used in ICSI. Fertilization and cleavage rates were comparable in both ESP and TESE groups, yielding four clinical pregnancies in each group (27 and 29% respectively). Embryo morphology was defined as excellent in significantly more cases in the ESP group than the TESE group, and implantation rate appeared somewhat higher in the ESP group (16%) than the TESE group (13%). The ESP technique yields results similar to TESE, and can be applied in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia as a prerequisite modality enabling us to avoid testicular biopsy in 35% of cases.      

附睾穿刺取精行ICSI治疗梗阻性无精子症

目的探讨附睾穿刺取精术(PESA)结合单精子卵胞浆内注射(ICSI)治疗梗阻性无精子症男性不育的可行性,并观察其临床效果。方法 7对夫妇为研究对象,男方均确诊为梗阻性无精子症,女方超促排卵获得卵细胞,男方于取卵日在局麻下通过细针穿刺附睾头部吸取少量精子,行ICSI,受精成功后24-48h,选择优质胚胎移植入子宫腔。因男性少弱精子症行ICSI治疗的20个治疗周期为对照组。结果附睾取精7例共11个治疗周期全部获得活动精子,ICSI后受精率65．9％,卵裂率98．3％,优质胚胎率71．9％,临床妊娠5例,周期临床妊娠率45．5％,与对照组比较,各项指标均无显著差异。结论附睾穿刺取得的精子与排出体外的精子具有相同的受精和获得优质胚胎的能力,PESA是治疗梗阻性无精子症男性不育的安全有效的方法。     

Successful testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in spite of high serum follicle stimulating hormone and azoospermia: correlation between testicular morphology, TESE results, semen analysis and serum hormone values in 103 infertile men

Spermatozoa recovered from testicular biopsies can be used through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to achieve a pregnancy. To assess the likelihood of successful testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men suffering from severe oligo- or azoospermia, bilateral biopsy specimens were obtained. Following semi-thin sectioning, the morphology of testicular samples was graded according to a modified Johnsen score. TESE was performed in parallel to this histological examination. The number of isolated spermatozoa was assessed in a semiquantitative way. From 103 patients investigated, 64 (62.1%) showed azoospermia in a preceding semen analysis and 29 (28.2%) patients had sperm concentrations between 0.1 and 1 x 10(6)/ml. In 10 patients who had higher sperm counts, most spermatozoa were non-motile. Spermatozoa could be detected after TESE in the testicular tissue of 49 (77%) azoospermic men. When follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration was normal, most patients had detectable spermatozoa after TESE. Nearly one-third of patients with mildly elevated FSH had no spermatozoa. Thirty-nine percent of patients in whom FSH was elevated to more than twice normal and 50% of patients with grossly elevated FSH had no detectable spermatozoa. In all, 82.8% of men with sperm concentrations between 0.1 and 1x10(6)/ml in their ejaculate showed spermatozoa in the tissue sample after TESE. Our data demonstrate that, contrary to previous recommendations, infertile men with azoospermia and high FSH values should be reconsidered for testicular biopsy, provided that tissue samples can be cryopreserved for later TESE/ICSI treatment.      

Results of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in two major groups of patients with obstructive azoospermia

Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were carried out in patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and men with failed reversal of vasectomy (FRV). PESA was successful in 55 out of 62 patients with CBAVD (89%) and in 57 out of 60 men with FRV (95%). The fertilization rates after ICSI (53 and 55%), cleavage rates (70 and 76%) and pregnancy rates (36 and 32%) did not differ significantly between the two respective groups (CBAVD and FRV). PESA and ICSI are effective both in patients with CBAVD and in those with FRV.      

No differences in outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa.

This retrospective consecutive case series aimed at comparing the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained after microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) in 162 couples. These couples were suffering from infertility because of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (n = 109), failed microsurgical reversal for vasectomy or postinfectious epididymal obstruction (n = 44), irreparable epididymal obstruction (n = 4), ejaculatory duct obstruction (n = 2) or anejaculation (n = 3). Overall, 176 MESA procedures were performed in the husbands, followed by 275ICSI procedures with either fresh (n = 157) or frozen-thawed (n = 118) epididymal spermatozoa. No significant differences were observed in the parameters of spermatozoa used either freshly or frozen-thawed. In the fresh epididymal sperm group 59.4% of all the injected oocytes fertilized normally as compared to 56.2% of all injected oocytes in the frozen-thawed epididymal sperm group, and embryonic development was comparable between the two groups. A total of 245 transfers were performed: 145 after the use of fresh epididymal spermatozoa and 100 after the use of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The overall pregnancy rate per ICSI cycle was significantly lower when frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa were used (26.3 versus 39.5%). However, no significant differences were found either in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates or in implantation rates. There were no differences in pregnancy outcome. In patients suspected of having obstructive azoospermia with no work-up or an incomplete one, MESA is the preferred method for sperm recovery because a full scrotal exploration can be performed and, whenever indicated, a vasoepididymostomy may be performed concomitantly. Recovery of epididymal spermatozoa for cryopreservation during a diagnostic procedure is certainly a valid option in these patients since ICSI may be performed later or even in another centre using the frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa without jeopardizing the ICSI success rate.