Positional treatment vs continuous positive airway pressure in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positional treatment in the management of positional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), using objective outcome measures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single blind crossover comparison of CPAP and positional treatment for 2 weeks each. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with positional OSA, aged (mean+/-SD) 51+/-9 years, with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 17+/-8. MEASUREMENTS: (1) Daily Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores; (2) overnight polysomnography, an objective assessment of sleep quality and AHI; (3) maintenance of wakefulness testing; (4) psychometric test battery; (5) mood scales; (6) quality-of-life questionnaires; and (7) individual patient's treatment preference. RESULTS: Positional treatment was highly effective in reducing time spent supine (median, 0; range, 0 to 32 min). The AHI was lower (mean difference, 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 10.2; p = 0.007), and the minimum oxygen saturation was higher (4%; 95% CI, 1% to 8%; p = 0.02) on CPAP as compared with positional treatment. There was no significant difference, however, in sleep architecture, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, maintenance of wakefulness testing sleep latency, psychometric test performance, mood scales, or quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSION: Positional treatment and CPAP have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with positional OSA.     

Evaluation of unattended automated titration to determine therapeutic continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND: Determination of the therapeutic pressure during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is usually performed by a technician during polysomnography. In recent years, several devices for automated adjustment of the therapeutic pressure by the means of computerized algorithms were developed. The aims of the present study were to compare two different devices for automated titration and to verify if unattended automated titration is a feasible strategy to determine the therapeutic CPAP. METHODS: We enrolled 16 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) defined by an apnea-hypopnea index > 20/h. Automated titration was performed in the hospital using two CPAP devices (Autoset; Resmed; North Ryde, Australia; and Somnosmart; Weinmann; Hamburg, Germany) in random order for 2 consecutive nights, based on different signals for the detection of respiratory events. During titration, there was no direct supervision by a technician, and polysomnography was not recorded. We defined the therapeutic pressure as the 95th percentile of the airway pressure over time (P95). RESULTS: We observed significant differences of the P95 between the two devices, with an average of 7.0 +/- 2.5 cm H(2)O for the Somnosmart and 9.9 +/- 2.6 cm H(2)O for the Autoset (p = 0.005) [mean +/- SD]. There was a considerable lack of agreement between the two devices, with a bias of 3.0 cm H(2)O and limits of agreement ranging from + 9.3 to - 3.2 cm H(2)O. We found no significant correlation between the paired differences of P95 and either indexes of severity of OSAS or lung function variables. CONCLUSION: Automated titration based on the analyses of flow (Autoset) or forced oscillations (Somnosmart) predicted significant different therapeutic pressures for fixed CPAP therapy. Thus, unattended automated titration performed during 1 night of hospital stay with commercially available devices cannot be used to determine accurately the therapeutic CPAP in patients with OSAS.     

Autotitration positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant of fixed continuous positive airway pressure

Compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is one of the most difficult management problems for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We postulated that autotitration positive airway pressure (APAP) may be effective in some patients who have an intolerance of fixed CPAP. The study was done to estimate how often patients who cannot tolerate fixed CPAP can tolerate APAP. We identified 25 patients seen in the Sleep Disorders Center who had been treated with fixed CPAP for OSA and were intolerant of CPAP therapy despite multiple efforts to improve tolerance. We substituted APAP therapy and measured subjective and objective compliance with treatment 1 month later. The primary end point was the number of patients who successfully tolerated the use of APAP at the end of 30 days, measured objectively by the device's compliance monitor. A positive outcome was defined as an average use of APAP that was greater than 3 h per night on more than 70% of possible nights. Of the 25 patients (mean age, 68 years; mean apnea-hypopnea index, 35), 11 were able to tolerate APAP therapy. The mean number of hours of use in these responders was 6.2; the mean percentage of nights of use among responders was 89%. Determinants of successful APAP use were an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) less than 18, male sex, OSA related to rapid eye movement, and a high body mass index. APAP therapy may be an effective option in patients who do not tolerate fixed-CPAP therapy.     

