Phase Ib dose-finding study of abiraterone acetate plus buparlisib (BKM120) or dactolisib (BEZ235) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundThe phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signalling axis and androgen receptor (AR) pathways exhibit reciprocal feedback regulation in phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in preclinical models. This phase Ib study evaluated the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) and the dual pan-PI3K/ mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor dactolisib (BEZ235) in combination with abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients with CRPC.Materials and methodsPatients with CRPC who had progressed on AA therapy received escalating doses of either buparlisib or dactolisib, along with fixed doses of AA (1000 mg once daily (qd)) and prednisone (5 mg twice daily (bid)). The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of either buparlisib or dactolisib in combination with AA. Secondary objectives included safety, antitumour activity (Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria; 30% of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline at ≥week 12) and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile.ResultsIn buparlisib + AA arm, 25 patients received buparlisib + AA (median age, 67 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0/1/2 for 7/17/1 patients, respectively). At 100 mg qd; two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (grade 3 hyperglycaemia; grade 2 asthenia), and this was the maximum buparlisib dose explored. Buparlisib + AA showed a 26% lower median area under the curve from time zero to 24°h (AUC_0–24) and 48% lower median maximum serum concentration (Cmax) versus the single-agent buparlisib assessed in first-in-human study. No objective response and few PSA decreases were reported.In dactolisib + AA arm, 18 patients (median age, 71 years; ECOG PS of 0/1 for 6/12 patients, respectively) received dactolisib + AA at the first dose level (200 mg bid). Five patients had 9 DLTs (grades 2&3 stomatitis; grade 3 hyperglycaemia; grades 2& 3 diarrhoea; grades 1& 2 pyrexia, grade 2 vomiting, and grade 2 chills).ConclusionsBased on the assessment of available pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy data, no further study is planned for either buparlisib or dactolisib in combination with AA in CRPC.     

Phase II open-label study of nintedanib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) is a small, orally available, triple angiokinase inhibitor in phase III development (various indications) that targets VEGFR 1–3, FGFR 1–3, and PDGFR-α/β. This open-label, uncontrolled, phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who had previously failed radiotherapy plus temozolomide as first-line therapy (STUPP), or the same regimen with subsequent bevacizumab-based therapy as second-line treatment (BEV). Patients with a performance status of 0–1, histologically proven GBM, and measurable disease (by RANO) were enrolled. Nintedanib was given orally at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (bid), with magnetic resonance imaging undertaken every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study was stopped prematurely following a preplanned futility analysis after inclusion of 13 patients in the STUPP arm and 12 in the BEV arm. Best response was stable disease (SD) in three patients (12 %); all other patients progressed within the first four 28-day cycles. One patient in the BEV arm has had SD for 17+ months. Median progression-free survival was 1 month and median overall survival was 6 months. Nintedanib had an acceptable safety profile, with no CTCAE grade 3–4 adverse events. Common adverse events were CTCAE grade 1–2 fatigue, loss of appetite, diarrhea, and nausea. Single-agent nintedanib (200 mg bid) demonstrated limited, but clinically non-relevant antitumor activity in patients with recurrent GBM who had failed 1–2 prior lines of therapy.     

Phase I dose‐escalation study of capmatinib (INC280) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Capmatinib is a highly specific, potent and selective MET inhibitor. This was an open‐label, multicenter, dose‐escalation, phase I study conducted in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (not selected based on their MET status). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or highest studied dose being safe. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model dependent on dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT) in cycle 1. Of 44 adult Japanese patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors enrolled, 29 received capmatinib capsules (doses ranging from 100 mg once daily [q.d.] to 600 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]) and 15 received tablets (200 mg b.i.d. and 400 mg b.i.d.). DLT occurred in two patients: grade 2 suicidal ideation (600 mg b.i.d. capsule) and grade 3 depression (400 mg b.i.d. tablet). MTD was not reached. The highest studied dose determined to be safe as tablet was 400 mg b.i.d., whereas it is not yet determined for capsules. Most common adverse events suspected to be drug‐related were increased blood creatinine, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting and diarrhea. Following repeated daily dosing up to day 15 by q.d. or b.i.d. regimen using capsules, median time to reach maximum plasma drug concentration (T_max) was 1.0‐4.0 hours; absorption was more rapid after dosing using tablets, with median T_max of 1.0 hour on both days 1 and 15. Eight patients had a best overall response of stable disease. These data support further clinical development of capmatinib.     

