首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

临床试验的伦理审查:服刑人员、劳教人员
引用本文:汪秀琴,熊宁宁,刘沈林,李七一,蒋萌,刘芳,邹建东,高维敏,薛学坤.临床试验的伦理审查:服刑人员、劳教人员[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2006,11(7):837-840.
作者姓名:汪秀琴  熊宁宁  刘沈林  李七一  蒋萌  刘芳  邹建东  高维敏  薛学坤
作者单位:南京中医药大学附属医院临床药理科,南京,210029,江苏
基金项目:科技部中国-斯洛伐克国际科技协作资助项目
摘    要:本文所谓的“服刑人员”是指监狱服刑人员,“劳教人员”是指劳动教养管理所的收容人员,简称“服刑劳教人员”.涉及这一特殊群体临床研究的伦理审查要求包括:伦理委员会的组成应该包括具有相应背景和经验的服刑劳教人员代表;研究是针对服刑劳教人员所患的疾病,并且如果不选择服刑劳教人员为受试者,研究不能同样好地进行;最小风险应该参照“健康人群”进行判断;知情同意应充分尊重其自主选择权;试验结束后治疗安排;以及公平招募,保护隐私,合理补偿等.

关 键 词:伦理委员会  伦理审查  服刑劳教人员  知情同意
文章编号:1009-2501(2006)07-0837-04
收稿时间:03 24 2006 12:00AM
修稿时间:05 25 2006 12:00AM

Ethic review in clinical research: persons who are serving a sentence or receiving reeducation through labour
WANG Xiu-qin,XIONG Ning-ning,LIU Shen-lin,LI Qi-yi,JIANG Meng,LIU Fang,ZOU Jian-dong,GAO Wei-min,XUE Xue-kun.Ethic review in clinical research: persons who are serving a sentence or receiving reeducation through labour[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,2006,11(7):837-840.
Authors:WANG Xiu-qin  XIONG Ning-ning  LIU Shen-lin  LI Qi-yi  JIANG Meng  LIU Fang  ZOU Jian-dong  GAO Wei-min  XUE Xue-kun
Affiliation:Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
Abstract:Persons who are serving a sentence refer to those who are serving a sentence in a prison,Persons who are receiving reeducation through labour refer to those who are receiving reeducation through labour in an institution,for short,both are called persons who are serving a sentence or receiving reeducation through labour.Ethical justification for research involving this special group are as follow: specific IRB should include someone who has appropriate background and experience to serve in that capacity;the research might not equally well be carried out with subjects other than persons who are serving a sentence or receiving reeducation through labour;definition of minimal risk shouldn't be compared with the risks normally encountered by this special group,but rather that of healthy persons;free choice in informed consent should be ensured;arrange treatment for research subjects after research terminated;fairly distribute research burdens;maintain confidentiality of research data and privacy;reasonable payment need to be considered,etc.
Keywords:institutional review board  ethic review  persons who are serving a sentence or receiving reeducation through labour  informed consent
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号