糠醛渣纤维乙醇同步糖化发酵过程研究

以过碱化处理的糠醛渣为原料,采用正交试验法进行同步糖化发酵(SSF)转化乙醇工艺条件及过程研究.通过考察反应温度、pH、纤维素酶用量和表面活性剂浓度来优化同步糖化发酵转化工艺条件.在正交优化条件基础上,进行了5 L发酵罐试验,并同步分析表征了发酵过程中还原糖浓度、乙醇浓度、酵母细胞数、纤维素含量及其结构变化.同步糖化发酵转化糠醛渣生成乙醇的优化条件为:反应温度38℃,pH 4.2,纤维素酶用量20 FPU/(g纤维素),吐温-20质量分数0.15%,酵母接种量10%.发酵罐中同步糖化发酵糠醛渣生成乙醇的转化率达到72.33%,过程分析表明反应时间为27 h时,糠醛渣糖化发酵产乙醇的转化率达到最高,比其他纤维原料的反应转化时间大大缩短.同步糖化发酵过程中,糠醛渣纤维素含量逐步降低,纤维索表观结晶度呈下降趋势,纤维素微晶尺寸减小.     

糠醛渣直接同步糖化发酵生产乙醇过程比较研究

以糠醛渣为原料,直接同步糖化发酵(SSF)生产乙醇,并与水洗糠醛渣生产乙醇进行对比。通过考察不同条件来优化同步糖化发酵生产工艺条件,并分析表征了SSF过程中乙醇浓度和副产物浓度变化。优化条件为:糠醛渣底物质量分数10%,纤维素酶用量12%,无患子皂素质量浓度0.5g/L,酵母接种量7g/L,同步糖化发酵乙醇得率达到其理论得率的93.1%。与水洗糠醛渣相比,糠醛渣直接SSF过程可将原料吸附的5.50%葡萄糖部分转化为乙醇。水洗糠醛渣SSF生产乙醇所产生的副产物要远低于糠醛渣直接生产所产生的副产物,添加无患子皂素可有效抑制糠醛渣同步糖化发酵过程中副产物的产生。     

木薯酒精渣同步糖化发酵制乙醇的工艺研究

研究了利用木薯酒精厂废渣为原料发酵生产乙醇的方法,结果表明:经过简单的机械粉碎后,通过同步糖化发酵生产乙醇是可行的。发酵条件为:木薯酒精渣经粉碎后取粒径小于0.85mm的部分,初始料水比1∶8,纤维素酶添加量为每克木薯渣(干重)30FPU,发酵过程中在24h内分批将剩余木薯渣加入至总料水比达到1∶2.5,利用5L发酵罐进行同步糖化发酵,发酵液中乙醇质量浓度达到52g/L,木薯酒精渣到乙醇的收率达到13%。纤维素酶的添加量对发酵效果影响显著,当达到每克木薯渣(干重)50FPU时,发酵液中乙醇质量浓度可达65g/L,乙醇收率达到16%。     

表面活性剂对麦草同步糖化发酵转化乙醇的影响

研究了5种非离子型表面活性剂(BSA, Tween-20, Tween-80, PEG-4000, PEG-6000)促进麦草同步糖化发酵的效果. 结果表明,5种表面活性剂均能促进麦草同步糖化发酵,以Tween-20效果最为显著. 反应体系中添加Tween-20可降低酶用量而保持乙醇浓度基本相同. 在pH 5.0、温度37℃、底物浓度50 g/L及Celluclast 1.5 l用量25 FPU/g、Novozym 188用量15 IU/g的反应体系中,添加0.03 g/g Tween-20,反应72 h,乙醇浓度达到18.7 g/L,比未添加表面活性剂的体系提高了14.0%,反应时间缩短了12 h.     

木薯酒精渣的预处理及补料同步糖化发酵制取乙醇

木薯酒精渣的处置是制约木薯燃料乙醇大规模产业化的问题之一。本文立足于探索木薯酒精渣利用途径,分析了木薯酒精渣的主要成分,对比了氨水、氢氧化钠、氨水组合稀硫酸3种预处理方式对于木薯酒精渣纤维素和木素含量及纤维素酶水解效率的影响,分析了处理前后木薯酒精渣的表面结构及纤维素结晶度,并以氨水处理后的木薯酒精渣为底物,进行了同步糖化发酵。结果表明,3种预处理方法中组合预处理能更好地增加纤维素含量和提高纤维素酶水解效率,与未处理原料相比,组合预处理后纤维素含量增加了111.26%,木素下降了35.05%,酶水解72h纤维素转化率从42.10%增加到61.71%。氨水预处理后,原料的木素含量降低,处理后木薯酒精渣的表面变得更加粗糙,纤维素结晶度有所增加,以氨水处理后的木薯酒精渣为底物进行分批补料同步糖化发酵,当初始底物浓度为100.0g/L,分别在20h、40h、60h进行补料至最终底物浓度为400.0g/L时,发酵120h乙醇浓度达到51.0g/L。     

玉米原料同步糖化发酵乙醇工艺

以液化醪为研究对象,对影响同步糖化发酵的植酸酶、酸性蛋白酶、糖化酶、酵母和酵母促进剂的添加量进行Placket-Burman(PB)设计,确定酸性蛋白酶、糖化酶和酵母是影响同步糖化发酵效果的显著性因素.利用响应面实验优化的同步糖化发酵工艺条件为液化醪w(固)=28％,发酵温度32℃,添加量分别为糖化酶95～145 u/...     

