The frequency of anti-C + anti-G in the absence of anti-D in alloimmunized pregnancies

Anti-D+C are often initially identified in sera from alloimmunized women. Anti-G may be present in these samples, mimicking anti-D+C, and therefore the differentiation of anti-D, -C and -G may be important. Sera from 27 alloimmunized women, initially identified as containing anti-D + anti-C, were analysed by adsorption/elution studies in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) using R(0)r (D+C-G+) and r'r(D-C+G+) red blood cells (RBC). Additionally, 15/27 samples were tested by adsorption in the presence of PEG and subsequently warm elution, using rGr (D-C-G+) RBC. Anti-G + anti-C, without anti-D, were identified in 4/27 samples (14.8%) and none of the newborn children needed postpartum treatment. The combination of D+G, D+C and D+C+G antibodies occurred in 25.9%, 11.1% and 48.1% of the women, respectively. Overall, anti-G was detected in 24/27 samples (88.9%). Pregnant women shown to have anti-G+C but not anti-D should receive Rh immune globulin. Additionally, the finding of apparent anti-D+C during pregnancy in D-negative spouses may lead to paternity testing and therefore a correct antibody identification is necessary.     

The routine use of Rh-negative reagent red cells for the identification of anti-D and the detection of non-D red cell antibodies

BACKGROUND: Before 1987, fewer than 50 patients per year at the authors' laboratory had a positive antibody detection test due to antepartum Rhesus immunoprophylaxis. However, after 1987, a marked increase was observed in the number of patients who had received Rh immune globulin (RhIG) during pregnancy as part of routine antepartum Rh immunoprophylaxis. In anticipation that an increased use of RhIG during pregnancy would increase the number of patients in whom anti-D was detected by this laboratory, a protocol was developed to abbreviate the process required to identify anti-D. Although this protocol was adopted primarily to address an anticipated increase in antenatal RhIG usage in women, it was also applied to alloimmunized Rh-negative males. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: When an Rh-negative patient (male or female) had a reactive screening test for unexpected antibodies and met certain other criteria, the patient's serum was tested with a three-vial set of Rh-negative reagent red cells (Rh-negative screening RBCs), instead of with panels of typed RBCs (panel RBCs), for the identification of anti- D or the detection of non-D antibodies. If the serum under test did not agglutinate or hemolyze Rh-negative screening RBCs, anti-D was identified and no further testing was performed. If the serum agglutinated or hemolyzed Rh-negative screening RBCs, conventional testing with panel RBCs was done to determine the antibody specificity. RESULTS: Rh-negative patients (n = 1174) who had reactive screening tests for unexpected antibodies were tested with Rh-negative screening RBCs; 1079 were found to have anti-D as a single antibody. Seven of these patients subsequently developed a non-D alloantibody, after transfusion or pregnancy, and one patient had anti-C that escaped detection at the time of initial testing with Rh-negative RBCs (a false- negative result). Ninety-two patients had anti-D in combination with a non-D antibody, and three patients had a non-D antibody but not anti-D. Use of the anti-D identification protocol actually reduced the laboratory workload by 176 College of American Pathologists workload units per month, in spite of a marked increase in the number of patients in whom anti-D was detected. No hemolytic transfusion reaction was attributed to the abbreviation of anti-D identification. CONCLUSION: The identification of anti-D may be abbreviated without jeopardizing patient safety. Such a protocol can reduce laboratory workload and might be particularly appealing to health care facilities that perform antibody detection testing on large numbers of Rh-negative pregnant women, especially if antepartum RhIG is administered routinely.     

Anti-G in a pregnant patient

BACKGROUND: Anti-G is a red cell (RBC) antibody of the Rh system. It has been described in pregnant women only in association with anti-D or anti-C; therefore, the ability of this antibody alone to cause hemolytic disease of the newborn is uncertain. One case in which this antibody caused no clinical sequelae is reported. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 35-year-old primigravida with type O, D-, C-, E-, c+ RBCs who was given 4 units of type O, D- allogeneic RBCs and 2 units of autologous RBCs 2 years antepartum. She was found to have anti-D and anti-C by an outside laboratory as part of a routine prenatal work-up. Further evaluation by our laboratory revealed the presence of anti-G and possible anti-C without anti-D. Titers at 22 weeks' gestation were 64 against r'r RBCs and 16 against R2R2 RBCs; these remained unchanged throughout the pregnancy. Amniocentesis performed at Weeks 28 and 32 showed no evidence of hemolytic disease of the newborn. A healthy 3.3-kg infant was delivered at 36 weeks' gestation. Prophylactic Rh immune globulin was administered antepartum and postpartum. The infant's RBCs were type O, D+, c+ C-, E-, and the direct antiglobulin test was positive. An acid eluate prepared from the baby's RBCs revealed anti-G. The total bilirubin was 5.5 mg per dL at birth, and the hematocrit was 66 percent. Total bilirubin peaked on Day 5 at 11.9 mg per dL, and no therapeutic intervention was required. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-G alone caused little if any fetal or neonatal hemolysis in this case. Although further study is needed, invasive fetal monitoring may be unnecessary if anti-G is the sole cause of fetomaternal RBC incompatibility.     

