医学期刊外送审稿的研究

为调查单盲法与双盲法审稿对审稿结果的影响，了解审稿人年龄、职称和学历与审稿结果的关系，随机抽取6家医学期刊编辑部100份文稿，按单盲、双盲方式分别送给2位审稿人审阅，把审稿单中论文质量评分表的评分结果进行统计学处理。结果表明，单盲法与双盲法审稿结果比较差异无显著性(P＞0．05)，不同职称、学历及年龄审稿人审稿结果比较差异无显著性(P＞0．05)，年龄与评分结果无相关关系(r＝0．064，P＝0．365)。结论是，该研究的审稿评分结果与审稿人的年龄、职称、学历及审稿方式无关。

Research of peer review of medical journals

The effects of single and double blind peer review methods were investigated and the relationships between the reviewers' age, position, educational background and peer review results were analyzed. One hundred papers were selec ted randomly from six editorial departments of medical journals,and sent to two reviewers according to single and double blind methods respectively.The resu lts showed that there was no significant difference between the single blind a nd double blind methods( P > 0.05 ),and there was no significant difference between age,position,educational background and the reviewing results ( P > 0.05 ).There was no relation between age and evaluation scores ( r = 0.0 64, P =0.365). The authors conclude that the peer review results have no relationships with the reviewer' age, position and educational background and the reviewing methods.