急诊腹腔镜脾切除术在外伤性脾破裂中的应用

目的探讨急诊腹腔镜脾切除术（1aparoscopic splenectomy,LS）治疗外伤性脾破裂的可行性。方法回顾分析我院2010年11月-2012年3月因外伤性脾破裂行急诊Ls20例的临床资料,根据脾蒂的不同类型,18例用Endo．GIA施行一级脾蒂离断,2例用Hem-o-lok施行二级脾蒂离断。结果20例手术均成功,无中转开腹,手术时间80-180min,平均110min,术中腹腔内有出血约700-1,2500ml,平均1300ml。术后无明显并发症发生。20例术后随访6个月,所有患者10天基本恢复正常生活,15—45天恢复正常工作,无严重术后并发症。结论急诊Ls治疗外伤性脾破裂可行。     

腹腔镜脾切除术在外伤性脾破裂的应用

目的探讨采用腹腔镜脾切除术在外伤性脾破裂的应用的可行性。方法2006年6月-2007年2月我院采用腹腔镜脾切除术治疗在外伤性脾破裂6例。结果6例顺利完成腹腔镜脾切除术,无中转开腹,手术时间150～220min,平均170min,术后恢复佳,无并发症或手术死亡。结论腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全,可行。     

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的技术要点。方法:用完全腹腔镜脾切除术治疗6例外伤性脾破裂患者,其中Ⅱ级损伤3例,Ⅲ级损伤3例,3例合并其他脏器损伤。结果:6例均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹。手术时间80～150min,平均110min。术中出血200～500ml,平均350ml。术后3例单纯性脾破裂者平均住院7d,3例伴合并伤者平均住院15.6d,术后患者顺利康复,无并发症发生。结论:腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全、可行,但有一定的技术难度。     

腹腔镜技术在治疗外伤性脾破裂中的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜技术在治疗外伤性脾破裂中的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析笔者所在医院2012年3月至2014年3月期间应用腹腔镜技术救治的19例外伤性脾破裂患者的临床资料。结果本组19例患者中,顺利完成腹腔镜手术17例,中转开腹2例,均获得成功救治,痊愈出院。其中行腹腔镜下电凝止血＋生物蛋白胶黏合保脾4例,行腹腔镜下无损伤线缝合＋网膜覆盖保脾8例,行腹腔镜脾切除术5例,中转开腹行脾切除术2例。手术时间50-186 min,平均90 min;术中失血250-2200 mL,平均780 mL;术后住院时间7-26 d,平均13.5 d,术后均无并发症发生。术后19例患者均获访,随访时间为3-12个月,平均8个月。随访期间无死亡及远期并发症发生。结论对外伤性脾破裂患者选择性施行的腹腔镜脾修补术和脾切除术具有良好的效果,其具有创伤小、痛苦轻及恢复快的优点,安全而可行,值得推广。     

腹腔镜脾切除术在创伤性脾破裂中的应用

脾切除术是治疗外伤性脾破裂的有效手段之一．目前外伤性脾破裂行脾切除,仍多采用剖腹手术途径。2006年9月至2009年8月．本院采用腹腔镜脾切除术（laparoscop ic spleneetomy,LS）及手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术（hand—assisted laparoseopic splenectomy,HALS）的方法,成功治疗14例外伤性脾破裂,效果满意。报道如下。     

腹腔镜治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜治疗外伤性脾破裂的手术方式及临床效果。方法:回顾分析2005年3月至2008年10月我院为37例外伤性脾破裂患者行腹腔镜治疗的临床资料,其中28例行完全腹腔镜保脾手术,4例行腹腔镜脾切除术,5例行"蓝碟"手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术。结果:37例手术均获成功,无中转开腹。手术时间45～120min,平均70min。26例单纯性脾破裂患者术后平均住院6d;11例有合并伤,平均住院13.5d。本组无死亡病例和并发症发生。结论:完全腹腔镜脾切除术或"蓝碟"手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂具有快速明确诊断、创伤小、操作安全、术后疼痛轻、康复快、并发症少、住院时间短等优点。     

外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术32例效果观察

目的观察外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术的效果。方法对32例外伤性脾破裂患者采用腹腔镜脾切除术,观察手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、并发症发生率等指标。结果本组患者均成功完成腹腔镜脾切除术。手术时间120~190 min,术中出血量200~780 m L,术后肛门恢复排气时间20~28 h,住院时间为9~15 d。术后出现胸腔积液1例、切口感染1例,均经对症处理后痊愈出院。结论腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂,具有创伤小、患者术后恢复快等优点,但须严格掌握手术适应证。     

腹腔镜脾切除治疗外伤性脾破裂

目的探讨采用腹腔镜脾切除的方法治疗外伤性脾破裂的可行性. 方法 2004年8月～2005年5月我院采用腹腔镜脾切除方法治疗外伤性脾破裂8例. 结果 7例顺利完成腹腔镜脾切除术,1例改行手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术成功.手术时间150～200 min,平均180 min.术中出血量600～5 500 ml,平均2 200 ml.Ⅱ级损伤5例,Ⅲ级3例,术后恢复佳,无并发症. 结论腹腔镜脾切除治疗外伤性脾破裂安全、可行.     

