基于雨课堂教学在国内本科医学课程中教学效果的系统评价

目的采用Meta分析方法评价雨课堂教学法和传统教学法对国内医学本科生学习效果的影响。方法检索中国知网、万方医学网、维普数据库及中国生物医学文献数据库,查找有关雨课堂教学法与传统教学在医学本科教育中应用的教学效果比较的随机对照研究;检索时限从建库至2019年10月;按照既定的纳入、排除标准筛选文献,提取资料并采用Jadad量表评价文献质量后,采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入20个随机对照研究;共3662名医学本科生。Meta分析结果表明,雨课堂教学组的理论和实践技能成绩均高于传统教学组(理论成绩:WMD=8.52,95%CI=7.30~9.74,P<0.001;实践技能成绩:WMD=8.95,95%CI=5.42~12.49,P<0.001)。结论雨课堂教学法有助于提高医学本科生的理论和实践技能成绩,其应用的教学效果优于传统教学;并为雨课堂教学法在医学本科课程中的推广应用提供了循证依据。

Systematic evaluation of the teaching effect of Rain Classroom-based teaching method in domestic undergraduate medical courses

Objective To compare the effect of Rain Classroom and traditional teaching model on the academic achievement of domestic medical undergraduates by Meta-analysis.Methods All literature were retrieved from CNKI,Wanfang Med Online,VIP,and CBM databases,and the retrieval time limited from the establishment of the database to October 2019.Randomized controlled trials(RTCs)for the evaluation of the effects of Rain Classroom method in undergraduate medical education were selected.Literature were screened according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria.Data was extracted and the quality of the literature was assessed using the Jadad scale.All analyses were performed by Stata 12.0 software.Results A total of 3662 medical undergraduates in 20 RCTs were included.Meta-analysis results showed that student's theoretical and practical scores of the Rain Classroom teaching group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group(theoretical scores:WMD=8.52,95%CI=7.30-9.74,P<0.001;practical scores:WMD=8.95,95%CI=5.42-12.49,P<0.001).Conclusion The Rain Classroom teaching method can effectively improve the theoretical and practical academic achievement among medical undergraduates and enhance the teaching effect.This study has also provided the evidence-based basis for the promotion and application of the Rain Classroom teaching method in medical undergraduate courses.