The Risk of Immunization to IgG Following Rh Immune Globulin Therapy

Three hundred thirteen women were typed for Gm and Inv factors and screened for the presence of antibodies to gamma globulin both before receiving Rh immune globulin and at six weeks, three, six, and nine months after injection. Thirty-five of the 313 women received multiple doses of Rh immune globulin following one or more pregnancies. In this group of patients, the incidence of anti-gamma globulins was no greater than in the women given a single 0.7 to 2.25 ml dose. Anti-gamma globulins were found in only 17 women (5.4%). Eleven had antibody prior to treatment and in six it first appeared in post injection specimens. Five of the women had allotype specific Gm agglutinators. In three, these were found in the pretreatment specimens. No evidence of Rh sensitization was demonstrable in the eleven Rh immune globulin recipients who had circulating anti-gamma globulins at the time of treatment. Our data indicates that the risk of sensitization to Gm and Inv factors is a function of the concentration of the antigen in the Rh immune globulin and the pheno-type of the recipients.     

Passive anti-C acquired in the setting of Rh immune globulin administration following Rh mismatched apheresis platelet transfusion: A case series

Rh immune globulin (RhIG) may be administered to Rh(D)-negative recipients of Rh(D)-positive platelet (PLT) transfusions to mitigate anti-D alloantibody formation. We report a series of seven patients in which anti-C was detected as a result of RhIG administered as immunoprophylaxis following Rh-mismatched apheresis PLT transfusion, persisting for a range of 27 to 167 days post-RhIG. The passively transferred anti-C antibodies created complexities for subsequent transfusion support. Based on these challenges, in combination with emerging evidence supporting an extremely low anti-D alloimmunization risk following Rh-mismatched apheresis PLTs, we have changed our practice and now limit RhIG immunoprophylaxis in this setting to women of reproductive age. In summary, the blood bank and apheresis communities should be aware that passive transfer of non-D antibodies is possible following RhIG administration. This phenomenon represents a compelling reason to consider the risk/benefit ratio of RhIG and to limit its use to situations in which it is clinically necessary.     

A case of mild HDFN caused by anti-C,anti-D,and anti-G: Diagnostic strategy and clinical significance of distinguishing anti-G from anti-D and anti-C

Anti-G is commonly present with anti-D and anti-C and can confuse serological investigations. The differentiation of anti-G from anti-D and anti-C is particularly essential for the accurate diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and appropriate administration of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Rhesus (Rh) negative women. We reported a rare case of anti-G together with anti-D and anti-C in a pregnant woman and her female neonate. The titers of IgG anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G in the woman were 256, 128, and 32, respectively. While the titers of IgG anti-D, anti-C, and anti-G in the neonate were 16, 8, and 4, respectively. The neonate experienced mild HDFN and only received phototherapy during hospitalization. This report discusses the diagnostic strategy and clinical significance of differentiating anti-G from anti-D and anti-C.     

Diagnosing hemolytic disease of the newborn.

A Rh negative, pregnant female presented to a major medical center for possible Rh alloimmunization. This female had nine previous pregnancies, including three spontaneous abortions, four live births, and two fetal demises. Because of poor prenatal care, the immunization Rh immune globulin was administered to only the first two pregnancies. After much laboratory testing and treatment, this tenth pregnancy also ended in fetal demise.     

