| 形式的刑法解释之提倡及其方法论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周洪波,彭文华.形式的刑法解释之提倡及其方法论[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周洪波 彭文华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 国家检察官学院,北京,102206
2. 佛山大学法律系,武汉大学,广东,佛山,528000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 形式的刑法解释以规范治理为目标,旨在揭示刑法规范的真实含义;实质的刑法解释以处罚必要为目标,根据有无处罚必要对刑法规范含义进行解释.形式的刑法解释以实现形式正义为目标,具有合法性,有时却违背合理性;实质的刑法解释以实现实质正义为目标,具有合理性,有时违背合法性.中国刑法解释应当坚持以形式的刑法解释为主导,允许有利于被告人的实质的刑法解释.
|
| 关 键 词： | 形式的刑法解释 实质的刑法解释 规范治理 处罚必要 正义 |
Introducing Formal Interpretation of the Criminal Law and Its Methodology |
| |
| ZHOU Hong-bo,PENG Wen-hua.Introducing Formal Interpretation of the Criminal Law and Its Methodology[J].Journal of Capital Normal University(Social Science Edition),2009(4). |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Hong-bo PENG Wen-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Formal interpretation of the criminal law aims to standardize provision administering by literally interpreting penal provisions while substantial interpretation strives to mete out necessary punishment by interpreting penal provisions in light of reason and need to punish an act instead of the criminal law itself. The theory of formal interpretation sees formal justice as its end with legality sometimes running counter to reasonableness whereas the theory of substantial interpretation aims to realize subst... |
| |
| Keywords: | The theory of formal interpretation The theory of substantial interpretation Provision administering Punitive necessity Justice |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
