In vitro susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii to trovafloxacin in comparison with susceptibilities to pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, doxycycline, and clarithromycin

The antibiotic susceptibilities of eight Greek isolates of Coxiella burnetii to trovafloxacin were determined by the shell vial assay. MICs of trovafloxacin and ofloxacin ranged from 1 to 2 microg/ml, those of pefloxacin ranged from 1 to 4 microg/ml, those of ciprofloxacin ranged from 4 to 8 microg/ml, those of doxycycline ranged from 1 to 2 microg/ml, and those of clarithromycin ranged from 2 to 4 microg/ml. Trovafloxacin exhibited no activity against C. burnetii at 4 microg/ml.     

Parameters of bacterial killing and regrowth kinetics and antimicrobial effect examined in terms of area under the concentration-time curve relationships: action of ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model

Although many parameters have been described to quantitate the killing and regrowth of bacteria, substantial shortcomings are inherent in most of them, such as low sensitivity to pharmacokinetic determinants of the antimicrobial effect, an inability to predict a total effect, insufficient robustness, and uncertain interrelations between the parameters that prevent an ultimate determination of the effect. To examine different parameters, the kinetics of killing and regrowth of Escherichia coli (MIC, 0.013 microg/ml) were studied in vitro by simulating a series of ciprofloxacin monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles. Initial ciprofloxacin concentrations varied from 0.02 to 19.2 microg/ml, whereas the half-life of 4 h was the same in all experiments. The following parameters were calculated and estimated: the time to reduce the initial inoculum (N0) 10-, 100-, and 1,000-fold (T90%, T99%, and T99.9%, respectively), the rate constant of bacterial elimination (k(elb)), the nadir level (Nmin) in the viable count (N)-versus-time (t) curve, the time to reach Nmin (t(min)), the numbers of bacteria that survived (Ntau) by the end of the observation period (tau), the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (log N(A)-t curve) from the zero point (time zero) to tau (AUBC), the area above this curve (AAC), the area between the control growth curve (log N(C)-t curve) and the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (log N(A)-t curve) from the zero point to tau (ABBC) or to the time point when log N(A) reaches the maximal values observed in the log N(C)-t curve (I(E); intensity of the effect), and the time shift between the control growth and regrowth curves (T(E); duration of the effect). Being highly sensitive to the AUC, I(E), and T(E) showed the most regular AUC relationships: the effect expressed by I(E) or T(E) increased systematically when the AUC or initial concentration of ciprofloxacin rose. Other parameters, especially T90%, T99%, T99.9%, t(min), and log N0 - log Nmin = delta log Nmin, related to the AUC less regularly and were poorly sensitive to the AUC. T(E) proved to be the best predictor and t(min) proved to be the worst predictor of the total antimicrobial effect reflected by I(E). Distinct feedback relationships between the effect determination and the experimental design were demonstrated. It was shown that unjustified shortening of the observation period, i.e., cutting off the log N(A)-t curves, may lead to the degeneration of the AUC-response relationships, as expressed by log N0 - log Ntau = delta log Ntau, AUBC, AAC, or ABBC, to a point where it gives rise to the false idea of an AUC- or concentration-independent effect. Thus, use of I(E) and T(E) provides the most unbiased, robust, and comprehensive means of determining the antimicrobial effect.     

In vitro antibacterial activity of a new fluoroquinolone, fleroxacin, against hospital bacteria and regression curve

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fleroxacin (FLE) were determined by agar dilution for 1261 bacterial strains isolated in 1992 in 4 university hospitals; in addition, antibiograms by agar diffusion were performed with 5 micrograms disks. Activity of FLE against nalidixic acid (NAL) susceptible (S) Enterobacteriaceae was close to that of other fluoroquinolones (FQ) (MIC 50 and 90: 0.12-0.25 micrograms/ml); like for other FQ, this activity was reduced against NAL intermediate and resistant (R) Enterobacteriaceae (4-32). MICs of FLE against P. aeruginosa were between 1 and 128 (8-128). FLE had also a good activity against NAL-S A. baumannii (0.12-0.5) but this activity is reduced against NAL-R Acinetobacter (64-128). FLE was highly active against Haemophilus (0.06-0.12), Gonococci (0.03-0.25), Meningococci (0.016-0.03) and B. catarrhalis (0.12-0.25). FLE showed activity close to the currently available FQ against methicillin susceptible Staphylococci (0.25-1); the resistant strains (32- > 128) are usually methicillin resistant. FLE is less effective against Enterococci (4-128), Streptococci (8-16) and Pneumococci (4-8). The coefficient correlation of the regression curve is 0.93; for MIC breakpoints of 1 and 4 micrograms/ml, zone diameter breakpoints should be 20 and 15 mm.     

