Effect of chronic treatment with typical and atypical neuroleptics on the expression of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in rat brain

The effect of chronic treatment (21 days) with typical and atypical neuroleptics on the expression of striatal and limbic D2 and D3 dopamine receptors was investigated in rat brain by in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography. Haloperidol and sulpiride increased D2 receptor expression in striatal and limbic areas. In contrast, clozapine had no effect on D2 receptor expression. Haloperidol decreased D3 receptor expression in limbic areas, with the exception of the islands of Calleja where an increase occurred. Sulpiride and clozapine increased D3 receptor expression in limbic and striatal regions but decreased D3 receptor expression in the islands of Calleja. This study demonstrates that chronic treatment with typical and atypical neuroleptics produces different regionally specific changes in limbic and striatal D2 and D3 receptor expression. The alterations in dopamine receptor expression were different for each drug, but a distinction between the effects of atypical and typical neuroleptics could be made. Comparison of mRNA levels in animals which were not withdrawn from drug treatment with those that were withdrawn, demonstrated that some changes in receptor expression occurred during drug treatment, whilst others only manifested when drug treatment had ceased. The different regulation of dopamine D2 and D3 receptor expression by typical and atypical neuroleptics may have relevance to the ability of these drugs to cause extrapyramidal side-effects.     

S 16924 ((R)-2-[1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4] dioxin-5-Yloxy)-ethyl]-pyrrolidin-3yl]-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-ethanone), a novel, potential antipsychotic with marked serotonin (5-HT)1A agonist properties: I. Receptorial and neurochemical profile in comparison with clozapine and haloperidol

S 16924 showed a pattern of interaction at multiple (>20) native, rodent and cloned, human (h) monoaminergic receptors similar to that of clozapine and different to that of haloperidol. Notably, like clozapine, the affinity of S 16924 for hD2 and hD3 receptors was modest, and it showed 5-fold higher affinity for hD4 receptors. At each of these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding procedure, S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol behaved as antagonists. In distinction to haloperidol, S 16924 shared the marked affinity of clozapine for h5-HT2A and h5-HT2C receptors. However, an important difference to clozapine (and haloperidol) was the high affinity of S 16924 for h5-HT1A receptors. At these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding model, both S 16924 and clozapine behaved as partial agonists, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In vivo, the agonist properties of S 16924 at 5-HT1A autoreceptors were revealed by its ability to potently inhibit the firing of raphe-localized serotoninergic neurones, an action reversed by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635. In contrast, clozapine and haloperidol only weakly inhibited raphe firing, and their actions were resistant to WAY 100,635. Similarly, S 16924 more potently inhibited striatal turnover of 5-HT than either clozapine or haloperidol. Reflecting its modest affinity for D2 (and D3) autoreceptors, S 16924 only weakly blocked the inhibitory influence of the dopaminergic agonist, apomorphine, upon the firing rate of ventrotegmental area-localized dopaminergic neurones. Further, S 16924 only weakly increased striatal, mesolimbic and mesocortical turnover of dopamine (DA). Clozapine was, similarly, weakly active in these models, whereas haloperidol, in line with its higher affinity at D2 (and D3) receptors, was potently active. In the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, S 16924 dose-dependently reduced dialysate levels of 5-HT, whereas those of DA and NAD were dose-dependently increased in the same samples. In contrast, although S 16924 also suppressed 5-HT levels in the striatum and nucleus accumbens, DA levels therein were unaffected. Clozapine mimicked this selective increase in DA levels in the FCX as compared to striatum and accumbens. In contrast, haloperidol modestly increased DA levels in the FCX, striatum and accumbens to the same extent. In distinction to S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol exerted little influence upon 5-HT levels. Finally, the influence of S 16924 upon FCX levels of 5-HT, DA (and NAD) was attenuated by WAY 100,635. In conclusion, S 16924 possesses a profile of interaction at multiple monoaminergic receptors comparable to that of clozapine and distinct to that of haloperidol. In addition, S 16924 is a potent, partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors. Correspondingly, acute administration of S 16924 decreases cerebral serotoninergic transmission and selectively reinforces frontocortical as compared to subcortical dopaminergic transmission. In line with these actions, S 16924 shows a distinctive profile of activity in functional (behavioral) models of potential antipsychotic activity (companion paper).     

