Rosiglitazone reduces liver fat and insulin requirements and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring high insulin doses

BACKGROUND: Liver fat is an important determinant of insulin requirements during insulin therapy. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonists reduce liver fat. We therefore hypothesized that type 2 diabetic patients using exceptionally high doses of insulin might respond well to addition of a PPARgamma agonist. METHODS: We determined the effect of the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone on liver fat and directly measured hepatic insulin sensitivity in 14 patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 51 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 36.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2), who were poorly controlled (glycosylated hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c) 8.9 +/- 0.4%) despite using high doses of insulin (218 +/- 22 IU/d) in combination with metformin. Liver fat content (1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy), hepatic insulin sensitivity [6 h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin 0.3 mU/kg.min) combined with [3-3H]glucose], body composition (magnetic resonance imaging), substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry), clinical parameters, and liver enzymes were measured before and after rosiglitazone treatment (8 mg/d) for 8 months. RESULTS: During rosiglitazone, HbA(1c) decreased from 8.9 +/- 0.4% to 7.8 +/- 0.3% (P = 0.007) and insulin requirements from 218 +/- 22 to 129 +/- 20 IU/d (P = 0.002). Liver fat content decreased by 46 +/- 9% from 20 +/- 3% to 11 +/- 3% (P = 0.0002). Hepatic insulin sensitivity, measured from the percent suppression of endogenous glucose production by insulin, increased from -40 +/- 7% to -89 +/- 12% (P = 0.001). The percent change in liver fat correlated with the percent decrease in HbA 1c (r = 0.53, P = 0.06), insulin dose (r = 0.66, P = 0.014), and suppression of endogenous glucose production (r = 0.76, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that rosiglitazone may be particularly effective in type 2 diabetic patients who are poorly controlled despite using high insulin doses. The mechanism is likely to involve reduced liver fat and enhanced hepatic insulin sensitivity.     

Influence of insulin treatment on insulin sensitivity in insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients

Insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes subjects was investigated before and 6 months after insulin administration in 43 type 2 diabetes patients (28 females and 15 males). Their age was 56.1+/-8.6 years, diabetes duration 11.7+/-6.8 years, BMI 29.5+/-5.3 kg/m2. All patients were on maximal dosage of oral hypoglycaemic agents and had poor metabolic control (HbA1c 11.2+/-1.6%). Insulin sensitivity was measured by euglycaemic clamp (insulin infusion rate 1 mU kg-1 min-1). The glucose disposal rate (M-value) was considerably lower in patients (2.4+/-1.6 mg kg-1 min-1, 0.2-8.1) compared with healthy subjects (7.1+/-0.2 mg kg-1 min-1, p<0.01). M-value was strongly associated with WHR (r=-0.41, p<0.05). The patients with poorest insulin sensitivity had the highest level of total cholesterol (r=-0.41, p=0.02) and LDL-cholesterol (r=-0.38, p=0.03). After 6 months of insulin treatment BMI was 30.3+/-4.2 kg/m2 (p<0.05), mean weight increase was 2.7+/-0.8 kg. M-value was substantially increased to 4.5+/-2.3 mg kg-1 min-1 (p<0.001), the degree of improvement depended on basal insulin sensitivity (r=-0.55, p<0.01). HbA1c was reduced to 7.7+/-1.4% (p<0.01), the correlation M-value with change of HbA1c (r=-0.59, p<0.01) was shown. Total cholesterol decreased from 6.3+/-1.1 to 5.4+/-1.1 mmol/l, LDL-cholesterol from 4.1+/-1.1 to 3.4+/-1.0 mmol/l, triglycerides from 2.6+/-1.6 to 1.6+/-0.7 mmol/l (p<0.001). In conclusion, insulin treatment of type 2 diabetes patients leads to decrease in insulin resistance due to reduction in glucose toxicity and plasma atherogenicity despite weight gain.     

The effect of rosiglitazone on the liver: decreased gluconeogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic hyperglycemia results from insulin resistance of peripheral tissues and glucose overproduction due to increased gluconeogenesis (GNG). Thiazolidinediones have been shown to improve glycemic control and increase peripheral insulin sensitivity. Whether chronic thiazolidinedione treatment is associated with a decrease in GNG has not been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 26 diet-treated type 2 diabetic patients randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (RSG; 8 mg/d; n = 13) or placebo (n = 13) for 12 wk. At baseline and 12 wk, we measured endogenous glucose production (by [3H]glucose infusion) and GNG (by the [2H]2O technique) after a 15-h fast. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was evaluated by a two-step (240 and 960 pmol/min/m(-2)) euglycemic insulin clamp. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, RSG reduced fasting plasma glucose (9.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter; P < 0.001), fasting fractional GNG (-15 +/- 4%; P = 0.002), and fasting GNG flux (-3.9 +/- 1.2 micromol/min/kg fat-free mass; P = 0.004), with no effect on glycogenolytic flux. Changes in GNG flux and fasting glucose were tightly correlated (r = 0.83; P < 0.0001). During both clamp steps, RSG enhanced insulin-mediated glucose clearance (by 26% and 31%; P = 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). In a subgroup of patients studied with magnetic resonance imaging, the reduction in GNG flux was correlated (r = 0.65; P < 0.02) with the reduction in visceral fat area. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: RSG increases peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity and decreases endogenous glucose release via an inhibition of gluconeogenesis.     