蒸汽爆破麦草同步糖化发酵转化乙醇的研究

近年来对木质生物资源同步糖化发酵转化乙醇的研究较多,但是,麦草同步糖化发酵转化乙醇的最佳工艺条件还未确定。文中采用正交试验设计的方法,对在混合酶(纤维素酶Celluclast 1.5 1,β-葡萄糖苷酶Novozym 188)与酿酒酵母菌作用下,稀硫酸催化的蒸汽爆破麦草原料同步糖化发酵转化乙醇的工艺条件进行研究,详细讨论了反应温度、底物质量浓度、发酵液pH值、纤维素酶浓度对乙醇质量浓度和得率的影响。结果表明,工艺条件对乙醇质量浓度和得率的影响程度由高到低依次为:底物质量浓度、纤维素酶浓度、发酵液pH值、反应温度。最佳工艺条件为反应温度35℃,底物质量浓度100 g/L,发酵液pH值5.0,纤维素酶浓度30 FPU/g。在此条件下,随着反应时间的延长,乙醇质量浓度持续上升。反应72 h后,乙醇质量浓度和得率分别达到22.7 g/L和65.8%。     

木薯干原料同步糖化发酵生产乙醇

提出了用木薯干为原料,同步糖化发酵(SSF)开发燃料乙醇的新工艺. 对各个影响条件进行了研究,获得了最佳的工艺条件：原料粉碎粒度0.45 mm,加水比2.8, 100℃下蒸煮30 min,a-淀粉酶、糖化酶的添加量分别为10, 180 U/g, 30℃下发酵48 h. 并与普通的先糖化后发酵(SHF)生产模式进行了对比,认为SSF具有工艺简单、能耗低、发酵迅速、醪液酒精度高等众多优点,值得工业推广.     

稀酸浸渍气爆预处理对纤维素乙醇同步糖化发酵的影响

纤维素乙醇预处理过程效率偏低是影响纤维素乙醇发展的一个重要因素。通过改进传统蒸汽爆破预处理方法,在蒸汽爆破前加入稀酸浸渍,有效地提高了后续同步糖化发酵的水平。采用硫酸浸渍气爆预处理后的草浆同步糖化发酵乙醇质量浓度达到27.5 g/L,达到葡萄糖乙醇理论产率的81%;采用乙酸浸渍气爆预处理后的草浆同步糖化发酵乙醇质量浓度达到25.5 g/L,达到葡萄糖乙醇理论产率的77%;相比传统气爆草浆用于同步糖化发酵,稀酸预处理能有效地减少抑制物的生成,提高后续直接利用草浆进行同步糖化发酵的水平,从而提高生产效率,降低生产成本,是可应用于工业化纤维素乙醇生产的重要方法。     

木质纤维生物质同步糖化发酵(SSF)生产乙醇的研究进展

综述了有关木质纤维生物质原料同步糖化发酵生产乙醇的最新研究进展和未来发展方向:同步糖化发酵是一种用于从木质纤维原料生产乙醇的工艺过程,此工艺的优点是酶水解与发酵同时进行,可以减少最终产物对酶水解的抑制作用,并减少投资成本,是最具发展潜力和优势的工艺之一。近年来在优化预处理工艺、降低纤维素酶成本以及己糖戊糖协同发酵等方面的研究都取得了长足的进步,其中以小麦秸秆为原料进行同步糖化发酵所得到的乙醇浓度接近40g/L。     

高底物浓度纤维乙醇同步糖化发酵工艺的比较

引言日益加剧的能源危机和环境污染,正迫使人们寻求新的可再生替代能源。纤维乙醇作为一种重要的生物质替代能源,经过近40多年的发展,已经具备了实现工业化生产的潜力。为了进一步降低纤     

Study of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for steam exploded wheat straw to ethanol

Although simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) has been investigated extensively, the optimum condition for SSF of wheat straw has not yet been determined. Dilute sulfuric acid impregnated and steam explosion pretreated wheat straw was used as a substrate for the production of ethanol by SSF through orthogonal experiment design in this study. Cellulase mixture (Celluclast 1.5 l and β-glucosidase Novozym 188) were adopted in combination with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae AS2.1. The effects of reaction temperature, substrate concentration, initial fermentation liquid pH value and enzyme loading were evaluated and the SSF conditions were optimized. The ranking, from high to low, of influential extent of the SSF affecting factors to ethanol concentration and yield was substrate concentration, enzyme loading, initial fermentation liquid pH value and reaction temperature, respectively. The optimal SSF conditions were: reaction temperature, 35°C; substrate concentration, 100 g·L⁻¹; initial fermentation liquid pH, 5.0; enzyme loading, 30 FPU·g⁻¹. Under these conditions, the ethanol concentration increased with reaction time, and after 72 h, ethanol was obtained in 65.8% yield with a concentration of 22.7 g·L⁻¹. __________ Translated from Chemical Engineering (China), 2007, 35(12): 42–45 [译自: 化学工程]     

