不同采血方法对快速血糖测定仪血糖测量值的影响

目的探讨不同采血方法对快速血糖测定仪血糖测量值的影响。方法90例糖尿病患者根据采血方法不同分为自然流出组、热水热敷按摩组和手指挤血组,每组30例。患者晚餐后空腹12 h,于次日早晨在静息状态下洗净左或右手无名指擦干在床边进行血糖检测,并与抽取静脉血葡萄糖氧化酶法检测血糖值进行比较。结果自然流出组血糖测量值和静脉采血测定值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),热水热敷按摩组和手指挤血组血糖测量值均显著低于静脉采血血糖测定值,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.001)。结论临床上使用快速血糖仪检测血糖值,采用自然流出法采血结果更准确。

Effects of different haemoslpasia methods on value of blood glucose measured by rapid blood glucose determinator

Objective To explore the effects of different haemospasia methods on value of blood glucose measured by rapid blood glucose determinator. Methods Ninety patients with diabetes were divided into natural effusion group（n = 30）, hot water massage group （ n = 30） and finger squeezing blood group （ n = 30） according to the different haemospasia methods. Patients keep stomach empty for twelve hours after supper. Blood glucose were measured at the next day morning in quiescent condition, and compared with the value of blood glucose measnred by taking glucose oxidation enzyme from venous blood. Results There was no statistical significance in value of blood glucose between natural effusion group and venous blood （P 〉 0. 05）. The values of blood glucose in hot water massage group and finger squeezing group were remarkably lower than those in venous blood group （ P 〈 0.01, P 〈 0. 001 ）. Conclusion Take the natural effusion method is accurate when value of blood glucose measured by rapid blood glucose determinator in clinic.