Medial prefrontal cortical D2 and striatolimbic D4 dopamine receptors: common targets for typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs

1. In vitro receptor autoradiography was used to examine the long-term effects of a typical (fluphenazine), atypical (clozapine), or potential atypical antipsychotic (S[+]-N-n-propylnorapomorphine; [+]-NPA) on different dopamine (DA) receptor subtypes. 2. D1-Like and D3 receptor levels were not changed with any treatment in any brain region examined. 3. D2 Receptors in caudate-putamen (CPu), nucleus accumbens (NAc) and olfactory tubercle (OT) were significantly increased by long-term treatment with fluphenazine, but not with clozapine or S[+]-NPA. 4. D2 Receptor levels in medial prefrontal cortex (MPC), but not dorsolateral frontal cortex (DFC), were elevated after repeated daily administration of fluphenazine, clozapine, and S[+]-NPA. 5. D4-Like receptors, assayed under D4-selective conditions, were increased by fluphenazine, clozapine and S(+)-NPA in both NAc and CPu, but by none of these treatments in OT, DFC or MPC. 6. These results support a common role for medial prefrontal cortical D2 and striatolimbic D4 receptors in mediating the clinical actions of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs.     

Relative predispositional effects and mode of inheritance of HLA-DRB1 alleles among community-based Caucasian females with rheumatoid arthritis

This review addresses two questions. First, why does clozapine apparently occupy low levels of dopamine D2 receptors in patients, in contrast to all other antipsychotic drugs which occupy 70-80% of brain dopamine D2 receptors? Second, what is the receptor basis of action of antipsychotic drugs which elicit low levels of Parkinsonism? Antipsychotic doses of clozapine occupy between 0% and 50% of D2 receptors, as measured in patients by a variety of radioligands. It has recently been found, however, that the percent occupancy of a receptor by a drug depends on the radioligand used to measure that receptor. Based on this new finding, this review concludes that clozapine clinically occupies high levels of D2 receptors in the absence of any radioligand. This occupancy is estimated to be of the order of 70-80% in the dopamine-rich region of the human striatum, and even higher in the limbic D2-containing regions which are low in endogenous synaptic dopamine. This conclusion arises from two different approaches. One approach is to relate the reported clozapine occupancies in the human striatum with the dissociation constants of the various radioligands at the D2 receptor. This relation extrapolates to approximately 70-80% occupancy by clozapine when clozapine competes with endogenous dopamine at the D2 receptor. The second approach is to calculate the D2 occupancy of each antipsychotic drug, using the average spinal fluid concentration and the correct dissociation constant of the antipsychotic, thereby revealing that all antipsychotic drugs, including clozapine, occupy approximately 70-80% of dopamine D2 receptors in the human striatum, and possibly higher in the limbic regions. As determined by the new dissociation constants, antipsychotic drugs which elicit Parkinsonism (trifluperazine, chlorpromazine, raclopride, haloperidol, fluphenazine, risperidone) bind more tightly than dopamine to D2, while those antipsychotic drugs which elicit little or no Parkinsonism (melperone, seroquel, perlapine, clozapine, remoxipride, molindone, sulpiride, olanzapine, sertindole) bind more loosely than dopamine to D2 receptors. Compared to the tightly bound antipsychotic drugs, the more loosely bound antipsychotics generally require higher clinical doses, require fewer days for clinical adjustment, but may dissociate from the D2 receptor more rapidly and could lead to clinical relapse somewhat earlier than that found with the traditional tightly bound antipsychotic drugs.     

