首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Henry's law and the behavior of weak acids and bases in fog and cloud
Authors:W Winiwarter  H Fierlinger  H Puxbaum  M C Facchini  B G Arends  S Fuzzi  D Schell  U Kaminski  S Pahl  T Schneider  A Berner  I Solly  C Kruisz
Affiliation:(1) Institut für Analytische Chemie, Technische Universität Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/151, A-1060 Vienna, Austria;(2) Istituto FISBAT-C.N.R., Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy;(3) Netherland Energy Research Foundation, PO Box 1, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands;(4) Zentrum für Umweltforschung und Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, J. W.-Goethe Universität, Postfach 111932, D-60054 Frankfurt a.M., Germany;(5) Deutscher Wetterdienst, Meteorologisches Observatorium Hamburg, Frahmredder 95, D-22361 Hamburg, Germany;(6) Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Wien, Strudlhofgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;(7) Present address: Austrian Research Centre, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria;(8) Present address: Amt für Umweltschutz, Magistrat Linz, A-4041 Linz, Austria;(9) Present address: Presidio Multizonale di Prevenzione, Settore Chimico, Via Tracehini 17, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Abstract:Experimental data from two field experiments on ground based clouds were used to study the distribution of formic acid, acetic acid, ammonia and S(IV) species between liquid and gas phase. The ratio of the concentrations of these compounds between the phases during concurrent measurements was compared to ratios expected according to Henry's law (considering the pH influence). Large discrepancies of several orders of magnitude were seen. Three hypotheses have been investigated to explain the observed discrepancies: The existence of a microscale equilibrium which does not persist in a bulk sample, a thermodynamic shift of the equilibrium due to competing reactions, and nonequilibrium conditions due to mass transfer limitations. Approximate quantitative calculations show that none of these hypotheses is sufficient to explain all of the discrepancies, so a combination of different effects seems to be responsible for this observation. The same theoretical considerations also suggest that mass transfer limitation may be an important factor for highly soluble compounds. The data presented here indicates that it is not possible to simply extrapolate interstitial gas phase composition from measured bulk liquid phase concentrations of a fog or cloud.Notation r max] liquid phase molar uptake rate (mol l–1 s–1) - A g ] concentration ofA in gas phase (atm) - A l ] concentration ofA in liquid phase (mol l–1) - A g , 0] concentration ofA in gas phase (atm) at time 0 - LWC liquid water content (g m–3) - R universal gas constant (0.082 l atm mol–1 K–1 - D g diffusivity (for all gases 0.1 cm2 s–1 was used) - K H * effective Henry's law coefficient (mol l–1 atm–1) - t f lifetime of fog droplet (s) - a droplet radius (cm) - agr accommodation coefficient - R factor of discrepancy - T temperature (K) - v mean molecular speed (cm s–1) formic acid: 35 000 acetic acid: 31 000 ammonia: 58 000
Keywords:Gas-liquid partitioning  Henry's law  formic acid  acetic acid  ammonia  S(IV)
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号