Accuracy of positive airway pressure titration through telemonitoring of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure device connected to a pulse oximetry in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Purpose

In COVID-19 era, all forms of access of patients to the sleep units should be reduced as much as possible when implementing telemedicine. In the field of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) therapy with positive airway pressure (PAP) devices, telemedicine includes the use of built-in software (BIS) and storage of PAPs and remote-controlled data (BISrc data) that are processed and transmitted daily to sleep units. We compared two methods of evaluating the final residual severity of OSA patients in home PAP titration: BISrc data versus nocturnal portable multichannel monitoring (PM) data in PAP (reference method) and to verify whether the efficacy PAP therapy guided by BISrc data was clinically adequate.

Methods

We conducted a real-life prospective study in newly diagnosed patients with OSA. Patients used an auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (AirSense 10 ResMed) with a pulse oximeter that allows daily transfer of BISrc data (apnea hypopnea index [AHI] and SaO₂) and remote changes in ventilator setting. Once the PAP titration was completed, the pressure value or ranges were kept constant for 3 days and home PM was repeated.

Results

There were 41 patients with moderate to severe OSA who completed the study. When considering AHI only, the diagnostic accuracy of BISrc on the third day was equal to 97.5%; when considering AHI > 10/h, ODI > 10/h, and SaO₂ < 90%, the diagnostic accuracy slightly decreased to 90.2%.

Conclusion

In clinical practice, the two measurement methods are equivalent. The use of BISrc data for home titration would reduce the access to sleep units. We urge that widespread use of BISrc be promoted in the current practice of management of OSA.     

Residual excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea treated with positive airway pressure therapy

Sleep and Breathing - Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly report residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) despite treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP). The present...     

Effect of personality traits on adherence with positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients

Purpose

Patient adherence with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is a significant clinical problem in obstructive sleep apnea treatment. Personality traits may be a factor for non-adherence. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between PAP therapy adherence and patient personality traits.

Methods

Patients were screened and recruited during their visit to a sleep clinic. Baseline data were collected from each patient’s electronic chart. Behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system (BIS/BAS) scales, short measure of five-factor model personality traits (mini-IPIP), positive and negative affect score (PANAS), and appetitive motivation scores (AMS) tests were used to measure personality traits. Data from the PAP device were obtained following a minimum of an initial 30 days, with adherence defined as >4 h/night on 70% of nights. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the data.

Results

A total of 400 patients were recruited. Three hundred twenty-one patients had all the data and were included in the study. Behavioral activation system–fun seeking (BAS-FS) and, to a certain extent, negative affect were significantly associated with adherence. Intellect/imagination was marginally significant. Additionally, older age (>65 years), profession, PAP type, side effects, efficiency, apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), and residual AHI showed significant associations with patient adherence with PAP therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that BAS-FS was still a significant predictor of adherence even after adjusting for other covariates.

Conclusion

BAS-FS, negative affect, and intellect/imagination are significant factors for adherence to PAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

     

Long-term compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea

In an attempt to identify predictors of long-term compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), we reviewed the records of 125 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) referred to our center for nasal CPAP trials. Severity of sleep apnea, sleep staging, daytime hypersomnolence, effectiveness of nasal CPAP, previous palatal surgery, and adverse reactions were compared in compliant and noncompliant patients. Nineteen patients did not tolerate a nasal CPAP trial in the laboratory or refused home nasal CPAP therapy. Ten patients were unavailable for follow-up. Of the remaining 96 patients, 23 (24 percent) had discontinued therapy, while 73 (76 percent) were still using nasal CPAP at 14.5 +/- 10.7 months (mean +/- SD). There were no statistically significant differences between the compliant and noncompliant patients in baseline apnea plus hypopnea index (AHI), baseline sleep staging, AHI while receiving nasal CPAP, sleep staging while receiving nasal CPAP, or frequency of adverse reactions during therapy. Severe daytime sleepiness was present in 65 of the 73 compliant patients and in 12 of the 23 noncompliant patients (p less than 0.05). Ten of 43 in the compliant group had previous palatal surgery compared with ten of 23 noncompliant patients (p less than 0.05). Our data confirm earlier observations in smaller samples that compliant and noncompliant patients have equally severe sleep apnea and good initial responses to nasal CPAP. Long-term compliance with nasal CPAP may be associated with the severity of daytime hypersomnolence on presentation. Previous palatal surgery was more frequent in patients who did not tolerate long-term nasal CPAP therapy.     