BIMG 80, a novel potential antipsychotic drug: evidence for multireceptor actions and preferential release of dopamine in prefrontal cortex

In radioligand binding studies, BIMG 80, a new putative antipsychotic, displayed good affinity at certain serotonin (5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT6), dopamine (D1, D2L, D4), and noradrenergic (alpha1) receptors. The effect of acute subcutaneous BIMG 80, clozapine, haloperidol, risperidone, amperozide, olanzapine, and Seroquel was then investigated on dopamine release in medial prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and striatum in freely moving rats using the microdialysis technique. Four different neurochemical profiles resulted from the studies: (a) Systemic administration of BIMG 80, clozapine, and amperozide produced greater percent increases in dopamine efflux in medial prefrontal cortex than in the striatum or the nucleus accumbens. (b) Haloperidol induced a similar increase in dopamine concentrations in the striatum and nucleus accumbens with no effect in the medial prefrontal cortex. (c) Risperidone and olanzapine stimulated dopamine release to a similar extent in all brain regions investigated. (d) Seroquel failed to change significantly dopamine output both in the medial prefrontal cortex and in the striatum. Because an increase in dopamine release in the medial prefrontal cortex may be predictive of effectiveness in treating negative symptoms and in the striatum may be predictive of induction of extrapyramidal side effects, BIMG 80 appears to be a potential antipsychotic compound active on negative symptoms of schizophrenia with a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects.     

Clozapine, haloperidol, and the D4 antagonist PNU-101387G: in vivo effects on mesocortical, mesolimbic, and nigrostriatal dopamine and serotonin release

With in vivo microvoltammetry, the dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists, clozapine (D4/D2), haloperidol (D2) and the selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G, were evaluated for their effects on DA and serotonin (5-HT) release within A10 neuronal terminal fields [mesocortical, prefrontal cortex (PFC), mesolimbic, nucleus accumbens, (NAcc)] and within A9 neuronal terminal fields [nigrostriatal, caudate putamen (CPU)], in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats. Clozapine, which also has 5-HT2 receptor antagonist properties, significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within A10 terminal fields, PFC and NAcc; DA release was not increased by clozapine within A9 terminals, CPU. Serotonin release was significantly (p < 0.001) increased by clozapine within A10 and A9 terminal fields. Haloperidol significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, but not within NAcc; haloperidol had a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase on 5-HT release within PFC [only at the highest dose studied (2.5 mg/kg)] and within CPU [only at the lowest dose studied 1.0 mg/kg) (p < 0.05)]. The selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, modestly, but significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, did not alter DA release within NAcc at the lowest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg) and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased DA release within NAcc at the highest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg). The selective D4 antagonist did not affect 5-HT release within either A10 or A9 terminal fields. The present data are discussed in terms of the neurochemistry, antipsychotic activity, and side effect profiles of clozapine and haloperidol, in order to provide comparative profiles for a selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G.     

Effects of in utero cocaine exposure on the expression of mRNAS encoding the dopamine transporter and the D1, D2 and D5 dopamine receptor subtypes in fetal rhesus monkey

The effects of in utero cocaine exposure on the development of the mRNAs encoding the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the D1, D2 and D5 dopamine receptor subtypes were determined in fetal monkey brains at day 45 and day 60 of gestation. Pregnant monkeys were treated with cocaine 3 mg/kg or saline i.m., four times a day from day 18 of gestation until the pregnancy was terminated at day 45 or day 60. The fetal brains were dissected, and tissue RNA extracted and quantified using ribonuclease protection assay analysis. In day 45 fetal monkeys, dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtype mRNAs and DAT mRNA were found in low quantities both in control and cocaine-treated subjects. In day 60 fetal monkeys, D1 receptor mRNA levels were highest in the frontal cortex/striatal area, and low to moderate quantities were found in diencephalic and mesencephalic fetal brain regions. Dopamine D2 receptor mRNA levels were highest in the frontal cortex/striatal area, diencephalon and the midbrain, moderate in the brainstem and low in the caudal temporal lobe and surrounding cortical areas. Dopamine D5 receptor mRNA was expressed in low quantities throughout the day 60 fetal monkey brain, whereas DAT mRNA was found in the midbrain only. In utero cocaine exposure caused a significant increase in dopamine D1, D2 and D5 receptor subtype mRNAs in the frontal cortex/striatal area of day 60 fetal monkeys. These results support the hypothesis that dopamine synthesis and release may be reduced in cocaine-treated fetuses, which results in dopamine receptor up-regulation.     

