Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation

Several therapeutic procedures have been proposed as bridging treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)awaiting liver transplantation(LT).The most used treatments include transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.Surgical resection has also been successfully used as a bridging procedure,and LT should be considered a rescue treatment in patients with previous HCC resection who experience tumor recurrence or post-treatment severe decompensation of liver function.The aims of bridging treatments include decreasing the waiting list dropout rate before transplantation,reducing HCC recurrence after transplantation,and improving post-transplant overall survival.To date,no data from prospective randomized studies are available;however,for HCC patients listed for LT within the Milan criteria,prolonging the waiting time over 6-12 mo is a risk factor for tumor spread.Bridging treatments are useful in containing tumor progression and decreasing dropout.Furthermore,the response to pre-LT treatments may represent a surrogate marker of tumor biological aggressiveness and could therefore be evaluated to prioritize HCC candidates for LT.Lastly,although a definitive conclusion can not be reached,the experiences reported to date suggest a positive impact of these treatments on both tumor recurrence and post-transplant patient survival.Advanced HCC may be downstaged to achieve and maintain the current conventional criteria for inclusion in the waiting list for LT.Recent studies have demonstrated that successfully downstaged patients can achieve a 5-year survival rate comparable to that of patients meeting the conventional criteria without requiring downstaging.     

大肝癌的消融治疗

肝癌是我国最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,当单个肿瘤直径大于5 cm时定义为大肝癌。大肝癌具有肿瘤恶性程度高、易出现肿瘤转移和血管浸润等特点,增加了治疗的难度。外科切除是大肝癌首选的治疗方案,但仅有20%~30%的患者符合手术治疗要求。对于不可切除的大肝癌国内外指南推荐经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)作为治疗方案,TACE可以控制肿瘤进展并延长患者生存时间,但反复多次的TACE治疗疗效有限,且对患者肝功能造成严重损害,单独的TACE治疗已无法满足临床需求。随着肿瘤消融技术如射频、微波和冷冻消融等不断发展,TACE联合肿瘤消融治疗已成为大肝癌治疗中的一个重要治疗手段。然而目前国内外关于大肝癌消融治疗的疗效仍有较多的争议,因此如何选择合适的消融时机,减少消融术后残留,降低消融术后肿瘤的复发,最终使患者生存获益是目前临床和科研仍需继续探讨的难题。针对以上内容,综述并分析了大肝癌消融治疗的现况、困境及未来发展趋势。     

Multimodal and systemic therapy with cabozantinib for treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: A case report with long term follow-up outcomes

Rationale:Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major therapeutic challenge. In recent years, new molecular-targeted therapies, such as cabozantinib, have been approved for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, clinical experience with these new drugs in the treatment of HCC in the LT setting is very limited.Patient concerns:In 2003, a 36-year-old woman was referred to the hospital with right upper abdominal pain.Diagnosis:An initial ultrasound of the liver demonstrated a large unclear lesion of the left lobe of the liver. The magnet resonance imaging findings confirmed a multifocal inoperable HCC in a non-cirrhotic liver. Seven years after receiving a living donor LT, pulmonary and intra-hepatic recurrence of the HCC was radiologically diagnosed and histologically confirmed.Interventions:Following an interdisciplinary therapy concept consisting of surgical, interventional-radiological (with radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) as well as systemic treatment, the patient achieved a survival of more than 10 years after tumor recurrence. As systemic first line therapy with sorafenib was accompanied by grade 3 to 4 toxicities, such as mucositis, hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, liver dysfunction, and hyperthyroidism, it had to be discontinued. After switching to cabozantinib from June 2018 to April 2020, partial remission of all tumor manifestations was achieved. The treatment of the remaining liver metastasis could be completed by RFA. The therapy with cabozantinib was well tolerated, only mild arterial hypertension and grade 1 to 2 mucositis were observed. Liver transplant function was stable during the therapy, no drug interaction with immunosuppressive drugs was observed.Outcomes:More than 10 years survival after recurrence of HCC after living-donor LT due to intensive multimodal therapy concepts, including surgery, RFA, and systemic therapy with cabozantinib in the second line therapy.Lessons:In conclusion, this report highlights the tolerability and effectiveness of cabozantinib for the treatment of HCC recurrence after LT. We show that our patient with a late recurrence of HCC after LT benefitted from intensive multimodal therapy concepts, including surgery, RFA, and systemic therapy.     