Phase I/II study of bevacizumab with BKM120, an oral PI3K inhibitor,in patients with refractory solid tumors (phase I) and relapsed/refractory glioblastoma (phase II)

Journal of Neuro-Oncology - The brain is a very soft tissue. Glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumours are highly infiltrative into the surrounding healthy brain tissue and invasion mechanisms that have...     

Phase II study of XR5000 (DACA) administered as a 120-h infusion in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

BACKGROUND: XR5000 is a tricyclic carboxamide that intercalates DNA and inhibits both topoisomerase I and II. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of XR5000 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme previously untreated with chemotherapy at relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received XR5000 at a dose of 3010 mg/m2 as a 120-h central venous infusion every 3 weeks. An independent panel assessed response every two cycles using McDonald's criteria (tumour size, steroid intake and neurological status); toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled (one ineligible patient was excluded from efficacy evaluation). Performance status was zero (five patients), one (nine patients) or two (one patient). They received 30 cycles of XR5000 (median 2, range 1-5). Haematological toxicity was mild, with only one patient experiencing grade 3 neutropenia. Other related grade 3/4 adverse events included chest pain (one patient), axillary vein thrombosis (one patient) and rigors/fever in the absence of neutropenia (one patient). There were no objective responses, 14 patients progressing on XR5000 and one having stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although XR5000 was generally well tolerated, these results do not support further evaluation in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using this dose and schedule.     

Phase II study of carboplatin and erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI-774) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be effective in a subset of glioblastoma patients. This phase II study assessed the clinical activity of erlotinib plus carboplatin and to determine molecular predictors of response. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Patients with recurrent glioblastoma with no more than two prior relapses received carboplatin intravenously on day 1 of every 28-day cycle (target AUC of 6 mg x ml/min). Daily erlotinib at 150 mg/day was dose escalated to 200 mg/day, as tolerated. Clinical and MRI assessments were made every 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Tumor tissue was evaluated for EGFR, AKT and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) status. One partial response (PR) was observed out of 43 assessable patients. Twenty patients (47%) had stable disease (SD) for an average of 12 weeks. Median PFS was 9 weeks. The 6-month PFS rate was 14%. Median overall survival (OS) was 30 weeks. This regimen was well tolerated with grade 3/4 toxicities of fatigue, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and rash requiring dose reductions. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) predicted that patients with KPS >/=90 treated with more than 1 prior regimen had the highest OS. No correlation was observed between EGFR, Akt or PTEN expression and either PFS or OS. Carboplatin plus erlotinib is well tolerated but has modest activity in unselected patients. Future trials should be stratified based on optimal molecular or clinical characteristics.     

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutant glioma: A multicenter,open-label,phase Ib/II trial

BackgroundOlutasidenib (FT-2102) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, brain-penetrant and selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). The aim of the study was to determine the safety and clinical activity of olutasidenib in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1^R132X mutation.MethodsThis was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ib/II clinical trial. Eligible patients (≥18 years) had histologically confirmed IDH1^R132X-mutated glioma that relapsed or progressed on or following standard therapy and had measurable disease. Patients received olutasidenib, 150 mg orally twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (cycle 1) and safety in phase I and objective response rate using the Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in phase II.ResultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled and followed for a median 15.1 months (7.3‒19.4). No DLTs were observed in the single-agent glioma cohort and the pharmacokinetic relationship supported olutasidenib 150 mg BID as the recommended phase II dose. In the response-evaluable population, disease control rate (objective response plus stable disease) was 48%. Two (8%) patients demonstrated a best response of partial response and eight (32%) had stable disease for at least 4 months. Grade 3‒4 adverse events (≥10%) included alanine aminotransferase increased and aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [12%], each).ConclusionsOlutasidenib 150 mg BID was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1^R132X mutation and demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pretreated population.     

Phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma

BackgroundPanobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with antineoplastic and antiangiogenic effects in glioma that may work synergistically with bevacizumab. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of panobinostat combined with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG).MethodsPatients with recurrent HGG were treated with oral panobinostat 30 mg 3 times per week, every other week, in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week. The primary endpoint was a 6-month progression-fee survival (PFS6) rate for participants with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) were evaluated as an exploratory arm of the study.ResultsAt interim analysis, the GBM arm did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM arm was closed. A total of 24 patients with GBM were accrued prior to closure. The PFS6 rate was 30.4% (95%, CI 12.4%–50.7%), median PFS was 5 months (range, 3–9 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (range, 6–19 months). Accrual in the AG arm continued to completion, and a total of 15 patients were enrolled. The PFS6 rate was 46.7% (range, 21%–73%), median PFS was 7 months (range, 2–10 months), and median OS was 17 months (range, 5 months–27 months).ConclusionsThis phase II study of panobinostat and bevacizumab in participants with recurrent GBM did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM cohort of the study was closed. Although it was reasonably well tolerated, the addition of panobinostat to bevacizumab did not significantly improve PFS6 compared with historical controls of bevacizumab monotherapy in either cohort.     

A phase 1/2, open-label,multicenter study of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab in patients with lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma have limited treatment options, requiring newer regimens. In this Phase 1/2 study (NCT03769181), we assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of isatuximab (Isa, anti-CD38 antibody) in combination with cemiplimab (Cemi, anti-programmed death-1 [PD-1] receptor antibody; Isa + Cemi) in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In Phase 1, we characterized the safety and tolerability of Isa + Cemi with planned dose de-escalation to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Six patients in each cohort were treated with a starting dose of Isa + Cemi to determine the RP2D. In Phase 2, the primary endpoints were complete response in Cohort A1 (cHL anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] naïve), and objective response rate in Cohorts A2 (cHL anti-PD-1/PD-L1 progressors), B (DLBCL), and C (PTCL). An interim analysis was performed when the first 18 (Cohort A1), 12 (Cohort A2), 17 (Cohort B), and 11 (Cohort C) patients in Phase 2 had been treated and followed up for 24 weeks. Isa + Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at the starting dose; thus, the starting dose of each drug was confirmed as the RP2D. Based on the Lugano 2014 criteria, 55.6% (Cohort A1), 33.3% (Cohort A2), 5.9% (Cohort B), and 9.1% (Cohort C) of patients achieved a complete or partial response. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggested no effect of Cemi on Isa exposure. Modest clinical efficacy was observed in patients with cHL regardless of prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure. In DLBCL or PTCL cohorts, interim efficacy analysis results did not meet prespecified criteria to continue enrollment in Phase 2 Stage 2. Isa + Cemi did not have a synergistic effect in these patient populations.     

Ipilimumab alone or in combination with radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from an open-label,multicenter phase I/II study