Effect of scopolamine on the efflux of dopamine and its metabolites after clozapine, haloperidol or thioridazine

The extracellular concentrations of dopamine (DA) and its metabolites, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens were measured in awake, freely-moving rats. Clozapine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) increased extracellular DA and HVA in both regions but increased DOPAC only in the striatum. Scopolamine (1 mg/kg), although it had no effect by itself in the striatum or nucleus accumbens, inhibited the ability of clozapine to increase extracellular DA, DOPAC and HVA concentrations in the striatum. The clozapine-induced increase in DA in the frontal cortex was not blocked by scopolamine. Haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and thioridazine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) also increased extracellular DA, DOPAC and HVA in the striatum, but scopolamine pretreatment did not inhibit these increases. The results suggest that clozapine differs from haloperidol and thioridazine in that the effect of clozapine, but not that of the two neuroleptic drugs, to increase DA release in the striatum acutely depends on muscarinic receptor stimulation. These results suggest that clozapine, despite its strong muscarinic antagonist properties, does not produce full blockade of muscarinic receptors in vivo in the striatum. The interaction of clozapine with the cholinergic system in the striatum could be relevant to its lack of ability to produce extrapyramidal symptoms or tardive dyskinesia.     

Evidence that an OX-2-positive cell can inhibit the stimulation of type 1 cytokine production by bone marrow-derived B7-1 (and B7-2)-positive dendritic cells

The present study was designed to compare the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the nucleus accumbens (NAC), using in vivo microdialysis with dual probe implantation in awake, freely moving rats. Amperozide (2 and 10 mg/kg), clozapine (5 and 20 mg/kg), and olanzapine (10 mg/kg), all of which are atypical antipsychotics, produced greater increases in extracellular DA levels in the mPFC than in the NAC. Olanzapine (1 mg/kg), risperidone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), also an atypical antipsychotic, and S-(-)-sulpiride (25 mg/kg), a typical antipsychotic, produced comparable increases in extracellular DA levels in the mPFC and the NAC. S-(-)-sulpiride (10 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), another typical antipsychotic, significantly increased extracellular DA levels in the NAC but not in the mPFC. The effects of the six antipsychotic drugs to increase extracellular DA levels in the mPFC relative to those in the NAC was positively correlated with the difference between their pKi values for serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT2A) and DA-D2 receptors and was inversely correlated to their pKi values for D2 or D3 receptors, but was not for 5-HT2A receptors alone. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the ability of antipsychotic drugs to produce a greater increase in prefrontal compared with NAC extracellular DA levels may be related, in part, to weak D2 and D3 receptor affinity relative to 5-HT2A receptor antagonism.     

Long-term treatment with haloperidol or clozapine does not affect dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex

We examined the effects of long-term treatment with haloperidol and clozapine on dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex. Dopamine D4 receptor binding sites were indirectly determined from the displacement experiments of [3H]clozapine binding using nemonapride. Three-weeks administration of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) or clozapine (10 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the D4 receptors in the frontal cortex. The density of D2 receptors, determined by [3H]spiperone binding to striatum, was increased by long-term treatment with haloperidol, but it was not significantly changed by that with clozapine.     

Identification of the populations of enteric neurons that have NK1 tachykinin receptors in the guinea-pig small intestine

In the present study we have compared the effects of the classical antipsychotic drug haloperidol and four different atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, ziprasidone) on extracellular levels of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) of conscious rats. Haloperidol (10, 100 and 800 nmol/kg), clozapine (0.3, 1, 10 and 30 micromol/kg), risperidone (100, 500 and 5000 nmol/kg), olanzapine (10, 100 and 500 nmol/kg) and ziprasidone (10, 100 and 1000 nmol/kg) were administered subcutaneously to rats. All compounds induced increases in dialysate levels of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex. The increases induced by the four antipsychotic agents in extracellular levels of dopamine and noradrenaline displayed a striking co-variation both in dose and time. A similar co-variation was seen in the decrease of dopamine and noradrenaline, after administration of a low dose (30 nmol/kg, s.c.) of the dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist (+)-7-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino) tetralin ((+)-7-OH-DPAT). It is concluded that there is a close coupling between the release of dopamine and noradrenaline in the medial prefrontal cortex. The mechanism of action of this interaction, that might be of importance for a better understanding of the mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs, is discussed.     

