Developing country perspectives on ‘mitigation actions’, ‘NAMAs’, and ‘LCDS’ |
| |
Authors: | Emily Tyler Anya Boyd Kim Coetzee Marta Torres Gunfaus Harald Winkler |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Independent Consultant, Rosebank, Cape Town, Western Cape 7700, South Africaemily@tyler.co.za;3. Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, ERC UCT Private Bag, Cape Town 7701, South Africa |
| |
Abstract: | The MAPS programme, which seeks to deepen mitigation ambition in developing countries, is engaged in exploring the concepts of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) and Low Carbon Development Strategies (LCDS) from a developing country perspective. Here, climate mitigation practitioners in six developing countries were surveyed for their understanding of these concepts (anonymous, personal communications with climate mitigation practitioners in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, India, and South Africa). It is found that there is much scope for clarity and conceptual elaboration in this policy space. NAMAs are largely interpreted as mitigation activities packaged for submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) registry, but are not held to constitute the full set of mitigation activity in a developing country. New terminology may be needed to describe this broader set. A tighter interpretation of LCDS to distinguish between a strategic or coordinating policy action may be useful. Other themes arising include the way ‘national appropriateness’ is reflected in the concepts, and the role of international policy in deepening mitigation action in developing countries. |
| |
Keywords: | co-benefits domestic policy LCDS NAMA national appropriateness sustainable development |
|
|