The Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared to Postoperative Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

The current approach to the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer is sequential chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation, and consolidation chemotherapy. Although significant tumor response is seen with this regimen, there are few studies that compare this approach to postoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the disease-free and overall survival of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to patients treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Ninety-four patients with stage IIB, MA, and MB breast cancer were treated with a standardized chemotherapy regimen. The first group, 60 patients who were followed prospectively, was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) consisting of vincristine, prednisone, Cytoxan, methotrexate, and 5-FU (CVFMP) followed by surgery and consolidation chemotherapy with adriamycin. The second group, 34 patients evaluated retrospectively, had surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy (PCT) with CVFMP followed by adriamycin. Overall median follow-up was 38 months. In the NCT group, 45/60 (75%) patients had a clinical response to induction therapy and the median reduction in tumor size was 50%. The rates of local recurrence, distant recurrence, and death from disease were similar in the two groups. The time to local recurrence was similar for the two groups. However, the median time to distant recurrence was shorter in the NCT group (19 month vs. 31 months, p = NS). Overall median survival among the NCT patients was shorter than for the PCT group (30 vs. 47 months, p = NS). The current study suggests that postoperative therapy is comparable to a neoadjuvant regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer with regard to local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival.     

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective review

PURPOSE: Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast represents a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers. The purpose of this study is to better characterize the clinical management of this disease including the role of radiation therapy after surgery. We compared patients that have been treated with either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of 43 patients with metaplastic breast cancer who were evaluated in our regional radiation oncology department between 1987 and 2002. Twenty-one patients were treated with an MRM and 22 with BCS. Five patients from the MRM group received adjuvant radiation, as did 19 patients from the BCS group. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pathologic and treatment-related factors was performed. Local control, disease-free, and overall survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared for the two groups. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for all patients was 44.2 months. Mean tumor size was 3.4 cm. Four patients (9%) had positive estrogen receptors and 20 (25%) had positive nodes. The overall 5-year projected local recurrence-free (88% vs. 85%, p = 0.86), disease-free (55% vs. 84%, p = 0.13), and overall survivals (80% vs. 89%, p = 0.58) were not significantly different for both groups. The only tumor parameter significantly associated with overall survival was nodal status. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that breast conservation appears to be a reasonable treatment option for women with metaplastic breast cancer, achieving equal survival to mastectomy. The use of adjuvant radiation seems essential for achieving high local control rates after conservation therapy. Further studies will be needed to determine the impact of chemotherapy on survival outcomes.     

Impact of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors on outcome in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with multimodality therapy

The authors reviewed the experience at their institution treating patients with locally advanced breast cancer using multimodality therapy to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome. One hundred patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with definitive therapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Three patients had stage IIB disease, 45 patients had stage IIIA disease, and 52 patients had IIIB disease. Thirteen patients had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Seventy-four patients (74%) received trimodality therapy consisting of systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Systemic therapy was delivered to 90 patients. Eighty-three patients (83%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. Eighty-five patients underwent mastectomy (85%). Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for their impact on outcome. The median follow-up was 47 months. Overall, the 5-year actuarial rates of local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival were 81%, 43%, 53%, and 55%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates for patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma, stage IIIA disease, and stage IIIB disease were 25%, 55%, and 53%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, local control was improved with radiation therapy (p = 0.008) and the absence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.008). Disease-free survival was improved with the addition of radiation therapy (p = 0.001) and with less than four positive lymph nodes (p = 0.003). Distant metastasis-free survival was improved in patients without inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0249) and with less than four involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0135). Cause-specific survival and overall survival were adversely affected by the presence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0135 and p = 0.0325, respectively) or four or more involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0082 and p = 0.012, respectively). Radiation therapy appears to be a critical component in the overall treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer by improving the rates of local control and disease-free survival. Other adverse factors for survival include four or more positive lymph nodes and inflammatory breast carcinoma.     