Different effects of subchronic clozapine and haloperidol on dye-coupling between neurons in the rat striatal complex

Atypical antipsychotic drugs, such as clozapine, are distinguished from classical antipsychotics (e.g. haloperidol) by their lower liability for producing motor side-effects. Although initial studies suggested that the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is related to their affinity for the D2 dopamine receptor, the delayed onset of both the therapeutic effects and the extrapyramidal symptoms associated with these drugs implicates a more complex mechanism of action. In this study, we found that continuous (but not acute) treatment of rats with either drug caused an increase in dye coupling between neurons in the limbic component of the rat striatal complex (i.e. the shell region of the nucleus accumbens) after withdrawal of the drugs. Furthermore, continuous treatment with haloperidol, but not clozapine, also increased dye coupling in the motor-related part of the striatal complex (i.e. the dorsal striatum). Thus, both therapeutically effective drugs show a delayed effect on dye coupling between neurons in the accumbens shell, whereas only the drug associated with motor side effects altered coupling between cells in the dorsal striatum. Antipsychotic drugs may therefore alleviate the profound disturbances in cognitive function of schizophrenics by producing sustained alterations in the way signals from the cortex are integrated within these brain regions.     

Iodine-123-iodobenzamide SPECT assessment of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in riperidone-treated schizophrenic patients

The recently introduced neuroleptic, risperidone, was expected to block fewer dopamine D2 receptors than typical neuroleptics (e.g., haloperidol), but at comparable potency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in relation to the neuroleptic dosage and to correlate the findings with the presence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Additionally, the data were compared to previous iodobenzamide (IBZM) SPECT findings in patients treated with other neuroleptics, haloperidol and clozapine. METHODS: In 20 patients with schizophrenia [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Third Edition-Revised)] treated with mean daily doses of risperidone ranging from 0.029 to 0.128 mg/kg body weight, SPECT was performed 2 hr after intravenous injection of 185 MBq 123I-IBZM, a selective dopamine D2 receptor ligand. Striatal IBZM binding was assessed by calculating a striatal/frontal cortex ratio, expressed as a percentage of the control value. RESULTS: Selective dopamine D2 receptor binding of the ligand was reduced in all treated patients, with binding values ranging from 7% to 68%. The degree of occupancy displayed an exponential dose-response relationship (r = -0.86; p < 0.0001). The slope of the curve was between those of haloperidol and clozapine but was closer and more similar in shape to the curve of haloperidol. Extrapyramidal symptoms were observed in 8 of 20 patients with binding values between 7% and 47%. However, there was no clear relationship between the degree of receptor occupancy and the presence of EPS. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest an exponential dose-response relationship between the daily dosage of risperidone and the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. The blockade of specific striatal IBZM binding found under therapy with risperidone is between those of haloperidol and clozapine. The dose-response curve for risperidone, however, shows greater similarity to that of haloperidol.     

Role of renal interstitial pressure on chronic control of arterial blood pressure

We examined the modulatory effect of serotonergic activities on haloperidol-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatum. Chronic treatment with haloperidol (0.1, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p., 3 weeks) increased the number of dopamine D2 receptors, while no increase was observed with atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine (10 mg/kg) and ORG 5222 (0.25 mg/kg). Chronic treatment with MK 212, a serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C receptor agonist (2.5 mg/kg), or with citalopram, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (10 mg/kg), potentiated the haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg)-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptor, while that with (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist (0.1 mg/kg), had no influence on the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Co-administration of ritanserin (1 mg/kg), a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, with a low dose of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), but not with a high dose of the agent (0.5 mg/kg), attenuated the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Drug occupation of 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors in vivo examined with use of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) was 69.8% and 45.1%, respectively, after the acute administration of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) plus ritanserin (1 mg/kg). This profile that 5-HT2A receptors were highly occupied compared with dopamine D2 receptors was similar to that of clozapine or ORG 5222. These results suggest that potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonism versus weak dopamine D2 receptor blockade may be involved in the absence of up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors after chronic treatment with clozapine or ORG 5222.     