A double-blind randomized study comparing the effects of continuing or not continuing rosiglitazone + metformin therapy when starting insulin therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of either continuing or discontinuing rosiglitazone + metformin fixed-dose combination when starting insulin therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral therapy. METHODS: In this 24-week double-blind study, 324 individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on maximum dose rosiglitazone + metformin therapy were randomly assigned to twice-daily premix insulin therapy (target pre-breakfast and pre-evening meal glucose < or = 6.5 mmol/l) in addition to either rosiglitazone + metformin (8/2000 mg) or placebo. RESULTS: Insulin dose at week 24 was significantly lower with rosiglitazone + metformin (33.5 +/- 1.5 U/day, mean +/- se) compared with placebo [59.0 +/- 3.0 U/day; model-adjusted difference -26.6 (95% CI -37.7, -15,5) U/day, P < 0.001]. Despite this, there was greater improvement in glycaemic control [HbA(1c) rosiglitazone + metformin vs. placebo 6.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 7.5 +/- 0.1%; difference -0.7 (-0.8, -0.5)%, P < 0.001] and more individuals achieved glycaemic targets (HbA(1c) < 7.0% 70 vs. 34%, P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals reporting at least one hypoglycaemic event during the last 12 weeks of treatment was similar in the two groups (rosiglitazone + metformin vs. placebo 25 vs. 27%). People receiving rosiglitazone + metformin in addition to insulin reported greater treatment satisfaction than those receiving insulin alone. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated but more participants had oedema [12 (7%) vs. 4 (3%)] and there was more weight gain [3.7 vs. 2.6 kg; difference 1.1 (0.2, 2.1) kg, P = 0.02] with rosiglitazone + metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of insulin to rosiglitazone + metformin enabled more people to reach glycaemic targets with less insulin, and was generally well tolerated.     

Influence of rosiglitazone treatment on beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes: evidence of an increased ability of glucose to entrain high-frequency insulin pulsatility

Thiazolidinediones have well-established insulin-sensitizing effects. Their impact on insulin secretion is less clarified. Consequently, we sought to determine potential effects of a thiazolidinedione (rosiglitazone) on the beta-cell function. Twenty type 2 diabetic individuals were randomized to receive rosiglitazone (rosi) 4 mg twice daily or placebo (pla) for 13 wk. Before treatment and at the end of the treatment period, the patients underwent an iv glucose tolerance test (0.3 g/kg), a hyperglycemic (15 mmol/liter) clamp with arginine (5 g) stimulation, assessment of baseline high-frequency insulin pulsatility, and glucose-entrained insulin pulsatility (6 mg/kg.min every 10 min), and a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced (pla, 8.2 +/- 2.1 vs. 8.8 +/- 2.6 mmol/liter; rosi, 8.6 +/- 7.1 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.2 mmol/liter; P < 0.01), and insulin sensitivity was increased by rosiglitazone treatment (M value: pla, 5.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.6 mg/kg.min; rosi, 5.9 +/- 2.2 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.3 mg/kg.min; P = 0.05). First-phase insulin secretion and insulin secretory capacity were unaffected. Glucose-entrained insulin secretion was increased as assessed by spectral power analysis (P = 0.05). In conclusion, rosiglitazone treatment for 3 months in type 2 diabetic patients exerts no action on insulin secretion per se. Improved glucose-entrained high-frequency insulin pulsatility suggests an increased ability of the beta-cell to sense and respond to glucose changes within the physiological range.     

Rosiglitazone in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evaluation in British Indo-Asian patients.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of rosiglitazone in reducing hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) of Indo-Asian origin taking concurrent sulphonylurea therapy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 26 weeks' duration at 31 primary and secondary care centres in areas of the UK with a high Indo-Asian population, including 177 patients aged 28-78 years. Rosiglitazone 8 mg/day or matching placebo was added to existing sulphonylurea therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 26. RESULTS: The mean changes in HbA1c were -1.16% with rosiglitazone (baseline 9.21%) and +0.26% with placebo (baseline 9.06%) (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.81, -1.08). HbA1c fell below 8% in 55% and 19% of patients, respectively (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.22, 0.51). The greatest improvements occurred in patients whose glycaemic control was initially poor. Improvements in homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell function with rosiglitazone were not accompanied by a change in plasma insulin or C-peptide after 26 weeks. Free fatty acids fell by 0.09 mmol/l with rosiglitazone and increased by 0.03 mmol/l with placebo (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI -0.19, -0.07). CONCLUSION: Rosiglitazone improved insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function, and glycaemic control in Indo-Asian patients with Type 2 DM who are at greater risk of the complications of Type 2 DM than other ethnic groups.     