BackgroundThis phase I/II study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) explored ipilimumab as monotherapy and in combination with radiotherapy, based on the preclinical evidence of synergistic antitumor activity between anti-CTLA-4 antibody and radiotherapy.Patients and methodsIn dose escalation, 33 patients (≥6/cohort) received ipilimumab every 3 weeks × 4 doses at 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg or at 3 or 10 mg/kg + radiotherapy (8 Gy/lesion). The 10-mg/kg cohorts were expanded to 50 patients (ipilimumab monotherapy, 16; ipilimumab + radiotherapy, 34). Evaluations included adverse events (AEs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, and tumor response.ResultsCommon immune-related AEs (irAEs) among the 50 patients receiving 10 mg/kg ± radiotherapy were diarrhea (54%), colitis (22%), rash (32%), and pruritus (20%); grade 3/4 irAEs included colitis (16%) and hepatitis (10%). One treatment-related death (5 mg/kg group) occurred. Among patients receiving 10 mg/kg ± radiotherapy, eight had PSA declines of ≥50% (duration: 3–13+ months), one had complete response (duration: 11.3+ months), and six had stable disease (duration: 2.8–6.1 months).ConclusionsIn mCRPC patients, ipilimumab 10 mg/kg ± radiotherapy suggested clinical antitumor activity with disease control and manageable AEs. Two phase III trials in mCRPC patients evaluating ipilimumab 10 mg/kg ± radiotherapy are ongoing.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00323882.     

Phase I dose‐escalation study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan‐class I PI3K inhibitor,in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan‐phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase inhibitor, targeting all four isoforms of class I PI3K (α, β, γ and δ). This open‐label Phase I dose‐escalation study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of continuous daily buparlisib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic marker changes. Fifteen patients were treated at 25 mg/day (n = 3), 50 mg/day (n = 3) and 100 mg/day (n = 9) dose levels. One dose‐limiting toxicity of Grade 4 abnormal liver function occurred at 100 mg/day. Considering the safety profile and the maximum tolerated dose in the first‐in‐man study of buparlisib in non‐Japanese patients, further dose escalation was stopped and 100 mg/day was declared the recommended dose. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were rash, abnormal hepatic function (including increased transaminase levels), increased blood insulin levels and increased eosinophil count. Hyperglycemia was experienced by two patients, one Grade 1 and one Grade 4, and mood alterations were experienced by three patients, two Grade 1 and one Grade 2. Pharmacokinetic results showed that buparlisib was rapidly absorbed in a dose‐proportional manner. Best overall response was stable disease for six patients, including one unconfirmed partial response. In these Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, buparlisib had a manageable safety profile, with similar pharmacokinetics to non‐Japanese patients. The recommended dose of 100 mg/day will be used in future studies of buparlisib in Japanese patients.     

A phase II randomized,multicenter, open-label trial of continuing adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles in patients with glioblastoma (GEINO 14-01)

BackgroundStandard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome.MethodsGlioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02209948","term_id":"NCT02209948"}}NCT02209948).ResultsFrom August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.001).ConclusionsContinuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS.Key Points1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS.2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset.3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities.     

Phase II study of ifosfamide with mesna in adult patients with recurrent diffuse astrocytoma

Summary Sixteen patients who developed CT or MRI scan evidence of recurrent diffuse astrocytoma after radiation therapy and nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy received ifosfamide (2500 mg/m²/day for 3 consecutive days) and mesna (500 mg/m²/dose, 5 doses/day for 3 consecutive days). Toxicity consisted primarily of leukopenia in that 60 percent of patients developed leukocyte nadirs less than 1500/mcL. Excessive somnolence occurred in three patients and may have contributed to a case of fatal pneumonia in one patient but was reversible in the other two. No patient had CT or MRI scan evidence of tumor regression. One patient remains stable at 11.3+ months, but all other patients developed evidence of progressive disease less than 6 months from initiation of therapy. The median times to tumor progression and death were 2.0 and 4.8 months, respectively. In conclusion, while ifosfamide and mesna can be given safely at this dose and schedule, there is no evidence of antitumor effect. The degree of leukopenia observed likely would prevent further dose escalation of ifosfamide or addition of other myelosuppressive agents without additional means of bone marrow support in this population of patients.Additional participating institutions include: Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center CCOP, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822 (Richard M. Goldberg); University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68105 (John F. Foley); Illinois Oncology Research Association CCOP, Peoria, Illinois 61603 (James B. Gerstner); and The St. Cloud Clinic of Internal Medicine, Ltd., St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 (John Weitz).     