Aggressive combined modality therapy for advanced local-regional breast carcinoma

Thirty-two women with advanced local regional breast carcinoma, including nine patients with histologically diagnosed inflammatory cancer, were entered on a prospective pilot study. They were treated aggressively with initial surgery, two courses of induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, +/- prednisone, +/- tamoxifen (CMF [P] [T]), local-regional radiotherapy, and then maintenance chemotherapy with CMF(P) (T) alternating with doxorubicin, vincristine, +/- tamoxifen (AV[T]). The patients have been followed for 19-70 months from the time of mastectomy and their actuarial three-year survival is 65% with a median survival that has not yet been reached. Median disease-free survival (time to progression) is currently 29.5 months. Women whose gross disease could not be totally resected surgically had shorter disease-free survivals than those rendered surgically free of disease (p = 0.01). Clinically evident cardiotoxicity was seen in 25% of the patients and was felt to be primarily due to the combination of doxorubicin and radiation therapy. It was significantly more common (Plt less than 0.05) in patients with left chest irradiation (seven of 18 women) as opposed to those with right-sided irradiation (one of 14).     

Management of elderly patients with primary breast cancer

From 1974 through 1983, three hundred forty-three patients aged 70 years or older at diagnosis received comprehensive post-operative radiation therapy for localized (Stage I-III) breast cancer following surgical procedures ranging from incisional biopsies to classical radical mastectomy. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for this series of elderly patients are 67% and 33%. The respective disease-free survival rates are 67% and 42%. Over one-half of these women were treated by less than total mastectomy. No differences were seen in survival, disease-free survival, or local regional control rates comparing similarly staged patients treated by radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, or tylectomy. Complications were few and seen primarily in those patients subjected to axillary dissection prior to irradiation. Long term survival appears to be achievable in the majority of elderly patients with regionally confined disease at presentation and aggressive treatment with curative intent is warranted. These elderly patients are often poor candidates for radical surgery. In this patient population, conservative surgery with post-operative radiation therapy is well tolerated and provides equivalent results to more radical surgical procedures.     

局部区域复发乳腺癌的治疗进展

和初治的乳腺癌相比,局部区域复发性患者的预后分析和挽救治疗策略选择存在更多的不确定性。本文首先分析了影响保乳手术和乳房切除术后局部-区域复发的高危因素以及相应的复发模式。以再次手术和包括完整复发灶及相应亚临床病灶的放射治疗为主要形式的局部治疗是综合治疗策略的基础,合理的局部治疗可以达到有效的局部疾病控制率并降低二次局部区域复发。虽然既往的前瞻性或回顾性资料对于全身治疗在局部-区域复发乳腺癌治疗中的价值始终没有确认,由多个国际乳腺癌研究组织联合发起的CALOR研究结果的公布第一次证实,在保留合理的内分泌治疗和靶向治疗的前提下,手术+放射治疗联合后续的全身化疗可以进一步提高无病生存率和总生存率,尤其在激素受体阴性的患者中获益更显著。所以结合原发病灶和复发灶的肿瘤标志物给予合理的全身治疗将成为局部区域复发患者综合治疗重要的组成部分。     

Eleven-year follow-up results in the delay of breast irradiation after conservative breast surgery in node-negative breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: This retrospective review was conducted to determine if delay in the start of radiotherapy after conservative breast surgery had any detrimental effect on local recurrence or disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 568 patients with T1 and T2, N0 breast cancer were treated with breast-conserving surgery and breast irradiation, without adjuvant systemic therapy, between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1992 at the London Regional Cancer Centre. The time intervals from definitive breast surgery to breast irradiation used for analysis were 0 to 8 weeks (201 patients), greater than 8 to 12 weeks (235 patients), greater than 12 to 16 weeks (91 patients), and greater than 16 weeks (41 patients). Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to local-recurrence and disease-free survival rates were calculated. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 11.2 years. Patients in all 4 time intervals were similar in terms of age and pathologic features. No statistically significant difference was seen between the 4 groups in local recurrence or disease-free survival with surgery radiotherapy interval (p = 0.521 and p = 0.222, respectively). The overall local-recurrence rate at 5 and 10 years was 4.6% and 11.3%, respectively. The overall disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 79.6% and 67.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that delay in the start of breast irradiation of up to 16 weeks from definitive surgery does not increase the risk of recurrence in node-negative breast cancer patients. The certainty of these results is limited by the retrospective nature of this analysis.     

Is surgery necessary after complete clinical remission following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer?