Plasma resistin concentration, hepatic fat content, and hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance in pioglitazone-treated type II diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of pioglitazone (PIO) on plasma resistin concentration, endogenous glucose production (EGP), and hepatic fat content (HFC) in patients with type II diabetes (T2DM). SUBJECTS: A total of 13 T2DM patients (age=51+/-2 y, BMI=29.7+/-1.1 kg/m(2), HbA(1c)=8.0+/-0.5%). METHODS: HFC (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and basal plasma resistin concentration were quantitated before and after PIO treatment (45 mg/day) for 16 weeks. Subjects received a 3 h euglycemic insulin (100 mU/m(2)/min) clamp with 3-[(3)H] glucose to determine rates of EGP and tissue glucose disappearance (Rd) before and after PIO. RESULTS: PIO reduced fasting plasma glucose (10.3+/-0.7 to 7.6+/-0.6 mmol/l, P<0.001) and HbA(1c) (8.0+/-0.4 to 6.8+/-0.3%, P<0.001) despite increased body weight (83.2+/-3.4 to 86.3+/-3.4 kg, P<0.001). PIO improved Rd (4.9+/-0.4 to 6.6+/-0.5 mg/kg/min, P<0.005) and reduced EGP (0.22+/-0.04 to 0.06+/-0.02 mg/kg/min, P<0.01) during the insulin clamp. Following PIO, HFC decreased from 21.1+/-3.5 to 11.2+/-2.1% (P<0.005), and plasma resistin decreased from 5.3+/-0.6 to 3.5+/-0.3 ng/ml (P<0.01). Plasma resistin concentration correlated positively with HFC before (r=0.58, P<0.05) and after (r=0.55, P<0.05) PIO treatment. Taken collectively, plasma resistin concentration, before and after PIO treatment, correlated positively with hepatic fat content (r=0.66, P<0.001) and EGP during the insulin clamp (r=0.41, P<0.05). However, the plasma resistin concentration did not correlate with whole body glucose disposal (Rd) during the insulin clamp either before (r=-0.18, P=NS) or after (r=-0.13, P=NS) PIO treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PIO treatment in T2DM causes a significant decrease in plasma resistin concentration. The decrease in plasma resistin is positively correlated with the decrease in hepatic fat content and improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity.     

Effect of long-term treatment with rosiglitazone on arterial elasticity and metabolic parameters in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 2-year follow-up study.

AIMS: Thiazolidinediones may influence the atherogenic process by improving cardiovascular risk factors. The present study was designed to determine the long-term effect of rosiglitazone on arterial compliance and metabolic parameters in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In an open-label, prospective study, 65 diabetic patients received rosiglitazone orally (4-8 mg/day) for 6 months. After 6 months, the patients continued an open follow-up study and were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients continuing rosiglitazone for 2 years, group 2 included patients discontinuing rosiglitazone and receiving other oral glucose-lowering agents. Lipid profile, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin, C-peptide, fibrinogen, high-sensitivity-CRP and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance were measured. Arterial elasticity was assessed using pulse wave contour analysis. RESULTS: In patients treated with rosiglitazone for 2 years: the large artery elasticity index (LAEI) increased from 10.0 +/- 4.6 to 13.9 +/- 4.7 ml/mmHg x 100 after 2 years (P = 0.003). The small artery elasticity (SAEI) index increased significantly from 3.2 +/- 1.2 to 5.1 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.0001). In patients who discontinued rosiglitazone: LAEI did not change after 6 months, but decreased from 12.1 +/- 5.4 to 8.9 +/- 3.9 ml/mmHg x 10 (P < 0.0001) at the end of 2 years. SAEI increased during the first 6 months of treatment, from 3.9 +/- 1.8 to 5.1 +/- 1.5 ml/mmHg x 100 (P < 0.0001) and decreased after discontinuation of rosiglitazone (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged treatment with rosiglitazone improved arterial elasticity. However, significant deterioration in LAEI and SAEI was observed in patients who discontinued rosiglitazone. The beneficial vascular effect of rosiglitazone on arterial elasticity was independent of glycaemic control.     