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

Despite careful selection for liver transplantation (LT) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HCC may still recur after LT and is frequently associated with dismal outcome. Tumor factors, including serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), the presence of microvascular invasion, tumor grade/differentiation, and largest tumor size are amongst the most important predictors of recurrence after transplantation. The nature of recurrence can be highly variable, but often presents with extra-hepatic involvement. As such, management of patients with HCC can be challenging, and consensus guidelines are lacking. Curative options, with surgery or ablation, which may be applicable in patients with isolated intra-or extrahepatic metastases, offer the best chance for improved long-term outcome in patients with HCC recurrence after transplantation. Most patients with recurrence have unresectable disease, and may benefit from palliative treatments, including intra-arterial therapies and/or systemic therapy.     

Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The lung is one of the most common sites of extrahepatic spread from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management in patients with pulmonary metastasis from HCC. METHODOLOGY: Fourteen patients with pulmonary metastases arising from HCC underwent surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1980 and 2001. The clinical and pathological data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Four patients were still alive and none of them had evidence of recurrent disease. Ten patients had died with recurrent HCC. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low. The mean overall survival was 42.7 months (range, 8-87). The mean survival after initial thoracotomy was 21.6 months (range, 1-66). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates after metastasectomy were 71.4%, 44.6%, and 26.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment is appropriate option in selected patients for pulmonary metastasis arising from HCC, and might prolong survival.     

Role of intrahepatic tumor control in the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and extrahepatic metastases

Background and Aim: There has been little information about the long‐term outcome and prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic metastases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical factors affecting survival after extrahepatic metastasis and to determine the survival benefit of controlling intrahepatic HCC. Methods: Between 2004 and 2009, a total of 240 consecutive patients with HCC and extrahepatic metastasis were recruited. Based on tumor extent, performance, and hepatic function, the patients underwent locoregional and/or systemic treatments. The treatment response of the intrahepatic tumor after extrahepatic metastasis and other prognostic parameters were analyzed retrospectively. Results: During the mean follow up of 276 days, 222 patients died; the median survival time was 146 days. Multivariate analysis revealed that Child–Pugh class A, smaller hepatic tumor size, absence of portal venous invasion, single metastatic organ involvement, and objective treatment response of the intrahepatic tumor were the favorable prognostic factors for survival. Of the 183 evaluable patients, 24 achieved complete or partial response for intrahepatic tumors after treatment. The overall survival for the 24 responders was significantly improved, with a median of 521 days, as compared to 170 days for the remaining 159 patients without objective tumor response. The leading cause of death was progressive intrahepatic tumor. Conclusions: Intrahepatic tumor status and hepatic reserve are among the significant predictors of survival in patients with HCC and extrahepatic metastases. This study indicates that even in patients with metastases from advanced HCC, therapeutic approaches to control intrahepatic tumors are important in improving patient survival.     

Management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplant

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is the leading cause of deaths in patients with hepatitis B or C, and its incidence has increased considerably over the past decade and is still on the rise. Liver transplantation(LT) provides the best chance of cure for patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis. With the implementation of the MELD exception system for patients with HCC waitlisted for LT, the number of recipients of LT is increasing, so is the number of patients who have recurrence of HCC after LT. Treatments for intrahepatic recurrence after transplantation and after other kinds of surgery are more or less the same, but long-term cure of posttransplant recurrence is rarely seen as it is a "systemic" disease. Nonetheless, surgicalresection has been shown to be effective in prolonging patient survival despite the technical difficulty in resecting graft livers. Besides surgical resection, different kinds of treatment are also in use, including transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, highintensity focused ultrasound ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Targeted therapy and modulation of immunosuppressants are also adopted to treat the deadly disease.     

Conversion therapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: What's new in the era of molecular and immune therapy?

