2004年阳江MS4.9地震震源参数分析

利用广东数字地震台网的资料计算了2004年9月17日广东阳江Ms4.9地震的震源机制为:节面走向57°,倾角47°,滑动角69°,主压应力方向342°,倾角0°,主张应力方向252°,倾角75°,属逆断层性质;地震矩为1.69×1015N·m,应力降为1.7 MPa,震源半径为876 m.根据阳江地区震前22个ML＞2.5的中小地震震源参数,得到一些经验关系.S波拐角频率随时间的变化显示出Ms4.9地震前有下降趋势;阳江序列P轴方位角的变化显示出震前4个月应力开始趋于一致.     

Source parameters of the Gonghe,Qinghai Province,China,earthquake from inversion of digital broadband waveform data

ＳｏｕｒｃｅｐａｒａｍｅｔｅｒｓｏｆｔｈｅＧｏｎｇｈｅ，ＱｉｎｇｈａｉＰｒｏｖｉｎｃｅ，Ｃｈｉｎａ，ｅａｒｔｈｑｕａｋｅｆｒｏｍｉｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎｏｆｄｉｇｉｔａｌｂｒｏａｄｂａｎｄｗａｖｅｆｏｒｍｄａｔａＬＩ－ＳＨＥＮＧＸＵ（许立生）ａｎｄＹＵＮ...     

姚安地震序列与大姚地震序列震源参数的对比研究

2000年1月15日在云南省姚安县发生了M_S6.5地震, 2003年7月21日和10月16日在云南省大姚县发生了M_S6.2、 M_S6.1地震。 这两个地震序列均发生在滇中块体, 震中位置相距42.5 km, 构造、 应力背景相似, 但序列类型不同, 时间间隔短。 为深入研究姚安地震和大姚地震序列的特征, 根据昆明区域数字台网记录的数字地震波资料, 利用遗传算法计算了2000年姚安地震和2003年大姚地震序列的震源参数。 研究结果表明, 姚安地震序列和大姚地震序列的地震矩和近震震级有很好的线性关系, 它们的地震矩M₀均在10¹²~10¹⁴ N·m, 地震矩与震源半径之间呈线性关系。 应力降随震级变化不明显。 拐角频率和地震矩之间有明显的依赖关系, 用最小二乘法拟合拐角频率和地震矩的关系式, 利用此关系式可计算出给定地震矩的拐角频率估计值f_a, 进而可分析实际计算的拐角频率与估计值之差(f_c-f_a)的时间变化曲线。 姚安地震序列和大姚地震序列实际计算的拐角频率与估计值之差(f_c-f_a)及应力降随时间的变化表现出了不同的特征: 姚安地震序列的应力降和拐角频率差值在4.3级和4.6级强余震前均有一个上升-下降过程, 反映余震区应力场有一个增高-下降过程; 大姚地震序列应力降和拐角频率差值在M_S≥4.6强余震发生之前均会出现高值异常, 但在M_S4.6～4.7地震之前出现的高值异常持续时间短, 在M_S6.1地震前出现的高值异常持续较长。 文中结合两个地震的发震构造, 序列类型等特征进行了分析讨论。     

2004年9月17日阳江4.9级地震概述

2004年9月17日广东阳江发生了4.9级地震,从地震序列、震中位置及等震线分布判断本次4.9级地震仍属1969年阳江6.4级地震＂老＂震区的晚期地震活动,与该区已发生的4～5级地震序列活动类似,具有前期余震频度、强度衰减快的特点.宏观调查及震源机制证实平冈断裂是此次4.9级地震的主要控震和发震构造.震前曾出现了一定数量的前兆异常,但地震学异常不显著,震前中小地震活动未出现异常活跃或异常平静.     

2001年4月阳江ML4.7级地震的异常与分析

分析了2001年4月阳江ML4．7地震前后的地震活动性和前兆异常，并对该区地震活动特征和未来地震活动趋势进行了讨论。     

1999年11月29日岫岩5.4级地震序列震源参数测定及标度关系分析

根据Andrews谱积分的方法, 采用近震源Brune圆盘模型, 测定了1999年11月29日辽宁岫岩M_S5.4地震序列的震源参数。 结果表明, 得到辐射能量与震级的关系, 与古登堡-里克特给出的关系基本一致; 地震矩与震级的关系中斜率和截距都小于陈培善等给出的全球结果; 视应力与震级呈半对数线性关系; 在双对数坐标下视应力随地震矩的增加而增加; 地震矩随拐角频率的7次方衰减, 在地震序列的不同阶段各参数的拟合关系斜率也不完全相同。     