Increased blood pressure variability in pheochromocytoma compared to essential hypertension patients

OBJECTIVE: Catecholamines are responsible for short and long-lasting blood pressure (BP) elevations in pheochromocytoma. We investigated whether in patients with pheochromocytoma this catecholamine excess would result in higher BP variability in comparison with patients suffering from essential hypertension (EH). DESIGN: We examined retrospectively 54 (26 treated with alpha1-blockers) patients with pheochromocytoma (30 patients also investigated after tumour removal) and 108 (42 treated with alpha1-blockers) patients with EH. They all underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. To assess the BP variability, coefficient of BP variability (SD of average BP/average BP) was used. RESULTS: In subjects with pheochromocytoma, a higher coefficient of BP variability was shown compared with EH during the 24-h period (0.12 +/- 0.03 versus 0.10 +/- 0.02, P = 0.003 for systolic BP in the treated group) and mainly during the daytime (0.11/0.13 +/- 0.04/0.03 versus 0.09/0.11 +/- 0.03/0.04, P = 0.007/0.06 for systolic/diastolic BP in the untreated group and 0.12/0.13 +/- 0.04/0.04 versus 0.09/0.12 +/- 0.04/0.02, P < 0.001/0.01 in the treated group). Tumour removal resulted in a decrease of the previously increased 24-h (0.11 +/- 0.03 versus 0.10 +/- 0.03, P = 0.04) and daytime (0.11 +/- 0.03 versus 0.09 +/- 0.03, P = 0.03) coefficient of systolic BP variation. Twenty-seven subjects with pheochromocytoma and inverted circadian BP rhythm (night-time BP > daytime BP) had a significantly higher 24-h (0.13 +/- 0.03 versus 0.10 +/- 0.03, P < 0.001 for systolic BP) and daytime coefficient of BP variation (0.13/0.15 +/- 0.04/0.03 versus 0.09/0.12 +/- 0.02/0.02, P < 0.001/<0.001) and also a higher occurrence of the isolated excretion of norepinephrine (14 versus seven subjects, P = 0.05) compared with the 27 subjects with pheochromocytoma without inverted circadian BP rhythm. CONCLUSION: The excess of catecholamines in patients with pheochromocytoma is associated with higher long-term BP variability in comparison with patients suffering from EH especially in subjects with inverted circadian BP rhythm. Tumour removal resulted in the amelioration of the previously increased BP variability.     

Effect of rosiglitazone on insulin resistance, C-reactive protein and endothelial function in non-obese young women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibit elevated levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and impaired endothelium dysfunction which are directly correlated with insulin resistance. Because rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity, we tested whether rosiglitazone treatment ameliorates high-sensitivity (hs)CRP levels and endothelial dysfunction in these patients. DESIGN: Thirty-one women with PCOS were recruited (mean age, 24.7+/-3.9 (s.e.) years; mean body mass index (BMI), 25.6+/-3.2 kg/m2). All women were treated with 4 mg rosiglitazone daily for 12 months. METHODS: Serum levels of testosterone, LH, FSH, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), insulin and hsCRP were measured. The BMI, hirsutism scores and insulin sensitivity indices were calculated before and after treatment. Arterial endothelium and smooth muscle function was measured by examining brachial artery responses to endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent stimuli before and after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment with rosigitazone there were significant decreases in serum testosterone (91.2+/-37.5 vs 56.1+/-21.8 ng/dl; P < 0.01) and fasting insulin concentrations (12.5+/-7.6 vs 8.75+/-4.03 microU/ml; P = 0.015). Insulin resistance indices were significantly improved after rosiglitazone treatment (P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in BMI, waist circumference, serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, FSH and LH levels. Hirsutism score was decreased significantly after treatment (10.8+/-1.8 vs 7.6+/-1.7; P < 0.05). Twenty-four of the women reverted to regular menstrual cycles. Levels of SHBG increased significantly after treatment (28.7+/-8.7 vs 48.4+/-11.2 nmol/l; P < 0.01). Serum hsCRP levels were decreased significantly after rosiglitazone treatment (0.25+/-0.1 vs 0.09+/-0.02 mg/dl; P = 0.006). There was also significant improvement in endothelium-dependent vascular responses after rosiglitazone treatment (9.9+/-3.9 vs 16.4+/-5.1%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that rosiglitazone treatment improves insulin sensitivity in women with PCOS. It also decreases androgen production without significant weight gain. More importantly, it has beneficial effects on endothelial dysfunction and low-grade chronic inflammation in normal weight young women with PCOS.     

Rosiglitazone RECORD study: glucose control outcomes at 18 months.