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally, with limited therapies and unsatisfactory prognosis once in the advanced stages. With promising advances in locoregional and systematic treatments, fast development of targeted drugs, the success of immunotherapy, as well as the emergence of the therapeutic alliance, conversion therapy has recently become more well developed and an effective therapeutic strategy. This article aimed to review recent developments in conversion therapy in liver transplantation (LT) for HCC.Data sourcesWe searched for relevant publications on PubMed before September 2022, using the terms “HCC”, “liver transplantation”, “downstaging”, “bridging treatment” and “conversion therapy.”ResultsConversion therapy was frequently represented as a combination of multiple treatment modalities to downstage HCC and make patients eligible for LT. Although combining various local and systematic treatments in conversion therapy is still controversial, growing evidence has suggested that multimodal combined treatment strategies downstage HCC in a shorter time, which ultimately increases the opportunities for LT. Moreover, the recent breakthrough of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for HCC also benefit patients with advanced-stage tumors.ConclusionsIn the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, applying the thinking of transplant oncology to benefit HCC patients receiving LT is a new topic that has shed light on advanced-stage patients. With the expansion of conversion therapy concepts, further investigation and research is required to realize the full potential of conversion treatment strategies, including accurately selecting candidates, determining the timing of surgery, improving the conversion rate, and guaranteeing the safety and long-term efficacy of treatment.     

Complete disappearance of pulmonary metastases in a case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with docetaxel-based systemic chemotherapy

A case of the complete shrinkage of pulmonary metastases from multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) after administration of docetaxel, cisplatin and enteric-coated tegafur/uracil is reported. A 54-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with recurrent multiple HCC associated with pulmonary metastases and compensated liver cirrhosis. Docetaxel, cisplatin and enteric-coated tegafur/uracil were given to this patient. After 2 months of treatment, there was a decrease in tumor markers and a shrinkage of the pulmonary metastases. Image analyses such as chest X-rays and chest computed tomography scans showed a disappearance of the pulmonary metastases, although the multiple HCC did not disappear completely. This was evaluated as a complete remission of metastatic lesions or a partial remission of primary lesions according to the World Health Organization criteria. No recurrence of pulmonary metastasis was seen for 10 months. This combination therapy was well-tolerated for lung cancer and could represent an effective treatment for pulmonary metastases from HCC.     

Clinical manifestations and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cardiac metastasis

Background and Aim:  Antemortem diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cardiac metastasis is uncommon. To clarify the clinical manifestation and survival of HCC patients with cardiac metastases, we initiated the present study.
Methods:  We retrospectively analyzed 48 HCC patients with metastases into cardiac cavity diagnosed antemortem. The baseline clinical characteristics, echocardiogram, treatment modality and the outcome data were collected.
Results:  The most common symptoms of cardiac metastasis included asymptomatic in 19 cases (39.5%), bilateral lower leg edema in 18 cases (37.5%) and exertional dyspnea in 15 cases (31.3%). The median and mean survival times from the time of diagnosis of cardiac metastasis were 102 days and 161 days, respectively. Compared with another cohort of 48 patients with age-, gender-, and stage-matched HCC patients without cardiac metastasis, the median survival in the cardiac metastasis group was similar to the control group (68 days) ( P  = 0.67). The cause of death was HCC in 29, hepatic failure in seven, multiple organ failure in four, gastrointestinal bleeding in three, sepsis in two, pulmonary embolism in one, respiratory failure in one, and acute myocardial infarction in one.
Conclusions:  Hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cardiac metastases were in the advanced stages. These patients had limited survival from the diagnosis of cardiac metastases. The most common cause of death was related to HCC per se or the underlying liver disease. Only a few patients expired because of cardiac metastases.     

Peg‐interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogue combination at inception of antiviral therapy improves both anti‐HBV efficacy and long‐term survival among HBV DNA‐positive hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy/ablation