Detection of multiple passively acquired alloantibodies following infusions of IV Rh immune globulin

BACKGROUND: Passively acquired blood group alloantibodies are detected regularly after infusions of IV Rh immune globulin (RhIG) for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in D+ patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples from 16 D+ patients with ITP were tested after treatment with IV RhIG for the presence of passively acquired alloantibodies. Similar studies were conducted for three D- patients after injections of IM RhIG for Rh immunoprophyl-axis. Four production lots of IV RhIG and 2 lots of IM RhIG were tested for the presence of alloantibodies. RESULTS: All 16 D+ patients with ITP developed a positive DAT, as well as positive antibody detection test results, after infusions of IV RhIG. All postinfusion plasma samples contained anti-D, as well as one or more additional antibodies, usually anti-C, -E, -G, -V, or -Fy(a). Eluates from patients' RBCs with positive DAT results contained multiple passively acquired alloantibodies. Multiple alloantibodies were detected in samples of different production lots of IV RhIG or IM RhIG. No acute transfusion reactions were observed in five D+ patients with ITP who had been treated with IV RhIG and had been given serologically incompatible D+ RBCs. After injections of IM RhIG, the only passively acquired alloantibody detected was anti-D. CONCLUSION: Plasma samples from D+ patients with ITP treated with IV RhIG regularly contained anti-D and multiple other passively acquired Rh, Duffy, or Kidd system alloantibodies. Postinfusion RBC samples all had positive DAT results with eluates containing anti-D and multiple other Rh, Duffy, or Kidd system antibodies. The consistent detection of multiple passively acquired alloantibodies after IV RhIG, in contrast to the detection of anti-D only after IM RhIG, reflects the immediate effect of the entire (bolus) dose of RhIG by the IV route, the dose for treating ITP that is approximately 10 times the dose for Rh immunoprophylaxis, and the expected serologic incompatibility with recipients' D+ RBCs.     

RhD阴性孕妇IgG抗体效价的检测及换血疗法临床效果探讨

目的 探讨RhD阴性孕妇产前免疫球蛋白(Ig)G抗体效价监测对新生儿溶血病(HDN)的诊断意义、Rh-HDN血清学试验及临床换血疗法治疗情况.方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年8月该院产科门诊收治的209例RhD阴性孕妇IgG抗体及同期在该院分娩的新生儿血清学试验检测结果及患儿临床资料.结果 209例孕妇中Ig...     

Red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy and their clinical consequences: synergistic effects of multiple specificities

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine clinical consequences of various specificities for the infant/fetus. The population was patients referred between 1998 and 2005 to the tertiary center because of detected red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization. Altogether 455 infants were delivered by 390 alloimmunized women.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from the blood bank register and the obstetric and neonatal database. As indicators of hemolytic activity of the antibodies, the frequency of the therapeutic interventions intrauterine transfusion, exchange transfusion, and simple transfusion was used.
RESULTS: Anti-D was the most common antibody (46.6%), followed by anti-K (15.4%). A combination of antibodies was detected in 27%. All three types of therapeutic intervention were significantly more frequent in women with anti-D plus an additional antibody than in women with anti-D as the sole antibody. The anti-D titer closely paralleled the clinical importance of the antibody. One case of anti-s with a titer of 512 required all three types of transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-D was the single most frequent and harmful specificity closely followed by anti-K. Combinations of antibody specificities were more harmful than single specificities, and a potentially synergistic effect should be considered.     

IgG titer, subclass, and light-chain phenotype of pregnancy-induced HPA-5b antibodies that cause or do not cause neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: The most common pregnancy-induced platelet-specific antibody is HPA-5b. Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia that results from anti-HPA-5b may cause severe hemorrhage in only a few infants, but the sequelae for the affected children can be severe. It is therefore essential that infants at risk for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia are identified. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The IgG titer, subclass, and light-chain composition of pregnancy-induced anti-HPA-5b were determined by the monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens assay. Sera were from 12 mothers, who among them had 16 pregnancies that resulted in an HPA-5-mismatched fetus (positive for HPA-5b). Eight mothers gave birth to an infant with a normal platelet count. Three maternal sera were obtained after delivery of a severely thrombocytopenic infant. Three alloimmunized women were followed repeatedly during the course of a subsequent pregnancy, again with an HPA-5-mismatched infant. RESULTS: There was no difference in the antibody titer or its subclass in mothers who had a thrombocytopenic child and the titer or subclass in mothers compared with those who had a child with a normal platelet count. All pregnancy-induced HPA-5b antibodies were of a predominant, lambda, light-chain type. The IgG subclass did not change during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Neither the antibody titer nor the subclass composition predict the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in a newborn whose mother is alloimmunized against HPA-5b.     