AIMS: To compare glucose control over 18 months between rosiglitazone oral combination therapy and combination metformin and sulphonylurea in people with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: RECORD, a multicentre, parallel-group study of cardiovascular outcomes, enrolled people with an HbA(1c) of 7.1-9.0% on maximum doses of metformin or sulphonylurea. If on metformin they were randomized to add-on rosiglitazone or sulphonylurea (open label) and if on sulphonylurea to rosiglitazone or metformin. HbA(1c) was managed to < or = 7.0% by dose titration. A prospectively defined analysis of glycaemic control on the first 1122 participants is reported here, with a primary outcome assessed against a non-inferiority margin for HbA(1c) of 0.4%. RESULTS: At 18 months, HbA(1c) reduction on background metformin was similar with rosiglitazone and sulphonylurea [difference 0.07 (95% CI -0.09, 0.23)%], as was the change when rosiglitazone or metformin was added to sulphonylurea [0.06 (-0.09, 0.20)%]. At 6 months, the effect on HbA(1c) was greater with add-on sulphonylurea, but was similar whether sulphonylurea was added to rosiglitazone or metformin. Differences in fasting plasma glucose were not statistically significant at 18 months [rosiglitazone vs. sulphonylurea -0.36 (-0.74, 0.02) mmol/l, rosiglitazone vs. metformin -0.34 (-0.73, 0.05) mmol/l]. Increased homeostasis model assessment insulin sensitivity and reduced C-reactive protein were greater with rosiglitazone than metformin or sulphonylurea (all P < or = 0.001). Body weight was significantly increased with rosiglitazone compared with sulphonylurea [difference 1.2 (0.4, 2.0) kg, P = 0.003] and metformin [difference 4.3 (3.6, 5.1) kg, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: In people with diabetes, rosiglitazone in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the standard combination of metformin + sulphonylurea in lowering HbA(1c) over 18 months, and produces greater improvements in C-reactive protein and basal insulin sensitivity but is also associated with greater weight gain.     

Reduction of intramyocellular lipid following short-term rosiglitazone treatment in Zucker fatty rats: an in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance study

The aim of the study was to characterize the effects of rosiglitazone, an oral insulin sensitizer, on intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content in tibialis anterior muscle and whole body lipid deposition in Zucker fatty rats using in vivo (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The IMCL/EMCL (extramyocellular) ratio was significantly lower in the rosiglitazone (FRSG) group at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of treatment at 3 mg/kg/d (0.04 +/- 0.01, 0.09 +/- 0.03, 0.11 +/- 0.02, and 0.07 +/- 0.02, respectively) versus baseline (0.43 +/- 0.12, P <.01 v all time points), whereas there was no difference in the control (FC) group at these time points (0.31 +/- 0.08, 0.36 +/- 0.08, 0.40 +/- 0.14, and 0.49 +/- 0.18, respectively) versus baseline (0.37 +/- 0.07). Absolute IMCL content was also lower at 28 days in the FRSG (0.41 +/- 0.09 micromol/g) versus FC (2.13 +/- 0.40 micromol/g, P <.005) group. To further characterize the temporal nature of this change, the IMCL/EMCL ratio was examined in the FRSG group on each of the first 4 days of treatment, and a steady decline was observed (0.38 +/- 0.12, 0.21 +/- 0.08, 0.12 +/- 0.04, 0.09 +/- 0.04, 0.05 +/- 0.03 at baseline and days 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively, P <.05 baseline v all time points). To examine the relationship between IMCL and insulin sensitivity, a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and IMCL measurement was performed on 7-day treated FRSG and FC groups. There was a negative correlation between absolute IMCL content and glucose infusion rate (r = -0.47, P <.04). The FRSG and the FC groups had similar whole body lipid content (expressed as a percentage of whole body water content) at baseline (48% +/- 5% and 44% +/- 2%, respectively), but the value was greater in the FRSG group following 28 days of treatment (103% +/- 4 v 84% +/- 6%, respectively, P <.02). In summary, there was a rapid (days) and pronounced reduction ( downward arrow approximately 70%) in IMCL content in tibialis anterior muscle following rosiglitazone treatment. Additionally, the increase in whole body lipid in the FRSG group suggests that there was increased adipocyte lipid storage following long-term rosiglitazone treatment. These results support the hypothesis that rosiglitazone indirectly increases peripheral insulin sensitivity by decreasing adipocyte lipolysis, thereby lowering IMCL content.     