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome]

Sixteen patients (male: 14, female: 2, 41-72 yrs, mean 57.5 yrs) with OSAS were treated by nCPAP in our hospital since 1987. Respiratory disturbance index ranged from 16.5 to 83.1. The longest apnea duration was 35.0-120.5 seconds before the treatment. Two patients were treated with Sleep Easy III (Respironics Inc.) and others with a home made instruments. nCPAP was set at a pressure of 5 to 10 cm H2O. 12 patients (75%) tolerated the device but 4(25%) did not. Polysomnographic parameters before and after nCPAP therapy were compared. The longest apnea duration was 63.1 +/- 23.5 to 40.9 +/- 27.4 seconds (P less than 0.001) and the lowest saturation oxygen was 55.1 +/- 20.4% to 71.4 +/- 18.6% (P less than 0.05). The sleep structure improved but not significant statistically. One of them used nCPAP at home for more than two. years and showed a good long term effect. We concluded that nCPAP is an effective and safe treatment for OSAS. However, patients may be uncomfortable because of the wearing of the nasal mask during sleep.     

Continuous positive airway pressure therapy decreases evening cortisol concentrations in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) show recurrent episodes of nightly hypoxic stress. The purpose of this study is the detection of alterations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis in OSAS patients before and after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. An activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was proposed because of the nightly hypoxic stress in these patients, but previous studies were not conclusive. Here we hypothesize that CPAP therapy decreases salivary cortisol concentrations in patients with severe OSAS. We performed a clinical within-subject study including 50 patients with newly diagnosed OSAS and an apnea-hypopnea index greater than or equal to 40 h⁻¹. Diurnal profiles of salivary cortisol concentrations were compiled before and after 3 months of treatment with CPAP. Therefore, 6 cortisol samples were collected: before and after lunch, in the evening, the next morning after awakening, and before and after breakfast. Thirty-eight patients returned after 3 months of CPAP therapy for follow-up. According to the reference range for healthy subjects, cortisol values were not pathologically increased. Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of CPAP therapy on diurnal cortisol profiles (P = .048). Subjects with severe OSAS showed a decrease (3.04 ± 0.55 nmol L⁻¹ pre-CPAP vs 2.48 ± 0.78 nmol L⁻¹ post-CPAP, P = .038) of evening cortisol levels after CPAP treatment, whereas prelunch levels were increased after CPAP therapy (7.18 ± 0.83 nmol L⁻¹ pre-CPAP vs 10.22 ± 1.10 nmol L⁻¹ post-CPAP, P = .044). Our results show that CPAP therapy decreases evening cortisol concentrations in patients with severe OSAS. These data suggest that OSAS may increase the cortisol nadir that is reversed after CPAP therapy.     

Compliance to continuous positive airway pressure therapy in a group of Portuguese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Introduction  

Obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is an emerging public health concern. Although different treatments for OSAHS had been proposed, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment in moderate to serious OSAHS in which success can be achieved by increasing compliance to CPAP.     