2001年4月22日阳江4.2级地震前部分地震波参数变化特征

应用广东数字遥测地震台网的数字化的地震形资料，研究阳江地震前，地震波波形时间线性度、平均半周期和地震波波形空间线性度等地震波参数变化特征。结果表明，震前半年时间内，上述地震波参数不同程度地出现下降异常。利用线性偏振度自动检测的P、S波初至具有可靠的精度，为广泛利用地震波参数预报地震提供了方便。     

实现数据库管理震源参数的探索

就如何利用数据库，结合Java、XML等手段对震源参数管理进行了一些探索，并给出了一些在一个实际系统中实现了的例子。     

Inversion of near-field waveform data for earthquake source rupture process ( II ): Inversion of Chi Chi earthquake source, 20 September, 1999, Taiwan

The new inversion algorithm developed based on the recent progress in the nonlinear programming study by us is used to invert the earthquake source process of Chi Chi earthquake M _w7.6, 20 Semptember, 1999, Taiwan. A curve fault model is constructed in our inversion to make the fault model close to the real rupturing fault to reduce the influence from the discrepancy between the constructed fault model and the real rupturing fault. The results show that (1) the rupture process of the Chi Chi earthquake source lasted about 32 seconds and the main faulting occurred between 6th to 21st second after the start of the ruptures and the high slip area were mainly located at the northern segment of the fault. (2) The slip was dominated by thrust faulting. The average rake angle was 64.5°, which was very consistent with those inverted by USGS, Harvard and CWB (Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan). The amount of the moment inverted in this paper was 7.76×10²⁰ NM, which was a slightly bigger than those inverted by USGS and Harvard. (3) A clear nucleation step existed in the source faulting process and it lasted about 6 seconds. The moment release rate accelerated obviously at the end of the nucleation step. The faulting started from the southern segment and mainly occurred at the northern segment after 10 seconds. At the end of this paper, we analyzed the reliability of the inversion result via comparing with the GPS observations and discussed its scientific signification.     

1950年西藏察隅M8.6强震序列震源参数复核

1950年8月15日西藏察隅发生M8.6巨大地震.我们利用收集到的全球239个台站的P波资料,利用我国国家测震台网的常规定位方法和模型,对察隅M8.6强震序列进行了重新定位,并在此基础上重新计算了震源机制解.重定位后的结果表明,察隅M8.6强震序列显示出不同时段的震中分区分布特征:第1阶段是前震,1950年2月23日在墨脱北部雅鲁藏布江大拐弯的顶部发生;第2阶段是1950年8月15日─1950年8月18日,发生主震和之后3天内的余震,都分布在察隅附近,并且这些震中呈北西条带分布;第3阶段的余震是1950年8月22日─1950年9月13日,它们扩展到南部的印度和缅甸地区;第4阶段的余震是1950年9月30日─1951年4月15日,发生在西部的墨脱、错那等地.这四个分区的关联特点为顺时针旋移.重新计算后的震源机制解显示出:主震的NWW走向的节面与主震后2区内余震震中的NWW分布方向一致;序列中所有的压应力轴P和张应力轴T,都接近于水平向,其倾伏角大都小于20°;察隅主震和2区内余震的压应力轴P为近南北向,张应力轴T为近东西向;但3区和4区余震的P轴为近东西向,T轴为近南北向.反映出该强震序列中余震震源机制解的差异比较大.     

2009年姚安6.0级地震序列研究

2009年7月9日在云南省姚安县发生M6.0地震,利用云南区域数字地震台网记录的ML≥2.0余震波形记录,通过对S波观测记录谱进行传播路径、场地响应和仪器响应等影响的逐一消除,得到131个地震的震源谱.进而根据Brune圆盘震源模型,利用遗传算法计算地震矩、应力降、震源半径等震源参数.结果表明,该地震序列的M0在1012-1016N·m,与近震震级有很好的线性关系,与震源半径呈线性关系;应力降与近震震级有一定线性趋势相关性;拐角频率和地震矩M0之间有明显的依赖关系.     