The restricted use of IGHV3 superspecies genes in anti-Rh is not limited to hyperimmunized anti-D donors

BACKGROUND: Antibodies produced against the D antigen make use of IGHV genes restricted to the IGHV3 superfamily. These findings are based on the IGHV gene analysis in anti-D-producing B cells from hyperimmunized donors, however, and therefore the restriction might be due to the hyperimmunization. In this study the IGHV gene usage of anti-Rh-producing B cells in a woman who was immunized in the last trimester of her pregnancy was analyzed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic analysis was performed by absorption and elution. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of the different anti-Rh was determined. A phage display library was constructed from 2.2 x 10(6) isolated B cells and pannings were performed with red cells of the r'r, R1R1, and R2R2 phenotype. RESULTS: A plasma sample of the immunized person showed high levels of both anti-D and anti-G and low levels of anti-C. Anti-D and anti-G contributed equally strong to the ADCC whereas anti-C did not. Eighteen anti-D-, 5 anti-G-, and 1 anti-C-specific phage clones were found, of which 16, 2, and 1 used the IGHV3s genes, respectively. CONCLUSION: For the first time a restriction to the IGHV3s genes in anti-D in a naturally immunized pregnant woman is shown. Moreover, the use of IGHV3s genes appears to be present in anti-C and anti-G as well. Therefore, it is concluded that restricted IGHV3s gene usage in anti-D is not due to hyperimmunization but due to characteristics of the Rh antigens and the intrinsic binding capacities of IGHV3s genes, supporting the common Rh footprint hypothesis.     

Immunization Against Rh

Clinical trials involving thousands of patients at risk have shown anti-D gamma globulin to be safe and effective in preventing Rh sensitization. Candidates for prophylaxis are women whose immune response has not yet been activated.     

Early plasmapheresis followed by high-dose γ-globulin treatment saved a severely Rho-incompatible pregnancy

An alloimmunized pregnancy induces anemia in the fetus and can ultimately lead to fetal hydrops and intrauterine fetal death. A woman with a severe Rho-incompatible pregnancy had experienced frequent pregnancies with fetomaternal transfusion without receiving RhIg and had high anti-D antibody titers present from early pregnancy. We succeeded in long-term inhibition of antibody production using plasmapheresis followed by high-dose γ-globulin treatment in early pregnancy.     

Do Rh-negative women with first trimester spontaneous abortions need Rh immune globulin?

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether literature supports the use of Rh immune globulin in Rh-negative women with first trimester spontaneous abortions to prevent maternal sensitization to the fetal Rh antigen and subsequent fetal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1966-2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE (1990 to 2005), and the reference sections of the articles found. The search is considered updated to December of 2005. Search terms included vaginal bleeding, Rh negative, Rh immune globulin, RhoGAM, isoimmunization, sensitization, first trimester pregnancy, threatened, and spontaneous abortion. RESULTS: The evidence to support the use of Rh immune globulin for a diagnosis of first trimester spontaneous abortion is minimal. There is a paucity of well-designed research that examines maternal sensitization or hemolytic disease of the newborn as an outcome in patients receiving, versus not receiving, Rh immune globulin in first trimester bleeding. There is significant evidence to demonstrate fetomaternal hemorrhage in first trimester spontaneous abortions; yet, no studies demonstrate subsequent maternal sensitization or development hemolytic disease in the fetus as a result of this hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In summary, there is minimal evidence that administering Rh immune globulin for first trimester vaginal bleeding prevents maternal sensitization or development of hemolytic disease of the newborn. The practice of administering Rh immune globulin to Rh-negative women with a first trimester spontaneous abortion is based on expert opinion and extrapolation from experience with fetomaternal hemorrhage in late pregnancy. Its use for first trimester bleeding is not evidence-based.     

The risk assessment study for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in a University Hospital in Turkey

Maternal red-cell alloimmunization occurs when a woman’s immune system is sensitized to foreign red-blood cell surface antigens, leading to the production of alloantibodies. The resulting antibodies often cross the placenta during pregnancies in sensitized women and, if the fetus is positive for red-blood-cell surface antigens, this will lead to hemolysis of fetal red-blood cells and anemia. The most severe cases of hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn baby are caused by anti-D, anti-c, anti-E and anti-K antibodies. There are limited data available on immunization rates in pregnant women from Turkey. The aim of the present study was to provide data on the frequency and nature of maternal RBC alloimmunization in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the indirect antiglobulin test results of Rh-negative pregnant women performed in our Blood Bank between 2006 and 2012. Indirect antiglobulin test positive women also underwent confirmatory antibody screening and identification. During the study period, 4840 women admitted to our antenatal clinics. With regards to the major blood group systems (ABO and Rh), the most common phenotype was O positive (38.67%). There were 4097 D-antigen-positive women (84.65%) and 743 women with D-antigen-negative phenotype (15.35%). The prevalence of alloimmunization was found to be 8.74% in D-antigen negative group. Despite prophylactic use of Rh immunglobulins, anti-D is still a common antibody identified as the major cause of alloimmunization in our study (anti-D antibody 68.57%, non-D antibody 31.42%). While alloimmunization rate to D antigen was 6.46%, non-D alloimmunization rate was 2.69% among Rh-negative pregnant women. Moreover, detailed identification facilities for antibodies other than anti-D are not available in most of centers across Turkey. However, large-scale studies on pregnant women need to be done in order to collect sufficient evidence to formulate guidelines and to define indications for alloantibody screening and identification.     

