学术期刊评价中不同指标之间互补研究

目的/意义]讨论科技评价中隐含的指标之间的互补问题，即一个指标不增加或增加很少，通过其他指标增加较多来进行弥补问题，并将互补分为等额互补、超额互补、欠额互补三类，进而分析指标之间互补对不同评价方法的影响。方法/过程]设计一种检验和判定方法，针对某种非线性评价方法，维持一个指标不变，计算增加其他不同属性指标均值带来评价值的变化大小，并与线性加权法评价值变化大小进行比较。结果/结论]研究发现，多属性评价方法指标之间的互补是个复杂问题，受评价方法、指标数据、权重设置、补偿值大小等多种因素的影响；基于比值的多属性评价方法更容易出现欠额互补；由于同类评价指标之间的相关性，讨论指标间互补应在不同属性指标间进行；指标互补问题对于多属性评价方法选取具有深远影响，本质上变相改变指标权重，可以作为评价结果检验和管理控制的一种方法。

The Complementary Study among Different Evaluation Indexes in Academic Journal Evaluation

Purpose/significance] This paper discusses the complementary problem between implicit indexes in science and technology evaluation. The complementary problem is that an index which does not increase or increases rarely can be compensated by other index increasing more, and the complementation is divided into equal complementation, excess complementation and under balance complementation. Method/process] It designed a method of test and judgment, aiming at a certain nonlinear evaluation method, and maintaining an index constant, to calculate the change of evaluation value which is caused by increasing other different attribute index average, and compared with the change of linear weighted method evaluation value.Result/conclusion] Research shows that the complementation between the index of multi-attribute evaluation method is a complex problem, which is influenced by various factors such as evaluation method, index data, weight arrangement and compensation value; the method of multi-attribute evaluation based on ratio is more likely to be the under balance complementation; due to the correlation between similar evaluation indexes, the indexes of complementary should be carried out between different attribute indexes; the complementation problem of indexes has a profound influence on the selection of multi-attribute evaluation methods, and in essence the index weight is changed euphemistically, which can be used as a method of evaluation test and management control.