首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

模式降水与温度预报的不一致性特征
引用本文:郭达烽,段明铿,夏旻惠,陈翔翔.模式降水与温度预报的不一致性特征[J].应用气象学报,2018,29(3):321-332.
作者姓名:郭达烽  段明铿  夏旻惠  陈翔翔
作者单位:1.江西省气象台, 南昌 330046
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41675056),灾害天气国家重点实验室开放课题(2014LASW-A01)
摘    要:为探讨模式产品预报不一致性问题,利用2015年11月—2016年10月业务中常用的GQEC,GQJP及T639模式的12 h降水、2 m温度网格产品,采用跳跃指数定量计算方法,研究了产品在不同区域内跳跃指数变化与预报不一致性问题。结果表明:产品多日平均跳跃指数随预报时效延长而增大;长时效预报比短时效预报跳跃频率大、预报不一致性也大;对比两种要素可知,降水的跳跃指数比温度大,跳跃频率高,预报不一致性大;对比不同模式发现,GQEC不仅跳跃指数值小,且跳跃频率低,预报不一致性小,GQJP虽然跳跃指数值小于T639,但其跳跃频率更高,预报一致性较T639低;产品跳跃频率存在季节差异,夏季降水和温度预报跳跃频率最高而冬季最低,夏季预报不一致性最大。研究还发现:基于跳跃指数的预报不一致性特征与选取的区域大小密切相关,区域越大,跳跃指数和预报不一致性越小;区域内跳跃指数分布特征与地理位置和地形等有关。

关 键 词:模式产品    不一致性    跳跃指数
收稿时间:2017/10/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/3/5 0:00:00

The Inconsistency of Forecasting in Operational Numerical Prediction Products
Guo Dafeng,Duan Mingkeng,Xia Minhui and Chen Xiangxiang.The Inconsistency of Forecasting in Operational Numerical Prediction Products[J].Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology,2018,29(3):321-332.
Authors:Guo Dafeng  Duan Mingkeng  Xia Minhui and Chen Xiangxiang
Affiliation:Meteorological Center of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330046;State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, and International Joint Research Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change, and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044,State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, and International Joint Research Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change, and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044,Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, and International Joint Research Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change, and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044 and Meteorological Center of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330046
Abstract:The inconsistency of the forecast reflects evolution characteristics with time of the prediction error of continuous multiple prediction at a fixed time in the future. In order to explore the inconsistency of forecasting products in operational numerical forecasting applications, 12 h precipitation and 2 m ground temperature, which are predicted by three numerical models GQEC, T639 and GQJP from November 2015 to October 2016 are analyzed. Quantitative calculation method of Jumpiness index is adopted by considering the sensitivity of the index to the target region.The inconsistency of the numerical model in three different regions is studied by means of statistical analysis and typical case study. Results show that for statistical average, the inconsistency of the numerical models increases with the extension of the forecast time. Long time prediction inconsistency is greater. Jumpiness index of precipitation and temperature is related to the magnitude of the change, and Jumpiness index of precipitation is larger than that of temperature. It also shows that results of two consecutive temperature forecast are more consistent. The temperature prediction ability of the model is better than that of precipitation forecast. The comparison of different numerical models shows that GQEC has obvious advantages in many aspects. Although Jumpiness index of GQJP is less than T639, its jumping frequency is greater, indicating its prediction consistency is inferior to T639. There are seasonal differences in jumping frequency of model products. Both the jump frequency of precipitation and temperature is the highest in summer and the lowest in winter. The inconsistency test of two typical cases of rainstorm and cold air cooling process further corroborates statistical analysis results. Results also show that the forecast inconsistency of the numerical model is not only related to the geographical position, but also to the selected area size. The larger the region is, the smaller Jumpiness index becomes, and vice versa. In addition, the spatial distribution of Jumpiness index in the region is related to geographical location and topography. In general, where elements change bigger, Jumpiness index becomes greater there. The regional distribution of Jumpiness index of different meteorological elements is different. The index value of Jumpiness index of 12 h precipitation forecast increases gradually from north to south in region Ⅰ. While 2 m ground temperature prediction, Jumpiness index from north to south in region Ⅰ gradually decreases.
Keywords:operational numerical prediction products  forecast inconsistency  Jumpiness index
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用气象学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号