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aimed to identify whether breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy alone following a complete clinical remission (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a worse outcome than those treated with surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six patients who had achieved a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 453 patients. Of these, 67 patients had undergone surgery as their primary locoregional therapy, and 69 patients had radiotherapy alone. Outcome was assessed in relation to local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63 months in the surgery group and 87 months in the no surgery group. Prognostic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. For surgery and no surgery, respectively, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival or overall survival (5-year, 74% v 76%; 10-year, 60% v 70%, P =.9) between the two groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased locoregional-only recurrence for the no surgery group (21% v 10% at 5 years; P =.09), but no long-term failures of local control. Patients in the no surgery group who also achieved an ultrasound complete remission had a 5-year local recurrence rate of only 8%. CONCLUSION: In patients achieving a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone achieve survival rates as good as with surgery, but with higher local recurrence rates. Ultrasound may identify a low recurrence rate subgroup for assessing no surgery in a prospective trial.     

Locally advanced breast carcinoma: results with combined regional therapy

To define optimal regional treatment as initial management of locally advanced (Stage III & IV) breast cancer, 509 patients treated from 1966-1982 were reviewed. All patients received comprehensive postoperative irradiation of the peripheral lymphatics and chest wall, following surgical procedures varying from incisional biopsy to classical radical mastectomy. Patients were followed from 1 to over 16 years. The survival rate at 5 and 10 years for the entire series is 41% and 26%. Fifty-eight patients having radical surgery for T3 tumors and subsequently found to have negative axillary lymph nodes showed the highest rates of survival, 72% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. This was significantly better (p less than .01) than patients with T3N+ disease, (5 year survival 44%; 10 year, 29%) and T4N+ disease (44%, 39%). Four hundred seventy patients with non-inflammatory carcinoma and no supraclavicular metastases were considered technically resectable. Three hundred eighty-one of these patients underwent a definitive surgical procedure removing all gross cancer prior to irradiation and, as expected, showed higher rates of local disease control than patients having lesser surgery (79% versus 45%, p less than .01). These patients also showed markedly better rates of survival and relapse-free survival with 50% alive and 38% disease free, versus 14 and 8%, at 5 years (p less than .01). There were no 10 year survivors among the 89 technically resectable patients having less than total gross resection. Long term relapse-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer can be achieved with aggressive combined local-regional therapy. Total resection of all gross cancer prior to irradiation is recommended. Modifications of postoperative radiation therapy techniques are suggested to further improve local control rates for these advanced tumors. This large series provides a baseline for evaluation of current programs adding adjuvant systemic therapy to regional treatment.     

Conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Earlier literature suggests a high incidence of multicentricity and bilaterality, with an overall poor prognosis, in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Consequently, there is considerable disagreement regarding appropriate local management of this disease. To determine the influence of invasive lobular histologic findings on local tumor control, disease-free survival, and overall survival, the authors reviewed 60 patients with Stage I and II invasive lobular breast carcinoma treated with local tumor excision and radiation therapy between 1981 and 1987 (mean follow-up, 5.5 years; range, 2.5 to 10 years). The 5-year actuarial risk of locoregional recurrence was 5%, with two of three failures occurring in the regional lymphatics. The mean time to locoregional failure was 28 months. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival (84%) and overall survival (91%) were comparable to those seen in several large series of similarly treated patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Contralateral breast cancer occurred at a rate of approximately 0.6% per year. This study and a review of the literature suggest that breast conservation, with local resection and radiation therapy, is appropriate therapy for invasive lobular breast cancer.     

An aggressive approach to marginally resectable lung cancer.

Between July 1968 and December 1974, 53 patients with lung cancer were planned for preoperative irradiation and surgery. All patients were considered clinically marginally resectable because of advanced local disease, 4 Stage II patients, with limited pulmonary reserve and 49 Stage III patients. Most patients received 3000 to 4000 rad followed in two weeks by thoracotomy. Forty-six patients were explored and 38 were resectable. Twelve patients are alive with a median follow-up of 48 months. The cumulative 5-year survival of all resectable patients is 27%. The survival of patients with marginally resectable lung cancer treated by accelerated radiotherapy followed by aggressive surgery approaches the survival experience of patients with primary resectable lung cancer and is superior to such patients treated with radiation therapy alone.     

