首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

黄土丘陵区不同生态重建模式评价方法
引用本文:徐勇,郭腾云,杨国安.黄土丘陵区不同生态重建模式评价方法[J].地理学报(英文版),2005,15(1):53-60.
作者姓名:徐勇  郭腾云  杨国安
作者单位:Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China
基金项目:国家自然科学基金;中国科学院知识创新工程项目
摘    要:1IntroductionIn a long history of land use and exploitation, in order to meet the demand of quickly increasing population for food supplies, China has accumulated many successful and unsuccessful experiences in promoting economic development by using land…

收稿时间:22 March 2004
修稿时间:9 November 2004

A comparison between different ecological de-farming modes in the loess hilly-gully region in China
XU Yong,GUO Tengyun,Yang Guoan.A comparison between different ecological de-farming modes in the loess hilly-gully region in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2005,15(1):53-60.
Authors:XU Yong  GUO Tengyun  Yang Guoan
Affiliation:Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing,100101,China;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing,100101,China;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing,100101,China
Abstract:The eco-environmental restoration has been a chief task of the western development strategies carried out by the central and local governments of China since the late 1990s, and the ecological de-farming has been regarded as a powerful measure for the ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau and the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. "Relieving and de-farming" (RD) and "rebuilding terrace and de-farming" (RTD) are two more mature ones among various de-farming modes. Taking the loess hilly-gully region as a case, this paper summarized the basic characteristics of RD and RTD modes, calculated the sizes of de-farming slope farmland, rebuilt terraces, enlarged garden plots and restored vegetation, and compared the differences of two modes in terms of de-farming area, ecological reestablishment index, investment demand amount and benefits. The results showed that RTD mode has many advantages, including suitable investment, sufficient grain supply and great benefits, and will be the best ecological reestablishment mode in the loess hilly-gully region, and RD mode which is being carried out in this region should be replaced by RTD mode as soon as possible.
Keywords:ecological de-farming mode  comparison  the loess hilly-gully region
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号