腹腔镜二级脾蒂离断法脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂体会

目的 探讨腹腔镜二级脾蒂离断法在外伤性脾破裂脾切除术中的应用价值。方法 回顾性分析自2010年10月至2012年10月我院38例应用腹腔镜二级脾蒂离断法治疗外伤性脾破裂脾切除术患者的临床资料。结果 本组38例经腹腔镜手术治疗的患者均获治愈,其中5例因术中出血量较大改为手助式腹腔镜切除,2例应用切割闭合器切除,无中转开腹。术后均无继发感染、再出血、胰漏等并发症。手术用时平均70 min,术后24～48 h拔引流管,平均住院7.5 d。结论 对于外伤性脾破裂患者选择性施行腹腔镜下二级脾蒂离断法脾切除术安全有效,值得推广。     

采用圈套器套扎脾蒂的腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂63例

目的探讨外伤性脾破裂行腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析我院2009年3月至2017年8月63例外伤性脾破裂行LS术临床资料,术中采用先结扎脾动脉,再用圈套器套扎脾蒂切除脾脏48例,采用二级脾蒂离断法逐根结扎切断进入脾脏血管切除脾脏15例。结果 60例顺利完成LS术,3例因脾脏出血或粘连严重中转开放手术,手术时间60~170 min,平均120 min,术中出血量100~800 m L,平均400 m L。术后无大出血、胰漏、血栓形成等并发症发生。结论外伤性脾破裂行LS术采用先结扎脾动脉,再用圈套器套扎脾蒂切除脾脏或二级脾蒂离断法逐根结扎切断进入脾脏血管切除脾脏是安全和可行的,效果满意,创伤小,恢复快,住院时间短。     

脾动脉结扎加脾部分切除治疗外伤性脾破裂

目的 总结应用脾动脉结扎加脾部分切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床经验.方法 对本院近8年间收治的64例接受脾动脉结扎加脾部分切除治疗的脾外伤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,重点分析脾部分切除术的手术方法、临床疗效和适应证.结果 术中双重结扎脾动脉,然后根据脾脏损伤的情况决定保留脾脏的部位,保证残脾不少于原脾体积的30%.全组无手术死亡病例,术后出现早期并发症者16例(25.0%),其中发热8例,脾窝积液1例,肠梗阻2例,左侧胸腔积液3例,切口感染2例,均经对症处理后治愈.结论 对部分外伤性脾破裂患者的治疗选择脾动脉结扎加脾部分切除术是安全可行的.     

Traumatic Rupture of Splenic Tissue 13 Years after Splenectomy. A Case Report

After splenectomy, two types of splenic tissue can remain in the human body: one type is the congenital accessory spleen, with its own vasculature and capsule. The other type is the acquired splenosis, caused by the spread of splenic tissue following splenic injury. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the literature dealing with spontaneous bleeding of splenic tissue, apart from the primary spleen, and to report a case showing the clinical and surgical importance of remaining splenic tissue after splenectomy.     

外伤性脾破裂患者及肝硬变患者脾切除术后血小板变化情况研究

目的比较外伤性脾破裂患者与肝硬变门静脉高压症患者脾切除术后血小板变化的差异,分析可能的原因及其临床意义。方法统计我院2008年7月至2009年12月期间47例外伤性脾破裂患者及36例肝硬变患者行脾切除术前后的血小板计数,比较脾切除术后2组患者血小板计数及其变化趋势的差异。结果脾破裂组47例患者术后均出现血小板异常升高,血小板计数最高值300×109/L～600×109/L者6例,600×109/L～900×109/L者21例,>900×109/L者20例;肝硬变组36例患者中有26例术后血小板最高值超过300×109/L,8例在100×109/L～300×109/L之间,2例仍低于100×109/L。2组患者术后血小板最高值分布的差异具有统计学意义(P=0.00)。脾破裂组患者与肝硬变组患者相比,术后血小板升高更明显,下降更缓慢(P<0.05)。Child A级患者血小板异常的持续时间及血小板升高幅度均超过Child B、C级患者(P=0.006,P=0.002)。结论脾破裂和肝硬变患者,因肝功能及全身状况的差异,术后血小板数量的变化有明显的不同。术后应根据血小板计数及凝血功能情况采取相应的治疗,方可取得良好的治疗效果。     

Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Isolated Splenic Sarcoidosis

Introduction:

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease with an unknown etiology. The pulmonary interstitium is mainly involved, with noncaseating granulomas and lymphadenopathy. It is a multisystemic disease, and the differential diagnosis should include infectious, neoplastic, and autoimmune diseases to prevent inappropriate treatment and unnecessary surgery. Abdominal disease without evidence of pulmonary abnormalities on chest radiography in sarcoidosis can be found in approximately 25% to 38% of cases.The approach to isolated splenic nodules in a patient with nonspecific abdominal symptoms should be focused on exclusion of malignancies and infections, and may require computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography–computed tomography imaging; scintigraphy; bone marrow biopsy; breast and genital examinations; and endoscopies.This report documents a rare case of isolated granulomatous disease of the spleen that was diagnosed and treated laparoscopically.

Case:

A 29-year-old woman presented with nonspecific complaints such as nausea, vomiting, and epigastric discomfort. Further laboratory test results were normal. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple splenic lesions. Additional examination findings were negative for occult neoplasia or infectious disease. Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed as a diagnostic procedure, without complications, and the final diagnosis was sarcoidosis.

Conclusion:

Isolated splenic sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of extrapulmonary disease. The final diagnosis may be achieved only by histology, requiring biopsy or splenectomy. Minimally invasive surgery is a safe and efficient method for diseases of the spleen and should be the first option when feasible. The patient did well; however, further monitoring is required to diagnose recurrence.     

Significance of Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Hypersplenism

Objective This study was aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism secondary to cirrhosis. Background While advances have been made in the treatment of liver cancer and chronic hepatitis, certain treatments such as radio frequency ablation (RFA) must often be discontinued due to thrombocytopenia caused by hypersplenism. Laparoscopic splenectomy is performed to treat diseases as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, but is contraindicated for hypersplenism in many institutions. Few studies have thus examined the safety and efficacy of this approach. Methods Efficacy and safety were retrospectively analyzed for laparoscopic splenectomies starting from January 2003. Relationships between postoperative increases in platelet count and thrombopoietin, platelet-associated immunoglobulin, excised spleen weight, and serum parameters were examined. Perioperative data of open splenectomies starting from January 1990 were compared with those of laparoscopic splenectomies. Results No laparoscopic cases were converted to open surgery in this series. Mean operative times of open and laparoscopic splenectomy were 205 and 173 min respectively. Mean blood losses were 750 and 359 ml (P < 0.05) and the mean weights of excised spleen were 460 and 525 g respectively. Postoperatively, no changes in liver function were noted, and platelet and leukocyte counts were significantly increased. Compared with preoperative platelet count, degree of increase at 2 weeks postoperatively did not correlate with preoperative thrombopoietin levels, but significantly correlated with levels of platelet-associated immunoglobulin and spleen volume (P < 0.05). Postoperative portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) was seen in 3 patients and these patients did not exhibit any clinical symptoms. Conclusions Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe technique for the treatment of hypersplenism and contributes to postoperative increases in platelet counts. Postoperative increases in platelet count seem to depend on platelet-associated immunoglobulin level and spleen weight, which may be valuable prognosticators.     

选择性出血动脉栓塞在外伤性脾脏破裂出血处理中的应用

目的探讨选择性出血动脉栓塞在处理外伤性脾脏破裂出血中的效果。方法采用Seldinger技术穿刺右侧股动脉,把导管放至脾动脉后造影,显示脾脏出血部位,然后把微导管放至出血（叶、段）血管,注入PVA、明胶海绵颗粒等栓塞剂进行止血。结果44例脾动脉造影显示脾外伤（夏氏分级）Ⅱ级23例,Ⅲ级19例,Ⅳ级2例。44例均顺利完成选择性出血血管栓塞,其中脾叶动脉血管栓塞13例,脾段动脉血管栓塞31例;1次栓塞成功35例,再次栓塞成功9例。无继发出血及开腹手术病例,无死亡病例。术后1周血红蛋白、红细胞压积恢复正常。44例随访0.5～1年,无再出血、严重感染及其他并发症发生。结论选择性脾动脉出血血管栓塞是治疗外伤性脾破裂出血的一种有效、简便、微创的方法。