Radiotherapy for breast cancer: today and tomorrow

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and radiation has allowed many women to preserve their breasts and avoid disfiguring surgery. Lumpectomy and breast irradiation is a standard therapy for early breast cancer patients who desire breast conservation. However, the overall rate of mastectomy exceeds that of BCT in the United States. There have been significant advances in patient awareness of the options available for local management of early breast cancer and changes in the attitudes of physicians, including surgeons, allowing a gradual rise in the rate of BCT in the last two decades. Now, investigations are designed to define subgroups of patients with early breast cancer in whom radiation can be safely omitted. In locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has allowed some women to have BCT after initial cytoreduction. This approach results in excellent local control when patients are carefully selected for BCT. There is renewed interest in postmastectomy radiation for early breast cancer patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. In this intermediate risk group for locoregional recurrence, the addition of chest wall and regional lymphatic irradiation to adjuvant systemic therapy has potential for significant improvement in ultimate survival. This concept is novel in breast cancer, a disease that was believed to be systemic at inception and in which only systemic control was thought to impact survival. In this era of effective adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer, local control measures have become more important as local control has real potential for impacting survival.     

复发转移性三阴性乳腺癌临床特征及总生存分析

目的：分析复发转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的治疗方式及总生存情况。方法回顾性分析复发转移后来我院治疗,并随访至病亡的78例三阴性乳腺癌患者临床资料,根据其临床特征、复发情况及治疗方式评价其总生存情况。结果78例患者总生存时间（OS）为6～236个月,中位OS为32.1个月。1年生存率92.3%,5年生存率28.2%,10年生存率6.4%。71例（91.0%）三阴性乳腺癌患者行根治术或改良根治手术,其无病生存时间（DFS）为1～184个月,中位DFS为15.0个月,7例（9.0%）患者为初治Ⅳ期。Ⅰ期三阴性乳腺癌患者OS为19.7～236个月,中位OS为90.0个月。复发转移后OS为3.0～93.3个月,中位OS为14.4个月。13例（16.7%）患者局部复发或单纯部位转移的患者行局部手术治疗联合全身治疗者中位OS为26.5月,65例（83.3%）仅行全身治疗者中位OS为12.2个月（P=0.034）。一线化疗方案含紫杉类药物的患者中位OS为14.6个月,未予紫杉类药物的患者中位OS为11.0个月（P=0.048）。结论复发转移性三阴性乳腺癌整体预后较差,生存期短,但异质性较高,且早期三阴性乳腺癌患者具有明显的生存优势。值得一提的是本文只针对已经有生存节点的患者进行分析,这组患者乳腺癌的恶性程度相对较高。也间接提示三阴性乳腺癌的治疗也不能一概而论。对这些早期复发的患者,目前的辅助治疗可能是不足够的。     

Primary medical therapy for operable breast cancer

Fifty-seven patients with large but potentially operable primary breast cancer were treated with primary medical therapy rather than initial mastectomy, using chemotherapy (15) or endocrine therapy (42) with the tumour remaining in situ. Of patients treated with chemotherapy, one (7%) achieved a complete remission, and eight (53%) a partial response (overall response rate 60%). Only one patient had progressive disease while on chemotherapy. Of patients who received endocrine therapy, one (2%) achieved a complete response, and 19 (45%) a partial response (overall response rate 47%). Two patients progressed on endocrine therapy. Only 10 patients have so far had a subsequent mastectomy (18%), and 17 (30%) have had radiotherapy and/or conservative surgery. The rest are still on medical therapy.With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 6–42 months) only two patients have had a local recurrence after being disease-free and none have developed uncontrollable local recurrence. Eight (14%) have developed distant metastases and four (7%) have died of metastatic disease.Primary medical therapy may offer an effective alternative to mastectomy for patients with operable breast carcinomas too large for conservative surgery and merits further study.     

Treatment of locoregionally advanced breast cancer with surgery, radiotherapy, and combination chemoimmunotherapy

Fifty-two patients with locally advanced primary breast cancer (T3, T4, N2, N3) but no evidence of distant metastases were treated with three cycles of combination chemotherapy. The regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (FAC-BCG), followed by local therapy (simple mastectomy and/or radiotherapy to the breast/chest wall and the regional lymphatic system) and adjuvant chemotherapy for two full years. The results were compared with those in an historical control group of 52 patients matched for initial stage of disease who were treated by a simple mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy only. Forty-nine (94%) of 52 FAC-treated patients and 48 (92%) of the control patients became free of clinically detectable disease. At the median follow-up time of 56 months, 37.5% of the FAC-treated patients and 19.5% of the control patients had remained free of disease. FAC-treated patients who completed 2 years of therapy and in whom adjuvant chemotherapy was started promptly after local treatment had a 48% disease-free survival rate of 4 years. In those in whom the initial manifestation was supraclavicular involvement, the estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 42% for patients treated with FAC and 9% for control patients. There were local recurrences in 25% of FAC-treated patients and 23% of control patients (not significant). Distant metastases developed in 50% of FAC-treated patients and 77% of control patients (p less than 0.01). The median disease-free interval was 25 months in the FAC-treated group and 11 months in the control group (p = 0.025). The greatest improvement in prognosis was in patients with supraclavicular involvement; the median disease-free survival was 26 months in FAC-treated patients and 6 months in the control group (p = 0.007). This multimodal approach effectively renders the majority of patients with locoregionally advanced breast cancer free of disease and prolongs the disease-free survival period.     