Predictive clinical parameters for therapeutic efficacy of rosiglitazone in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study evaluated the efficacy of rosiglitazone in non-obese and obese Korean type 2 diabetic patients of long duration. A total of 125 patients (M:F=44:81, mean age: 58.4+/-9.1 years, BMI: 24.2+/-2.7 kg/m2, duration of diabetes: 11.0+/-6.4 years) were randomly allocated to 12 weeks of rosiglitazone treatment (4 mg per day) or a control group. Responders were defined as patients who experienced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) reduction of >20% or HbA1c reduction of >1 (%). Rosiglitazone significantly improved glycemic control by reducing FPG and HbA1c (-3.4 mmol/l and -1.1%, P<0.001, respectively). It also significantly increased HOMA(beta-cell function) (+9.7, P<0.01) and QUICKI (+0.029, P<0.001), and decreased HOMA(IR) (-1.73, P<0.001). Females and those with higher waist-hip ratio made up a greater portion of rosiglitazone-responders. Responders (45 patients, 75%) also showed significantly higher FPG, HbA1c, systolic blood pressures, fasting insulin levels and HOMA(IR), and lower QUICKI than nonresponders. Among these parameters of responders, waist-hip ratio of non-obese subgroup, initial glycemic control of obese subgroup, and systolic blood pressure of both subgroups lost their significance after subdivision analysis. However, the baseline HOMA(IR) and QUICKI were significantly correlated with the response rate to rosiglitazone. Moreover, in multiple logistic regression analysis, HOMA(IR) and QUICKI retained their significance as the independent predictors. Even in Korean type 2 diabetic patients of long duration but with relatively preserved beta-cell function, rosiglitazone improved glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function. In this ethnic group, female gender, central obesity, and especially severe insulin resistance were identified as predictive clinical parameters of rosiglitazone-responders.     

Decreased plasma adiponectin concentrations are closely related to hepatic fat content and hepatic insulin resistance in pioglitazone-treated type 2 diabetic patients

The effect of pioglitazone (PIO) on plasma adiponectin concentration, endogenous glucose production (EGP), and hepatic fat content (HFC) was studied in 11 type 2 diabetic patients (age, 52 +/- 2 yr; body mass index, 29.6 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2); HbA(1c), 7.8 +/- 0.4%). HFC (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and basal plasma adiponectin concentration were quantitated before and after PIO (45 mg/d) for 16 wk. Subjects received a 3-h euglycemic insulin (100 mU/m(2).min) clamp combined with 3-[(3)H] glucose infusion to determine rates of EGP and tissue glucose disappearance (Rd) before and after PIO. PIO reduced fasting plasma glucose (10.0 +/- 0.7 to 7.2 +/- 0.6 mmol/liter, P < 0.01) and HbA(1c) (7.8 +/- 0.4 to 6.5 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.01) despite increased body weight (83.0 +/- 3.0 to 86.4 +/- 3.0 kg, P < 0.01). PIO improved Rd (6.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.5 mg/kg.min, P < 0.005) and reduced EGP (0.23 +/- 0.04 to 0.05 +/- 0.02 mg/kg.min, P < 0.01) during the 3-h insulin clamp. After PIO treatment, HFC decreased from 21.3 +/- 4.2 to 11.0 +/- 2.4% (P < 0.01), and plasma adiponectin increased from 7 +/- 1 to 21 +/- 2 micro g/ml (P < 0.0001). Plasma adiponectin concentration correlated negatively with HFC (r = -0.60, P < 0.05) and EGP (r = -0.80, P < 0.004) and positively with Rd before (r = 0.68, P < 0.02) pioglitazone treatment; similar correlations were observed between plasma adiponectin levels and HFC (r = -0.65, P < 0.03) and Rd after (r = 0.70, P = 0.01) pioglitazone treatment. EGP was almost completely suppressed after pioglitazone treatment; taken collectively, plasma adiponectin concentration, before and after pioglitazone treatment, still correlated negatively with EGP during the insulin clamp (r = -0.65, P < 0.001). In conclusion, PIO treatment in type 2 diabetes causes a 3-fold increase in plasma adiponectin concentration. The increase in plasma adiponectin is strongly associated with a decrease in hepatic fat content and improvements in hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. The increase in plasma adiponectin concentration after thiazolidinedione therapy may play an important role in reversing the abnormality in hepatic fat mobilization and the hepatic/muscle insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Metabolic effects of indinavir in healthy HIV-seronegative men

