学者影响力评价指标的相关性研究

目的/意义]随着Web 2.0环境下社交网络的普及与开放获取运动的兴起,学者影响力表现为两个方面:学术影响力与社会影响力.目前反映学者社会影响力的评价指标已达20多种,故需要遴选合理的评价指标,避免强相关性的指标,最终构建客观、公正的学者影响力评价指标体系.方法/过程]收集PlumX/Pitt工具中提供的指标和数据,采用Spearman方法尝试探究学者学术影响力指标(被引频次)与替代计量学中社会影响力指标之间的相关性以及各项社会影响力指标之间的相关性并进行分析.结果/结论]要综合评价学者的影响力,应当引入社会影响力指标;从数据关联性角度,一些学者影响力的评价指标需要进行调整.

Study on Correlation of Researcher Influence Indicators

Purpose/significance] With the popularity of social network and the rise of open access movement under the environment of Web 2.0, researcher influence can be expressed as two aspects: Academic influence and social influence. At present, the number of evaluation indicators which can reflect researchers' social influence have reached more than 20, So there is an need for us to select the reasonable evaluation indicators, avoid the use of strong correlation ones and ultimately build an objective and fair evaluation index system of researcher influence.Method/process] We collect the indicators and data provided by PlumX/Pitt tool, use the Spearman method and try to explore and analyze the correlation relationship between the indicators of researchers' academic influence and social influence, as well as correlation relationship between various indicators of social influence. Result/conclusion] The results showed that in order to evaluate researcher influence comprehensively, social influence indicators should be added. And from the perspective of the data relevance, some indicators need to be adjusted.