Comparative in vitro activities of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219) against 221 aerobic and 217 anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections

Four hundred thirty-eight bacteria cultured from specimens of patients with serious intra-abdominal infections were tested by agar dilution against trovafloxacin and other quinolones and antimicrobial agents. Trovafloxacin inhibited 435 strains (99.3%) at < or =2 microg/ml. All the quinolones had similar activities against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas sp., but trovafloxacin showed superior activities against streptococci, enterococci, and anaerobic organisms. Because of its excellent in vitro activities against diverse bacteria, trovafloxacin has potential use as a single agent for polymicrobial infections.     

Comparison of the in vitro activity of several cephalosporin antibiotics against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria resistant to cephaloridine

The in vitro activity of each of two oral [cefatrizine (BL-S640), cephalexin] and three parenteral (cefamandole, cefazolin, cephapirin) cephalosporin antibiotics was compared with that of cephalothin against 168 clinical isolates of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria selected as resistant to 20 mug of cephaloridine per ml on the basis of agar dilution susceptibility test data. Each of the five other cephalosporins inhibited a greater percentage of gram-negative bacillary isolates than did cephalothin or cephaloridine, with minimal inhibitory concentration values ranging 2- to 50-fold lower. Significant differences between minimal inhibitory concentrations of the compounds tested were also observed in tests against strains of Streptococcus faecalis and of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Potential advantages of including more than a single cephalosporin antibiotic in the panel of antibiotics used for routine susceptibility testing, suggested by these observations, are discussed.     

In vitro and in vivo comparisons of valnemulin, tiamulin, tylosin, enrofloxacin, and lincomycin/spectinomycin against Mycoplasma gallisepticum

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for valnemulin, tiamulin, enrofloxacin, tylosin, and lincomycin/spectinomycin were determined for a virulent strain of Mycoplasma gallispeticum (MG). At the initial reading, the lowest MICs were seen with valnemulin and tiamulin, followed by tylosin, enrofloxacin, and a relatively high MIC for lincomycin/spectinomycin. At the final reading, at 14 days, a similar pattern was obtained, with valnemulin giving the lowest MIC (< 0.008 mg/ml). The same strain of MG was used to infect groups of 20 2-day-old chicks in two separate experiments. In both, several concentrations of valnemulin and tiamulin and one each of tylosin and enrofloxacin were administered to separate groups in the drinking water. In the second experiment, one group of chicks was given lincomycin/spectinomycin. Each experiment had one infected unmedicated group and an uninfected unmedicated group. Mortality, clinical signs, and gross lesions, in both experiments, were significantly less (P < 0.001) in the uninfected and infected medicated groups (except for the two lowest dosages of valnemulin, lincomycin, and spectinomycin) than in the infected unmedicated groups. Also, the mean body weight gain was greater in the uninfected and infected medicated groups. Among the infected birds, MG was recovered from fewer chicks in the infected medicated groups except for the lowest two dosages of valnemulin. Serologic results were negative for the uninfected groups, and there were fewer positive reactors for the infected medicated groups except for the group treated with lincomycin/spectinomycin. Valnemulin should prove to be a useful addition to the antimicrobials in the control of MG infection in chickens.     

In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone, compared to the activities of 11 other oral antimicrobial agents against 390 aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from human and animal bite wound skin and soft tissue infections in humans

The in vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new oral 8-methoxyquinolone, was compared to the activities of 11 other oral antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, amoxicillin clavulanate, penicillin, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, and doxycycline) against 250 aerobic and 140 anaerobic bacteria recently isolated from animal and human bite wound infections. Bay 12-8039 was active against all aerobic isolates, both gram-positive and gram-negative isolates, at < or = 1.0 microg/ml (MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC90s < or = 0.25 microg/ml) and was active against most anaerobes at < or = 0.5 microg/ml; the exceptions were Fusobacterium nucleatum and other Fusobacterium species (MIC90s, > or = 4.0 microg/ml) and one strain of Prevotella loeschii (MICs, 2.0 microg/ml). In comparison, the other quinolones tested had similar in vitro activities against the aerobic strains but were less active against the anaerobes, including peptostreptococci, Porphyromonas species, and Prevotella species. The fusobacteria were relatively resistant to all the antimicrobial agents tested except penicillin G (one penicillinase-producing strain of F. nucleatum was found) and amoxicillin clavulanate.