Comparison of verapamil and bepridil,two slow channel inhibitors,in protection against calcium-induced arrhythmias

Summary Verapamil and bepridil share the common property of antagonizing the slow inward calcium-mediated current, but bepridil has some additional antiarrhythmic properties. The efficacy of these two compounds against CaCl₂-induced arrhythmias has been compared in rats. CaCl₂ was administered i.v. by continuous infusion until death (25 mg·kg^–1·min^–1 or 40 mg·kg^–1·min^–1) or by bolus injection (160 mg·kg^–1). Bepridil (5, 10 mg·kg^–1) or verapamil (2.5,5 mg·kg^–1) were injected 10 min before CaCl₂. Bepridil (10 mg·kg^–1) or verapamil (5 mg·kg^–1) prolong the survival time during CaCl₂ infusion. After pretreatment, the injection of 160 mg·kg^–1 CaCl₂ is less toxic: 25% of animals are protected by bepridil (5 mg·kg^–1), 41% by bepridil (10 mg·kg^–1) or verapamil (5 mg·kg^–1).At death the myocardial Ca²⁺ level is not different in controls and pretreated animals, thus, the ratio myocardial Ca²⁺/total injected Ca²⁺ is significantly lowered by bepridil (10 mg·kg^–1) or verapamil (5 mg·kg^–1). The efficacy of the two drugs on this model appears related solely to inhibition of slow inward current despite the additional antiarrhythmic profile of bepridil.