Production of fuel ethanol from softwood by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation at high dry matter content

BACKGROUND: The production of bio‐ethanol from softwood is considered a promising alternative to fossil fuels in Sweden. In order to make fuel ethanol economically competitive with fossil fuels, it is important to reduce the production cost, which can be done by increasing the dry matter content of the fermentation medium, thus reducing the energy demand in the final distillation of the fermentation broth. Running simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) at higher dry matter content has, however, been found to decrease the ethanol yield. RESULTS: The use of different stirrer types and stirring speeds in the present study has shown to have an influence on the final ethanol yield in SSF with 10% water‐insoluble solids (WIS). Also, higher concentration of pretreatment hydrolysate, i.e., with increased inhibitor concentration, at the same WIS resulted in a decreased ethanol yield. However, despite stirring problems and high inhibitor concentration, ethanol was produced at 12% WIS with an ethanol yield in the SSF step of 81% of the theoretical based on the content of fermentable sugars in the fermentor. CONCLUSION: The decrease in ethanol yield in SSF at high dry matter content has been shown to be a combined effect of increased mass transfer resistance and increased inhibitor concentration in the fermentation broth. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Comparisons of existing pretreatment,saccharification, and fermentation processes for butanol production from agricultural residues

Some of the most recent, relevant, industrial and academic contributions made in the field of butanol production are reviewed here. The focus on butanol is due to the growing demand for non‐fossil biofuels. In addition, butanol can be mixed with fossil fuels or can be used alone, allowing an alternative to gasoline. Butanol can be synthesised biologically using sugars extracted from biomass such as agricultural waste. This agricultural waste must be pretreated before it is suitable for sugar extraction. Following this stage, enzymatic hydrolysis is employed, before performing fermentation using microorganisms. This article summarises some of the economical methods such as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). Different pretreatment and saccharification processes were compared. Acid pretreatment and saccharification achieved the highest sugar concentrations from wheat straw. Monoethanolamine pretreatment achieved highest sugars from hardwood. Comparisons and analysis of different types of fermentation processes illustrated that immobilised reactor provided the best butanol rate of production. Integration of fermentation with product removal process improved butanol production in immobilised reactor. Gas stripping method was illustrated to be the product removal process. © 2011 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering     

Sago starch saccharification and simultaneous ethanol fermentation by amyloglucosidase and Zymomonas mobilis

Simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation (SSF) of sago starch was studied using amyloglucosidase (AMG) and Zymomonas mobilis. The optimal concentration of AMG and operating temperature for the SSF process were found to be 0.5% (v/w) and 35°C, respectively. Under these conditions with 150 g dm^?3 sago starch as a substrate, the final ethanol concentration obtained was 69.2 g dm^?3 and ethanol yield, Y_P/S, 0.50 g g^?1 (97% of theoretical yield). Sago starch in the concentration range of 100–200 g dm^?3 was efficiently converted into ethanol. When compared to a two-step process involving separate saccharification and fermentation stages, the SSF reduced the total process time by half.     

氧气辅助湿热预处理对玉米秸秆酒精发酵的影响

为了解氧气（O₂）在玉米秸秆湿热预处理中的作用,优化玉米秸秆酒精生产工艺,本文采用三种不同湿热预处理条件处理玉米秸秆,即条件1（195℃,15min）、条件2（195℃,15min,12bar O₂）和条件3（195℃,15min,12bar O₂,2g/L Na₂CO₃）,并利用酿酒酵母对预处理后的玉米秸秆同步糖化发酵酒精工艺（SSF）进行了研究。实验结果表明：经过预处理,玉米秸秆分为固体滤饼与水解液两部分,其中绝大部分纤维素以固体形式保留在滤饼中,而半纤维素和木质素由于不稳定则发生了部分水解或降解。三种预处理条件下纤维素总体收率分别为91.2%、94.6%和95.9%,半纤维素总体收率分别为74.5%、50.3%和68.2%,固体滤饼中木质素质量分数分别为25.2%、17.5%和13.7%,纤维素酶解葡萄糖率分别为64.8%、65.8%和67.6%。表明氧气对纤维素收率影响不大,能够促进半纤维素的溶出。氧气主要与木质素发生反应,尤其与碱性物质碳酸钠（Na₂CO₃）结合,能够促进木质素降解,从而获得了较高的纤维素收率和纤维素酶解葡萄糖率。因此在底物质量分数8%,经过酿酒酵母142h发酵,经条件3处理的玉米秸秆获得的酒精浓度最高,最终酒精浓度达到25.0g/L,并且整个发酵过程没有明显的抑制作用产生。