BACKGROUND: Therapy with HIV protease inhibitors (PI) has been associated with hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and changes in body composition. It is unclear whether these adverse effects are drug related, involve an interaction with the host response to HIV or reflect changes in body composition. METHODS: Indinavir 800 mg twice daily was given to 10 HIV-seronegative healthy men to distinguish direct metabolic effects of a PI from those related to HIV infection. Fasting glucose and insulin, lipid and lipoprotein profiles, oral glucose tolerance (OGTT), insulin sensitivity by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, and body composition were measured prior to and after 4 weeks of indinavir therapy. RESULTS: Fasting glucose (4.9 +/- 0.1 versus 5.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; P = 0.05) insulin concentrations (61.7 +/- 12.2 versus 83.9 +/- 12.2 pmol/l; P < 0.05), insulin : glucose ratio (12.6 +/- 1.7 versus 15.9 +/- 1.9 pmol/mmol; P < 0.05) and insulin resistance index by homeostasis model assessment (1.9 +/- 0.3 versus 2.8 +/- 0.5;P < 0.05) all increased significantly. During OGTT, 2 h glucose (5.1 +/- 0.4 versus 6.5 +/- 0.6 mmol/l; P < 0.05) and insulin levels (223.1 +/- 48.8 versus 390.3 +/- 108.8 pmol/l;P =0.05) also increased significantly. Insulin-mediated glucose disposal decreased significantly (10.4 +/- 1.4 versus 8.6 +/- 1.2 mg/kg x min per microU/ml insulin; 95% confidence interval 0.6--.0;P < 0.01). There was no significant change in lipoprotein, triglycerides or free fatty acid levels. There was a small loss of total body fat (15.8 +/- 1.4 versus 15.2 +/- 1.4 kg;P = 0.01) by X-ray absorptiometry without significant changes in weight, waist : hip ratio, and visceral or subcutaneous adipose tissue by computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of HIV infection, treatment with indinavir for 4 weeks causes insulin resistance independent of increases in visceral adipose tissue or lipid and lipoprotein levels.     

Rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone (ROS) on insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, and glycaemic response to glucose challenge and meal in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: Thirty patients with IGT (ages between 30 and 75 years and BMI (body mass index) < or = 27 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 15) or ROS (4 mg/day) (n = 15). All participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), meal test, and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) before and after the 12-week treatment. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of ROS treatment, there were significant increases in total cholesterol (TC) (4.25 +/- 0.22 vs 4.80 +/- 0.17 mmol/l, P < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (1.25 +/- 0.07 vs 1.43 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, P < 0.05), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (2.70 +/- 0.15 vs 3.37 +/- 0.17 mmol/l, P < 0.05) without changes in triglyceride concentration, TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. Although the acute insulin response (AIR) to intravenous glucose and disposition index (measured as the ability of pancreatic beta-cell compensation in the presence of insulin resistance) remained unchanged, the insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) were remarkably elevated (0.38 +/- 0.06 vs 0.54 +/- 0.09 x 10(-5) min(-1)/pmol, P < 0.05; 0.017 +/- 0.002 vs 0.021 +/- 0.001 min(-1), P < 0.05, respectively) in the ROS group. The glucose, insulin, and c-peptide areas under curve (AUC) in response to OGTT and the glucose and insulin AUC during meal were significantly ameliorated in the ROS group. Five out of 15 (33%) and two out of 15 (13%) subjects treated with ROS and placebo, respectively, reversed to normal response during OGTT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rosiglitazone treatment significantly improved insulin resistance and reduced postchallenge glucose and insulin concentrations in patients with impaired glucose tolerance without remarkable effects on beta-cell secretory function.     

Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk profile in long-term withdrawing alcoholics

BACKGROUND: Rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are greater in heavy alcoholics than in either teetotallers or light-to-moderate drinkers. OBJECTIVE: On the assumption that factors leading to atherosclerotic damage remain operative even after long-term alcohol withdrawal, we studied the possible mechanisms of raised cardiovascular risk in former heavy alcoholics. METHODS: Forty-two apparently disease-free, normotensive alcoholics detoxified for 37.1 +/- 31.9 (SD) months, median 24, participated in the study. They were compared with 39 lifetime alcohol-abstaining control subjects, carefully matched for age, sex, body mass index, smoking and dietary habits, physical activity, lipids and fasting glucose. Endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery, high-resolution ultrasound technique), blood pressure, and some parameters of endothelial activation, oxidative stress, vascular inflammation and insulin sensitivity were measured. RESULTS: The maximal percentage of flow-mediated dilatation was reduced in detoxified alcoholics (10.1 +/- 4.6 versus 14.9 +/- 7.4, P < 0.001) who also showed significantly higher blood pressure (systolic 127.5 +/- 12.9 versus 118.2 +/- 10.7 mmHg, P < 0.001; diastolic 79.4 +/- 7.1 versus 74.6 +/- 6.4 mmHg, P < 0.01; mean 95.4 +/- 8.2 versus 89.1 +/- 7.3 mmHg, P < 0.001), uric acid (5.0 +/- 1.1 versus 4.4 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, P < 0.05), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (2.1 +/- 2.0 versus 1.0 +/- 0.9 mg/l, P < 0.01), endothelin-1 (0.38 +/- 0.11 versus 0.17 +/- 0.10 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and fasting insulin (10.4 +/- 4.5 versus 5.6 +/- 1.6 muU/ml, P < 0.001) with abnormal homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (2.3 +/- 1.1 versus 1.2 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Previous heavy alcoholism, in spite of long-term withdrawal, is associated with endothelial dysfunction and a wide cluster of haemodynamic, vascular and metabolic abnormalities that indicate an unfavourable cardiovascular and metabolic risk profile even in apparently disease-free former alcoholics.     

Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension and insulin resistance might be associated through peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction which compromises skeletal muscle blood flow and decreases glucose uptake, inducing insulin resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with losartan as compared to atenolol would improve insulin sensitivity through regression of peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction. METHODS: In 70 hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, we measured minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography and insulin sensitivity (M/IG) by a 2-h isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 years of blinded treatment with atenolol- or losartan-based regimens. RESULTS: Blood pressures were reduced similarly in the two treatment groups. After 3 years, MFVR was increased (3.7 versus 3.2 mmHg x min x 100, P < 0.05) and M/IG decreased (8.6 versus 12.1 l/kg x mmol x min, P < 0.05) in patients treated with atenolol, whereas MFVR and M/IG were unchanged (3.5 versus 3.5 mmHg x min x 100 and 12.6 versus 11.1 l/kg x mmol x min, both P = NS) in patients treated with losartan. As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less increase in MFVR (4.3 versus 27%, P < 0.05) and less decrease in M/IG (24 versus -14%, P < 0.01). The relative change in M/IG was inversely associated with the relative change in MFVR (r = -0.16, P < 0.05) independently of the relative change in body mass index (r = -0.29, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction and higher insulin sensitivity. The relative change in MFVR and M/IG were inversely related, supporting the hypothesis that peripheral vascular changes in hypertension may induce insulin resistance. The ability of losartan to preserve insulin sensitivity may explain the lower incidence of new onset diabetes in patients treated with losartan in the LIFE study.     

Ambulatory blood pressure and neuroendocrine control after diet-assisted gastric restrictive surgery

BACKGROUND: Long-term weight control after conventional diet is disappointing but may be improved when diet is assisted by gastric restrictive surgery (GRS). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of GRS on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and neuroendocrine BP control in 28 morbidly obese subjects. METHODS: A BP and heart rate were recorded every 10 min for 25 h before and 4 months after GRS. Effects of marked reductions in body weight on the renin-angiotensinaldosterone system, on plasma insulin and on sympathetic activity were also determined. RESULTS: Body mass index decreased from 43 +/- 1 to 34 +/- 1 kg/m2 and systolic (S) BP decreased by 7 +/- 2 mmHg during daytime (P=0.01) and by 8 +/- 3 mmHg during the night (P=0.02). Pulse pressure, a marker of reduced arterial compliance, decreased by 5 +/- 1 mmHg throughout the 24 h period (P < 0.001). Diastolic BP remained unchanged. Heart rate decreased more during the night (-13 +/- 2 bpm, P<0.0001) than during daytime (-5 +/- 2 bpm, P=0.03). Reductions in SBP were largest in subjects with highest initial BP values (r = -0.63, P<0.001) but were unrelated to weight loss. GRS decreased fasting glycaemia, plasma insulin, plasma C peptide and 24 h urine sodium (n=20) and noradrenaline (n=19) excretion (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Diet-assisted GRS favourably affects neuroendocrine BP control in obese patients. Reductions in sodium intake, insulin levels and sympathetic tone combined with possible improvements in arterial compliance induce persistent 24 h reductions in SBP and pulse BP. Reductions in BP are largest in subjects with highest initial BP values and are unrelated to the amount of weight loss, thereby emphasizing the importance of even moderate reductions in weight on BP control.     

Rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

AIMS: To determine the effects of rosiglitazone on insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure when administered to subjects with persistent impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with persistent IGT were randomized to receive rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluation at baseline and at the end of treatment included measurement of whole body insulin sensitivity during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp and deriving an insulin sensitivity index. Changes in glucose and insulin concentration were determined after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and mixed meal tolerance tests, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored. RESULTS: Rosiglitazone significantly improved the insulin sensitivity index by 2.26 micro g/kg per min per pmol/l relative to placebo (P = 0.0003). Four of nine subjects receiving rosiglitazone reverted to normal glucose tolerance and 5/9 remained IGT, although four of these had improved 2-h glucose values. In the placebo group, 1/9 subjects progressed to Type 2 diabetes and 8/9 remained IGT. Following OGTT and meal tolerance test, glucose and insulin area under curve were reduced over 3 and 4 h, respectively. Compared with placebo, ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly in the rosiglitazone group by 10 mmHg systolic (P = 0.0066) and 8 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.0126). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with its effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone substantially improved whole body insulin sensitivity and the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to an OGTT and meal tolerance test in subjects with persistent IGT. Furthermore, rosiglitazone reduced systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure in these subjects.