Inversion of near-field waveform data for earthquake source rupture process (Ⅱ): Inversion of Chi Chiearthquake source, 20 September, 1999, Taiwan

The new inversion algorithm developed based on the recent progress in the nonlinear programming study by us is used to invert the earthquake source process of Chi Chi earthquake Mw7.6, 20 Semptember,1999, Taiwan. A curve fault model is constructed in our inversion to make the fault model close to the real rupturing fault to reduce the influence from the discrepancy between the constructed fault model and the real rupturing fault. The results show that (1) the rupture process of the Chi Chi earthquake source lasted about 32 seconds and the main faulting occurred between 6th to 21st second after the start of the ruptures and the high slip area were mainly located at the northern segment of the fault. (2) The slip was dominated by thrust faulting. The average rake angle was 64.5°, which was very consistent with those inverted by USGS, Harvard and CWB (Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan). The amount of the moment inverted in this paper was 7.76×1020 NM, which was a slightly bigger than those inverted by USGS and Harvard. (3) A clear nucleation step existed in the source faulting process and it lasted about 6 seconds. The moment release rate accelerated obviously at the end of the nucleation step. The faulting started from the southern segment and mainly occurred at the northern segment after 10 seconds. At the end of this paper, we analyzed the reliability of the inversion result via comparing with the GPS observations and discussed its scientific signification.     

A new approach for separating mixed model parameters: application to simultaneous inversion of earthquake source parameters

A method for simultaneous determination of mixed model parameters, which have different physical dimensions or different responses to data, is presented. Mixed parameter estimation from observed data within a single model space shows instabilities and trade-offs of the solutions. We separate the model space into N-subspaces based on their physical properties or computational convenience and solve the N-subspaces systems by damped least-squares and singular-value decomposition. Since the condition number of each subsystem is smaller than that of the single global system, the approach can greatly increase the stability of the inversion. We also introduce different damping factors into the subsystems to reduce the trade-offs between the different parameters. The damping factors depend on the conditioning of the subsystems and may be adequately chosen in a range from 0.1 % to 10 % of the largest singular value. We illustrate the method with an example of simultaneous determination of source history, source geometry, and hypocentral location from regional seismograms, although it is applicable to any geophysical inversion.     

中国大陆主要地震活动区中小地震震源参数研究

本文利用中国大陆几个主要地震活动区近几年积累的大量ML≥3.0数字地震观测记录,在分别反演得到13个不同构造研究区域的介质衰减模型、348个台站的场地效应的基础上,自0.1~20 Hz的SH观测波形数据中逐步消除了仪器、噪声、几何扩散、传播路径的介质衰减、台站场地效应等影响后,恢复了2573次3.0≤ML≤6.0地震的震源谱,采用ω平方震源模型拟合震源谱后,利用Brune的圆盘模型计算了它们的震源参数,并讨论了中国大陆中小地震的震源特征,比较了中国大陆不同地区的应力降释放水平,综合讨论了地震应力降与震源深度、机制解类型、地震大小等各种因素的关系.研究表明,中国大陆中小地震释放的应力降在0.1~20 MPa之间,绝大多数在10 MPa以下.新疆天山中东段地区、青藏块体东北缘及龙门山断裂带东北缘是高应力降地震集中的区域,表明这里的断层受到相对较强的构造剪应力作用.中小地震释放的应力降随着震级的增大而增大,应力降Δσ∝M03.14,不遵循常数应力降模型.在深度20 km以内,中小地震释放的应力降对深度的依赖不显著,但在20 km以上深度显示出随深度增大而增大的现象.中小地震释放的应力降没有表现出与震源机制类型的相关性.本研究实现了震源参数的准实时计算,丰富了大陆块体内部地震震源定标率关系研究的样本.可以预见,随着中小地震数据的大量产出和积累,这些震源参数的时空分布特征研究将会为地震预测预报研究提供有实际物理意义的依据,得到的介质衰减模型及场地效应等也将对台网日常震级ML测定所需的量规函数、台站校正值的研究提供重要参考.     