Antiviral therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA‐positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical treatment, but antiviral treatments require further optimization. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacies of different antiviral strategies with HCC patients after hepatectomy/ablation. This prospective, randomized, controlled and multi‐centre trial enrolled HBV DNA‐positive primary HCC patients after hepatectomy/ablation between January 2007 and January 2009. Patients were divided into four groups: early combination (entecavir plus Peg‐interferon [IFN]α‐2a co‐administration during year 1); late combination (addition of Peg‐IFNα‐2a for 48 weeks after 1 year of entecavir); nucleos(t)ide analogue[NA] monotherapy; and non‐antiviral treatment. Primary endpoints included recurrence‐free survival and overall survival. A total of 447 patients were enrolled. The 2‐year and 8‐year recurrence‐free survival and 8‐year overall survival rates were significantly higher in the early combination group than in the other two antiviral groups (P < .05). After 48‐week treatment, more patients achieved an HBsAg reduction >1500 IU/mL and the mean HBsAg level was significantly lower in the early combination group compared with the late combination and NA monotherapy groups (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that early combination therapy and a reduction in HBsAg by >1500 IU/mL after 48 weeks of therapy correlated with reduced mortality and disease recurrence. Early introduction of combination antiviral treatment may represent a more effective therapeutic strategy for patients with HBV DNA‐positive HCC after hepatectomy/ablation. A reduction in HBsAg by >1500 IU/mL after 48‐week treatment is associated with reduced mortality and disease recurrence of HBV DNA‐positive HCC patients after hepatectomy/ablation.     

Radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary metastases from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used for the treatment of intrathoracic malignancies. Although RFA has been found to be promising in the treatment of lung metastases from some types of neoplasms, little is known concerning its clinical significance in the treatment of pulmonary metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This retrospective study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of computed tomography‐guided RFA for pulmonary metastasis from ESCC. A series of 10 ESCC patients with 17 pulmonary tumors were included. Correct placement of the ablation device into the target tumor proved to be feasible in all tumors (100%). The mean visual analog scale score, with values that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible), was 1. This suggested that this procedure was well tolerated. No procedure‐related deaths occurred. A pneumothorax needing drainage was a major complication in two patients. Local control of ablated tumor lasting for at least 1 year was achieved in 10 (83%) of 12 assessable tumors. Although locoregional recurrences developed in two tumors, these lesions could be recontrolled by repeat treatment with RFA. Three patients died of recurrent disease. The predicted 1‐ and 2‐year overall survival rates after lung RFA were 77.8% and 62.2%, respectively. Percutaneous computed tomography‐guided RFA yielded relatively high levels of local control in patients with pulmonary metastases from ESCC and was associated with an acceptable level of complications. It was concluded that a prospective study will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of systemic therapy and RFA for ESCC lung metastases.     

Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluated patterns and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).METHODS: From 2001 to 2014, 293 patients underwent LDLT for HCC at our transplant center. We retrospectively reviewed 54(18.4%) patients with HCC recurrence after LDLT. We evaluated patterns and outcomes of HCC recurrence after LDLT, with particular attention to the Milan criteria at transplantation, treatments for HCC-recurrent patients, and factors related to survival after HCC recurrence. Furthermore, we evaluated the efficacy of combination treatment of sorafenib and an mT OR inhibitor.RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates after HCC recurrence were 41.1%, 20.5%, and 15.4%, respectively. The median time interval between LDLT and HCC recurrence was 6.5 mo. Although recurrence rates according to the Milan criteria at LDLT were significantly different, HCC recurrence patterns and survival rates after HCC recurrence were not significantly different between the two groups. Time to recurrence 12 mo(P = 0.048), multiple recurrences at HCC recurrence(P = 0.038), and palliative treatment for recurrent tumors(P = 0.003) were significant independent prognostic factors for poor survival after HCC recurrence in a multivariate analysis. The combination treatment of sorafenib and sirolimus showedsurvival benefits in the palliative treatment group(P = 0.005).CONCLUSION: Curative treatment for recurrent HCC after LDLT is the most important factor in survival rates after HCC recurrence and combination treatments of sorafenib and an m TOR inhibitor could have survival benefits in patients with HCC recurrence after LT in the palliative treatment group.     