A multicenter Phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas

BACKGROUND: Based on evidence of activity in preclinical and Phase I studies, the authors undertook a study of bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, for patients with metastatic sarcomas. METHODS: Two arms were opened, each using a Simon two-stage design. Arm A included patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Arm B accrued patients with other types of soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were not allowed to have received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The initial dose of bortezomib was a 1.5 mg/m2 intravenous push twice weekly followed by a rest week. The dose was escalated to 1.7 mg/m2 if patients tolerated Cycle 1 well. The dose escalation was eliminated due to toxicity observed in the first six patients. RESULTS: Painful neuropathy, myalgias, and asthenia were the most significant observed toxicities. The most frequent toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, and nausea. Pharmacodynamic data from 18 patients with complete data collection did not show consistent differences between patients with or without Grade 2 or Grade 3 neuropathy (toxicity graded according the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Arm A had low accrual and was closed. One confirmed partial response among 21 evaluable patients was observed on Arm B in a patient with leiomyosarcoma. Due to the inactivity of this agent, the study was closed after the first stage of accrual. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. If studied further in sarcomas, bortezomib should be investigated in combination with agents with demonstrated preclinical synergy.     

Phase Ib study of tivozanib (AV-951) in combination with temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundTivozanib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, with a long half-life. Tivozanib has demonstrated clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase Ib study determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluated the safety and clinical activity of tivozanib plus temsirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced RCC were administered open-label tivozanib 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/d orally (3 weeks on/1 week off) and temsirolimus 15 or 25 mg/week intravenously in a 3 + 3 dose–escalation design and subsequent expansion cohort.ResultsOf 27 patients treated, 20 patients had received ?1 prior VEGF-targeted therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; the RP2D was determined to be tivozanib 1.5 mg/d plus temsirolimus 25 mg/week. Combination of tivozanib plus temsirolimus demonstrated acceptable tolerability and suggested no synergistic toxicity. The most common grade ?3 adverse events were fatigue and thrombocytopenia (15% each). One patient each required dose reduction of tivozanib or temsirolimus due to an adverse event. Confirmed partial responses and stable disease were achieved at 23% and 68%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses may suggest lack of an interaction between tivozanib and temsirolimus.ConclusionsIn this small phase Ib study, tivozanib and temsirolimus were safely combined at the fully recommended dose and schedule of both agents. The observed clinical activity and manageable toxicity profile of this combination warrant further exploration in patients with RCC.     

A phase I study of cediranib in combination with cilengitide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Background

Despite being a highly vascularized tumor, glioblastoma response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is transient, possibly because of tumor co-option of preexisting blood vessels and infiltration into surrounding brain. Integrins, which are upregulated after VEGF inhibition, may play a critical role in this resistance mechanism. We designed a study of cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with cilengitide, an integrin inhibitor.

Methods

This phase I study was conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Once the maximum tolerated dose was determined, 40 patients enrolled in a dose expansion cohort with 20 being exposed to anti-VEGF therapy and 20 being naive. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, proportion of participants alive and progression free at 6 months, radiographic response, and exploratory analyses of physiological imaging and blood biomarkers.

Results

Forty-five patients enrolled, and no dose toxicities were observed at a dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and cilengitide 2000 mg twice weekly. Complete response was seen in 2 participants, partial response in 2, stable disease in 13, and progression in 21; 7 participants were not evaluable. Median overall survival was 6.5 months, median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and progression-free survival at 6 months was 4.4%. Plasma-soluble VEGFR2 decreased with treatment and placental growth factor, carbonic anhydrase IX, and SDF1α, and cerebral blood flow increased.

Conclusions

The combination of cediranib with cilengitide was well tolerated and associated with changes in pharmacodynamic blood and imaging biomarkers. However, the survival and response rates do not warrant further development of this combination.     

