Patient perspectives on de‐simplifying their single‐tablet co‐formulated antiretroviral therapy for societal cost savings |
| |
| Authors: | HB Krentz S Campbell VC Gill MJ Gill |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Southern Alberta Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada;2. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Objectives The incremental costs of expanding antiretroviral (ARV) drug treatment to all HIV‐infected patients are substantial, so cost‐saving initiatives are important. Our objectives were to determine the acceptability and financial impact of de‐simplifying (i.e. switching) more expensive single‐tablet formulations (STFs) to less expensive generic‐based multi‐tablet components. We determined physician and patient perceptions and acceptance of STF de‐simplification within the context of a publicly funded ARV budget. Methods Programme costs were calculated for patients on ARVs followed at the Southern Alberta Clinic, Canada during 2016 (Cdn$). We focused on patients receiving Triumeq® and determined the savings if patients de‐simplified to eligible generic co‐formulations. We surveyed all prescribing physicians and a convenience sample of patients taking Triumeq® to see if, for budgetary purposes, they felt that de‐simplification would be acceptable. Results Of 1780 patients receiving ARVs, 62% (n = 1038) were on STF; 58% (n = 607) of patients on STF were on Triumeq®. The total annual cost of ARVs was $26 222 760. The cost for Triumeq® was $8 292 600. If every patient on Triumeq® switched to generic abacavir/lamivudine and Tivicay® (dolutegravir), total costs would decrease by $4 325 040. All physicians (n = 13) felt that de‐simplifying could be safely achieved. Forty‐eight per cent of 221 patients surveyed were agreeable to de‐simplifying for altruistic reasons, 27% said no, and 25% said maybe. Conclusions De‐simplifying Triumeq® generates large cost savings. Additional savings could be achieved by de‐simplifying other STFs. Both physicians and patients agreed that selective de‐simplification was acceptable; however, it may not be acceptable to every patient. Monitoring the medical and cost impacts of de‐simplification strategies seems warranted. |
| |
| Keywords: | Canada cost savings de‐simplification health economics HIV/AIDS |
|
|