Primary radiotherapy of breast cancer: treatment results in locally advanced breast cancer and in operable patients selected by positive axillary apex biopsy.

To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy without surgery, treatment results in patients treated for locally advanced breast cancer (n = 209) and those selected by positive axillary apex biopsy (n = 289) in the period between 1977 and 1985 have been analysed retrospectively. Treatment consisted of primary irradiation to the breast and regional lymph nodes followed by a boost to the primary breast tumour and palpable regional disease to a mean normalised total dose (NTD) of 64.7 Gy with a range of 33.4-93 Gy (2 Gy fractions, alpha/beta = 5 Gy). Adjuvant systemic treatment was given in 30% of the locally advanced and in 40% of the apex positive patients. Thirty percent of the apex positive patients had an excisional biopsy of the breast tumour. By multivariate analysis a prognostic index is constructed for locoregional control, overall survival and distant disease-free interval. Primary tumour size and clinical nodal status are independent prognostic factors for locoregional control. Based on the prognostic index for local control four different groups can be identified with 5 year local control rates varying from 47 to 86%. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and patients irradiated to a NTD of 60 Gy or more had significantly better local control. For overall survival primary tumour size, clinical nodal size and age are independent prognostic factors. Patients irradiated to a NTD above 60 Gy had significantly better results. Survival according to the prognostic index for survival varies between 20 and 50% at 5 years for the four groups subdivided according to the index for survival. Primary tumour size, clinical node size and age are independent prognostic factors for distant disease-free interval. Patients treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy had significantly better results. In the four groups subdivided according to the prognostic index for distant disease-free interval results vary from 17 to 30% at 5 years.     

Chemoradiation therapy for potentially resectable gastric cancer: clinical outcomes among patients who do not undergo planned surgery

PURPOSE: We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes among resectable gastric cancer patients treated preoperatively with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) but rendered ineligible for planned surgery because of clinical deterioration or development of overt metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1996 and 2004, 39 patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer received preoperative CRT but failed to undergo surgery. At baseline clinical staging, 33 (85%) patients had T3-T4 disease, and 27 (69%) patients had nodal involvement. Most patients received 45 Gy of radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients underwent induction chemotherapy before CRT. Actuarial times to local control (LC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The cause for surgical ineligibility was development of metastatic disease (28 patients, 72%; predominantly peritoneal, 18 patients), poor performance status (5 patients, 13%), patient/physician preference (4 patients, 10%), and treatment-related death (2 patients, 5%). With a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 1-95 months), actuarial 1-year LC, DC, and OS were 46%, 12%, and 36%, respectively. Median LC and OS were 11.0 and 10.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer treated with preoperative CRT are found to be ineligible for surgery principally because of peritoneal progression. Patients who are unable to undergo planned surgery have outcomes comparable to that of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy alone. CRT provides durable LC for the majority of the remaining life of these patients.     

Radical radiation vs surgery plus post-operative radiation in advanced (resectable) supraglottic larynx and pyriform sinus cancers: a prospective randomized study.