Changes in source parameters of foreshocks and aftershocks of the 2001 M_S=6.0 Yajiang, Sichuan, earthquake

Introduction An MS=6.0 earthquake occurred on February 23, 2001 in Yajiang county, Sichuan Province. The earthquake is located on the east of the southeast segment of the Litang-Dewu fault with strike of NW. Before the event, on February 14, an MS=5.0 earthquake took place nearly in the same place. In 1948 an MS=7.3 earthquake occurred on the northwestern segment of the Litang fault. The length of the surface rupture belt caused by the earthquake is 70 km, which extended from Litang to…     

2008年汶川8.0级地震序列震源参数分段特征的研究

本文利用四川省区域固定地震台网观测记录到的2008年汶川8.0级地震序列的资料,从中挑选部分台站和地震资料,在精确扣除了余震区地震波衰减与台站场地响应后,计算得到了汶川地震序列中1070次ML≥3.0级地震的震源参数,结果显示,地震矩与震级之间有较好的线性关系,应力降和视应力的大小与震级大小有关.利用ML3.0级地震资料得到的应力降的时空演变过程研究结果表明,汶川余震序列地震应力降总体上随时间是一个衰减过程,预示着主震发生后整个余震区应力降呈逐渐衰减的状态.主震发生之后,以虎牙—北川—安县为界,空间上龙门山断裂带上地震活动水平和应力降具有明显的分段性.5月17日之前ML≥5.0余震主要集中在龙门山断裂带北川以西,由于地震释放了较多应力,该地区应力降较低,而北川至青川之间地震活动水平相对较弱,应力降一直处于高值水平.5月17日之后,ML5.0余震活动主体地区则转移到北川至青川之间,在该段发生了5月25日青川6.4级最大余震,在这之后,整个余震序列应力降随时间变化开始趋于平稳.     

Source time functions of the Gonghe，China earthquake retrieved from long－period digital waveform data using empirical Green＇s function technique

ＳｏｕｒｃｅｔｉｍｅｆｕｎｃｔｉｏｎｓｏｆｔｈｅＧｏｎｇｈｅ，Ｃｈｉｎａｅａｒｔｈｑｕａｋｅｒｅｔｒｉｅｖｅｄｆｒｏｍｌｏｎｇ－ｐｅｒｉｏｄｄｉｇｉｔａｌｗａｖｅｆｏｒｍｄａｔａｕｓｉｎｇｅｍｐｉｒｉｃａｌＧｒｅｅｎ＇ｓｆｕｎｃｔｉｏｎｔｅｃｈｎｉｑ...     

晋冀鲁豫交界地区震源参数特征

利用晋冀鲁豫交界地区邯郸地震台网记录的地震波形资料,选取2005—2016年M_L≥1.8地震事件,采用Brune震源模型,结合遗传算法得到该区中小地震震源参数,并分析各参数形态特征。研究表明：①晋冀鲁豫交界地区中小地震的地震矩取值范围1.34×10¹¹—2.63×10¹⁵ N·m,震源半径取值范围132—1 044 m,拐角频率f_c取值范围1.25—9.82 Hz,应力降取值范围0.036 4—11.063 1 MPa;②震源参数之间相互关系;③按照震中分区分析不同区域应力降分布特征,河北邯郸、邢台等地及附近地区应力降范围为0 MPa<Δσ≤5 MPa,河南濮阳以及范县和山西黎城等地及附近地区应力降范围为5 MPa <Δσ≤11.063 1 MPa,该区处于高应力背景场状态。     

内蒙古中西部地区震源参数研究

选取内蒙古测震台网2009—2016年内蒙古中西部M_L≥2.8中小地震波形记录,采用多台联合反演方法,计算该区中小地震震源谱参数,获得地震矩M₀、矩震级M_W、应力降Δσ和震源尺度r,利用线性回归,分析近震震级M_L、地震矩M₀、矩震级M_W、应力降Δσ和震源尺度r之间的关系。结果表明,各参数之间存在一定线性关系,内蒙古中西部地区应力降模型为增加应力降模型（ISD）。     

Changes in source parameters of foreshocks and aftershocks of the 2001 Ms=6.0 Yajiang,Sichuan, earthquake

In this paper changes in focal mechanisms) parameters of wave spectra, and stress drops for the Ms=5.0 forcshock and Ms=6.0 mainshock in February 2001 in Yajiang County, Sichuan, and seismicity in cpiccntral region are studied. Comparison of focal mechanisms for the Yajiang earthquakes with distribution patterns of aftcrshocks, the nodal plane Ⅰ, striking in the direction of NEN, of the Yajiang M=5.0 event is chosen as the faulting plane, the nodal plane Ⅱ, striking in the direction of WNW, of the M=6.0 event as the faulting plane. The strikes of the two faulting planes are nearly perpendicular to each other. The level of stress drops in the cpicentral region before the occurrence of the M=6.0 earthquake increases, which is consistent with increase of seismicity in the epicentral region. The rate decay of the Yajiang earthquake sequence, changes in wave spectra for foreshocks and aftershocks,and focal mechanisms are complex.