Symptomatic colonic polyps in childhood: not so benign

We investigated the degree of striatal dopamine-2 (D2) receptor occupancy in six schizophrenic patients receiving clinically effective antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10-25 mg/day in comparison to patients treated with clozapine 300-600 mg/day (n = 6) or haloperidol 5-20 mg/day (n = 10). 123I Iodobenzamide (IBZM) and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) were used for the visualization of striatal D2 receptors. For the quantification of striatal D2 receptor occupancy, striatal IBZM binding in patients treated with antipsychotics was compared to that in untreated healthy controls (n = 8) reported earlier. Olanzapine led to a mean striatal D2 receptor occupancy rate of 75% (range 63-85). Haloperidol-treated patients showed dose-dependently (Pearson r = 0.64; P < 0.05) a significantly higher (P < 0.05) mean occupancy rate of 84% (range 67-94). During clozapine treatment, the mean D2 receptor occupancy of 33% (range < 20-49) was significantly lower than with olanzapine (P < 0.005). The higher striatal D2 receptor occupancy of haloperidol was correlated with the incidence and severity of extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPS). No clinical relevant EPS occurred during treatment with olanzapine or clozapine. There was no correlation between the degree of striatal D2 receptor occupancy and clinical improvement.     

Identification of genetic markers associated with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome in an Afrikaner population

The noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists dizocilpine and phencyclidine cause behavioral changes in animals that can be blocked by antipsychotic agents, implicating NMDA receptors in the expression of schizophrenic symptoms. In the present study, we examined the effects of dizocilpine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) on locomotor activity and on the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 immediate-early genes (IEGs) in mice. Results indicate that dizocilpine increases locomotor activity and selectively increases the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate cortex. Haloperidol (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (0.6-1.25 mg/kg) block both the locomotor response and the increased IEG immunoreactivity induced by dizocilpine (0.6 mg/kg). The 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin (0.06-0.25 mg/kg), ketanserin (0.03-0.12 mg/kg) and amesergide (0. 3-1.25 mg/kg) also significantly attenuated the locomotor response to dizocilpine. Haloperidol and clozapine suppressed the head weaving induced by dizocilpine, but ritanserin, as previously reported did not. Although some attenuation of the c-fos and hsp-70 immunoreactivity was seen with the 5-HT2 antagonists it was less pronounced than that induced by haloperidol or clozapine. In conclusion, 5-HT2 antagonists as well as antipsychotic compounds attenuate the locomotor response to dizocilpine in mice. Haloperidol and clozapine appear to be more effective, however, in attenuating the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate gyrus than 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin, ketanserin or amesergide. We thus have seen a dissociation in the capacity of compounds to alter the effects on behavior and IEG expression after dizocilpine administration.     

Trimidox-mediated morphological changes during erythroid differentiation is associated with the stimulation of hemoglobin and F-cell production in human K562 cells

Previous studies have demonstrated that stimulation of the ventral hippocampal (VH) formation (including the ventral CA1 and subicular areas) elicits increased locomotor activity in rats. The locomotor-activating effects of VH stimulation have been hypothesized to be mediated via hippocampal output to cortical and subcortical dopamine (DA) systems. This study examined whether increased locomotor activity produced by VH stimulation was blocked by pretreatment with a DA receptor antagonist, and whether DA metabolism in subdivisions of the nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen, and prefrontal cortex was elevated by VH stimulation. Stimulation of the VH (defined as the ventral CA1 and its borders, ventral subiculum, and entorhinal cortex) with the cholinergic agonist carbachol was found to elevate locomotor activity, while pretreatment with the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol blocked this effect. Stimulation of the VH did not alter DA metabolism (i.e., ratio of the DA metabolites DOPAC or HVA/DA) in any of the brain regions studied. These results indicate that the increased locomotor activity elicited by VH stimulation is not associated with dramatic increases in DA metabolism, but that it does require tonic activation of D2 receptors.     

