首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

最高人民法院作为刑法司法解释主体问题辨析
引用本文:孟庆华,王伟.最高人民法院作为刑法司法解释主体问题辨析[J].天中学刊,2011,26(1):31-34.
作者姓名:孟庆华  王伟
作者单位:河北大学,政法学院,河北,保定,071002
摘    要:刑法司法解释的应然主体不应为法官个人,而应为作为法官整体的最高审判组织。尽管法官解释刑法的现象是存在的,而且是大量的,但不能由此推导出法官具有刑法司法解释权的结论。最高人民法院在法律系统中的集权,即最高人民法院的"垄断解释权"是完全有必要的。解释法律的集权胜于分权,如果地方法院都享有解释法律的职权,则统一适用法律就难以保障。最高人民法院具有刑法司法解释权也是完全必要的。

关 键 词:最高人民法院  刑法司法解释  主体

Supreme People's Court as the Subject of Judicial Interpretation of the Criminal Law Issues of Controversy
MENG Qing-hua,WANG Wei.Supreme People''s Court as the Subject of Judicial Interpretation of the Criminal Law Issues of Controversy[J].Journal of Tianzhong,2011,26(1):31-34.
Authors:MENG Qing-hua  WANG Wei
Affiliation:MENG Qing-hua,WANG Wei(Hebei University,Baoding Hebei 071002,China)
Abstract:The natural subject of judicial interpretation of criminal law ought not to be the judge but the highest judicial organization of judges as a whole.In spite of the existence of judge explaining criminal law,from which the judge has the power of judicial interpretation to interpret criminal law can not deduced.The centralized power of Supreme People's Court in the legal system or the Supreme Court's monopoly power of interpretation is absolutely necessary because centralization is better than decentralizatio...
Keywords:Supreme People's Court  judicial interpretation of the criminal law  subject  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号