AIM: Survival in head and neck cancers reflect loco-regional control. With an aim of organ and function preservation the present study was undertaken to compare local failure and survivals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 1991-December 1995, 72 patients with resectable advanced supraglottic cancers, were randomized to radical surgery followed by post-operative radiation therapy (Sx+PORT) (Arm I) or radical radiation therapy followed by salvage surgery (RRT+/-SSx) (Arm II). RESULTS: Sixty-four of 72 patients were evaluable, 55 were T3 (86%) and 9 were T4 (14%) tumors. In Arm I (n=35) with a mean follow-up of 24 months (2-86 months), 21 patients were alive without disease. Six patients had recurrence, one each at local and tracheostomy stoma, four had nodal recurrence only, and two developed 2nd primary in soft palate/tonsil and parotid at 15 and 18 months respectively. In Arm II (n=29), with a mean follow-up of 24 months (3-81 months), 14 patients were alive without disease. Thirteen patients had recurrence, eight had local (one patient had persistent disease), two nodal only, three loco-regional and two patients developed distant metastasis (lung). One out of eight local recurrence and 2/2 nodal recurrences were salvaged with Sx. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival between the two treatment arms, DFS (5 years) of 70% in Arm I vs 50% in Arm II (p=0.04), but did not have any impact on overall survival OAS (5 years); 73% vs 77% (p=0.79). Voice/laryngeal preservation was possible in 18/29 patients (62%) treated with RRT+/- Sx, without significantly affecting the OAS. "Pathological upstaging" was another significant finding seen in 64% of clinical T3 after radical surgery. CONCLUSION: RRT+/-SSx can be a feasible option in low volume, favourable resectable stage III and IV supraglottic lesions for better quality of life.     

Posperative radiation therapy for carcinoma of the breast: Improved results with elective irradiation of the chest wall

A review was conducted of all patients with primary cancer of the breast treated by the Radiation Therapy Department of Mount Sinai Medical Center from 1966–1978. The initial surgical procedure was radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy for 926 patients. The mean follow-up for this group was 6.42 years, the range was 1–13 years. All postoperative therapy was given with megavoltage equipment. Treatment was directed to either the peripheral lymphatics (internal mammary chain, supraclavicular and axillary apex) or to the peripheral lymphatics fossa and chest wall. The decision to include the chest wall within the treatment volume was based upon the extent of disease at the primary site and the degree of involvement of the axilla. Curves were generated to compare, by stage, control of disease for both postoperative radiotherapy techniques. The expected enhancement of local (regional) control was seen for patients with more advanced disease who received chest wall irradiation. Differences favoring the more comprehensively irradiated group were also seen in disease-free and overall survival for all three stages of disease, with statistically significant benefit in survival analysis for patients with Stage II and III disease. (Stage II-peripheral lymphatic group: 5 years = 54%; 10 years = 36%. Peripheral lymphatic plus chest wall group: 5 years = 71%; 10 years = 49 %.Stage III-peripheral lymphatic group: 5 years = 32%; 10 years = 15%. Peripheral lymphatic plus chest wall group: 5 years = 51 %; 10 years = 38%.) These results imply that microscopic residual disease within the soft tissues of the chest wall can metastasize without necessarily manifesting as regionally recurrent disease. Postoperative irradiation of the chest wall imparts additional survival advantage to a significant percentage of patients treated by radical surgery. Criteria for the inclusion of the chest wall within postoperative radiotherapy fields should be broadened.     

Prognostic factors in patients with isolated recurrences of breast cancer (stage IV-NED)

Background: One to 10% of women with metastatic breast cancer have a recurrence of their disease as an isolated lesion (local, regional, or distant) which may be treated by surgical resection, irradiation, or both. These are patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease, or stage IV-NED. Because natural history and prognostic factors for patients with stage IV-NED are poorly determined, we decided to evaluate a group of patients with stage IV-NED treated at a single institution.Patients and methods: Ninety-six patients with isolated recurrence of stage IV breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment of loco-regional or distant recurrence was surgery in 18 patients and surgery plus irradiation in 78 patients. Seventy-nine patients received systemic therapy after loco-regional treatment (24 chemotherapy and 55 hormonotherapy). Prognostic factors were analyzed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Five-year DFS and OS for the whole group were 29% and 49% respectively. On the univariate analysis, patients without axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy had significantly greater 5-year DFS and OS than patients with nodal involvement (51% vs. 14% and 70% vs. 34% respectively, p< 0.05). DFS was also significantly better for patients receiving systemic therapy after local treatment (31% vs. 19%). On the multivariate analysis, absence of nodal involvement and systemic therapy were associated with longer DFS (p = 0.044 and p = 0.008, respectively) and OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011, respectively). None of the other factors analyzed including menopausal status, T-stage, number of involved nodes, receptor status, adjuvant therapy, sites of first recurrence, or time from mastectomy to first recurrence had a predictive value for DFS and OS.Conclusion: Patients with stage IV-NED have poor prognosis due to early development of metastatic disease. Absence of axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy and systemic therapy following local management is associated with improved DFS and OS. These results suggest that systemic therapy after local treatment in stage IV-NED is indicated. Poor prognosis in patients with previous nodal involvement warrants new approaches.