Prophylactic liver transplantation for high-risk recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. Radical treatment of HCC in early stages results in a long disease-free period and improved overall survival. The choice of optimal management strategy for HCC mainly depends on the severity of the underlying liver disease. For patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and HCC within Milan criteria(MC), liver transplant(LT) is the choice of treatment. However, for patients with good residual liver reserve and HCC within MC, selection of other curative treatments such as liver resection(LR) or radiofrequency ablation may be a reasonable alternative. For patients without cirrhosis, LR can result in an overall survival similar to that provided by LT. Therefore, it is an accepted alternative to LT especially in areas with organ shortage. However, the cumulative 5-year recurrence rate of HCC post LR might be as high as 70%. For initial transplant-eligible(within MC) patients with recurrent HCC post LR, salvage liver transplant(SLT) was first proposed in 2000. However, most patients with recurrent HCC considered for SLT are untransplantable cases due to HCC recurrence beyond MC or comorbidity. Thus, the strategy of opting for SLT results in the loss of the opportunity of LT for these patients. Some authors proposed the concept of "de principe liver transplant"(i.e., prophylactic LT before HCC recurrence) to prevent losing the chance of LT for these potential candidates. Factors associated with the failure of SLT will be dissected and discussed in three parts: Patient, tumor, and underlying liver disease. Regarding patient-related factors, the rate of transplantability depends on patient compliance. Patients without regular follow-up tend to develop HCC recurrence beyond MC at the time of tumor detection. Advancing age is another factor related to severe comorbidities when LT is considered for HCC recurrence, and these elderly candidates become ineligible as time goes by. Regarding tumor-related factors, histopathological features of the resected specimen are used mostly for determining the prognosis of early HCC recurrences. Suchprognostic factors include the presence of microvascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, the presence of microsatellites, the presence of multiple tumors, and the presence of the gene-expressing signature associated with aggressive HCC. These prognostic factors might be used as a selection tool for SLT or prophylactic LT, while remaining mindful of the fact that most of them are also prognostic factors for post-transplant HCC recurrence. Regarding underlying liver disease-related factors, progression of chronic viral hepatitis and high viral load may contribute to the development of late(de novo) HCC recurrence as a consequence of sustained inflammatory reaction. However, correlation between the severity of liver fibrosis and tumor recurrence is still controversial. Some prognostic scoring systems that integrate these three factors have been proposed to predict recurrence patterns after LR for HCC. Theoretically, after excluding patients with high risk of post-transplant HCC recurrence, either by observation of a cancer-free period or by measurement of biological factors(such as alpha fetoprotein), prophylactic LT following curative resection of HCC could be considered for selected patients with high risk of recurrence to provide longer survival.     

局部消融在肝细胞癌治疗中的应用

手术切除和肝移植被认为是肝细胞癌(HCC)根治性治疗手段,但仅有10%~20%的HCC患者能接受这些治疗。近些年来,射频消融、微波消融、冷冻消融及新近出现的不可逆电穿孔消融等局部治疗方法逐渐成为无法手术患者的替代治疗。除了局部控制肿瘤生长改善预后外,消融技术还有助于肿瘤降级以便二次切除。重点介绍了射频消融及联合其他治疗手段治疗HCC的进展,对射频消融与其他局部消融进行了比较,简述了智能导航技术在辅助消融中的应用,认为随着影像医学的发展以及其他相关领域的进步,未来消融技术在临床应用中将更加广泛。     

High intensity focused ultrasound,liver disease and bridging therapy

High-intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU)is a noninvasive modality that uses an extracorporeal source of focused ultrasound energy.This technique was introduced by Lynn et al and is able to induce coagulative necrosis in selected tissues without damaging adjacent structures.Although HIFU has been studied for 50years,recent technological developments now allow its use for tumours of the liver,prostate and other sites.In liver disease,HIFU has been used to treat unresectable,advanced stages of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and liver metastases.Hepatocellular carcinoma is a serious health problem worldwide and is endemic in some areas because of its association with hepatitis B and C viruses(in 20%of cases).Liver transplantation(LT)has become one of the best treatments available because it removes both the tumour and the underlying liver disease such as cirrhosis(which is present in approximately 80%of cases).The prerequisite for longterm transplant success depends on tumour load and strict selection criteria regarding the size and number of tumour nodules.The need to obtain the optimal benefit from the limited number of organs available has prompted strict selection criteria limited to only those patients with early HCC who have a better long-term outcome after LT.The so-called"bridging therapy"has the aim of controlling disease burden for patients who are on the organ transplant waiting list.Amongst various treatment options,transarterial chemoembolisation and radiofrequency ablation are the most popular treatment choices.Recently,Cheung et al demonstrated that HIFU ablation is a safe and effective method for the treatment of HCC patients with advanced cirrhosis as a bridging therapy and that it reduced the dropout rate from the liver transplant waiting list.In this commentary,we discuss the current value of HIFU in the treatment of liver disease,including its value as a bridging therapy,and examine the potential advantages of other therapeutic strategies.     