Arbitrary-pressure continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Current resources are inadequate to meet the demand for polysomnography, resulting in long waiting lists. This study aimed to evaluate the role of arbitrary-pressure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a method to reduce delays in commencing treatment. The study was of an open, randomized, parallel design. Ninety-one subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were randomized to either arbitrary-pressure CPAP based on body mass index before treatment polysomnography or to CPAP at settings determined by polysomnography. Both interventions resulted in similar improvements in clinical outcomes as determined by Epworth Sleepiness Score, Short Form-36 Quality of Life questionnaire, objective compliance, and subjective attitudes to treatment. There was higher sleep efficiency at treatment polysomnography in the group commenced at arbitrary pressure (81.8 +/- 10.1% [mean +/- SD] compared with 72.2 +/- 18.0%, p = 0.01). Subjects unable to tolerate CPAP were identified by the use of arbitrary pressure, leading to a reduction in the proportion of "wasted" treatment polysomnograms (studies performed in subjects not persisting with treatment) relative to commencing therapy after treatment polysomnography (3 of 39 compared with 12 of 35, p = 0.01). This approach to initiating treatment with CPAP appears feasible when there are long waiting lists for polysomnography.     

经鼻持续气道正压通气对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的综合疗效

经鼻持续气道正压通气（CPAP）是目前治疗阻塞性呼吸暂停综合征（OSAS）最有效的内科治疗方法,通过向气道内增加一定程度的正压,保持上气道通畅,消除患者夜间缺氧,改善患者夜间打鼾,白天嗜睡等临床症状,恢复睡眠结构,并治疗与此相关的各系统疾病,提高患者长期的生活质量。     

Prediction of continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) prediction formulas can potentially simplify the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, they can be difficult to derive and validate. We tested a statistical method to derive and validate a CPAP prediction formula using the same sample population. Seventy-six OSA patients underwent polysomnography and CPAP titration. Anthropometric measures, sleep parameters, and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) were evaluated as predictors. All subsets regression was used to determine the optimum number of variables in the model. The Bayes information criterion was used to find the best-fit model. The model was then evaluated by a tenfold cross-validation procedure. Subjects were obese (BMI 31.3 ± 5.4) and had significant daytime somnolence (ESS 11.9 ± 5). Mean respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was 53.5 ± 31.3. The ESS was not predictive of titrated CPAP. The best-fit model included three variables (CPAP_pred = 30.8 + RDI × 0.03 − nadir saturation × 0.05 − mean saturation × 0.2). This model explained 67% of the variance. Our data and the literature suggest that a combination of two to three factors is predictive of titrated CPAP: RDI, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and obesity. Except for RDI, the specific factors vary in each population. A CPAP prediction formula that explains a high proportion of the titrated CPAP variance can be easily derived from parameters measured during the diagnostic work-up of OSA patients using a unique statistical model that allows derivation and validation of the formula in the same test population.     

Clinical characteristics of periodic limb movements during sleep categorized by continuous positive airway pressure titration polysomnography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Sleep and Breathing - The presence of periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS) varies among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing treatment with continuous positive airway...     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) are subject to an increased cardiovascular morbidity including systemic hypertension. Little is known about the effects of treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on systemic hypertension. METHODS: Automated ambulatory 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring was performed in 88 consecutive patients who were referred for evaluation of snoring or suspected OSAS. In addition, the long-term effects of CPAP therapy on 24-h BP were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients had OSAS and 26 habitual snoring. Patients with OSAS had significantly higher mean arterial BP values than snorers (102.7 +/- 10.7 v 94.0 +/- 10.2 mm Hg; P < .01). Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis disclosed that the degree of systemic hypertension was independently associated with the severity of OSAS as determined by the apnea/hypopnea index (R = 0.43; P < .001), but not with age, body mass index, or smoking habits. Of the 62 patients with OSAS, 52 were treated with CPAP and reevaluated after 9 months. The CPAP resulted in a significant decrease in mean arterial BP (from 103.7 +/- 10.4 to 99.1 +/- 10.8 mm Hg; P < .05). For those patients with systemic hypertension whose BP improved with CPAP therapy, 24-h mean pulse pressure at baseline (r = -0.36; P < .05) as well as average heart rate during the day (r = -0.35; P < .05) turned out as predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome contributes, at least in part, to the development of systemic hypertension, and CPAP may improve BP values in treated OSAS patients. Predictors of a beneficial CPAP effect on BP are a high heart rate and a high pulse pressure before treatment.