EORTC 26083 phase I/II trial of dasatinib in combination with CCNU in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

The treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma remains a major oncologic problem, with median survival after progression of 7–9 months. To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the combination of dasatinib and cyclonexyl-chloroethyl-nitrosourea (CCNU) was investigated in this setting. The study was designed as multicenter, randomized phase II trial, preceded by a lead-in safety phase. The safety component reported here, which also investigated pharmacokinetics and preliminary clinical activity, required expansion and is therefore considered a phase I part to establish a recommended dosing regimen of the combination of CCNU (90–110 mg/m²) and dasatinib (100–200 mg daily). Overall, 28 patients were screened, and 26 patients were enrolled. Five dose levels were explored. DLTs, mainly myelosuppression, occurred in 10 patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was recorded in 7 patients (26.9%) and thrombocytopenia in 11 patients (42.3%). No significant effect of CCNU coadministration on dasatinib pharmacokinetics was found. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.35 months (95% confidence interval: 1.2–1.4) and 6-month PFS was 7.7%. In this phase I study of recurrent glioblastoma patients, the combination of CCNU and dasatinib showed significant hematological toxicities and led to suboptimal exposure to both agents.     

Phase 2 study of temozolomide and Caelyx in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

Temozolomide has established activity in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Caelyx (liposomal doxorubicin) has established activity in a broad range of tumors but has not been extensively evaluated in the treatment of GBM. Phase 1 data suggest that temozolomide and Caelyx can be combined safely at full dose. In this phase 2 study, combination temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) orally, days 1-5) and Caelyx (40 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1) was given every 4 weeks to a cohort of 22 patients with recurrent GBM, who received a total of 109 cycles (median 3.5 cycles). The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 31-80 years), and 17 were male. All patients had received radiotherapy, but only 2 had received prior chemotherapy. One patient (5%) had a complete response, 3 patients (14%) had a partial response, and 11 patients (50%) had stable disease. The median time to progression for the cohort was 3.2 months (range, 1-13 months). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (range, 1-16+ months). Seven patients (32%) were progression free at 6 months. Hematological toxicity included grade 3/4 neutropenia in 4 patients (18%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (18%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity included rash in 3 patients (14%), nausea and vomiting in 1 patient (4%), hypersensitivity reaction to Caelyx in 3 patients (14%), and palmar-plantar toxicity in 1 patient (4%). We conclude that the combination of temozolomide and Caelyx is well tolerated, results in a modest objective response rate, but has encouraging disease stabilization in the treatment of recurrent GBM.     

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab), a fully human monoclonal antibody against hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Patients with histologically confirmed, measurable recurrent GBM or gliosarcoma (World Health Organization grade 4) and ≤3 relapses or prior systemic therapies received AMG 102 (10 or 20 mg/kg) by infusion every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was best confirmed objective response rate (central assessment) per Macdonald criteria. Of the 61 patients who enrolled, 60 received AMG 102. Twenty-nine patients (48%) had previously received bevacizumab. There were no objective responses per central assessment, but 1 patient had an objective response per investigator assessment. Median overall survival (95% CI) in the 10- and 20-mg/kg cohorts was 6.5 months (4.1-9.8) and 5.4 months (3.4-11.4), respectively, and progression-free survival (PFS) per central assessment was 4.1 weeks (4.0-4.1) and 4.3 weeks (4.1-8.1), respectively. PFS was similar among patients who had previously received bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab-naive patients. The most common adverse events were fatigue (38%), headache (33%), and peripheral edema (23%). AMG 102 serum concentrations increased approximately dose-proportionally with 2-fold accumulation at steady state. Plasma total HGF/SF and soluble c-Met concentrations increased 12.05- and 1.12-fold, respectively, from baseline during AMG 102 treatment. AMG 102 monotherapy at doses up to 20 mg/kg was not associated with significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent GBM.