Intrauterine transfusion via umbilical vein in severe Rh isoimmunization

Although the widespread use of anti-D immune globulin has dramatically reduced the incidence of Rh isoimmunization, an occasional pregnant patient becomes a candidate for intrauterine transfusion because of sensitization to Rh antigens or irregular red blood cell antigens. Current methods of ultrasonography provide needle guidance to the umbilical vein, permitting fetal intravascular transfusion. We have reported a case involving five separate intrauterine transfusions via the umbilical vein.     

Plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of D alloimmunization in pregnancy

The alloimmunized pregnancy can result in fetal and newborn mortality due to fetal anemia. Control of fetal anemia has not been possible until recently, and management consists of following the degree of fetal anemia during gestation until intrauterine transfusion is feasible to support the fetus until delivery. Cordocentesis and intrauterine transfusion have potential complications that have been well documented. Control of fetal anemia via immune modulation utilizing plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin administration has been attempted alone and in combination with varying results. We present a case report of an Rh(D) alloimmunized pregnancy, in which successful management consisted of initial therapeutic plasmapheresis (TPE) followed by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration until delivery at 37 weeks gestation without the need for intrauterine transfusion. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The RoHar antigenic complex is associated with a limited number of D epitopes and alloanti-D production: a study of three unrelated persons and their families

BACKGROUND: the RoHar antigenic complex has been characterized serologically by difficulties in D typing, weak e expression, lack of G antigen, presence of Rh33, a low-frequency Rh antigen, and, more recently, a second low-frequency antigen, FPTT. Allocation to one of the partial D catagories was not considered because of the unuaual reactions of RoHar cells and because anti-D production was not observed in RoHar persons. STUDY DESIGN and METHODS: Three unrelated RoHar donors and their families were studied in detail with special emphasis on D epitope mapping, e and G typing, and screening for antibodies. RESULTS: Only D epitopes 5 and 6/7 were demonstrable, and D epitopes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9 seem to be absent in the RoHar complex. In one individual, the presence of alloanti-D with limited specificity, not reacting with RoHar red cells of other individuals, was found 6 months after a second D+ pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The finding of alloanti-D in an RoHar r person supports the concept that the D characteristic of this phenotype is a partial D antigen, which is consistent with the presence of the limited number of D epitopes found in epitope mapping. As has been suggested for other partial D antigens, RoHar individuals should be regarded as D- for the receipt of blood, and pregnant RoHar women who have had D+ pregnancies should receive anti-D prophylaxis.     

Specificity and isotype of Rh specific antibodies produced by human B-cell lines established from alloimmunized Rh negative women.

Despite the successful outcome of anti-D prophylaxis program, alloimmunization still occurs. The aim of this study was to examine the specificity and isotype of anti-Rh antibodies in plasma samples of Rh negative alloimmunized individuals and to study the same parameters in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) generated from the same donors. Specificity of anti-Rh antibodies was determined in plasma of nine alloimmunized subjects by direct hemagglutination using a panel of known RBC genotypes and isotype of specific antibodies were identified by an antigen specific ELISA. Similar methods were employed to determine specificity and isotype of antibodies produced by Rh specific LCLs established from four donors. LCLs were generated by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from each donor followed by their culture over a feeder of human fetal fibroblasts. Upon emergence of lymphoblastoid cells, culture supernatants were assayed for presence of Rh specific antibody by hemagglutination assay. Anti-D was the predominant antibody in both plasma samples and among the 128 established LCLs; however, antibodies to other Rh specificities namely C and E were also produced. The isotype of anti-Rh antibody in all plasma samples was found to be IgG, predominantly IgG1, combined in 7 samples with IgM. Similarly 76%, 9.2% and 14.8% of LCLs were determined to produce antibody of IgG, IgM and of both isotypes, respectively. The data supported that the D antigen is the immunodominant component of the Rh system as indicated by the in vitro and in vivo profiles of Rh specificities in our alloimmunized subjects.