Surgical treatment for gastric GIST with special reference to liver metastases

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is recently defined as a tumor expressing c-kit and sometimes showing liver metastasis. We investigated the outcomes of gastric GIST with special attention to the effect of repeated treatment for the patients with liver metastases. METHODOLOGY: Fourteen gastric GISTs were retrospectively reviewed and the significance of the NIH stratification system was examined. RESULTS: Liver metastasis was found in 4 of the 14 patients with gastric GISTs. Three of the 4 patients had metachronous liver metastases and underwent repeated hepatectomies after the initial operation for gastric GIST. The other patient had a synchronous liver metastasis and underwent total gastrectomy and partial resection of the liver as the initial treatment. Two of the 4 patients have received treatments 6 times, including hepatic resection, microwave coagulation therapy (MCT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or by imatinib. All 4 patients with hepatic metastases are alive after the first hepatectomy with a mean survival time of 64.8 months with or without imatinib treatment. None classified to very low risk and low risk groups by the NIH system showed liver metastasis, while 43% of the patients classified to the high risk showed liver metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated surgical and medical treatments for liver metastases from gastric GIST improve survival. Special attention should be paid to be the high risk group categorized by the NIH classification system.     

Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and extrahepatic metastasis

Extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently been paradoxically increasing due to increased survival with effective locoregional therapies. The intrahepatic stage of the tumor is important for determining the risk of an extrahepatic lesion. Almost all patients with intrahepatic stage T(3-4), with or without EHM, die of progressive intrahepatic HCC but not due to EHM; thus, the majority of patients with HCC and EHM need to undergo concurrent treatment for intrahepatic HCC. There is no convincing evidence, to date, that systemic chemotherapy improves overall survival. Sorafenib is the first systemic agent that has demonstrated a significant survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC; however, the modest improvement of 3 months is far from satisfactory. Therefore, most hepatologists still rely on the conventional multidisciplinary approach to treat patients with EHM. The concept of the multidisciplinary treatment is the combination of locoregional therapies for both the intrahepatic HCC and symptomatic EHM when confined to a single organ. Targeted therapy may be considered for patients with advanced intrahepatic HCC and multiple EHM, however the potential efficacy of this approach requires confirmation. The outcome of ongoing clinical trials of the multidisciplinary approach, combining conventional locoregional therapy and targeted systemic therapy, is pending.     

Metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma to spleen and small intestine

Metastasis of cancer to the spleen or small intestine is rare. We encountered a case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with splenic and jejunal metastases. A 60-year-old man was referred to us in February 2005 with a diagnosis of splenic tumor. Since 2001, he had been treated repeatedly for HCC with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection; partial liver resection, transcatheter arterial chemo-embolization, and radiofrequency ablation therapy had been performed. In October 2004, he had undergone partial pulmonary resection due to metastasis of HCC to the lung. The splenic tumor, which was detected by computed tomography, seemed to be a metastasis of HCC. Splenectomy was performed for the splenic tumor, and a jejunal tumor was discovered and also resected. Both the splenic and jejunal tumors were diagnosed pathologically as metastases from the HCC. After repeated treatment for HCC, metastases can appear in various organs; thus, careful observation is necessary during follow-up.     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The role of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved over the past two decades, and transplantation has become one of the few curative treatment modalities for patients with HCC. Early results were poor, but the current restrictive selection criteria can yield excellent results. This review will discuss recent issues in the field, including (1) factors affecting the recurrence of HCC after LT; (2) the effect of downstaging HCC before LT, including transarterial catheter chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA); and (3) living-donor versus deceased-donor liver transplantation for HCC patients. The most important factors that have been described to affect LT survival include the tumor size, vascular invasion, and the degree of tumor differentiation. Recently, tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma carboxy prothrombin, were reported as predictors of HCC recurrence after LT. Furthermore, the experience accumulated with locoregional therapies such as TACE and RFA as bridging procedures to LT, along with the reduced waiting time under the HCC-adjusted MELD (model for endstage liver disease) system for organ allocation has led to improved outcomes. With the recent advances in adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there may be a marked change in the role of liver transplantation for hepatic malignancies, in particular for HCC.