Expression of mRNAs encoding dopamine receptors in striatal regions is differentially regulated by midbrain and hippocampal neurons

The glutamate analogue kainic acid was injected into the hippocampus of intact or 6-hydroxydopamine deafferented rats to investigate the influence of hippocampal neurons on the expression of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNAs in subregions of the striatal complex and possible modulation by dopaminergic neurons. Quantitative in situ hybridization using 35S-labeled oligonucleotide probes specific for dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNAs, respectively, were used. It was found that an injection of kainic acid into the hippocampal formation had alone no significant effect on dopamine D1 or D2 receptor mRNA levels in any of the analyzed striatal subregions in animals analyzed 4 h after the injections. Kainic acid stimulation in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the dopamine lesion produced an increase in D1 receptor mRNA levels in the ipsilateral medial caudate-putamen, and a bilateral increase in core and shell of nucleus accumbens (ventral striatal limbic regions). A unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion alone caused an increase in D2 receptor mRNA in the lateral caudate-putamen (dorsal striatal motor region) ipsilateral to the lesion and an increase in D1 receptor mRNA in the accumbens core ipsilateral to the lesion. However, in dopamine-lesioned animals, dopamine D1 receptor mRNA levels were increased bilaterally in nucleus accumbens core and shell and in the ipsilateral medial caudate-putamen following kainic acid stimulation in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the dopamine lesion. These results indicate a differential regulation of the expression of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNAs by midbrain and hippocampal neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relationship between mixed venous saturation and cardiac index, hemoglobin and oxygen consumption in aortic surgery]

Recent evidence from studies of receptor occupancy and regulation in post-mortem brains of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders and in non-human primates is providing new leads in the ongoing quest to understand the pathophysiology and causes of schizophrenia and to develop more effective methods of treatment. These studies suggest that the cerebral cortex may harbour the elusive common sites of action of antipsychotic medications and indicate that chronic treatment with these drugs differentially regulates both families of dopamine receptors in this structure. Upregulation of the cortical dopamine D2 receptors is accompanied by a downregulation of the D1 sites. Balancing the opposing actions of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor regulation may hold the key to optimal drug therapy and to understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In this article, Michael Lidow, Graham Williams and Patricia Goldman-Rakic review the evidence supporting the cerebral cortex as a pivotal site for these mechanisms underlying the action of antipsychotics.     

Clozapine and haloperidol block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and associated genomic responses in rats

Behavioral sensitization resulting from repeated, intermittent exposure to psychostimulants such as amphetamine (Amp) is hypothesized to model pathophysiology of psychotic disorders. The present study was designed to characterize the effects of a typical and an atypical antipsychotic drug, haloperidol and clozapine, respectively, on the induction of context-independent sensitization to Amp. Peripheral Amp treatment for five days (2 mg/kg/day, s.c.) produced an augmented stimulant response to an acute Amp challenge (2 mg/kg, s.c.) given seven days after the last pretreatment injection. Interestingly, preexposure to high doses of either clozapine (20 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) alone also led to a sensitized behavioral response to an acute Amp challenge. The cross-sensitization between Amp and high doses of the haloperidol and clozapine may have occluded any blockade of Amp behavioral sensitization by the antipsychotics. Indeed, administration of a lower dose of clozapine (4 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) with Amp during the preexposure phase clearly blocked the induction of behavioral sensitization. In addition to the behavioral sensitization, Amp-pretreated rats showed a reduction in the ability of the acute Amp challenge to induce c-fos mRNA in the medial prefrontal cortex and neurotensin/neuromedin N (NT/N) mRNA in the nucleus accumbens-shell. At doses that blocked the initiation of behavioral sensitization to Amp, clozapine fully and haloperidol partially restored the capacity of acute Amp to induce c-fos and NT/N gene expression. These data lend support to the psychostimulant-sensitization model of psychosis and a role of dopamine D2-like receptors in the phenomenon.