首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

东天山香山铜镍-钛铁成矿与两类岩浆演化关系探讨
引用本文:王亚磊,张照伟,尹希文,尤敏鑫.东天山香山铜镍-钛铁成矿与两类岩浆演化关系探讨[J].岩石学报,2018,34(8):2245-2261.
作者姓名:王亚磊  张照伟  尹希文  尤敏鑫
作者单位:国土资源部岩浆作用成矿与找矿重点实验室西安地质调查中心;新疆维吾尔自治区有色地质勘查局704大队
基金项目:本文受国土资源部公益性行业科研专项(201511020)、中国地质调查局地质矿产调查项目(DD20160013、20160346、20190171)、国家自然科学基金项目(41402071、41873053)、陕西省自然科学基金面上项目(2018JM4030)和陕西省青年科技新星项目(2015KJXX-71)联合资助.
摘    要:香山矿床是东天山唯一一个铜镍矿体与钛铁矿体共存的复合型矿床,目前普遍被认为是同源岩浆高度演化的产物。但为何区内众多同时代镁铁-超镁铁质岩体中只有香山岩体产出有大型钛铁矿床?这一问题仍有待进一步探讨。本文通过系统对比香山与其相邻的黄山东、黄山和黄山南等典型铜镍矿的地球化学特征、母岩浆性质及岩浆演化过程,认为香山岩体母岩浆相对其相邻典型铜镍矿床并不富集Fe和Ti,且其母岩浆早期演化过程及分异演化程度相似。模拟计算表明:岩浆体系早期都处于较还原的环境(f_(O_2)QFM+1),而且都发生了大量橄榄石、斜方辉石和单斜辉石的分离结晶和硫化物的熔离,由此消耗了岩浆体系中大量的Fe,导致残余岩浆中Fe含量降低;另外在岩浆演化的各阶段,尤其到岩浆演化后期,大量角闪石的结晶进一步降低了残余岩浆中的Fe和Ti的含量,不能造成Fe和Ti的逐渐富集,据此我们认为同源岩浆演化不具备形成钛铁矿床的物质基础。通过初步对比东天山地区典型铜镍矿床和钛铁矿床与该地区早二叠世两类玄武岩的地球化学特征及演化趋势,我们初步推测东天山地区铜镍成矿与钛铁成矿是两类不同性质岩浆独立演化的产物,铜镍成矿可能与拉斑玄武质岩浆演化密切相关,而钛铁矿则可能与碱性玄武岩演化密切相关。

关 键 词:东天山  两类玄武岩  香山矿床  铜镍矿与钛铁矿共存  独立演化
收稿时间:2017/12/1 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/3/23 0:00:00

The relationship between NiCu-FeTi deposits and two magma series, Eastern Tianshan, NW China
WANG YaLei,ZHANG ZhaoWei,YIN XiWen and YOU MinXin.The relationship between NiCu-FeTi deposits and two magma series, Eastern Tianshan, NW China[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2018,34(8):2245-2261.
Authors:WANG YaLei  ZHANG ZhaoWei  YIN XiWen and YOU MinXin
Affiliation:MLR Key Laboratory of Genesis and Exploration of Magmatic Ore Deposits, Xi''an Center, China Geological Survey, Xi''an 710054, China,MLR Key Laboratory of Genesis and Exploration of Magmatic Ore Deposits, Xi''an Center, China Geological Survey, Xi''an 710054, China,No. 704 Geological Party, Xinjiang Geological Exploration Bureau for Nonferrous Metals, Hami 100083, China and MLR Key Laboratory of Genesis and Exploration of Magmatic Ore Deposits, Xi''an Center, China Geological Survey, Xi''an 710054, China
Abstract:The Xiangshan complex is an unique complex which hosts both Ni-Cu sulfide and Ti-Fe oxide orebodies in Eastern Tianshan. Many researchers consider these orebodies belong to comagmatic evolution products. However, why only do the Xiangshan deposit show the coexistence of magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide and Ti-Fe oxide deposits among the contemporaneous mafic-ultramafic introsions? To answer this question, this article systematically compares the geochemical characteristics, parental magma properties and the evolution processes of the Xiangshan Ni-Cu-bearing intrusion with those of the other contemporaneous Ni-Cu deposits, including the Huangshandong, Huangshan and Huangshannan deposits. We find that the parental magma of the Xiangshan Ni-Cu-bearing intrusion does not has higher Fe-Ti contents than other typical Ni-Cu deposits, and their evolution processes and differentiation degrees are similar. The crystallization differentiation of minerals (olivine, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene) and the sulfide segregation consumed abundant Fe element in the melt, resulting in the decrease of Fe content in the residual magma reduce. Moreover, the crystallization of hornblende at each stage of the magma evolution, especially at the late stage, reduced the Fe and Ti contents in the residual magma. Thus, the residual magma does not have the potential to form Fe-Ti orebodies. So we infer that the Ni-Cu and Fe-Ti orebodies were not the products of the same comagmatic evolution. Meanwhile, by comparing the geochemical characteristics and evolution trends of the Xiangshan deposit with those of the two types of the Early Permian basalts (the tholeiitic and alkaline basalts) in this area, we infer that mineralization of the Ni-Cu sulfide and Fe-Ti oxide orebodies belongs to the evolution products of these two types of magma series, respectively.
Keywords:Eastern Tianshan  Two magma series  Xiangshan deposit  The coexistence of Ni-Cu and Fe-Ti mineralization  Independent evolution
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩石学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩石学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号